The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
That's enough of the "let's dogpile on Martello" for one week, hmm? Let the poor man have some peace. Is it any wonder he's so grumpy when you people will not leave him be?
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.Hey look a distraction.
edited 12th May '12 7:13:18 AM by TuefelHundenIV
Who watches the watchmen?... I was trying to help him avoid getting "dogpiled".
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.Hey look a subject change. How about that local generic issue.
Who watches the watchmen?...Looks like crap.
...Oh, right, you meant "in terms of pornography". Ummmmmm...
...Well, it apparently has problems in how it portrays BDSM...bad start already...
edited 12th May '12 7:22:56 AM by Raidouthe21st
We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)According to the article about it, it's "mommy porn" and "That said, where Stephanie Meyer’s prose is G-rated, James’s is unabashedly explicit. Here, the most racy and alternately corny scenes from the first installment of her softcore porn series."
So... softcore porn with recycled Cinderella plot?
edited 12th May '12 7:25:06 AM by ccoa
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.Well, it is advertised as "Erotic Fiction"...
We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)Hm, someone tagged Nyarko-San. The only reason I can think of for that is the way that Kuuko dresses on occasion. It's not a fanservice heavy show and the primary appeal is how absurd it is, so I can't see what other issues it might have.
As for the way she dresses, she's a girl that looks about 13-14 who occasionally wears a skintight costume with flame markings on it. I don't think the work is intended for older audiences and I can't recall anything approaching explicit or even implicit sex, but then the season is only about half over at this point.
Kichiku Megane has two devilheads, but from what I can tell it doesn't appear to be that bad.
edited 12th May '12 7:25:44 AM by Arha
Sounds boring.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - FighteerAs for the way she dresses, she's a girl that looks about 13-14 who occasionally wears a skintight costume with flame markings on it. I don't think the work is intended for older audiences and I can't recall anything approaching explicit or even implicit sex, but then the season is only about half over at this point.
So basically it is a teenager wearing the equivalent of most superhero costumes? If so, doesn't sound like a problem to me.
edited 12th May '12 7:31:21 AM by Catbert
The Twilight-offspring-whatever thing.
As for Nyarko San, it was flagged by the same person who flagged everything on the recommendation page. Which means it's most likely innocuous.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer^^^ Basically. I think the only issue would be the target demographic. She does look young.
^ Yeah, I was trying to change the subject by providing information on something I know at least a little.
edited 12th May '12 7:31:16 AM by Arha
Nyarko-San is basically a moe Lovecraft parody right?
Unless its fanservice heavy I don't see the problem.
I just read that Daily Beast article on Fifty Shades Of Grey.
I laughed and cringed alternately. It's some of the worst erotic prose I've ever read. Is it really just porn? I think probably it is. Has anyone read the entire book?
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.Let's put it this way, it is literally Twilight fanfiction with the names changed, and reworked into a novel.
Who's masochistic enough to read that?
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - FighteerTo be honest, I don't really care whether or not it's fanfiction-in-all-but-name; I'm more concerned about whether or not it's pornography.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.Middle-aged women who read Twilight and wished that it was more similar to a typical bodice-ripper?
I know it's not absolutely damning, but this SNL skit plays on the book's reputation.
The problem, of course, is that if it's reviewed, it has to be one of those that breaks the exemption, since it's sold in mainstream bookstores, and on Amazon.
edited 12th May '12 9:58:22 AM by BadWolf21
I've seen it suggested as a Mother's Day gift
The child is father to the man —OedipusBeing sold in mainstream bookstores on or Amazon isn't part of the exemption, as far as I know. Amazon sells tons of porn - written, drawn and live-action.
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.How is it sold on book stores? If it's classified as adult material, then that makes it reviewable.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
I'm just trying to avoid him accidentally attracting flames from understandably offended/concerned people, which might lead to an open Flame War derail. I believe that he's trying to be fair despite his dislikes for a large section of the pending-for-review items, which is why I'm said what I said in my previous post.
edited 12th May '12 7:10:05 AM by MarqFJA
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.