The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

Also, sitcoms will sometimes use it as a joke. You won't generally hear it yourself, but shows like Friends and How I Met Your Mother have featured it as a "keeping up the roommate/neighbours" subplot (the latter replaced the expected sounds with bagpipes, as per the show's framing device).

Also, Pizza Boy Special Delivery is something of a Dead Horse Trope, and is more often seen in, again, sitcoms, where couples are trying to spice up their love life (usually in incredibly cliched ways, a la Porn Tropes that haven't been used since the '70s/ever).

edited 4th May '12 10:07:58 PM by BadWolf21

^^That's just one example, though, for a pretty titillating trope. I just don't see the point of having a trope on this website that details who howls like a dog when they are having intercourse.

And on a different but similar note, my thoughts are similar to Brother-Sister Incest. It can't exactly be wiped clean considering there seems to be enough examples, and it appears enough today to not be completely superfluous, but perhaps an eye should be kept on it or something.

^^ The redlinked page, yes.

edited 4th May '12 10:16:25 PM by BlackDove

We are not having that discussion. I am sorry.

Mod ninja'd by a few seconds. Impressive.

edited 4th May '12 10:31:14 PM by InsanityPrelude

Fighter-ninja'd.

edited 4th May '12 10:22:37 PM by BadWolf21

Oh my goodness. This is just sad.

v Oh, my bad for misreading. I would say cut them too, just to tie up the loose ends. Compared to other things on the wiki, they don't seem to be that important.

Also, at the Bliss Stage link sometime back: Yeah, "Have sex" or whatever doesn't seem terribly bad, vague as it is. More up to the players there. Then again, I don't know much about it either.

edited 4th May '12 10:28:22 PM by BlackDove

Oh yeah. I'm entirely in favor of nuking Kuso Miso Technique and FATAL from orbit, but I'm just wondering if cutting/nuking such pages means we need to remove all mentions of Memetic Mutation or Shout-Out that originated from them but that don't have the same "porn" content as their source.

Examples being, the Yaranaika dance mix based on Balalaika (which has made it to vocaloid and public performances) or, say, someone mentions FATAL in an offhanded way in the course of a Two Gamers on a Couch comic as the brain-scarring experience they had in their last tabletop gaming group.)

edited 4th May '12 10:26:25 PM by AGroupie

I think that's been answered already. I wouldn't quote me on it but the impression I got was we can mention them, just don't link to the source material?

OK

@BlackDove: I would've proposed cutting FATAL, TBH, but Komodin mentioned the large number of inbound links so I wasn't sure if that would cause even more problems.

I was the one who originally nominated FATAL for review by the council. I don't really care what happens to it to be honest with you all. Cut it, stub it, whatever. But it definitely deserves a review.

Quite the Understatement.

Oh, come on. No matter how hard the 5P tries, they'll never come up with something as funny as the RPG.net review.

Okay, so I have no idea where I should put this. So I'm sorry if it doesn't belong here.

From the Lost Girls page:

I've never read that comic, but that sentence bothers me.

And then there's this:

So... what should be done with that?

edited 5th May '12 3:59:51 AM by kay4today

That's not what Lolicon means. It's misuse, and therefore useless to us.

Second, I'm very leery to trust a sentence about a supposed interview without a citation.

Third, it says teen sex, not preteen sex. Teen sex can be 13-20. Preteen would be just....no.

Mind you, I don't know the comic.

I know Martello's weighed in on the topic, but then again, he owns the text himself. Not sure about the others.

I don't know the comic either, I just saw an user on SA mentioning it. That's why I posted it in here to get some other opinions on it.

@Pyrite

Uh... why do we still have a page on this? If all of this is true, that is.

edited 5th May '12 4:27:42 AM by kay4today

Because the rest of the 5P hasn't got around to it yet, perhaps? That seems to be the most likely reason. *shrug*

Just putting up these reviews for consideration.And judging from the commentary, it's porn / erotica and contains consensual underaged child-adult sex. While it's supposedly very well-written and well-drawn porn, and is open to critical analysis on a fair number of themes... based on the current guidelines, this shit don't fly.

edited 5th May '12 6:33:03 AM by Pyrite

@kay: As you can see on about the 4th or 5th page of the work queue, ComicBook.Lost Girls is up for review (amongst many, many other works.) If it's something that needs to be cut, it won't hurt things for the page to stay up a little while longer to give all the panel members time to review it properly.

Is the disposition thing supposed to be showing up for me? I was looking through Content Violation Reports, and I saw that I have the option to type something in for Gor because it has three devil heads.

I think it's probably a bug of some sort, as only the 5P really have the authority to give a disposition. I think they're still undecided on just what the hell to do with the page in question.

They were planning on cutting it, but Martello and Meeble found some evidence that a few books and media weren't completely pornograpic. It seems like they're voting on cleaning and locking it at this point.

If you're referring to the box and not the actual status of Gor, FE's already addressed this. Apparently, you won't be able to save anything, despite how it looks. Haven't tried it myself, though.

edited 5th May '12 6:59:37 AM by Pyrite

Okay. Thanks!