Follow TV Tropes

Ask The Tropers

Go To

Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help. It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread for ongoing cleanup projects.

Ask the Tropers:

Trope Related Question:

Make Private (For security bugs or stuff only for moderators)

WhirlRX Since: Jan, 2015
1st Sep, 2019 08:20:55 AM

Real life situation must wait for twenty to twenty five years from what i remember. Also, HIH might be misused.

Edit: The fact that there's little coverage shows ots not overshadowed.

Edited by WhirlRX
sgamer82 Since: Jan, 2001
1st Sep, 2019 08:56:04 AM

From Overshadowed by Controversy itself:

Keep in mind that, despite how it is usually used, "controversial" is not the same thing as "offensive." You can have a completely family-friendly and non-political work that still provokes dissent, especially if the work is aiming for realism. Additionally, since most scandals and controversies tend to not overshadow a work or creator in the long run, only add examples if the controversy in question is still the main point of discussion about a work/creator after at least a few months (six months to be absolutely safe). Finally, please be cautious when editing this page.

wingedcatgirl MOD (Holding A Herring)
1st Sep, 2019 09:09:12 AM

^^ You're thinking of Never Live It Down. No Recent Examples, Please! says Overshadowed by Controversy is six months.

Trouble Cube continues to be a general-purpose forum for those who desire such a thing.
sgamer82 Since: Jan, 2001
1st Sep, 2019 09:19:25 AM

I went ahead and removed the example (and a reference to it in another example) using this ATT thread and the quoted section in the edit reason and sent a "Murky Example" notifier to the person who added it, detailing exactly why I removed it. Though it came out a bit wall of text-y because the notifiers' formatting is nonexistent.

Edited by sgamer82
Acebrock Since: Dec, 2009
1st Sep, 2019 09:28:34 PM

So, what of the Harsher in Hindsight link that has been added, deleted, and readded by a third troper (so not really an edit war)? I'm not familiar with the controversy (and only vaguely familiar with the show), but judging from the Harsher in Hindsight's page description, it doesn't qualify as an example, but then again, I tend to limit my interaction with YMMV and avoid tropes like Harsher in Hindsight unless I think I have good reason to add them so I'm not 100% sure.

My troper wall
sgamer82 Since: Jan, 2001
1st Sep, 2019 09:48:05 PM

I left it alone, myself. I tend to be biased against Harsher in Hindsight, and I'm not 100% clear if this counts as "this thing happened, then this other thing happened", which I regard as the most common form of misuse.

Edited by sgamer82
WhirlRX Since: Jan, 2015
1st Sep, 2019 09:56:01 PM

Unless the show has pedophilic elements in, i wouldn't considered it harsher.

WarJay77 (Troper Knight)
1st Sep, 2019 09:59:39 PM

The entire example is just "kids show has pedo creator". Not really something I'd consider HIH.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
sgamer82 Since: Jan, 2001
1st Sep, 2019 10:12:13 PM

In that case, I'm all for torching it. Though, given the edit reasons I'm seeing, probably make sure it's noted it's being removed for not being an example, not for any truthfulness or lack of to the claim.

Edited by sgamer82
Acebrock Since: Dec, 2009
1st Sep, 2019 10:47:26 PM

I went ahead and nuked it, then, noting that despite any truthfulness (or lack thereof) it's not an example of HIH

My troper wall
CryptidProductions Since: Mar, 2019
2nd Sep, 2019 01:19:44 AM

Since she was already long cut from the production for other reasons before this even came out I have my doubts it will result in OBC if Netflix distances themselves and the show from her enough.

M84 Since: Jun, 2010
2nd Sep, 2019 01:32:19 AM

I suppose the justification for it being Harsher in Hindsight was because it's not just "kids show has pedo creator". Rather, it's "kid's show with a main character who idolizes youth and thinks becoming an adult is awful has a pedophile creator."

Edited by M84 Disgusted, but not surprised
WarJay77 (Troper Knight)
2nd Sep, 2019 01:46:40 AM

That's still a bit of a stretch...

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
M84 Since: Jun, 2010
2nd Sep, 2019 01:57:15 AM

It is, which is why I'm not particularly interested in adding it back. I will however add that we generally shouldn't be removing YMMV entries, since they are after all YMMV.

...Yeah, this is why I generally don't add YMMV trope entries myself.

Disgusted, but not surprised
WarJay77 (Troper Knight)
2nd Sep, 2019 01:59:22 AM

Thing is, even YMMV entries have criteria. The Harsher in Hindsight criteria requires that something be directly related to a moment in the work, not just tangentially, coincidentally, similar.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
WarJay77 (Troper Knight)
2nd Sep, 2019 01:59:22 AM

Thing is, even YMMV entries have criteria. The Harsher in Hindsight criteria requires that something be directly related to a moment in the work, not just tangentially, coincidentally, similar.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
M84 Since: Jun, 2010
2nd Sep, 2019 02:09:06 AM

I guess the issue is that it's less a moment (as per the trope criteria) and more the entire premise of the show itself.

Disgusted, but not surprised
mr_allen Since: Apr, 2015
2nd Sep, 2019 02:17:37 AM

The thing that most people don't really understand about YMMV is that there should at least be a general consensus about it and it should fulfill the trope it's under. If it doesn't fulfill both of those then it shouldn't be listed.

Edited by mr_allen
M84 Since: Jun, 2010
2nd Sep, 2019 02:27:36 AM

A general consensus might be a bit much, considering the very nature of YMMV. But it should fill the second condition.

Disgusted, but not surprised
mr_allen Since: Apr, 2015
2nd Sep, 2019 02:33:31 AM

I'm saying general consensus because people are thinking that one person having an opinion is good enough. There are a lot of cleanup threads in the forum simply because that's not true.

StFan Since: Jan, 2001
2nd Sep, 2019 03:31:45 AM

Edit: sorry, posted in the wrong thread. Please disregard.

Edited by StFan
Top