Follow TV Tropes

Following

Rename (alt titles 8/31): Skippy Rules

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Sep 1st 2012 at 11:59:00 PM
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#1: Mar 21st 2012 at 3:20:16 PM

First line in the description is "A rule or regulation is mentioned, and somebody pipes up that it's also known as "The (insert name) rule"." The name doesn't indicate that at all. Worse, the Trope Namer, Skippys List, doesn't even have anything to do with the trope, and the name seems like a redirect to that page.

And it's not thriving, at 9 wicks and 1 inbound.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Feather7603 Devil's Advocate from Yggdrasil Since: Dec, 2011
#2: Mar 21st 2012 at 3:45:49 PM

Knowing what the actual Skippy rules are about, it's a terrible trope name. Those rules are about the consequence of abusing Ain't No Rule. There will be.

This is just about naming a rule after someone who broke it.

I think a better name could help. I don't think it's a terribly common trope, but probably more common than what it appears looking at the page and its usage.

edited 21st Mar '12 3:46:49 PM by Feather7603

The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.
pawsplay Since: Jan, 2001
#3: Mar 23rd 2012 at 12:33:44 AM

I support a rename. If the trope were actually applied to Skippy's list, there would be like forty rules named after Skippy, which would make them hard to tell apart.

Real life trivia: I've met Skippy. He's a friend of a friend.

edited 23rd Mar '12 12:34:00 AM by pawsplay

Spark9 Since: Nov, 2010
#4: Mar 23rd 2012 at 1:33:49 AM

"Skippy Rules" sounds like the kind of rules that people skip (or houserule away) for whatever reason.

That the trope page needs to point out that it's about this Skippy and not that other Skippy indicates that the name is not very good. There are also several other things named Skippy, including an (unrelated) film and comic strip.

So I support a rename.

Godnat It doesn't bug me Since: Jun, 2011
It doesn't bug me
#5: Mar 23rd 2012 at 2:31:54 AM

There ought be more examples of this than those listed.

There are a ton from the sports world.

But, yeah, definetly needs a rename.

edited 23rd Mar '12 2:32:29 AM by Godnat

I swear to God there used to be a really witty sig here.
Catbert Since: Jan, 2012
#6: Mar 23rd 2012 at 4:44:48 AM

Whether we rename or not, it might be a good idea to put this on YKTTW for a few weeks to see if we can scrounge up more examples.

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#7: Mar 23rd 2012 at 5:06:43 AM

We could just kick it back there entirely.

Fight smart, not fair.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#8: Mar 23rd 2012 at 12:22:40 PM

It should be kicked back, yes. I know it's a trope (I can name several Real Life examples from various sports leagues), but it's terrible as-is. Nobody would find it under the name (particularly when the Trope Namer isn't an example... opaque Trope Namers that make even less sense when you are familiar with the source material are the worst). It needs more examples. And it needs a much better name.

After checking, while closely related to Person as Verb, it is distinct. I'd be tempted to go with Eponymous Rule, but the cynic in me wonders if enough people would know what "eponymous" means. Person Named Rule or Character Named Rule would probably work better.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
wanderlustwarrior Role Model from Where Gods Belong Since: Jun, 2009 Relationship Status: What's love got to do with it?
Role Model
#9: Apr 5th 2012 at 10:53:34 AM

If it gets kicked back, if anyone remembers any more of this example than I, they can add it:

  • In Phil Of The Future, the extensive, yet subtle, screwing around the Diffy's have done while being stuck in the past have resulted in the establishment of the Diffy Law, prohibiting backwards time travel, and apparently ending the time tourism industry.

The sad, REAL American dichotomy
pawsplay Since: Jan, 2001
#10: Apr 5th 2012 at 11:09:38 AM

Eponymous Rule. [up][up] I think it can be considered a reasonable personal obligation to learn what "eponymous" means at some point if you're going to be a troper.

DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#12: Apr 5th 2012 at 5:43:08 PM

"I think it can be considered a reasonable personal obligation to learn what "eponymous" means at some point if you're going to be a troper."

BTW, would "eponymous" make a valid trope?

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper from Somewhere in California Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
#14: Apr 5th 2012 at 6:30:36 PM

[up]Not the same thing. This is when you name a work after a specific thing.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Treblain Not An Avatar Since: Nov, 2012
Not An Avatar
#15: Apr 5th 2012 at 7:47:34 PM

We have The Namesake, which has eponym as a redirect.

We're not just men of science, we're men of TROPE!
HersheleOstropoler You gotta get yourself some marble columns from BK.NY.US Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Less than three
You gotta get yourself some marble columns
#16: Apr 5th 2012 at 8:27:47 PM

I recognize that the title is not the definition, but would a title focusing on the fact that the rule is named after a person and not specifying why it's named after that person invite wicking things like Megan's Law? Would that even constitute misuse?

[down]Ok, so my concern stands: laws like that are not examples; if the title only indicates the eponym aspect, would it attract that sort of misuse?

edited 5th Apr '12 9:58:26 PM by HersheleOstropoler

The child is father to the man —Oedipus
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#17: Apr 5th 2012 at 9:20:44 PM

That would be misuse - this trope is for naming rules and the like after someone who is known for doing the kind of act which required the rule in the first place. Laws are not examples in 99% of cases because they either get named for the people who passed them or in memory of the victims that the law is required to protect.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
Stratadrake Dragon Writer Since: Oct, 2009
Dragon Writer
#18: Apr 5th 2012 at 10:04:54 PM

In other words, the non-wiki, in-universe analogue to a Trope Namer?

An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#19: Apr 6th 2012 at 7:15:52 AM

Ok, so my concern stands: laws like that are not examples; if the title only indicates the eponym aspect, would it attract that sort of misuse?

It's a fair concern, but to approach it from the other direction - what name could we give it that's easy to use and wouldn't cause misuse? I'm not emotionally attached to any of the names that I suggested, but I have no idea what would work better.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
HersheleOstropoler You gotta get yourself some marble columns from BK.NY.US Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Less than three
You gotta get yourself some marble columns
#20: Apr 6th 2012 at 9:46:49 AM

The Violator Rule?

Ok, that's really stupid, but maybe it's a starting point?

The child is father to the man —Oedipus
ccoa Ravenous Sophovore from the Sleeping Giant Since: Jan, 2001
Ravenous Sophovore
#21: May 9th 2012 at 6:02:10 AM

Clocking due to lack of activity.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#22: May 9th 2012 at 8:40:52 AM

We never really came to a conclusion on a new name. The Violator Rule (or maybe Violator's Rule) would probably work well. Should we have a crowner?

edited 9th May '12 8:41:37 AM by 32_Footsteps

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.
HersheleOstropoler You gotta get yourself some marble columns from BK.NY.US Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Less than three
You gotta get yourself some marble columns
#23: May 9th 2012 at 10:08:24 AM

Did we come to a conclusion on whether to rename in the first place? Just for form's sake, I realize it's probably fairly straightforward.

The child is father to the man —Oedipus
Spark9 Since: Nov, 2010
#24: May 9th 2012 at 2:35:59 PM

I made a crowner, tvtropes.org/pmwiki/crowner.php/Skippy Rules?open=all#7isudyn6

32_Footsteps Think of the mooks! from Just north of Arkham Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
#25: May 9th 2012 at 2:39:50 PM

Actually, I think the thread was leaning towards kicking everything back to YKTTW to get a better name and more examples.

Reminder: Offscreen Villainy does not count towards Complete Monster.

PageAction: SkippyRules
9th May '12 8:21:23 AM

Crown Description:

What would be the best way to fix the page?

Total posts: 62
Top