Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / Subtext

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 22nd 2021 at 10:20:58 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Isn't Example As A Thesis supposed to be bad?, started by nuclearneo577 on Jul 31st 2011 at 12:38:36 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
FastEddie MOD Since: Apr, 2004
Dec 1st 2010 at 9:01:43 PM •••

Wow. This used to be a really good article. Now it sucks. Ima fix it and lock it.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty Hide / Show Replies
89.138.95.219 Since: Dec, 1969
Dec 3rd 2010 at 12:04:19 AM •••

Isn't that a bit heavy handed? I'll freely admit I'm biased (I did write some of the previous content) but one person just dictating what goes on a page sounds out of place in a wiki.

p.s. the current text is just two people having a conversation, saying one thing and thinking another, it isn't really subtext.

anonymous738 Since: Apr, 2010
Dec 25th 2010 at 1:01:04 PM •••

It doesn't even look like an article anymore...

Aknorals Since: Oct, 2010
Apr 12th 2011 at 4:35:16 AM •••

Erm, you could have at least made it Woody Allen and Annie Hall so people can actually click on what you're talking about.

muninn Since: Jan, 2001
May 29th 2011 at 10:21:04 PM •••

Can we have the article that actually looks and reads like a wiki article? (ie. not the Annie Hall version)

Now Bloggier than ever before!
Glixinator Since: Feb, 2011
Aug 28th 2011 at 12:12:55 PM •••

I agree, this is a page, but not an article. Fast Eddie, shame on you for vandalizing and locking it, shame. I don't even know what the article used to look like, so double shame. UNLOCK THE DAMN ARTICLE!

edit: Ok, now I've seen it in the edit history, but still, shouldn't it have both an article similar to what you deleted and an execution similar to what you replaced it with, and an examples section?

Edited by Glixinator
Oddstar Since: Jun, 2014
Jul 14th 2015 at 1:45:03 PM •••

Yeah, this really is lame. I agree with Glixinator.

MikuruFan Since: Nov, 2012
Feb 25th 2013 at 6:29:02 PM •••

There should be a list of its subtropes, like Incest Subtext, Homoerotic Subtext, Foe Romance Subtext, etc. or it should be made an index page. Currently, there really is not much content.

Praetyre Since: Oct, 2015
Aug 29th 2010 at 8:38:04 PM •••

Just to satisfy my curiosity.. what is "fandom" vernacular? Pretty much all of humanity can be said to be a fandom of something (even a random Mongolian villager, say, is part of the fandom of Tezhin the Village Throat Singer) and when I think of subtext, I think of hidden meanings within text, not erotic undertones (though that can be one of the hidden meanings) or sodomy.

Hide / Show Replies
flyingferret Since: Sep, 2010
Dec 13th 2010 at 10:23:33 AM •••

The hidden meanings can be sexual. Or not.

BlueIce-Tea Since: Dec, 1969
May 3rd 2010 at 7:46:26 AM •••

This article makes it sound like all subtext is sexual, when really you can have subtext about all sorts of things.

Hide / Show Replies
deltree Since: Jul, 2009
Jun 15th 2010 at 2:18:38 PM •••

Well, you should remember that 'subtext' is an anagram of 'butt sex'

69.181.139.198 Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 26th 2010 at 1:34:41 AM •••

"In a book that has it readers can thrust deepr, harder, into it, going back and forth, through its pages until, they release the hidden subtext."

Wanton Cruelty to the Common Comma, anyone? I like the Subtext, though, so I'll clean this up.

Top