Poor Image: Extra Eyes

Unneccesarily wordy. There's a thousand more focused images of people with extra eyes.

Garnet would be my first suggestion, but if this doesn't work for whatever reason there's loads more pictures of her and, like i said, loads more prominent multi-eyed characters that could be the face of this trope way more effectively than current.

I guess this will come down to whether or not people prefer the lampshading in the current. Either's good with me.

The suggestion is good, but I think we should find something with even more eyes just to show how extreme the trope can get.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness

The suggestion would fit better on Third Eye than on Extra Eyes.

(and the current is funnier)

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!

Fluorite?◊ (Cropped of course)

Jawbreakers on sale for 99¢

Would either of these work? They're both from Yu-Gi-Oh! if anyone's wondering.

EDIT: Actually, they probably look more like Eyes Do Not Belong There than anything

Edited by KingofNightmares on Feb 24th 2020 at 6:27:41 AM

—signature not found—

Third Eye already has a really good pic; if Garnet isn't picked for this page, I'd say start an Image Links page with her and a couple of other pics.

From Monsters, Inc.: [1]◊

Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!

That's my favourite so far.

Gallaxhar◊ from Monsters vs. Aliens, with the caption "You can make a Dreamworks Face no matter the number of eyes".

monsters Inc one

"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."

Monsters Inc one. Many eyes and no overlap with Eyes Do Not Belong There

—signature not found—

8.

back lol

Monsters Inc. one. The Monsters vs. Aliens one would work too, but I can't find a higher quality version.

Keet cleanup

Bit late in the day considering the support that the Monsters Inc. pic has but how about the pic here?

Monsters Inc. I like the second Yu-Gi-Oh one one too, though.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness

Characters.Monsters Inc has a smaller version of 8 as part of a collage in the "Monsters Inc. Staff" folder, under "Other Scarers". Would this be OK? He's such a minor character that getting anything better for that collage will be a tough sell.

Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!

If the monster's inc. one doesn't work, my vote is for 6.1

If it's part of a collage in a characters page, I think it's fine.

Jawbreakers on sale for 99¢

Yeah, I don't think the collage is a big deal.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness

I didn't think it was. Besides, if that is too much of a problem, there are more pics of him out there, so I found. We're fine. 8 works.

Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!

8.

(Annoyed grunt)

I prefer 10.

The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us.

8.

Crowner's hooked.