main index Narrative
|
Phoenix Wright: I can't walk into court with a ripped suit; I'll look so unprofessional...
Pinkie Pie: You could just go naked like me.
Phoenix: AAGH!! ARE YOU CRAZY!? I'm not gonna show up in court naked!
Pinkie: Why not? Everypony else does it!
In Real Life, we humans are basically the only animals uncomfortable with public nudity; other animals in the world don't share this taboo, and spend the entirety of their lives without ever covering themselves in a shred of clothing. So when a work of fiction uses animals for its core cast of thinking, personified characters, what's an author to do about their underlying, well, nudity?
Now is an important time to define the term "nudity": When we say that a person is "naked", we usually use mean it in a social context, implying that they should Please Put Some Clothes On. Even though the standard for acceptable human attire can vary with each culture, this isn't a standard we hold animals to; we just don't view their nudity as being so objectionable. Maybe it's the coat of fur (or feathers) that partially obscures their genitals already; maybe it's the four-legged posture that makes their unmentionables less visible than those of a bipedal human (especially from the front). So while we may not particularly want to be looking at an animal's family jewels, the omission of them in art is much less noticeable than Barbie Doll Anatomy.
This gets weird with a Half-Dressed Cartoon Animal, since they often do have a concept of nudity. But even that is sort of a mock nudity, since it doesn't make the viewers feel uncomfortable the same way as human nudity would in many cultures.
It can also be due to Conservation of Detail by the author, especially in written media where they have more important things to discuss than informing the audience whether there's "something" visible between an animal's hind legs. But visual media needs frequent, consistent depictions of the characters (human or otherwise) so whether or not an animal is "anatomically correct" can be an important stylistic decision for the artist: Executives and Moral Guardians may object to such anatomical features, but on the other hand, an artist may prefer to show their work rather than deal with complaints that their Animals Lack Attributes.
But things start to get weird when throwing anthropomorphism into the mix. A Talking Animal (speech-impaired or otherwise) and their relatives like the Nearly Normal Animal and Partially Civilized Animal can easily get by without their lack of pants or shirt ever getting questioned. The Civilized Animal and Funny Animal can still get away with being naked, but when the animals are depicted in sufficiently human mantle, a lack of clothes may leave them stranded in Uncanny Valley territory.
When it is deemed "necessary" to clothe animals in some form of attire, artists have a wide range of options at their disposal: open/close all folders
Actual Articles of Clothing Tropes Accessory Wearing Cartoon AnimalAs the nonhuman equivalent of wearing Diamonds in the Buff, the individual is still essentially 'naked' underneath whatever pelt or plumage they naturally possess; but their Amplified Animal Aptitude is conveyed through the use of jewelry or other worn accessories. (Ring Around The Collar and White Gloves can also count.) Similarly, they may be wearing only the equivalent of a fig-leaf or Loin Cloth — the bare minimum necessary to preserve a sense of modesty for the audience if they are Petting Zoo People or Borderline Little Bit Beastly. (This is also a popular visual motif for depicting characters as 'exotic' or 'native' in origin.)
Half-Dressed Cartoon AnimalOne of the most common depictions in Western Animation, the individual is wearing a partial set of clothing — usually just a shirt or coat to cover their upper body while their bottoms, legs, and feet remain bare (unless they wear shoes). Going "topless" with a skirt or pants but no shirt is also an option, like the animal equivalent of a Walking Shirtless Scene.
Barefoot Cartoon AnimalExtending "half-dressed" to "mostly-dressed" results in this: The animal wears a full set of clothing, except retaining their unshod feet. Spat-wearing, but otherwise fully-dressed animals also count as Barefoot Cartoon Animals. When this is the status quo in a setting, the exception becomes known as The One Who Wears Shoes.
Fully Dressed Cartoon AnimalThis is an animal who wears a full set of clothing including footwear (socks and/or shoes). Often averted because a full outfit with shoes and/or socks has a high chance of obscuring what species a particular animal character is. Funny Animals who typically have this form of dress, especially the head-to-toe variant, can be a little unsettling when shown completely naked, but it's not as unsettling as a nude Petting Zoo Person.
Animal Attire Convention Tropes The One Who Wears ShoesWhen being barefoot (whether otherwise fully-dressed, half-dressed, accessory-wearing, or otherwise completely nude) is the status quo in a setting, wearing shoes or socks becomes the exception. Sometimes, this is inverted by having footwear-wearing be the status quo and being barefoot be an exception.Pantsless Males, Fully Dressed FemalesAnother convention applied largely to anthropomorphized animals (Petting Zoo People, Borderline Petting Zoo People, Funny Animals, and even Civilized Animals) is a gender-based Double Standard regarding who is allowed to wear what kinds clothes; for example, requiring females to adhere to a higher standard of dress than the males.Sleepwear and Swimwear ParadoxThis is the tendency for the sleepwear and swimwear of typically completely naked, mostly naked, or partially dressed Funny Animals and CivilizedAnimals to not follow the rules of their everyday dress (or lack of dress). Instead, they appear more fully dressed in their sleepwear and swimwear than in their normal outfits.
Normally Pantsless or Naked Character With a Towel Wrapped Around His/Her WaistThis is a tendency for a typically pantsless, mostly naked, or completely naked animal character to wrap a towel around his/her waist when he/she gets out of the shower or bathtub.Winter Attire Without Pants, Shoes, or BootsFor winter weather, a naked or partially clothed Funny Animal or Civilized Animal would often dress with a hat, scarf, and jacket, but without pants or shoes/boots. They would seem to be dressed for the weather, but logically, they should still be cold because of the lack of shoes/boots and pants.Pantsless or Mostly Naked Character Acting Denuded When NakedThis is when a Half-Dressed Cartoon Animal or, in a few cases, an Accessory Wearing Cartoon Animal reacts to protect his or her modesty when he or she is spotted completely naked. Natural Body Parts as Articles of Clothing Tropes Fur Is ClothingA manner of playing the subject of an animal's "fur coat," feathers (if a bird), or scales for laughs is to treat it as an actual article of clothing. Expect to see Goofy Print Underwear and/or a reaction from the character (see above point) to protect his or her modesty if he or she should be suddenly denuded.
Removable ShellThe turtle and other shelled or carapaced creature equivalent of Fur Is Clothing.Eggshell ClothingOne manner of presenting a child-like demeanor for young animals born from eggs is to preserve their modesty using part of their egg's shell.Ears As a HatThis is when an animal with pinnae (outer ear flaps) doffs his/her ears as if they were a hat.Note: Due to the broad nature of this Super Trope, please limit examples to cases regarding the topic as a whole; examples of averting or playing with individual subtropes may be placed on the respective pages. Examples of The Super Trope as a Whole:New Media
Other Examples That Do Not Fit The Subtropes:Comics
"You know, Donald Duck never wore pants, but when he comes out of the shower, he puts a towel around his waist. I mean, what's that about?" — Chandler, Friends *]]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||