Right, and making it YMMV would not at all loosen the standards, it would just make it clear that these are fan opinions about a relationship, not an objective trope. I don't see any issue. Just because something is subjective doesn't mean it can't have strict criteria- just look at Complete Monster.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessI put the reasons for making it YMMV on the crowner itself, if it means anything.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!Is it just me, or does that crowner miss out on some of the proposals made in thread?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI figured some of those options were already decided on, but how about this one? Please close the old crowner, then.
Some options I considered putting up, but might need approval to do so, are:
- Rename Strangled by the Red String.
- Rename Relationship Writing Fumble, create a Super-Trope for misinterpreted audience perspectives on relationships, and cut the name "Relationship Writing Fumble".
- Transplant Relationship Writing Fumble (defined as characters who are meant to be platonic are seen as being romantic) to a new name, using the name "Relationship Writing Fumble" for an index about audience interpretations of relationships.
- Rename Relationship Writing Fumble, create an index for misinterpreted audience perspectives on relationships, and cut the name "Relationship Writing Fumble".
Note that making an index would not permit examples on that page or trope pages.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!I still think there's a Missing Supertrope going on here about misinterpreted character relationships in general that Relationship Writing Fumble could be renamed as rather than an index.
Edited by PhiSat on Mar 28th 2019 at 1:12:48 PM
Oissu!Is that not covered by the above options?
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!Edited by A_Really_Big_Cat on Mar 29th 2019 at 3:42:02 AM
I see an index option but not a supertrope option. Just thought adding one might be useful/helpful.
Oissu!~Phi Sat It's in the crowner itself. The options in that post outside of the crowner are ones I might or might not put there.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!Just to note, the Slap-Slap-Kiss is misused. It's not a character dyanamic as much as it is a specific action. How about "to much belligerence in there sexual tension".
Edited by randomtroper89 on Apr 3rd 2019 at 1:09:30 PM
Clock is set.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanCrowner in post #80.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!Got it; turning off the clock.
Any opinions of the proposed options from post 80?
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!Right now, the crowner options are unanimous in their opinions (although we're technically at Day 1 due to the recent hook). I don't think we need the additional suggestions in post #80 to solve this thread's problem. I would instead recommend a wait-and-see approach for a few months/year after the changes decided upon by this crowner are enacted.
Link to TRS threads in project mode here.I know crowners are borked, but I think this one can be called?
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessSince histories are preserved, we should still be able to call.
Anyways, calling in favor of making the trope YMMV.
she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope ReportDoes that exclude the other options? I feel like the "Supertrope" and "Rename" ideas aren't mutually exclusive with a move to YMMV, and all of those ideas have received unanimous consensus; just one vote shy of a three-way-tie.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessI thought all the crowner options were going to be applied since none of them were mutually exclusive and all of them were voted up.
Oissu!Me, too. Is that not the case? :/
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessI moved Designated Love Interest to the YMMV page. Now let's move and clean up wicks.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!So we're just not doing the other options, then? The YMMV idea was, if I remember correctly, supplemental to the other ideas. It's not going to fix the misuse on it's own.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessI thought we were doing all the options, since they were all supplemental and were unanimously approved.
Oissu!In other words, we will:
- Make Designated Love Interest YMMV.
- Define Designated Love Interest as romantic relationships being seen as platonic.
- Launch Displacement: Relationship Writing Fumble as a Super-Trope, platonic-as-romantic misinterpretations to a new name.
The one downvoted option, by the way, was "Cut Designated Love Interest." That's not happening.
Edited by Brainulator9 on May 16th 2019 at 4:36:32 AM
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!
Crown Description:
What would be the best way to fix the page?
It's an Audience Reaction and those are usually YMMV. The other Designated tropes are also all YMMV so it's for consistency.
Edited by PhiSat on Mar 18th 2019 at 11:46:45 AM
Oissu!