Page Restoration Petitions

A question about Legend Of Queen Opala, if I may: It has been decided to completely cut the page because it's porn. However the page is about both the first and the second game, and the second one allows you to play a Bleached Underpants version (it's even on the game's page):

So why not clean the page and make it about the Bleached Underpants version of the second game only? I'm curious about this since I didn't see it explained anywhere...

How did that get two devil heads so fast? It was one last time I checked...

Anyway, assuming there's no pedophilia in the clean version, I'm fine with that option. Can anyone who's played it chip in?

Legend of Queen Opala II is incomplete at this moment. It's creator decided to make it an Episodic Game divided in 3 parts, and I am waiting until at least the second episode is released before going serious on it.

However, if II is gonna be at all like I, then there will be no lolishit at all. All sex in the first was with adult, mature and curvaceous women. Not a single insinuation of pedo-pandering at all.

edited 17th Jun '12 7:36:07 AM by Sachiko

Well, until I see evidence that the complete version of Episode II will actually have a "clean" version, my opinion will remain steadfast for cutting it.

The page can always be eliminated and a request to restore it filed later on when we have more information. For now, however, the page shall remain empty.

You could restrict the content to the first game and possibly open it up to the second when a clean option is added.

The first game doesn't have a "clean" option. Such a thing is present only in the second.

Speaking of the second game: - Episode II is expected to get released in a few days (I read something about the 20th of June) - there's no loli (or shota) content at all

That's all I have to add for now.

EDIT: Found the post by the author:

edited 17th Jun '12 10:14:01 AM by shadowblack

Edited by GraySloth on Jan 26th 2024 at 1:29:32 AM

Well, we can wait a few days then. If it turns out it's not actually getting released that soon, then I'm on board for cutting it. Once the second one comes out, we can re-evaluate.

Fifty Shades should prolly have a P5-only thread. We did dump a lot of information on them. Also, it's apparently a trilogy, so someone might have to flip through the other two books.

edited 17th Jun '12 10:04:52 AM by LargoQuagmire

Edited by GraySloth on Jan 26th 2024 at 1:29:54 AM

If not now, there are talks of a movie, so it will be churning more money. If that does happen, it might even be a mainstream movie. That might be awkward for TVT when it comes along, if we go to cut...

If the book stays cut and the movie is not cut worthy then we allow the movie as a bleached underpants version, simple.

I personally feel the book deserves an stub on the media coverage of it.

edited 17th Jun '12 3:33:39 PM by Shadis

Exactly. And after all, if we really need to, we could simply mention the book and a few of the less prurient differences in the movie article.

Edited by GraySloth on Jan 26th 2024 at 1:30:11 AM

Regarding Queen Opala, I looked it up, and... no, I don't think we need that, thank you very much. Nearly every resource I've found on the game puts emphasis on the sex, and while there does appear to be a battle system and some sort of plot, they just seem to be excuses for said sex, for instance, there's a boss where, if you beat him, he rewards you with his porn collection... or something. Particularly worrying is the emphasis on bestiality, including one character (the obligatory Hot Mom romance option, for the curious) who apparently once got pregnant by a horse (??!!!???!). Add that to the fact that it seems to just be something some girl coded in her basement for her Original Characters to star in, and I don't think many tears will be shed over losing this one. From the looks of it, that Bleached Underpants version would have to be pretty durn bleached for us to allow this back in...

Anyway, if anyone cares, they can check out the sex-scene remover and see if it removes the sex scenes. If it does, boom, we got a page for Opala II.

@Hamburger Time: Bestiality isn't anywhere on the 5P removal list, except where it makes something into porn (and Opala is PWP with or without the zoophilia). Just saying.

Yes, I'd rather take a wait and see approach before giving the second one it's own page as well, so that it can be reviewed to determine that the Bleached Underpants version truly doesn't have any problematic content.

[Failed thread hop. Need more coffee.]

edited 18th Jun '12 10:31:13 AM by JHM

Edited by GraySloth on Jan 26th 2024 at 1:30:45 AM

You are a much braver person than I, though I'm glad to see that my vague suspicions about this work may have had some sort of justification.

Edited by GraySloth on Jan 26th 2024 at 1:31:02 AM

"ultimately its view on BDMS is a negative one."

So it condemns BDSM? That would explain the lack of a safe word and the other unsafe elements.

So what's happening to the Gorn examples?

Edited by GraySloth on Jan 26th 2024 at 1:31:19 AM