Follow TV Tropes

Ask The Tropers

Go To

Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help. It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread for ongoing cleanup projects.

Ask the Tropers:

Trope Related Question:

Make Private (For security bugs or stuff only for moderators)

JRads47 Since: Dec, 2014
20th Nov, 2019 06:57:37 AM

This previous query about them hasn't been answered either.

Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
20th Nov, 2019 07:06:18 AM

You know, I'd be much more inclined to be on his side if he didn't completely and 100% whitewash the guy.

For reference, here is the previous ATT query on removing a sentence gushing about Jew Wario.

Note that I had P Med him yesterday telling him not to do this and to take it to discussion if he wanted to readd stuff and not edit war (the Kamen Rider example is a straight re-add, the Channel Awesome example is new content). I don't know if the PM was before or after he readded it.

Edited by Larkmarn Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Kuruni (Long Runner)
20th Nov, 2019 07:10:38 AM

Ew... this is the entry in Heartwarming.Channel Awesome.

  • Jewwario did many heartwarming things; he constantly went out of his way to cheer people up and help them with their depression. He even talked people out of suicide, with one such example here. He was incredibly kind to his fans, and even made a video specifically to help people going through depression titled "You're not stupid", seen here. On the same subject, Doug Walker still made a tribute video for him after his suicide, despite secretly knowing of his crimes at the time while most Channel Awesome contributors did not.

The part that I bold for highlight come off really wrong. It come off as "I known he's sexual predator and I don't care" instead of "I known he's sexual predator but I still like him" (still wrong, but I can see the point). Plus, they can't even make proper pothole and just link to Main.

Edited by Kuruni
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
20th Nov, 2019 07:12:00 AM

Yeah that being the only mention of the negative and actually considering "covering up predatory behavior" as making it more heartwarming is... honestly unnerving.

And yeah, he doesn't seem to get namespaces.

Edited by Larkmarn Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
nombretomado (Season 1)
20th Nov, 2019 07:18:01 AM

bobg is suspended for, at best, thoughtless edits that violate ROCEJ. Remove the edits.

Libraryseraph (Five Year Plan)
20th Nov, 2019 07:21:17 AM

^ Understood, will do. Thanks for the prompt response.

Absolute destiny... apeachalypse?
RallyBot2 Since: Nov, 2013
20th Nov, 2019 08:24:50 AM

The rules, at their core, come down to "don't be a dick." Some tropers would be wise to remember that.

Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
20th Nov, 2019 08:37:38 AM

Noting that I do believe the "cartridge" entry from the Kamen Rider page can likely be restored with more context (both in terms of being close to a ZCE and context to the greater scheme of things).

I don't know the work so I can't add it, but it seems like it is a heartwarming moment from a work and doesn't necessarily have to lionize a predator.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
20th Nov, 2019 09:00:47 AM

Just to throw my hat in? We should never have an entry lionizing a sexual predator, not as heartwarming or otherwise. It’s like saying “well, Jimmy Saville making these kids happy is heartwarming, despite molesting a bunch of others!”

Doesn’t belong. At all. And this is part of a pattern with this user that has grown steadily disturbing

RallyBot2 Since: Nov, 2013
20th Nov, 2019 09:16:21 AM

^ The question becomes where we draw the line. I'm perfectly fine doing this case-by-case instead of making some set of arbitrary criteria for agenda-based tropers to exploit.

Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
20th Nov, 2019 09:35:58 AM

I think if there’s a confirmed sexual predator and the entry talks about his grooming behavior in the positive with a creepy “wel, aside from that...” that’s pretty much a straight “no.” As you said, probably case by case

WarJay77 (Troper Knight)
20th Nov, 2019 11:28:41 AM

Okay, I sympathized with their point a little bit in the last ATT discussion, where they'd taken issue with the fact that everyone wanted to just remember Justin for the bad he did, and gloss over anything he did that was good. (I didn't agree with them, mind- I just understood what they were getting at.)

But...this is crossing a line into creepyville. If they don't show up to discuss their ban, we need to keep an eye on these pages; this smelling like wonkage.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
SkyCat32 (Five Year Plan)
20th Nov, 2019 04:54:05 PM

I do not condone the whitewashing of sexual predators or other violent offenders at all. I mean, just because Ted Bundy worked at a suicide hotline doesn't mean that he was any less of a violent criminal.

Society cannot progress unless all predators are seen as heinous, regardless of gender, past good deeds, or their past tribulations.

Edited by SkyCat32 Feels good, don't it?
rjd1922 Since: May, 2013
20th Nov, 2019 04:58:39 PM

I would have been fine with keeping the JewWario mention on Gush.New Media since Gush/ pages are meant for personal accounts and it was written before the allegations came out, but the Heartwarming/ examples are definitely not OK.

Keet cleanup
SkyCat32 (Five Year Plan)
nombretomado (Season 1)
20th Nov, 2019 09:29:56 PM

The troper in question has been bounced after further review into their account. Closing this query.

Top