Follow TV Tropes

Following

Not Tropeworthy: Phallic Weapon

Go To

Deadlock Clock: May 17th 2014 at 11:59:00 PM
spacemarine50 Since: Mar, 2012
#1: Mar 12th 2014 at 2:15:04 AM

Sent this trope through TRS before, but didn't fix the main issue. There are several problems, but the rest can't be dealt with until it's determined if it's tropeworthy (because of People Sit On Chairs). From the description: "Guns, cannons, swords, daggers... they're all penises." Sums it pretty well, not to mention getting into how it's used really and symbolically which adds to the qualifying examples.

needsanewhobby Since: Feb, 2014
#2: Mar 12th 2014 at 3:31:30 AM

Maybe we should have a "lampshades/subversions only" rule on the examples. I've Seen It A Million Times, but I agree this can't turn into every use of a gun ever because that's People Sit On Chairs.

edited 12th Mar '14 3:32:11 AM by needsanewhobby

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#3: Mar 12th 2014 at 4:08:06 AM

It needs to be two things: 1) Actual phallic symbols used as weapons (a dildo sword happens in later chapters of Girly, for example) and 2) discussions/lampshades of the weapons' phallic imagery. Anything else needs to go.

Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#5: Mar 12th 2014 at 5:23:22 AM

[up][up] Wouldn't those be covered by Compensating for Something?

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#6: Mar 12th 2014 at 5:37:31 AM

The "compensating" part is not there for nothing. So no.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#7: Mar 13th 2014 at 1:43:50 PM

Agree with Willbyr. That's the best way to do this. Maybe with a soft split in the middle.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Pig_catapult Hurler of Swine from Knee-deep in Nightmare Fuel Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: You cannot grasp the true form
Hurler of Swine
#9: Apr 12th 2014 at 4:29:36 PM

Given that any weapon longer than it is wide is going to get construed by someone as a phallic symbol (because Everyone Is Jesus in Purgatory and Freud Was Right), we need to have some method of limitation, although I'm undecided on precisely what.

edited 12th Apr '14 4:30:04 PM by Pig_catapult

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#10: Apr 12th 2014 at 4:35:44 PM

Make it In-universe only.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Lakija Lakija from Chicago Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Maxing my social links
Lakija
#11: Apr 12th 2014 at 9:01:15 PM

[up] I agree with that. If the characters in a work perceive some weapon as phallic shaped, then it should count. However, the audience thinking that a weapon is such a shape is highly subjective. People have a tendency to see sexual things everywhere.

Obvious weapons, however, like the Saints Row Dildo Sword, should also be added.

It is what it is.
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#12: Apr 12th 2014 at 9:51:00 PM

I agree, there can be an exception for literal phalic weapons. Maybe with a soft split.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#13: May 14th 2014 at 6:04:34 AM

This thread's gone limp, let's clock it and see if it gets any action.

edited 14th May '14 6:04:40 AM by Willbyr

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#14: May 18th 2014 at 7:32:28 AM

Clock's up; locking up.

Add Post

Total posts: 14
Top