The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
Dynasty Scans has Yuri Yuri. I'll look through it and see if it's actually objectionable.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
likes the cheeses.
Thanks, Shima.
Visit my contributor page to assist with the "I Like The Cheeses" project!
Five chapters in. There's been one image of panties, and no one was wearing them. They were hanging on a line with some other laundry. Otherwise, it so far seems that the most sexual it gets is sparkles and Love Bubbles.
edited 6th May '12 7:19:12 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
TV Tropes' Sonic Wiki Curator
So, it's clean content-wise, right?
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.
It's got 25 chapters, but it seems clean so far. Yes, they're in middle school, but they're 14 and it's more cute than sexual.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
I have it on a reliable source that the closest that Yuru Yuri gets to "objectionability" is an Imagine Spot by some self-deluded girl. Other than that, it's more or less squeaky clean.
edited 6th May '12 7:36:43 AM by MarqFJA
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
Decemberist
Question: when a thread here asks for input, does that mean the general troper population may comment, or only certain people outside P5?
"Shit, our candidate is a psychopath. Better replace him with Newt Gingrich."
Apparition in the Woods
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
The general population is permitted, but not too many people swing by...
The Demon Slayer
If a thread asks for feedback, any troper can drop in and give it. If it's marked P5 only, no one except the P5 (and possibly the mods) can post in it without getting their post thumped.
TV Tropes' Sonic Wiki Curator
Someone flagged the Wiki Sandbox... what.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.
Yuri Yuri seems squeeky clean. Yes, there's hints of romance, but it never gets past hugging and sparkles. I would recommend it for angel votes.
edited 6th May '12 7:47:39 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Decemberist
Alright.
"Shit, our candidate is a psychopath. Better replace him with Newt Gingrich."
I think they were trying to reset the page type - no wonder, that wretched button is right above with no confirmation page.
edited 6th May '12 7:47:43 AM by SeptimusHeap
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Wiki Sandbox was flagged by mistake. The flagger is a troper who hasn't been participating in these discussions.
edited 6th May '12 7:49:11 AM by lu127
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
"Yuri Yuri seems squeeky clean. Yes, there's hints of romance, but it never gets past hugging and sparkles. I would recommend it for angel votes."
Hm yeah I don't see anything particularly pornographic or nasty there.
Yuri-Yuri sure has the word yuri on the main descriptor paras a lot. Yuri Yuri Yuri Yuri Yuri...
But it looks like it'd be AT WORSE Azumanga Daioh level, which is tame enough to show 10 year olds most of the time.
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if a decent number of the weirder flags have come from people not aware of this process who were trying to change the page type. The flag tool is exactly where the page-type-tool used to be, so any experienced troper on autopilot is likely to mistakenly flag things when they're trying to change page types.
For the record yuri is often used in a nonsexual romantic context as seems to be the case hear.
What she said. This flagger tool is a sucker in its current place. And there is no warning page to boot.
edited 6th May '12 10:22:40 AM by SeptimusHeap
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
I think that there should be not only a warning page to verify that flagging the page is what the user intended, but that there should also be a requirement that the person provides a brief description of the questionable content that he/she sees in the work. No description (which only needs to be a sentence or two), no flag.
If a ruling has already been made on a page, is the flag option removed from said page? You know, so it doesn't get flagged again?
This shouldn't necessarily be the case. Works undergo genre shift, and there is the potential for mistakes by either the defenders or the panel members themselves - they too are fallible, and new information not previously mentioned could come to light.
However, there should be some minimum time - perhaps 3-4 months, before a reviewed work can be appealed.
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
Yeah, a warning page, plus a cooldown period in between flaggings for each article, plus relocating the button so that the original page-type button is back to its place.
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
Good point
I think you need to look at ratings before flagging anything.
If Sister Princess is PG-13, then it's exempt for the process.
As for Yuru Yuri, the magazine
it was published in is both shonen and seinen, so it's hard to tell. May need a look.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer