Does Not Illustrate: Ho Yay.Franklin

The image doesn't show an interaction between two characters of the same gender that could be interpreted as romantic. It's just an Accidental Visual Innuendo between two stuffed animals.

EDIT: So looking at the page, it's listed because the dolls belong to Franklin and Bear. Still not a very good image, though.

Edited by rjd1922 on Oct 21st 2020 at 7:35:33 AM

Agreed. +1 to pull.

Make like a Bop-It player and pull it.

Maybe move it to AccidentalInnuendo.Western Animation?

Edited by jandn2014 on Oct 22nd 2020 at 9:42:50 AM

I wouldnt be against that. Ho Yay, or not the image is actually pretty funny.

Agree with moving the current image to AccidentalInnuendo.Western Animation. For this page, maybe Bear's Valentine to Franklin◊ or Franklin and Bear back-to-back from this GIF.

EDIT: Linked to the correct image.

Edited by rjd1922 on Oct 23rd 2020 at 12:54:50 PM

I'm good to put it on AccidentalInnuendo.Western Animation.

I've made the move and both pages are tagged...not sure about the caption on its new page.

Zap the caption.

Definitely get rid of the caption.

Yeah, get rid of the caption.

I think the more concerning thing is that someone tried to make a Ho Yay page for a preschool show.

As I explained here, I don't think Ho Yay needs to be sexual, but that's a topic for this thread, not Image Pickin'. Any thoughts on my replacement suggestions?

And I've given my thoughts on it in that thread, here.

I think the back-to-back suggestion works. The Valentine's suggestion doesn't have both characters or Valentine's-related imagery — it just looks like Franklin doing some arts and crafts.

Not quite sure how romantically-coded the back-to-back suggestion is. I guess their facial expressions could indicate it?

Crap, I linked the wrong Valentine image. This◊ is Bear's Valentine to Franklin.

In that case, I'll put in my vote for that one.

19's decent.

It's actually adorable, and much more age-appropriate.