CM/MB Policy and Thread Culture

The edits they got up on the original account are still "valid" since it was pre-ban evasion - if there are any more that they got up through their socks, they should be cut at this point.

Cut the Koala sock candidates pending verification, save for the ones that were already effort-posted again by a different troper.

As for ban evaders, the only other ones I can spot on the list is the ones under Witchoftheabsolute. I can definitely vouch for Octomus, don't know about the other.

And apologies if this was brought up but would it be easier to add the draft pages for quotes, writeups and images in the administrive part of the threads?

Wet: That or the thread headers.

Alright, took a lot more time than I thought it would, but I drafted Magnificent Bastard Administrivia. I copied over as much as I could from CM's Administrivia page, deleted the things that didn't transfer over, and added the things from the original MB OP that the page didn't cover. How's it looking?

Thank you, Mr. Star(k)!

Btw on the "Too Detestable" part I changed "charming" to "magnificent", gross as he is, you'll be hard pressed to find a fan of say Full Metal Panic, for instance, who doesn't find Gauron darkly charismatic despite his sadism and pedophilia making him way too bad for MB. I can think of quite a few nasties who don't count for committing atrocious crimes but their charm is still intact imo.

Edited by 43110 on Nov 8th 2022 at 7:58:33 AM

Thought we agreed to remove South Park from the not-an-MB thing. Since it was just one person bringing it up.

That's a good point - I'd forgotten about that. I'll do that now!

I can do Blue when the threads reopen- I was considering him but didn't say anything and the sockpuppet got to him first

Go for it, 'Seraph. I don't remember the last time you got to do an effortpost, actually.

I did one in March. It's not "got to do an effortpost" so much as "I don't look for characters in the same way the rest of the thread does", but thanks

Actually hold up. Is Monotrenum themselves a sock of a banned account. Because if so what they approved as them needs to be removed too.

Would like confirmation on that, actually. Will call for a cut if necessary.

There's probable clause to believe that monotrematum has ties to a bounced user named Carliro and their socks.

Yeah…Cut Mono's candidates.

Made cuts and requests as appropriate.

Looking over. They also posted this one, these two, this guy, this

Anyone mind removing these on the sandboxes. I'm on mobile and trying to do it myself would cause serious issues for my phone.

I took care of the CM pages and requested a Cutlist for YMMV.Middlewest

EDIT: I THINK I got

Edited by ACW on Nov 8th 2022 at 12:01:15 PM

I cut listed the page as well... oh well, it'll be taken care of one way or another now.

Question about the reservations: are the works that were scheduled for discussion in october grandfathered or are they free to grab?

That kinda seems like a thing best addressed with folks courteously. Kind of an ironing out the kinks stuff

Well, there were some I was still wanting to discuss coming the reopening of the threads, Smile especially.

Are the MTG ones heinous enough to count if not for a ban-evader? Just curious

If they got approved, probably.

Guess they can be re-vetted once the threads start.