Hi
Opened.
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
Pull. Maybe a side-by-side comparison between a film and their sequel?
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Goku Black
Pull
"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."
Hi
Do any of the Disney sequels that fit this have Rotten Tomatoes ratings?
With or without the third film.
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
^^^ Hunchback II has 30% compared to the original's 74%.
But I'd go with Cinderella and the sequel- 97% drops to 11%
![[nja]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/user_ninja_2074.png "[nja]"){kind=small}
'd, suggestion also works.
Edited by WarJay77 on Feb 7th 2019 at 1:34:56 PM
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
The third one's Audience score is a bit too high for my taste. Also, how come?
Better use the Aladdin franchise as an example. The two sequels have consistently lower-than-fifty scores of both the critics and the audiences.
Spiral out, keep going.
The Unknown
...I like King of Thieves. Also, it's more of a series finale for the show.
I'd use the Hunchback comparison.
Edited by Karxrida on Feb 7th 2019 at 11:33:38 AM
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
"Well, I liked it" is not much of an argument against using it.
The second statement, though, brings a good point: what does count as a sequel? Any full length feature? Do we count Christmas specials? Also, is it Sequelitis of there's only one sequel?
Spiral out, keep going.
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
I like the layout of the image, but doesn't Sequelitis refer to overall series decline? I don't think showing just one sequel is sufficient for that.
Hi
Yeah, it'd be better to go with something that has multiple sequels if possible. Alternately, we could just have Tomatometer ratings of several works and their flopped sequels without all the other information like pictures from the works.
(x8) Wait, WHAT? How in the world does Beauty And The Beast Belles Magical World have a 72% audience rating?
(checks Rotten Tomatoes)
Huh. Apparently, from what I gather, a significant number of positive audience reviews for this movie are actually reviews for the original Beauty and the Beast, and they all seem to be from 2008 or earlier. I guess that, when Rotten Tomatoes was just starting out, a lot of people posted their Beauty and the Beast reviews on the wrong page?
Anyways, I guess my point is that the audience rating is very erroneously skewed, which unfortunately blunts the effectiveness of 8.1 as an illustration of the trope. If we could edit out the audience ratings for the three movies and just show the professional critics' Tomatometer, perhaps it could work... but eh, I'm not too keen on all the blank space...
Checking the page, it seems that Santa Clause (on the main page) is actually a Disney movie.
Maybe just move that picture to this subpage?
Edited by Adept on Feb 8th 2019 at 2:10:07 AM
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
Works for me.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
![[tup]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Thumbs_up_emoticon_3268.png "[thumb up]"){kind=small}
Better than moving Santa Claus to Disney.
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
Clear and concise.
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
Latest suggestion is perfect.
Keet cleanup
The Unknown
I can pretty easily tell that the image is an edited picture with the DVD cover in place of the baby being thrown into a well. Even ignoring that, the cover is really hard to see and it doesn't really convey why is the sequel inferior to the first one.