YMMV Pokemon Discussion

Collapse/Expand Topics
 

MagBas
Topic
10:00:07 AM Jun 13th 2015
edited by MagBas
I am in the doubt about the divisive nature of the Base Breaker examples. Charizard in particular. Beyond this, the first Pikachu entry not implies that he is divisive.(48th place out of 600+? In a publication to "young adult males", as noted by the description?)
PDL
10:12:59 AM Jun 13th 2015
I'd remove it unless there's concrete evidence that it isn't just one person's thinking. Or make it more neutral sounding.
MagBas
05:44:11 PM Jun 24th 2015
Okay, thanks.
Larkmarn
06:28:15 AM Jun 25th 2015
Let me guess, Darthrai added that, didn't he?
Darthrai
07:35:50 AM Jun 30th 2015
edited by Darthrai
I did, four years ago. I didn't add Charizard but agree with the assessment of him as a Base Breaker.

Could I suggest re-adding them, but in less detail and with a less vitriolic tone (more neutral-sounding, as PDL suggested)? Such as:

  • Pikachu is this with the Periphery Demographic. While it's the face of the franchise and a huge cultural icon in general, it frequently finds itself glossed over by older fans in favor of more powerful and "edgy" Pokémon. Its Spotlight-Stealing Squad nature and archetypical Kid-Appeal Character traits also tend to be points of contention, along with the fact that its role as the Series Mascot is largely due to its role in the polarizing anime series.
  • Charizard, mostly due to Hype Backlash. While a very popular Pokémon, some fans (particularly those of the other starter lines) dislike the favoritism that it gets both from Game Freak and from the fanbase, to the point that it was a frequent sight in competitive battles in tiers where it was too weak to compete prior to Generation VI.

The fact is, both characters are widely-liked but also have very vocal hatedoms (same for Lucario and other Nintendo characters like Lucina and Rosalina); in my opinion, this shouldn't be ignored.

EDIT: Pikachu was actually considered a Base Breaker for a loooooooong time on this wiki, even before I joined and inflicted my personal bias. Also, these opinions are based on what I've seen in many communities (not 4chan, which seems to worship Pikachu), which may or may not be completely in line with my personal opinion.
elkeryos
Topic
12:10:57 PM Oct 8th 2014
I don't get it. I AM french, and Tortank IS pronounced Thor-TANK, such as a tank, the english word.
Okoa
Topic
10:46:13 AM Jul 13th 2014
edited by 96.28.182.48
This gem under Unfortunate Implications:

"Mega Gardevoir's Fairy Tale Wedding Dress combined with Gardevoir's feminine appearance, Undying Loyalty to its Trainer, and the statement that Mega Evolution takes the bond between Trainer and Pokemon to the "next level" makes one wonder just what Game Freak was going for with this."

Any objections to removing that? I find this statement pretty asinine.
madgodzulcan
10:55:29 AM Jul 13th 2014
edited by 67.221.204.48
Go for it, sounds more like Does This Remind You of Anything? anyway.
SeptimusHeap
11:36:01 AM Jul 13th 2014
^^Also, it does not explain at all how it's offensive to anyone and lacks a citation which Unfortunate Implications needs.
Scardoll
Topic
12:03:51 PM Jan 1st 2014
Under Base Breaker...

  • Conkeldurr. While it's an extremely powerful and useful Pokémon (even competitively), it's generally viewed as (and possibly designed to be) extremely ugly. Its pre-evolution, Gurdurr may even be more widely hated, because it's just as hideous, if not more, than Conkeldurr, and it's a common annoyance in caves when you're looking for a rare Pokemon or have run out of repels. Not helped that it looks vaguely similar in some ways to a clown.

The clown resemblance is pretty obviously intentional. It's a visual pun on "circus strongman".
Larkmarn
01:45:53 PM Jan 1st 2014
Intentional or not, people don't like clowns very much. Could be rewritten, though.
Scardoll
03:16:22 PM Jan 1st 2014
Oh, I don't mind it being there (Even if I'm a fan of Conkeldurr.). I just think "vaguely similar" makes it sound like the clown resemblance was accidental.
Larkmarn
03:23:15 PM Jan 1st 2014
Agreed.
Larkmarn
Topic
10:17:05 AM Nov 15th 2013
edited by 156.33.241.8
I feel like the Ensemble Darkhorse needs to be cleaned, BADLY.

For one, doesn't every generation have its own ED listing? Do we even need one?

For another, it's way, way too big. And it includes starters, mascots, box legendaries, and freaking Pikachu. I'm going to cut the really egregious ones.

Any thoughts on whether non-box Legendaries should be cut? I'm thinking about Mew and Mewtwo. Also the pseudo-Legendaries... they're not pushed that hard, but due to their stats they're pretty much forced on the player.
MagBas
11:19:21 AM Nov 15th 2013
edited by 200.187.113.33
The pseudo-legendaries are not pushed in the player at all and it is extremely easy to end Gold/Silver without learn about Tyrannitar's existence.
Larkmarn
11:28:53 AM Nov 15th 2013
Alright, I'll leave those.

I also pulled Lucario, but now I'm not sure. I thought he was one of the ones that was revealed early and that his popularity came from getting his own movie (like Zoroark), but now I can't remember if he was already popular before the movie.
Collapse/Expand Topics