Here's◊ a better version of 1.2. 1.3's quality is really off, but I couldn't find a better quality version. 1.1 just seems like an arms deal to me.
1.2 works.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!2 works. I rather like 1.3 as well though. (Albeit, probably with a crop.)
Edited by rachiebird on Jan 17th 2020 at 10:49:40 AM
2.
(Annoyed grunt)2 is probably the best option.
2
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessThanks for the quality upgrade. Yes, #2 is good.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!2 works, but I like 1.3 better, especially if we could find a quality upgrade.
The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us.1.1. is on Arms Dealer.
Here's the other two suggestions at wiki size:
ETA: I dunno, despite the quality issues I also favor Al Capone/1.3. JD/1.2 looks more "goofy" than "badass" by comparison, like it'd be a better fit for Neighbourhood-Friendly Gangsters.
Edited by Morgenthaler on Jan 18th 2020 at 5:17:43 AM
You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!"for Al Capone.
The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us.Johnny Dangerously is on Neighbourhood-Friendly Gangsters...I’d be fine with putting 1.2 on that page and using the crop of 1.3 here.
For the record, 1.3 is actually a foreign porn film so it’ll go on the “P5 works” list if/when it’s approved.
Oh, is it porn? I think that pushes my vote a little bit more towards 1.2. I like 1.3 slightly better, but maybe not enough that I want to give up the chance to link to another work on the wiki.
I don't see it shown as an image, though.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!Clock is set.
By my count that's eight people in favor of 2 (quality upgrade of 1.2); does this need a crowner?
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!I'd've put it up already but there's the question about it possibly being a better fit for Friendly Neighborhood Gangster, which I'm inclined to say it's a better fit for.
I agree — 1.3 for this trope and 1.2 for Neighborhood Friendly Gangster
Right, good point. Yes, I agree with 1.3 here and 1.2 on FNG.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!1.2 for Friendly Neighborhood Gangster; 1.3 for here.
(Annoyed grunt)Bump?
(Annoyed grunt)"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."
I vote for 1.3/11.1, although I question how 1.2 illustrates "being sympathetic to the audience" to qualify as Neighbourhood-Friendly Gangsters
I think it's more about the overall tone of the pic, it has a lighter feel than 1.3.
At the very least, I think consensus has shifted enough toward using 1.3 on this page, so it's in and tagged. I'll have to relocate the source to get the tag 100% accurate. Caption?
Old pic:
Edited by Willbyr on Feb 6th 2020 at 11:54:24 AM
Aside from looking blurry and off-color, the image misses any indication that the guy in the center is a criminal of any kind. Frankly, it looks like a man who's either polyamorous or hiring two prostitutes, but not a gangster.
Perhaps Lord of War does it better◊, or Johnny Dangerously, or a crop of this movie poster◊.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!