Voting to pull on quality issues alone, that's really grainy.
Pull.
(Annoyed grunt)Pull
"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."Larger version: [1]◊
Keet cleanupPull
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessWith the quality upgrade, 'tis a weak keep for me — took me a while to place that it was Britney, but paired with the text, her outfit and pose do indicate some form of pure image.
Pull.
Health sure is versatile. It's possible to be both light-headed and dim-witted. At the same time, no less.Weak keep with quality upgrade.
Keet cleanupDefinite Keep Until Better Image Suggested. It's by no means "good" but myopia and text aside, it's clearly a magazine (indicating the person is famous) and her outfit and pose do scream "purity."
Definitely better than nothing, especially factoring in the text.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.I swapped in the quality upgrade for now, but I'm not convinced it should stay. The dress and pose may show "purity", but the text is doing all the work for "contractual".
Weak pull. I'm usually okay if an image has text to help explain it, but this is too reliant.
Currently mostly inactive. An incremental game I tested: https://galaxy.click/play/176 (Gods of Incremental)Clock is set.
I'm still not convinced it's pull-worthy. I don't think the text is too much, and the "contractual" part would be hard to illustrate anyway.
This does give vibes of Age-Inappropriate Dress for Britney in that she's forced to give the "pure" appearance associated with young girls.
Would be fine with just the quality upgrade.
Spiral out, keep going.The clock's up and I don't think we've got enough consensus to pull the pic. Locking up.
Without knowing the actor in the pic, it relies entirely on the text, and so might as well be a page quote. Should we pull this one?