Rename?: Dont Explain The Joke get usage counts
Deadlock Clock: 11th Apr 2012 11:59:00 PM

Total posts: [64]
1
2
3
26 DragonQuestZ26th Dec 2011 06:17:18 PM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
"I don't see why we need to have two different tropes for "killing the joke by explaining the punchline" and "killing the joke by explaining some part of the setup"."

I don't see anyone here suggesting a split. The point is that explaining the setup is not to be done at all.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
27 Madrugada26th Dec 2011 06:26:17 PM , Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
But that's the way the trope is used, fairly often. The explanation is about some part of the set-up that affects the punchline.

Alice: "Why won't sharks eat lawyers?"

Bob: "I don't know. Why?"

Alice: "Professional courtesy."

Bob: (doesn't laugh)

Alice: (explains the concept of "professional courtesy")

Did she explain the punchline or the set-up? I say it could legitimately be considered either — or both.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
28 DragonQuestZ26th Dec 2011 06:29:04 PM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
[up]First of all, it was tropers potholing the context that is mainly the problem.

Second, that's not explaining the punchline. That would be "because lawyers are seen as no better than sharks". It would be explaining why it was professional courtesy, not what that concept is.

And asking for context info on a joke wouldn't be a trope itself. It would more be a kind of The Watson.

edited 26th Dec '11 6:29:46 PM by DragonQuestZ

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
[up][up]Also, the explanation doesn't actually kill the joke, as the joke was already dead when Bob didn't get it.

edited 27th Dec '11 1:40:13 AM by petrie911

Belief or disbelief rests with you.
Yeah, the joke or punchline thing is too fine a split. It is all about wrecking the joke.

edited 27th Dec '11 10:03:29 AM by FastEddie

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Diagonalizing The Matrix
Please see Naming a Trope.

Why do we have a page which advises using the word "trope" as a placeholder?

edited 27th Dec '11 10:59:47 AM by TripleElation

Pretentious quote || In-joke from fandom you've never heard of || Shameless self-promotion || Something weird you'll habituate to
We don't, anymore. I pulled a bunch of stuff from it and locked it. Case of the article drifting into contradicting itself without constant oversight.

edited 27th Dec '11 11:13:50 AM by FastEddie

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
33 DragonQuestZ27th Dec 2011 02:03:36 PM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
Explaining a joke means to tell how the joke works. About the only time explaining the context would be also explaining the joke would be something like an association or stereotype (like why a Light Bulb Joke about a certain nationality applies).
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
34 nrjxll27th Dec 2011 04:20:45 PM , Relationship Status: Not war
[up][up]I tend to agree with your changes, but why was it locked?
Also known as Katz
Just popping in to second that it doesn't need a rename. Herculean effort and a lot of confusion for a problem unrelated to the name.
36 DragonQuestZ27th Dec 2011 10:35:18 PM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
People potholing this trope name for things that seem like the trope name, but not the trope definition, is stemming from the trope name.

Then again, I need to check more wicks.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
37 DragonQuestZ27th Dec 2011 11:27:32 PM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
38 Spark928th Dec 2011 01:59:51 AM from Castle Wulfenbach , Relationship Status: Too sexy for my shirt
Gentleman Troper!
Okay, we should probably get a page action crowner in here.
Special trousers. Very heroic.
Really? First let's see if can get a second on the motion.
Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
40 DragonQuestZ28th Dec 2011 09:24:40 AM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
Well I second, but I also ask which actions to propose.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
41 Firebert28th Dec 2011 09:27:01 AM from Somewhere in Illinois
That One Guy
I too support the motion.
[up][up][up] Which motion?
"I even like the idea of a nice man who sees me when I'm sleeping and knows when I'm awake. And that man is Barack Obama." - Bill Maher
43 DragonQuestZ31st Dec 2011 11:42:29 AM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
[up]Making a page action crowner. Something like we do nothing but clean up examples and wicks, or we rename it, or we redefine it, etc.

edited 31st Dec '11 11:42:54 AM by DragonQuestZ

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
44 DragonQuestZ6th Jan 2012 10:04:31 AM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
Page action crowner here. If you can think of another reasonable suggestion to add, please do so.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
45 DragonQuestZ8th Jan 2012 11:41:35 AM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
Bumping for more votes.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
I really think you're making mountains out of molehills here, Z. Cleaning up and/or renaming a few thousand wicks is a lot of work for a harmless joke.

Splitting off "The joke wasn't funny until someone pointed out why its supposed to be funny" has some merit. I'm adding it to the crowner, though I'm not voting it up yet.
47 DragonQuestZ8th Jan 2012 04:44:44 PM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
"I really think you're making mountains out of molehills here, Z. Cleaning up and/or renaming a few thousand wicks is a lot of work for a harmless joke."

How is rampant misuse a harmless joke? Misuse is people getting the trope wrong. That's not a joke. It's showing a trope name is bad.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
48 DragonQuestZ8th Jan 2012 07:03:30 PM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
BTW, the splitting part isn't mutually exclusive to other options (as in we would still clean up the current trope).
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
49 DragonQuestZ10th Jan 2012 11:23:19 AM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
Or that might be a bit confusing. I added a combo option instead. Bumping for more votes.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
50 DragonQuestZ20th Jan 2012 02:03:17 PM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
Okay, it looks like we might be able to do both top options (splitting and redefining), but troper potholes should still be cut regardless.

And even with a redefinition, explaining a term to help set up the joke is not explaining it. Some successful jokes often involve giving a little background.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.

Page Action: Dont Explain The Joke
6th Jan '12 10:01:20 AM
What would be the best way to fix the page?
At issue:
What to do with Dont Explain The Joke, as it's both a pothole magnet, and suffers misuse from those that think any information given about a joke is explaining it, when the trope is actually explaining what the punchline means.

Total posts: 64
1
2
3