I know that one of the parents is a character from JoJo's Bizarre Adventure from the clothes, but this one's JAFANC overall.
Those are all better than the current.
Dang, I look away from this trope for two hours...
Maybe pair a picture of a canon character + an obvious fanart with them and their kid? But pull as JAFAAC regardless.
Edited by Synchronicity on Jan 30th 2021 at 11:27:05 AM
JAFAAC, pull. Even if I wanted context, the pic isn't even potholed to a work page.
clearly things are going well.I like the Steven Universe suggestions, 2 the most, 3 the least (as for those who don't watch the show, it's not clear Stevonnie is two people in a Fusion Dance). But I think it's a good idea to pair it with a canon screenshot of Steven and Connie.
Hahaha, I was just coming over to post about this myself.
Yeah, voting to pull as JAFAAC.
EDIT: Also giving my approval to #2 of the Steven Universe pics.
Edited by Mimic1990 on Jan 30th 2021 at 10:09:29 AM
Thankfully there's a canon picture of them kissing◊. Also this◊ if you need to see their faces but still make clear they're in a relationship.
Edit: 'd!
Edited by Crossover-Enthusiast on Jan 30th 2021 at 12:50:28 PM
Jawbreakers on sale for 99¢I prefer the second one (exactly because their faces are visible), but the first one is okay too.
Second.
The suggestions are fine, but I'd prefer something that makes it more clear that it's an original character not just fanart of a show with canon kids. Whether the art style be distinctly different, or we use an introductory sheet of the OC alongside an image of their canon parents...something like that.
It looks similar (though not identical) to the canon style, IMO, but my main concern is that it's difficult to tell if the kids are fanon characters. Though a caption could mitigate that.
Edited by mightymewtron on Jan 31st 2021 at 2:09:19 PM
I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.Isn't the above Steven Universe fan art distinctly different from the show's official art in your opinion?
I think what she meant was that there's no evidence the kids aren't canon.
I wonder if an image of a blatantly non-canon pairing and their kids would get it across?
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessI have the same problem with it. It's not obvious that the kid is not canon.
The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us.Hmm, maybe it'd be better to do something like Sailor Earth, where we put a picture of a canon character and an obvious-fanart-of-their-offspring.
Edited by Adept on Jan 31st 2021 at 9:09:44 PM
Maybe a troper-made fanchild for Trope-tan?
I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.Maybe an image to please ReinaTheHedgehog?
Content Warning: My posts may involve my actions dealing with R-rated or Not Safe for Work content. Same for my edit history.I'm not opposed to any of those with permission. I think Sonic is better known than Steven Universe so more people would recognize that he doesn't have a child in canon (as far as I know).
I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.I like the first of those the most. And while I'm familiar with Steven Universe, has a point that Sonic is more famous and also less likely to be a father.
Plus, the Sonic fandom has some infamy for their OCs.
Clock is set.
Pull current, at least.
Jawbreakers on sale for 99¢It's already gone, though.
...it is? I don't think we ever reached consensus to pull it, just replace it.
Jawbreakers on sale for 99¢
Crown Description:
Nominations for replacement images:
Well, that was quick. I have no idea who this character is or what canon characters are his fanon parents.
I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.