Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
"Add it back"? We never had a page for it in the first place, from what I can tell.
Anyway, spare us the wall of text. This Is A Wiki. You can make the page yourself, if it doesn't go against the The Content Policy and the 5P Circuit.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
I think we did have a page, but it was removed precisely because it violated The Content Policy and the 5P Circuit.
Edit: It has its own thread years ago
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13356748600A95820100&page=1
There was a page (you probably looked for it in a namespace it didn't have prior to the 2nd Google Incident). I know I saw it when it existed.
Also, the work does go against the 5P policy, so its making isn't allowed. This decision was contested in the past to no avail, so contesting it now is a waste of time.
EDIT: Ninja'd!
Edited by MyFinalEdits 135 - 169 - 273 - 191 - 188 - 230 - 300
Ah, okay. I made a URL and it didn't give me a cut-page notice; it acted like it never existed. But I guess it did.
Welp, then you're SOL, OP.
Edited by WarJay77 Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
There was a bit of a discussion in 2016 where Willbyr went over why it wouldn't be brought back, though they mentioned the only way it could be brought back would be as a stub with no examples.
We don't want that kind of pedo shit on our wiki.
Edit: Ninja'd by a lot of people.
Edited by RallyBot2
By my understanding, you can still add entries for the series on trope pages, but you can not link to the page, not even as a redlink, and the entry is otherwise required to follow all other troping rules, including 5P.
Edited by sgamer82
I think WarJay's issue is that the work is actually Kodomo no Jikan; note the typo in the title. Indeed, Main.Kodomo No Jikan and Manga.Kodomo No Jikan are both cut and locked.
Note that this is not a statement over whether or not I personally believe it should have a page; I could write a whole Wall of Text if need be, but I don't feel like being accused of flogging a dead horse like this. Yes, consensus can change (see Syndrome from The Incredibles being upvoted as a Complete Monster years after he was determined not to count), but in this case, it hasn't.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!
^ Yep, that's it. I've never heard of this work before now, so I searched for "Jinkan", not "Jikan".
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Again, OP, you can try to get it back, but there would be no point to it.
I've stated before that I wouldn't mind re-examining some P5-removed works and bringing them back provided their pages were locked and their trope content was strictly limited to examples that didn't mention their prurient content. Kodomo no Jikan is not one of those works. I read most of it back in the day primarily to see what all the fuss was about, and the point I made back in that content discussion thread still stands—whatever good aspects of it there are (and, believe it or not, there are some genuinely noteworthy and positive aspects to the story) are so undermined by the incessant loli fanservice that they're completely neutered. What really sealed the deal for me was [spoilers] the teacher character developing romantic interest in the main girl about 3/4 through, which is the moment I dropped it as it was what I feared would happen. I checked out the final chapter a few months back to satisfy my curiosity, and it ends with them getting married once the girl hits legal age and, thankfully offscreen, consummating the union.
It's not coming back. Period, end of discussion, finis.
I didn't remember seeing them get married, just that they start dating and try but fail to make love. Missing the point aside, can we lock this thread since the discussion won't go anywhere?
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!
^ You may be right; I was skimming so I may have glossed over some details. Regardless, this does need to be closed.
I'm not an idiot, I understand it's a very controversial manga but still... I first started reading it as a part of my quest to witness the most banned content on this world, but what I discovered the was one of the most unapologetic, engrossing stories I've ever read which not only do I believe is probably my favorite Manga now but it helped me cope with my own abuse story as a kid. In my case, it was very ambiguous, there was no violence and my abuser was not that much older than myself, I had always been told that the pain of abuse was instantaneous so as a kid I thought that if it didn't hurt instantly it wasn't abuse. But the pain started to creep up as the years went by and such ambiguousness was compounded with a lot of doubts no one wanted to answer or aknowledge could be asked since it was tabu to question the white and black morality of the situation and just doing it surely meant you were an abuser. But Kodomo No Jinkan asked those questions and slowly I felt I wasn't so alone, in my quest for edgy shit I thought I had become insensitive, but the uncomfortable actions combined with actually caring for the characters made me so uncomfortable I couldn't believe it. Near the end there's an abuse scene that made me angry and disgusted (that was the intention) to levels I didn't thought I was capable of feeling anymore. And the ending is quite controversial for not being ideal to many moral standard (maybe stretching them a bit), but that's kinda the point, when you have been broken you happiest ending will still be a shattered one for the eyes of most people but is one you should strive for instead of giving up because the perfect normal people's ending is unreachable. Also there's a very sick character with PTSD which at the end decides to start dealing with it after avoiding it for so long, it hurt deep inside in a very needed way. I know in appearance it looks bad and most people want it to "tell don't show" but I think of it as medicine, not for your normal headache as it is chemo extreme so I guess is fine if people can't take it, but to be hated after doing so much good it makes me feel alone. So I wanted to ask if we can include it back please, I think it can do a lot of good with people still stuck in between traumas they can't just tell anybody about.