The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

In general the fact that a work has enough tropes in it to make a page about it suggest that it's not porn because porn has no story. And while personal preference of works has been in issue in this thread, what about taste in the porn it self, anything can be porn to somebody.

We are going for intentional porn.

Indeed, paedo junk will condemn a work regardless of the plot. With porn, it seems that significant non-Excuse Plot plot will redeem the story.

edited 12th May '12 12:44:18 PM by SeptimusHeap

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

No one anyone in this thread knows of. I am sure someone somewhere likely has tried. T He system was created to seriously use these rules. Digging into the details of the game only makes it worse. There are a few reviews which bring it too light.

Plus if you want to roleplay there are a whole host of less vile table top options that exclude things like modifiers for anal stretching for adults and children.

Last i checked even having plot does not necessarily redeem a work.

edited 12th May '12 12:29:23 PM by TuefelHundenIV

Who watches the watchmen?

Nobody wants to use FATAL. We just want to make fun of it.

Honestly, if there are pedophiles trying to use FATAL, I'd call it karma in action.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.

Many anons from 4chan have tried. Numerous times.

All of them eventually gave up because it sucked.

edited 12th May '12 12:30:46 PM by Raidouthe21st

We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)

FATAL is unplayable. People only want to make fun of it.

So it is both a crappy system and filled with vile crap. Why keep it. We can make fun of it without giving it press or a presence. Same for some of the other crappy nasty works that have gotten axed.

Who watches the watchmen?

Welp, that settles it: with all that y'all said about this piece of crap, I'm giving it a devilhead.

Now, what should I put down for its disposition...

edited 12th May '12 12:37:03 PM by Komodin

Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.

Perhaps you should open a P5 only thread to decide what you want to do about it? We've all put in our opinions. No one favors leaving it as is.

Ah, excellent idea, mon. It'll be up in a jiffy.

Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.

It was brought up pages ago, but Mysterious Skin is DEFINITELY a movie with Child Molestation as Drama as its main focus, to shed a light on how horrifying it is (the two main teenaged characters/victims are both portrayed as incredibly damaged because of their experiences in different ways). This movie's intention couldn't get farther from titillation. If anyone needs details from me on it, I'd be happy to supply them, but it is most definitely not porn and not "pedoshit".

You can go ahead and PM me the dirt on it, mon.

Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.

Don't cut FATAL! You're going to kill off one of the few sources of laughter this wiki has! Seriously, soon we'll be in a production of Waterworld. We'll have to drink our own interesting articles, sail on a sea of clean, clinical articles, and actually kinda funny articles will be as rare as unicorns.

Admittedly, I might be overreacting.

edited 12th May '12 1:00:48 PM by Bluesunnyday

Blue Pacific, signing off...

You are, and it's not helping.

I just made a thread for Mysterious Skin. It's open for feedback.

"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.

Why "mon", Komodin? I'm a curious girl.

"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer

I was wondering the same thing. Jamaican?

"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.

Cut FATAL. Not because it's pornographic or anything. But because the wiki is supposed to be about celebrating fiction. If the entire page is people bitching about a game they don't like, why does it have a page?

I think "mon" is Cajun-speak, or something.

Good point.

edited 12th May '12 1:19:21 PM by MarqFJA

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.

Don't fret; it's just a Verbal Tic I picked up from some Jamaican friends of mine. We were close, y'know.

edited 12th May '12 1:25:42 PM by Komodin

Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.

I never knew mon was Jamaican!

"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer

I noticed Paladin Of Shadows got flagged rightfully so. When the P5 gets to it if you need any input I read the series as part of familiarization project when I worked for the Libraries.

edited 12th May '12 1:38:12 PM by TuefelHundenIV

Who watches the watchmen?

What's this Battlemamono thing? It seems to be a fanfic spawned from Monster Girl Encyclopedia. Remember when I said that thing was like a species of weeds? The page specifically mentions a type of creature called a "lolimon." I think we can pretty safely cut this one without a whole lot of research, especially since you can't view the actual "work" without getting a membership at the MGU or whatever. I'm certainly not getting a membership there.

edited 12th May '12 2:20:56 PM by Martello

"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.

Well, you can read "chronicles" of the story related to it at a place called [REDACTED]*

. It involves the protagonist having sexual intercourse with the young girl, whatever she actually is, whether it be some plant-girl or something else. All I know, from skimming that first bit, is that it deserves the cut.

edited 12th May '12 2:32:01 PM by BlackDove

... What the fuck.

Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.

Oh, that would explain what I read. Yes, cut it.