These are what we call the 'YMMV items.' Things that some people find in this work. We call them 'your mileage might vary' because not everyone sees these things in the same way. This starts discussions in the trope lists, a thing we don't want. Please use the discussion page if you'd like to discuss any of these items.
Acceptable Ethnic Targets: The lyrics to "Savages" had to be changed when concerns about racism toward the Indians came up. However, everyone seemed to be fine with the prejudice of the Indians toward the white settlers.
Contested Sequel: Some fans may like that this movie attempts to be historically accurate by pairing Pocahontas up with John Rolfe and having her go to England. Others are of the opinion that, if the first movie was going to be historically accurate, it would never have paired Pocahontas and John Smith up in the first place, and that Disney should have left the shippers alone.
Critical Research Failure: While the first movie at least admitted to being a straight up legend rather than incredibly accurate, the sequel has its fair share of unintentional goofs. For example, in one of the musical numbers, William Shakespeare is seen being writing the script for Hamlet....except that in the movie's timeline, Hamlet was already written and performed at least half a decade by then. There's also the fact that the King and his subjects are enjoying a bear bating, which, instead of pitting dogs against a bear tied up to a stake, is replaced with two jesters poking a bear with pitch forks.
Because he was originally Ratcliffe's dog, Percy is expected to be viewed as a villain, even though he's really just a victim bystander along for the ride. Meeko started all of the conflicts.
Ratcliffe himself could be seen as this for most of the movie, where he's mostly a greedy, xenophobic Jerkass who isn't any more unreasonable than Powhatan, until the very end when he crosses the line by trying to shoot the Indians when they've already agreed to peace.
Die for Our Ship: The Disney fanbase bashes John Rolfe for ending up with Pocahontas instead of Smith. Either that, or they act as if the sequel/history doesn't exist and keep shipping John Smith/Pocahontas.
Fanon Discontinuity: Never before has there been a Disney movie that's received more fangirl hate than the sequel, for obviousreasons. Disney has unfortunately made it harder for fans to disregard the sequel by releasing it and its predecessor on the same Blu-ray Disc.
Although, since 2010 and Pocahontas's arrival in the Disney Princess line, the merchandising always depicted her with John Smith. Except in his own movie, Rolfe is pretty much unheard of since.
Mel Gibson voices someone who reconciles two warring races and falls in love with a woman of another ethnicity, and Christian Bale plays a meek, gentle and not-exactly-prone-to-violence-or-anger sailor. Fast-forward ten-fifteen years and Mel Gibson is yelling racial slurs at a certain race in general and his girlfriend in particular, and Christian Bale has become infamous for an on-set rant at the director of photography.
The line "The ladies at court will be all a-twitter" in "Mine, Mine, Mine" has become a lot funnier with the ascension of Twitter.
Christian Bale would also go on to play Pocahontas' husband John Rolfe ten years later in The New World. Also Irene Bedard's Pocahontas has a Missing Mom as motivation. Irene Bedard would also play Pocahontas's mother in that same film.
Inferred Holocaust: Kind of. The film ends with a "happy ending" in which the settlers and natives come to terms with each other. Anyone with the vaguest knowledge of history knows this will last about three seconds before relations go south for about 300 years.
Unless you count the film as complete fiction and interpret the ending as the settlers permanently returning to England. After all, there was no gold in Virginia, so why would they stay? Again, only if you regard the film as fiction.
The sequel does address this as there's now a proper British settlement in Virginia but tensions between the settlers and natives are still high. Not to mention Pocahontas has to attempt to stop an Armada led against her people.
Love It or Hate It: The movie itself is one, moreso than any other entry in the Disney Renaissance: one side will paint it as a beautiful, Scenery Porn-laden fable with a love story worthy of a live action film and simply had the bad luck to directly follow The Lion King. The other will paint it as a pretentious, preachy and boring movie with a lame villain, dull protagonists and an unmemorable story.
Moral Event Horizon: Ratcliffe wasn't well liked as mentioned being The Scrappy among the Disney Villains below, but he crossed it when he still decides to attack the natives even after Powhatan spares John Smith.
Ron the Death Eater: Pocahontas herself gets this a lot with regards to Kocoum. While it can be argued that she didn't give him much interest, people treat her as some manipulative harlot and portray Kocoum as the Dogged Nice Guy. They call Pocahontas kissing John Smith as "stabbing him in the back". This is ignoring that Pocahontas had no romantic interest in Kocoum at all and she was just told she would be marrying him - she had no say in it at all. And Kocoum most likely only wanted to marry her because she was The Chief's Daughter.
Ratcliffe is an unusual example in that, as a villain, he's meant to be disliked. However, he's disliked for a different reason than most other Disney Villains - he just isn't cool enough or menacing enough. Like the rest of the movie, he had the bad luck to be following The Lion King, which had Scar, who not only was more effective and menacing as a villain, but far cooler. To add insult to injury, Ratcliffe was followed by a villain who was even MORE evil than Scar: Frollo, who was succeeded by the genuinely likable and coolHades, who was followed by Shan Yu, Plus, the Disney Renaissance had previously given us Faux Affably Evil villains like McLeach and Jafar, the absolutely terrifyingUrsula, and the Memetic Badass that is Gaston. Ratcliffe just couldn't cut it compared to the otherwise-stellar track record of Disney Renaissance villains.
And in the end, Ratcliffe ended up the most hated villain of all Renaissance villains to a lot of kids who grew up in the 90s and 00s. Why, you ask? Because he ruined a perfectly good happy ending and wasn't likeable/cool enough to make up for it.
Ratcliffe is Rescued from the Scrappy Heap for some in the DTV sequel of all things due to being a more competent threat there as opposed to just a greedy buffoon. It also helps that the way his mouth is animated is hilariously bizarre.
Signature Song: "Colors of the Wind". Helped along by the earliest trailers for the film consisting of nothing but this song (and Pocahontas introducing herself to John).
So Okay, It's Average: A more common reception nowadays, while not very many people are able to claim that this is a masterpiece, there are thousands of people who agree that it's no where near Disney's worst offering.
Values Dissonance: The clash of cultures was inevitable. However, it's played up a lot more in the sequel, where Pocahontas is shocked that a bear is chained up, and calls the Europeans "Savages" for torturing an animal for personal entertainment (which naturally resonates with modern audiences).
Visual Effects of Awesome: Pocahontas herself. She had 55 animators involved in designing her and is regarded as one of the most beautifully and realistically animated Disney characters. Her movements were helped by Rotoscoping.
"The rest of you, take out your shovels! It's time to start digging!" In Virginia. For gold. At a random spot in the middle of the woods. Yeah, great plan, Ratcliffe!
No gold is found. The natives inform the invaders gold isn't a known thing in their land. What is Ratcliffe's "logical" reaction? "THE INDIANS ARE HIDING THE GOLD LET'S ATTACK THEM!"
Kocoum was told the white men were dangerous and carried sticks that could shoot fire - he saw the effect of it himself when his friend Nanuteck was shot in the leg. So what does he do when he sees John Smith kiss Pocahontas? Charge screaming.
Oh, no! John Smith has just been shot! What will you do, O great leader Thomas? Why, send him back on a five-month-long voyage to England with inadequate medical care! What a wise and just leader!