Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
What's the relationship between Two Thousand AD and Judge Dredd— is that the publisher, like with Marvel publishing Conan?
Covered in Star Wars Cleanup, Deadpool, and Web Video sand. I'm not coarse and rough, but I get everywhere.Yes, kind of. It did start out as a 2000 AD comic (and, actually, still is), but it's also been published by DC and IDW, if not others as well.
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsI say have it on both. Similar to what we do with Conan.
Fan-Preferred Couple cleanup threadMakes sense to me to have it on both, given the precedent for doing that, but I'd like to have the other troper's side as well just in case.
Edited by ImmiThrax Covered in Star Wars Cleanup, Deadpool, and Web Video sand. I'm not coarse and rough, but I get everywhere.I sent them a PM telling them about this discussion.
Hope your prepared for an unforgettable luncheonYeah, I think both. I won't touch it for now though; don't wanna get suspended.
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsSorry guys that I am late. Hmm, to answer your question, I would say separate the two from each other, and for the 2000 page in question. You know how in DC, it tells you for animation, go to this page, or for live action, go to this page, etc. Why not do this with the Dredd and 2000 page. Put in for the Dredd page, go here, in 2000, and boom, you can go there without problems? That way, the Dredd name will remain as is in the main page, but it would solve this issue. What do you guys say on the matter?
I don't know if I like that idea. Hell, if it were JUST DC I could live with it, but considering there's ALSO IDW (and I THINK Dark Horse too)...
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsYeah. I still say have it on both. It's again not with out precedent.
Fan-Preferred Couple cleanup threadI agree with Bull.
Rawr.So it's okay to add it back to the main comic page as well?
CM Dates; CM Pending; CM DraftsBumping for input.
Rawr.The way I see it, any characters that are in both should be listed in both. Any that are NOT in the 2000 AD should go under just the Comic Books page and not 2000 AD, unless it's still considered part of the same continuity and being published under the 2000 AD banner.
Edited by DracoKanjiYou've got four people agreeing and only one dissenting voice (who appears to be confusing a multimedia franchise hub for what amounts to be a cross-creator example). Consensus is already on your side and you've waited three days. EDIT: DracoKanji raises a good point, but I can't categorize them as for/against because I don't know the work any more than they do.
Edited by crazysamaritan Link to TRS threads in project mode here.^^ Judge Dredd has his own page, and 2000 AD has its own common continuity otherwise. I see no reason not to index in both the comic and 2000AD pages.
Edited by SkyCat32 Rawr.
Okay, ~Psychotic Ranger 4567 and I seem to be going back and forth, and I want to nip this before it becomes an Edit War.
I think that Judge Dredd should be listed for works with their own examples at both Monster.Two Thousand AD page Monster.Comic Books (similar to, say, how Conan the Barbarian's listed under both Monster.Marvel Comics and Monster.Comic Books ), but 4567 thinks it should only be under one. If it were just 2000 AD stuff that'd be fine, but considering there's DC, IDW, etc., that's numerous other comics. Just like Conan has both Marvel and Dark Horse.
So, thoughts?
Edited by ACW