Changed w/o discussion: Regal Ringlets

Changed back in February by lexii from this:

I honestly think the previous pic was better — here the crown and Pimped-Out Dress aren't as focused on; most of what you see right away is hair.

Leaning toward the old pic.

Honestly, I like the current better. Current has way more ringlets, and they're way more of a focal point. Also, the crown feels more inherently regal than just a dress.

But the current also appears to be cosplay, and therefore not something we have the licence to use without permission. So it's sort of a moot point anyways. Revert, unless someone else has a better suggestion.

Edited by rachiebird on Dec 10th 2019 at 9:36:13 AM

Current

Old pic is way too jpeged for my tastes. Perhaps Rose Quartz?◊

Edited by Crossover-Enthusiast on Dec 11th 2019 at 10:27:51 AM

I think that 5's deliberate VHS effect is more distracting than jpg artifacts. Revert.

Edited by Piterpicher on Dec 11th 2019 at 4:44:44 PM

5 is not regal enough. Either current or the old one works.

Rose is listed in the examples, but fair enough on the VHS-ing.

It's not enough that it's an example. It should clearly show the trope at first sight. For me, it does not.

Revert.

From the same film:

Both are much better than either current or the original.

11.1 seems to have more royal traits, while 11.2 has larger hair. Ultimately, I'll go with 11.2 as she seems to be royal enough as well.

Alternative shots from The Three Musketeers (2011)

Edited by eroock on Dec 11th 2019 at 6:45:03 AM

Kind of OK, better than the original, but I prefer 11.2.

Too red for my taste. I prefer 11.2.

The pics in 11 are set shots (not from the movie) which may get us into trouble.

I don't think that's an issue. 11.2.

11.2 for me.

I prefer 14.2, honestly.

Crowner?

Crowner, hollering to hook.

Rarity, from MLP:FIM:

Night Vision unfriendly, and downplays it way too much in both the "Regal" and the "Ringlets" department.