Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ExiledFromContinuity / LegalReasons

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Similarly, characters that appeared in Creator/DICEntertainment-produced cartoons based on video games, such as [[WesternAnimation/SuperMarioBros Oogtar and the cavemen]], [[WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog Scratch, Grounder, and Coconuts]][[note]]Though Grounder is based on an existing design from ''VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2'' onward, they were red in the games save one teal one meant as a ShoutOut.[[/note]], [WesternAnimation/SonicTheHedgehogSatAM Sally Acorn and the other Acorn characters]], and even WesternAnimation/{{Captain N|TheGameMaster}} are believed to be banned from appearing in their video game source material due to messy rights issues with the characters (though in the case of Captain N, he wasn't created by Nintendo nor appears in any Nintendo video games whatsoever). This is possibly the reason why they don't appear or get referenced at all in the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, and it also doesn't help that the characters often suffer from mockery by fans. The only official game appearances the Acorn characters and Scratch, Grounder and Coconuts ever made were ''VideoGame/DoctorRobotniksMeanBeanMachine'' and ''VideoGame/SonicSpinball'', as both were essentially MerchandiseDriven fare for the TV shows and developed in the United States.

to:

* Similarly, characters that appeared in Creator/DICEntertainment-produced cartoons based on video games, such as [[WesternAnimation/SuperMarioBros Oogtar and the cavemen]], [[WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog Scratch, Grounder, and Coconuts]][[note]]Though Grounder is based on an existing design from ''VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2'' onward, they were red in the games save one teal one meant as a ShoutOut.[[/note]], [WesternAnimation/SonicTheHedgehogSatAM [[WesternAnimation/SonicTheHedgehogSatAM Sally Acorn and the other Acorn characters]], and even WesternAnimation/{{Captain N|TheGameMaster}} are believed to be banned from appearing in their video game source material due to messy rights issues with the characters (though in the case of Captain N, he wasn't created by Nintendo nor appears in any Nintendo video games whatsoever). This is possibly the reason why they don't appear or get referenced at all in the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, and it also doesn't help that the characters often suffer from mockery by fans. The only official game appearances the Acorn characters and Scratch, Grounder and Coconuts ever made were ''VideoGame/DoctorRobotniksMeanBeanMachine'' and ''VideoGame/SonicSpinball'', as both were essentially MerchandiseDriven fare for the TV shows and developed in the United States.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The SPECTRE fracas in ''Film/JamesBond'' movies is a good non-comics example, and probably the most notorious case in live-action films. The villainous terrorist organization debuted in ''Literature/{{Thunderball}}'', a book written by Creator/IanFleming based on a screenplay he worked on with several other people. One of said people, Kevin [=McClory=], brought him to court in a complicated brouhaha; eventually, it was settled out of court, but the terms prevented SPECTRE from appearing in ''Film/TheSpyWhoLovedMe''. The pre-title sequence of ''Film/ForYourEyesOnly'' shows Bond dropping [[LawyerFriendlyCameo a suspicious-looking bald man]] into a smoke stack [[TakeThat as a way of saying that the series didn't need SPECTRE]]. This is also what led to the Creator/DanielCraig films using the {{Expy}} organization Quantum. This legal battle finally ended on November 15, 2013 when MGM and Danjaq, LLC (the owners of the ''James Bond'' franchise) acquired the rights and interests of the estate of Kevin [=McClory=] (who died in 2006, about ten years after [[http://variety.com/1998/film/news/mclory-makes-official-claims-to-bond-rights-1117478405/ trying to inflate how he much contributed to Bond]]), and the title of the next Bond movie ended up being...''Film/{{SPECTRE}}''.

to:

* The SPECTRE fracas in ''Film/JamesBond'' movies is a good non-comics example, and probably the most notorious case in live-action films. The villainous terrorist organization debuted in ''Literature/{{Thunderball}}'', a book written by Creator/IanFleming based on a screenplay he worked on with several other people. One of said people, Kevin [=McClory=], brought him to court in a complicated brouhaha; eventually, it was settled out of court, but the terms prevented SPECTRE from appearing in ''Film/TheSpyWhoLovedMe''. The pre-title sequence of ''Film/ForYourEyesOnly'' shows Bond dropping [[LawyerFriendlyCameo a suspicious-looking bald man]] into a smoke stack [[TakeThat as a way of saying that the series didn't need SPECTRE]]. This is also what led to the Creator/DanielCraig films using the {{Expy}} organization Quantum. This legal battle finally ended on November 15, 2013 when MGM and Danjaq, LLC (the owners of the ''James Bond'' franchise) acquired the rights and interests of the estate of Kevin [=McClory=] (who died in 2006, about ten years after [[http://variety.com/1998/film/news/mclory-makes-official-claims-to-bond-rights-1117478405/ trying to inflate how he much contributed to Bond]]), and the title of the next Bond movie ended up being...''Film/{{SPECTRE}}''.''Film/{{SPECTRE}}'', with the film revealing that [[HijackedByGanon SPECTRE was the true power behind Quantum]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The SPECTRE fracas in ''Film/JamesBond'' movies is a good non-comics example, and probably the most notorious case in live-action films. The villainous terrorist organization debuted in ''Literature/{{Thunderball}}'', a book written by Creator/IanFleming based on a screenplay he worked on with several other people. One of said people, Kevin [=McClory=], brought him to court in a complicated brouhaha; eventually, it was settled out of court, but the terms prevented SPECTRE from appearing in ''Film/TheSpyWhoLovedMe''. This is also what led to the Creator/DanielCraig films using the {{Expy}} organization Quantum. This legal battle finally ended on November 15, 2013 when MGM and Danjaq, LLC (the owners of the ''James Bond'' franchise) acquired the rights and interests of the estate of Kevin [=McClory=] (who died in 2006, about ten years after [[http://variety.com/1998/film/news/mclory-makes-official-claims-to-bond-rights-1117478405/ trying to inflate how he much contributed to Bond]]), and the title of the next Bond movie ended up being...''Film/{{SPECTRE}}''.

to:

* The SPECTRE fracas in ''Film/JamesBond'' movies is a good non-comics example, and probably the most notorious case in live-action films. The villainous terrorist organization debuted in ''Literature/{{Thunderball}}'', a book written by Creator/IanFleming based on a screenplay he worked on with several other people. One of said people, Kevin [=McClory=], brought him to court in a complicated brouhaha; eventually, it was settled out of court, but the terms prevented SPECTRE from appearing in ''Film/TheSpyWhoLovedMe''. The pre-title sequence of ''Film/ForYourEyesOnly'' shows Bond dropping [[LawyerFriendlyCameo a suspicious-looking bald man]] into a smoke stack [[TakeThat as a way of saying that the series didn't need SPECTRE]]. This is also what led to the Creator/DanielCraig films using the {{Expy}} organization Quantum. This legal battle finally ended on November 15, 2013 when MGM and Danjaq, LLC (the owners of the ''James Bond'' franchise) acquired the rights and interests of the estate of Kevin [=McClory=] (who died in 2006, about ten years after [[http://variety.com/1998/film/news/mclory-makes-official-claims-to-bond-rights-1117478405/ trying to inflate how he much contributed to Bond]]), and the title of the next Bond movie ended up being...''Film/{{SPECTRE}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Thanks to the complex status of VideoGame/{{Strider}} Hiryu, which requires the OK from both Capcom and manga studio Moto Kikaku to be used, he was beyond the grasp of U.S. Gold when they decided to create their [[VideoGame/StriderReturns own sequel]] to the [[VideroGame/StriderArcade original]]. Instead of bothering with that, they simply swapped the sprite's uniform white, named him "Hinjo" and called it a day. This was also the reason he was dropped from the roster in ''VideoGame/MarvelVsCapcom3''. Fortunately, thanks to all the fan support he received, Capcom decided to work things out and he was finally included in ''Ultimate''.

to:

* Thanks to the complex status of VideoGame/{{Strider}} Hiryu, which requires the OK from both Capcom and manga studio Moto Kikaku to be used, he was beyond the grasp of U.S. Gold when they decided to create their [[VideoGame/StriderReturns own sequel]] to the [[VideroGame/StriderArcade [[VideoGame/StriderArcade original]]. Instead of bothering with that, they simply swapped the sprite's uniform white, named him "Hinjo" and called it a day. This was also the reason he was dropped from the roster in ''VideoGame/MarvelVsCapcom3''. Fortunately, thanks to all the fan support he received, Capcom decided to work things out and he was finally included in ''Ultimate''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Similarly, characters that appeared in Creator/DICEntertainment-produced cartoons based on video games, such as [[WesternAnimation/SuperMarioBros Oogtar and the cavemen]], [[WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog Scratch, Grounder, and Coconuts]][[note]]Though Grounder is based on an existing design from ''VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2'' onward, they were red in the games save one teal one meant as a ShoutOut.[[/note]], [[WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM Sally Acorn and the other Acorn characters]], and even WesternAnimation/{{Captain N|TheGameMaster}} are believed to be banned from appearing in their video game source material due to messy rights issues with the characters (though in the case of Captain N, he wasn't created by Nintendo nor appears in any Nintendo video games whatsoever). This is possibly the reason why they don't appear or get referenced at all in the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, and it also doesn't help that the characters often suffer from mockery by fans. The only official game appearances the Acorn characters and Scratch, Grounder and Coconuts ever made were ''VideoGame/DoctorRobotniksMeanBeanMachine'' and ''VideoGame/SonicSpinball'', as both were essentially MerchandiseDriven fare for the TV shows and developed in the United States.
** In the case of the Freedom Fighters and other ''WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM'' characters, this is significantly more vague. The [[ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog Archie Sonic comics]] were heavily based on the cartoon, and long outlived its progenitor, with the cartoon's characters actually surviving the soft reboot (which was caused by former Archie writer Ken Penders somehow gaining the rights to the characters he created in a legal fiasco that is too complex and too idiotic to be worth explaining here). While they didn't transition over to the [[ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogIDW IDW Sonic comics]], all indications are that it's less a legal issue and more to do with SEGA's own mandates for who is allowed to appear.
* When Creator/{{Rare}} was working with Nintendo, originally they planned on making the ''VideoGame/DonkeyKong'', ''VideoGame/BanjoKazooie'', and ''[[VideoGame/ConkersBadFurDay Conker]]'' [=IPs=] take place in the same universe. This is most apparent with ''VideoGame/DiddyKongRacing'', where Diddy Kong, Banjo, and Conker appeared together, and [[AllThereInTheManual the manual]] alluding to off-screen adventures explaining how they knew each other. However when Rare was bought out by [[Creator/XboxGameStudios Microsoft]], they were forced to drop this idea, resulting the Donkey Kong games no longer referencing any other Rare series. This notably impacted the aforementioned ''Diddy Kong Racing''; when it was remade for the Nintendo DS Banjo and Conker were replaced with Tiny Kong and Dixie Kong respectively, while the original N64 version never got a re-release.

to:

* Similarly, characters that appeared in Creator/DICEntertainment-produced cartoons based on video games, such as [[WesternAnimation/SuperMarioBros Oogtar and the cavemen]], [[WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog Scratch, Grounder, and Coconuts]][[note]]Though Grounder is based on an existing design from ''VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2'' onward, they were red in the games save one teal one meant as a ShoutOut.[[/note]], [[WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM [WesternAnimation/SonicTheHedgehogSatAM Sally Acorn and the other Acorn characters]], and even WesternAnimation/{{Captain N|TheGameMaster}} are believed to be banned from appearing in their video game source material due to messy rights issues with the characters (though in the case of Captain N, he wasn't created by Nintendo nor appears in any Nintendo video games whatsoever). This is possibly the reason why they don't appear or get referenced at all in the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, and it also doesn't help that the characters often suffer from mockery by fans. The only official game appearances the Acorn characters and Scratch, Grounder and Coconuts ever made were ''VideoGame/DoctorRobotniksMeanBeanMachine'' and ''VideoGame/SonicSpinball'', as both were essentially MerchandiseDriven fare for the TV shows and developed in the United States.
** In the case of the Freedom Fighters and other ''WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM'' ''WesternAnimation/SonicTheHedgehogSatAM'' characters, this is significantly more vague. The [[ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog Archie Sonic comics]] were heavily based on the cartoon, and long outlived its progenitor, with the cartoon's characters actually surviving the soft reboot (which was SoftReboot caused by former Archie writer Ken Penders somehow gaining the rights to the characters he created in a unrelated legal fiasco that is too complex and too idiotic to be worth explaining here).issues. While they didn't transition over to the [[ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogIDW IDW Sonic comics]], all indications are that it's less a legal issue and more to do with SEGA's own mandates for who is allowed to appear.
* When Creator/{{Rare}} was working with Nintendo, originally they planned on making the ''VideoGame/DonkeyKong'', ''VideoGame/BanjoKazooie'', and ''[[VideoGame/ConkersBadFurDay Conker]]'' [=IPs=] take place in the same universe. This is most apparent with ''VideoGame/DiddyKongRacing'', where Diddy Kong, Banjo, and Conker appeared together, and [[AllThereInTheManual the manual]] alluding to off-screen adventures explaining how they knew each other. However when Rare was bought out by [[Creator/XboxGameStudios Microsoft]], they were forced to drop this idea, resulting the Donkey Kong games no longer referencing any other Rare series. This notably impacted the aforementioned ''Diddy Kong Racing''; when it was remade for the Nintendo DS UsefulNotes/NintendoDS, Banjo and Conker were replaced with Tiny Kong and Dixie Kong respectively, while the original N64 UsefulNotes/Nintendo64 version never got a re-release.



** Surprisingly, Creator/SquareEnix was able to produce a HD remaster for the original game ''and'' retain Deep Jungle, which would be otherwise impossible without cutting the world out. And since some items relating to the controversial world have appeared in ''coded'', it's possible that it's a sign saying that the trope could be [[TheBusCameBack averted one day]].

to:

** %%** Surprisingly, Creator/SquareEnix was able to produce a HD remaster for the original game ''and'' retain Deep Jungle, which would be otherwise impossible without cutting the world out. And since some items relating to the controversial world have appeared in ''coded'', it's possible that it's a sign saying that the trope could be [[TheBusCameBack averted one day]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Webcomic/OnePunchMan'' featured an one-shot antagonist called Goddess Glasses that appeared only on ONE's webcomic due to her design being "borrowed" from another mangaka back then when ONE was still unemployed. Both Murata's manga and the anime replaced her with similar character called Do-S.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the case of the Freedom Fighters and other WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM characters, this is significantly more vague. The [[ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog Archie Sonic comics]] were heavily based on the cartoon, and long outlived its progenitor, with the cartoon's characters actually surviving the soft reboot (which was caused by former Archie writer Ken Penders somehow gaining the rights to the characters he created in a legal fiasco that is too complex and too idiotic to be worth explaining here). While they didn't transition over to the [[ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogIDW IDW Sonic comics]], all indications are that it's less a legal issue and more to do with SEGA's own mandates for who is allowed to appear.

to:

** In the case of the Freedom Fighters and other WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM ''WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM'' characters, this is significantly more vague. The [[ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog Archie Sonic comics]] were heavily based on the cartoon, and long outlived its progenitor, with the cartoon's characters actually surviving the soft reboot (which was caused by former Archie writer Ken Penders somehow gaining the rights to the characters he created in a legal fiasco that is too complex and too idiotic to be worth explaining here). While they didn't transition over to the [[ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogIDW IDW Sonic comics]], all indications are that it's less a legal issue and more to do with SEGA's own mandates for who is allowed to appear.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In the case of the Freedom Fighters and other WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM characters, this is significantly more vague. The [[ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog Archie Sonic comics]] were heavily based on the cartoon, and long outlived its progenitor, with the cartoon's characters actually surviving the soft reboot (which was caused by former Archie writer Ken Penders somehow gaining the rights to the characters he created in a legal fiasco that is too complex and too idiotic to be worth explaining here). While they didn't transition over to the [[ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogIDW IDW Sonic comics]], all indications are that it's less a legal issue and more to do with SEGA's own mandates for who is allowed to appear.

Added: 645

Changed: 651

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Want to see the characters that only appear in ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaCDIGames'' appear in future games in the ''Franchise/TheLegendOfZelda'' series from Creator/{{Nintendo}}? Dream on. The games are property of Philips, not Nintendo, and the characters that were created strictly for the games (such as Gwonam from ''Link: The Faces of Evil'' and Duke Onkled from ''Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon'') are Philips' property. Of course, the games themselves [[CanonDiscontinuity are considered nonexistent]] by Nintendo, so the chances of ''anything'' pertaining to the CD-i games appearing in Nintendo's official canon, even if the legal problems weren't in play, are slim.

to:

* ''Franchise/TheLegendOfZelda'':
**
Want to see the characters that only appear in ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaCDIGames'' appear in future games in the ''Franchise/TheLegendOfZelda'' series from Creator/{{Nintendo}}? Dream on. The games are property of Philips, not Nintendo, and the characters that were created strictly for the games (such as Gwonam from ''Link: The Faces of Evil'' and Duke Onkled from ''Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon'') are Philips' property. Of course, the games themselves [[CanonDiscontinuity are considered nonexistent]] by Nintendo, so the chances of ''anything'' pertaining to the CD-i games appearing in Nintendo's official canon, even if the legal problems weren't in play, are slim.



** Also affected by this is the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, as none of the characters from the CD-i games or King Harkinian make any appearances in that series, nor are there any trophies, stickers or chronicles pertaining to either of them.

to:

** Also affected by this is the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, as none of the characters from the CD-i games or King Harkinian make any appearances in that series, nor are there any trophies, spirits, stickers or chronicles pertaining to either of them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* Similarly, characters that appeared in Creator/DICEntertainment-produced cartoons based on video games, such as [[WesternAnimation/SuperMarioBros Oogtar and the cavemen]], [[WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog Scratch, Grounder, and Coconuts]][[note]]Though Grounder is based on an existing design from ''VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2'' onward, they were red in the games save one teal one meant as a ShoutOut.[[/note]], [[WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM Sally Acorn and the other Acorn characters]], and even WesternAnimation/{{Captain N|TheGameMaster}} are believed to be banned from appearing in their video game source material due to messy rights issues with the characters (though in the case of Captain N, he wasn't created by Nintendo nor appears in any Nintendo video games whatsoever). This is possibly the reason why they don't appear or get referenced at all in the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, and it also doesn't help that the characters often suffer from SnarkBait by fans. The only official game appearances the Acorn characters and Scratch, Grounder and Coconuts ever made were ''VideoGame/DoctorRobotniksMeanBeanMachine'' and ''VideoGame/SonicSpinball'', as both were essentially MerchandiseDriven fare for the TV shows and developed in the United States.

to:

* Similarly, characters that appeared in Creator/DICEntertainment-produced cartoons based on video games, such as [[WesternAnimation/SuperMarioBros Oogtar and the cavemen]], [[WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog Scratch, Grounder, and Coconuts]][[note]]Though Grounder is based on an existing design from ''VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2'' onward, they were red in the games save one teal one meant as a ShoutOut.[[/note]], [[WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM Sally Acorn and the other Acorn characters]], and even WesternAnimation/{{Captain N|TheGameMaster}} are believed to be banned from appearing in their video game source material due to messy rights issues with the characters (though in the case of Captain N, he wasn't created by Nintendo nor appears in any Nintendo video games whatsoever). This is possibly the reason why they don't appear or get referenced at all in the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, and it also doesn't help that the characters often suffer from SnarkBait mockery by fans. The only official game appearances the Acorn characters and Scratch, Grounder and Coconuts ever made were ''VideoGame/DoctorRobotniksMeanBeanMachine'' and ''VideoGame/SonicSpinball'', as both were essentially MerchandiseDriven fare for the TV shows and developed in the United States.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Want to see the characters that only appear in ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaCDIGames'' appear in future games in the ''Franchise/TheLegendOfZelda'' series from Creator/{{Nintendo}}? In your dreams. The games are property of Philips, not Nintendo, and the characters that were created strictly for the games (such as Gwonam from ''Link: The Faces of Evil'' and Duke Onkled from ''Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon'') are Philips' property. Of course, the games themselves [[CanonDiscontinuity are considered nonexistent]] by Nintendo, so the chances of ''anything'' pertaining to the CD-i games appearing in Nintendo's official canon, even if the legal problems weren't in play, are slim.

to:

* Want to see the characters that only appear in ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaCDIGames'' appear in future games in the ''Franchise/TheLegendOfZelda'' series from Creator/{{Nintendo}}? In your dreams.Dream on. The games are property of Philips, not Nintendo, and the characters that were created strictly for the games (such as Gwonam from ''Link: The Faces of Evil'' and Duke Onkled from ''Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon'') are Philips' property. Of course, the games themselves [[CanonDiscontinuity are considered nonexistent]] by Nintendo, so the chances of ''anything'' pertaining to the CD-i games appearing in Nintendo's official canon, even if the legal problems weren't in play, are slim.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Want to see the characters that only appear in ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaCDIGames'' appear in future games in the ''Franchise/TheLegendOfZelda'' series from Creator/{{Nintendo}}? It's all in your dreams, because it's highly unlikely that will happen. The games are property of Philips, not Nintendo, and the characters that were created strictly for the games (such as Gwonam from ''Link: The Faces of Evil'' and Duke Onkled from ''Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon'') are Philips' property. Of course, the games themselves [[CanonDiscontinuity are considered nonexistent]] by Nintendo, so the chances of ''anything'' pertaining to the CD-i games appearing in Nintendo's official canon, even if the legal problems weren't in play, are slim.

to:

* Want to see the characters that only appear in ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaCDIGames'' appear in future games in the ''Franchise/TheLegendOfZelda'' series from Creator/{{Nintendo}}? It's all in In your dreams, because it's highly unlikely that will happen.dreams. The games are property of Philips, not Nintendo, and the characters that were created strictly for the games (such as Gwonam from ''Link: The Faces of Evil'' and Duke Onkled from ''Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon'') are Philips' property. Of course, the games themselves [[CanonDiscontinuity are considered nonexistent]] by Nintendo, so the chances of ''anything'' pertaining to the CD-i games appearing in Nintendo's official canon, even if the legal problems weren't in play, are slim.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
d


* Want to see the characters that only appear in ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaCDIGames'' appear in future games in the ''Franchise/TheLegendOfZelda'' series from Creator/{{Nintendo}}? Keep dreaming because it's highly unlikely that will happen. The games are property of Philips, not Nintendo, and the characters that were created strictly for the games (such as Gwonam from ''Link: The Faces of Evil'' and Duke Onkled from ''Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon'') are Philips' property. Of course, the games themselves [[CanonDiscontinuity are considered nonexistent]] by Nintendo, so the chances of ''anything'' pertaining to the CD-i games appearing in Nintendo's official canon, even if the legal problems weren't in play, are slim.

to:

* Want to see the characters that only appear in ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaCDIGames'' appear in future games in the ''Franchise/TheLegendOfZelda'' series from Creator/{{Nintendo}}? Keep dreaming Creator/{{Nintendo}}? It's all in your dreams, because it's highly unlikely that will happen. The games are property of Philips, not Nintendo, and the characters that were created strictly for the games (such as Gwonam from ''Link: The Faces of Evil'' and Duke Onkled from ''Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon'') are Philips' property. Of course, the games themselves [[CanonDiscontinuity are considered nonexistent]] by Nintendo, so the chances of ''anything'' pertaining to the CD-i games appearing in Nintendo's official canon, even if the legal problems weren't in play, are slim.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Thanks to the complex status of VideoGame/{{Strider}} Hiryu, which requires the OK from both Capcom and manga studio Moto Kikaku to be used, he was beyond the grasp of U.S. Gold when they decided to create their own sequel to the original. Instead of bothering with that, they simply swapped the sprite's uniform white, named him "Hinjo" and called it a day. This was also the reason he was dropped from the roster in ''VideoGame/MarvelVsCapcom3''. Fortunately, thanks to all the fan support he received, Capcom decided to work things out and he was finally included in ''Ultimate''.

to:

* Thanks to the complex status of VideoGame/{{Strider}} Hiryu, which requires the OK from both Capcom and manga studio Moto Kikaku to be used, he was beyond the grasp of U.S. Gold when they decided to create their [[VideoGame/StriderReturns own sequel sequel]] to the original.[[VideroGame/StriderArcade original]]. Instead of bothering with that, they simply swapped the sprite's uniform white, named him "Hinjo" and called it a day. This was also the reason he was dropped from the roster in ''VideoGame/MarvelVsCapcom3''. Fortunately, thanks to all the fan support he received, Capcom decided to work things out and he was finally included in ''Ultimate''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Similarly, characters that appeared in Creator/DICEntertainment-produced cartoons based on video games, such as [[WesternAnimation/SuperMarioBros Oogtar and the cavemen]], [[WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog Scratch, Grounder, and Coconuts]][[note]]Though Grounder is based on an existing design from ''Sonic 2'' onward, they were red in the games save one teal one meant as a ShoutOut.[[/note]], [[WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM Sally Acorn and the other Acorn characters]], and even [[WesternAnimation/CaptainNTheGameMaster Captain N]] are believed to be banned from appearing in their video game source material due to messy rights issues with the characters (though in the case of Captain N, he wasn't created by Nintendo nor appears in any Nintendo video games whatsoever). This is possibly the reason why they don't appear or get referenced at all in the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, and it also doesn't help that the characters often suffer from SnarkBait by fans. The only official game appearances the Acorn characters and Scratch, Grounder and Coconuts ever made were ''VideoGame/DoctorRobotniksMeanBeanMachine'' and ''VideoGame/SonicSpinball'', as both were essentially MerchandiseDriven fare for the TV shows and developed in the United States.

to:

* Similarly, characters that appeared in Creator/DICEntertainment-produced cartoons based on video games, such as [[WesternAnimation/SuperMarioBros Oogtar and the cavemen]], [[WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog Scratch, Grounder, and Coconuts]][[note]]Though Grounder is based on an existing design from ''Sonic 2'' ''VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog2'' onward, they were red in the games save one teal one meant as a ShoutOut.[[/note]], [[WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM Sally Acorn and the other Acorn characters]], and even [[WesternAnimation/CaptainNTheGameMaster Captain N]] WesternAnimation/{{Captain N|TheGameMaster}} are believed to be banned from appearing in their video game source material due to messy rights issues with the characters (though in the case of Captain N, he wasn't created by Nintendo nor appears in any Nintendo video games whatsoever). This is possibly the reason why they don't appear or get referenced at all in the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, and it also doesn't help that the characters often suffer from SnarkBait by fans. The only official game appearances the Acorn characters and Scratch, Grounder and Coconuts ever made were ''VideoGame/DoctorRobotniksMeanBeanMachine'' and ''VideoGame/SonicSpinball'', as both were essentially MerchandiseDriven fare for the TV shows and developed in the United States.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Franchise/KingdomHearts'' itself is entirely absent from [[Ride/DisneyThemeParks Disneyland and Disneyworld]]. While Disney owns the rights to all ''Kingdom Hearts'' characters, they're still not included for a few reasons: [[PopCulturalOsmosisFailure a good number of people wouldn't know who the characters are]], the few that do know probably wouldn't care, and Disney doesn't want to run afoul of any licensing issues that might come up with Square Enix. Sora could be seen in the parks back when [[VideoGame/KingdomHeartsI the first game]] came out, but [[http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/disney/images/4/47/Sora_DLP.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20111030182254 the costume]] [[UncannyValley left much to be desired]]. The Mitsukoshi store at Epcot's Japan pavilion carries some ''Kingdom Hearts'' merchandise, but that's about it.

to:

* ''Franchise/KingdomHearts'' itself is entirely absent from [[Ride/DisneyThemeParks Disneyland and Disneyworld]]. While Disney owns the rights to all ''Kingdom Hearts'' characters, they're still not included for a few reasons: [[PopCulturalOsmosisFailure a good number of people wouldn't know who the characters are]], the few that do know probably wouldn't care, and Disney doesn't want to run afoul of any licensing issues that might come up with Square Enix.Creator/SquareEnix. Sora could be seen in the parks back when [[VideoGame/KingdomHeartsI the first game]] came out, but [[http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/disney/images/4/47/Sora_DLP.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20111030182254 the costume]] [[UncannyValley left much to be desired]]. The Mitsukoshi store at Epcot's Japan pavilion carries some ''Kingdom Hearts'' merchandise, but that's about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Disney was unable to reuse Bowser from the ''Franchise/SuperMarioBros'' franchise in the ''Disney/WreckItRalph'' sequel ''Disney/RalphBreaksTheInternet'', whilst once again omitting Mario from the feature after having previously cut him from ''Wreck-it Ralph'', after the ''Super Mario Bros.'' franchise's movie rights were acquired by Creator/{{Universal}} Studios almost a year before its release. To make up for their absence, an EasterEgg was added to where the background of Spamley's shack has yellow question mark blocks hidden in a stash full of game items. It should be noted that Creator/{{Nintendo}} ''did'' give Disney permission to use Mario in ''Wreck-it Ralph'', but the filmmakers didn't know where to fit him without turning the whole movie into a full-blown ''Mario'' adaptation. On the flip side, [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic and Dr. Eggman]], both of whom appeared in the previous film and whose [[Film/SonicTheHedgehog2020 movie rights]] were tied up with Creator/{{Paramount}}, were allowed to appear in ''Ralph Breaks the Internet'' at Paramount's blessing.

to:

* Disney was unable to reuse Bowser from the ''Franchise/SuperMarioBros'' franchise in the ''Disney/WreckItRalph'' ''WesternAnimation/WreckItRalph'' sequel ''Disney/RalphBreaksTheInternet'', ''WesternAnimation/RalphBreaksTheInternet'', whilst once again omitting Mario from the feature after having previously cut him from ''Wreck-it Ralph'', after the ''Super Mario Bros.'' franchise's movie rights were acquired by Creator/{{Universal}} Studios almost a year before its release. To make up for their absence, an EasterEgg was added to where the background of Spamley's shack has yellow question mark blocks hidden in a stash full of game items. It should be noted that Creator/{{Nintendo}} ''did'' give Disney permission to use Mario in ''Wreck-it Ralph'', but the filmmakers didn't know where to fit him without turning the whole movie into a full-blown ''Mario'' adaptation. On the flip side, [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic and Dr. Eggman]], both of whom appeared in the previous film and whose [[Film/SonicTheHedgehog2020 movie rights]] were tied up with Creator/{{Paramount}}, were allowed to appear in ''Ralph Breaks the Internet'' at Paramount's blessing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The Mewtwo featured in ''Anime/PokemonTheFirstMovie'' is owned by the estate of the movie's screenwriter, Creator/TakeshiShudo (despite The Pokémon Company owning the concept of Mewtwo). This is why the much-maligned ''Anime/PokemonGenesectAndTheLegendAwakened'' created a different, [[SuspiciouslySimilarSubstitute if very similar]] Mewtwo, and why [[Anime/MewtwoStrikesBackEvolution the first movie's CGI remake]] required the permission of Shudo's estate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Disney still has the rights to the film; most likely the reason the world didn't appear in future games is because it wasn't a very popular world.


** Don't expect to see Deep Jungle, the world based on ''Disney/{{Tarzan}}'', ever again in any games past [[VideoGame/KingdomHeartsI the first]], [[CanonDiscontinuity even in the form of flashbacks or recaps]], as Creator/{{Disney}} is unable to secure the ''Literature/{{Tarzan}}'' trademarks from the Creator/EdgarRiceBurroughs estate[[note]]''Tarzan'' and all elements pertaining to it are in the public domain as the copyrights to the novels have expired, but the trademarks to these elements were retained by the Burroughs estate, thus subjecting them to similar restrictions[[/note]].

Added: 591

Changed: 591

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Don't expect to see Deep Jungle, the world based on ''Disney/{{Tarzan}}'', ever again in any ''Franchise/KingdomHearts'' games past [[VideoGame/KingdomHeartsI the first]], [[CanonDiscontinuity even in the form of flashbacks or recaps]], as Creator/{{Disney}} is unable to secure the ''Literature/{{Tarzan}}'' trademarks from the Creator/EdgarRiceBurroughs estate[[note]]''Tarzan'' and all elements pertaining to it are in the public domain as the copyrights to the novels have expired, but the trademarks to these elements were retained by the Burroughs estate, thus subjecting them to similar restrictions[[/note]].

to:

* ''Franchise/KingdomHearts'':
**
Don't expect to see Deep Jungle, the world based on ''Disney/{{Tarzan}}'', ever again in any ''Franchise/KingdomHearts'' games past [[VideoGame/KingdomHeartsI the first]], [[CanonDiscontinuity even in the form of flashbacks or recaps]], as Creator/{{Disney}} is unable to secure the ''Literature/{{Tarzan}}'' trademarks from the Creator/EdgarRiceBurroughs estate[[note]]''Tarzan'' and all elements pertaining to it are in the public domain as the copyrights to the novels have expired, but the trademarks to these elements were retained by the Burroughs estate, thus subjecting them to similar restrictions[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Disney was unable to reuse Bowser from the ''Franchise/SuperMarioBros'' franchise in the ''Disney/WreckItRalph'' sequel ''Disney/RalphBreaksTheInternet'', whilst once again omitting Mario from the feature after having previously cut him from ''Wreck-it Ralph'', after the ''Super Mario Bros.'' franchise's movie rights were acquired by Creator/{{Universal}} Studios almost a year before its release. To make up for their absence, an EasterEgg was added to where the background of Spamley's shack has yellow question mark blocks hidden in a stash full of game items. It should be noted that Creator/{{Nintendo}} ''did'' give Disney permission to use Mario in ''Wreck-it Ralph'', but the filmmakers didn't know where to fit him without turning the whole movie into a full-blown ''Mario'' adaptation. On the flip side, [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic and Dr. Eggman]], both of whom appeared in the previous film and whose [[Film/SonicTheHedgehog2019 movie rights]] were tied up with Creator/{{Paramount}}, were allowed to appear in ''Ralph Breaks the Internet'' at Paramount's blessing.

to:

* Disney was unable to reuse Bowser from the ''Franchise/SuperMarioBros'' franchise in the ''Disney/WreckItRalph'' sequel ''Disney/RalphBreaksTheInternet'', whilst once again omitting Mario from the feature after having previously cut him from ''Wreck-it Ralph'', after the ''Super Mario Bros.'' franchise's movie rights were acquired by Creator/{{Universal}} Studios almost a year before its release. To make up for their absence, an EasterEgg was added to where the background of Spamley's shack has yellow question mark blocks hidden in a stash full of game items. It should be noted that Creator/{{Nintendo}} ''did'' give Disney permission to use Mario in ''Wreck-it Ralph'', but the filmmakers didn't know where to fit him without turning the whole movie into a full-blown ''Mario'' adaptation. On the flip side, [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic and Dr. Eggman]], both of whom appeared in the previous film and whose [[Film/SonicTheHedgehog2019 [[Film/SonicTheHedgehog2020 movie rights]] were tied up with Creator/{{Paramount}}, were allowed to appear in ''Ralph Breaks the Internet'' at Paramount's blessing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* When Creator/{{Rare}} was working with Nintendo, originally they planned on making the ''VideoGame/DonkeyKong'', ''VideoGame/BanjoKazooie'', and ''[[VideoGame/ConkersBadFurDay Conker]]'' [=IPs=] take place in the same universe. This is most apparent with ''VideoGame/DiddyKongRacing'', where Diddy Kong, Banjo, and Conker appeared together, and [[AllThereInTheManual the manual]] alluding to off-screen adventures explaining how they knew each other. However when Rare was bought out by [[Creator/XboxGameStudios Microsoft]], they were forced to drop this idea, resulting the Donkey Kong games no longer referencing any other Rare series. This notably impacted the aforementioned ''Diddy Kong Racing''; when it was remade for the Nintendo DS Banjo and Conker were replaced with Tiny Kong and Dixie Kong respectively, while the original N64 version never got a re-release.

Added: 1159

Removed: 932

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A complicated case in ''VideoGame/PuyoPuyo''; after Compile's bankruptcy, SEGA owns the rights to ''Puyo Puyo'' and seemingly any character that has appeared in those games, but D4 Enterprise owns ''Madou Monogatari'', Puyo Puyo's parent RPG series. This leads to the situation where SEGA can make ''Puyo Puyo'' games and use the characters Compile initially created for those games, but cannot directly reference ''Madou Monogatari''. For example, the character Witch alludes to her grandmother Wish in the SEGA games, but never name drops her due to the copyright situation. Meanwhile D4 Enterprise basically holds the ''Madou Monogatari'' name and presumably the few exclusive characters from the games, but cannot use the characters from the ''Puyo Puyo'' franchise without negotiating with SEGA. SEGA has gotten around this by the use of soft reboots of the franchise, with Compile's characters being transported into other worlds via [[ExcusePlot excuse plots]], while D4 Enterprise and Compile Heart created thinly-veiled Expies of the ''Madou Monogatari'' characters in a parallel universe when making ''Sorcery Saga: Curse of the Great Curry God''.



* A complicated case in ''VideoGame/PuyoPuyo''; after Compile's bankruptcy, Sega owns the rights to Puyo Puyo and seemingly any character that has appeared in those games, but D4 Enterprises owns ''Madou Monogatari'', Puyo Puyo's parent RPG series. This lead to an awkward situation where Sega can make Puyo Puyo games and use the characters Compile initially created (but not the world they come from or any characters related to them that did not make an official ''Puyo'' game appearance before 2000) and D4 can make Madou Monogatari games under the localized name ''Sorcery Saga'' but cannot use the characters from that franchise in their games. Sega has gotten around this by the use of soft reboots of the franchise with Compile's characters being transported into other worlds via [[ExcusePlot excuse plots]] while D4 and Compile Heart created thinly-veiled Expies of the Madou Monogatari characters in a parallel universe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Interestingly, the Magazine/DoctorWhoMagazine comic ''was'' able to get away with using Grace twice (in "The Fallen" and "The Glorious Dead").

to:

*** Interestingly, the Magazine/DoctorWhoMagazine ''Magazine/DoctorWhoMagazine'' comic ''was'' able to get away with using Grace twice (in "The Fallen" and "The Glorious Dead").
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A complicated case in ''VideoGame/PuyoPuyo''; after Compile's bankruptcy, Sega owns the rights to Puyo Puyo and seemingly any character that has appeared in those games, but D4 Enterprises owns ''Madou Monogatari'', Puyo Puyo's parent RPG series. This lead to an awkward situation where Sega can make Puyo Puyo games and use the characters Compile initially created (but not the world they come from or any characters related to them that did not make an official ''Puyo'' game appearance before 2000) and D4 can make Madou Monogatari games under the localized name ''Sorcery Saga'' but cannot use the characters from that franchise in their games. Sega has gotten around this by the use of soft reboots of the franchise with Compile's characters being transported into other worlds via [[ExcusePlot excuse plots]] while D4 and Compile Heart created thinly-veiled Expies of the Madou Monogatari characters in a parallel universe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The SPECTRE fracas in ''Film/JamesBond'' movies is a good non-comics example. The villainous terrorist organization debuted in ''Literature/{{Thunderball}}'', a book written by Creator/IanFleming based on a screenplay he worked on with several other people. One of said people, Kevin [=McClory=], brought him to court in a complicated brouhaha; eventually, it was settled out of court, but the terms prevented SPECTRE from appearing in ''Film/TheSpyWhoLovedMe''. This is also what led to the Creator/DanielCraig films using the {{Expy}} organization Quantum. This legal battle finally ended on November 15, 2013 when MGM and Danjaq, LLC (the owners of the ''James Bond'' franchise) acquired the rights and interests of the estate of Kevin [=McClory=] (who died in 2006, about ten years after [[http://variety.com/1998/film/news/mclory-makes-official-claims-to-bond-rights-1117478405/ trying to inflate how he much contributed to Bond]]), and the title of the next Bond movie ended up being...''Film/{{SPECTRE}}''.

to:

* The SPECTRE fracas in ''Film/JamesBond'' movies is a good non-comics example.example, and probably the most notorious case in live-action films. The villainous terrorist organization debuted in ''Literature/{{Thunderball}}'', a book written by Creator/IanFleming based on a screenplay he worked on with several other people. One of said people, Kevin [=McClory=], brought him to court in a complicated brouhaha; eventually, it was settled out of court, but the terms prevented SPECTRE from appearing in ''Film/TheSpyWhoLovedMe''. This is also what led to the Creator/DanielCraig films using the {{Expy}} organization Quantum. This legal battle finally ended on November 15, 2013 when MGM and Danjaq, LLC (the owners of the ''James Bond'' franchise) acquired the rights and interests of the estate of Kevin [=McClory=] (who died in 2006, about ten years after [[http://variety.com/1998/film/news/mclory-makes-official-claims-to-bond-rights-1117478405/ trying to inflate how he much contributed to Bond]]), and the title of the next Bond movie ended up being...''Film/{{SPECTRE}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A year or so ago, Catalyst Game Labs (the game's current publisher) gained the rights to use the artwork for much of the Unseen... except for Macross based designs, which Harmony Gold still retains control over.

to:

** A year or so ago, In 2012, Catalyst Game Labs (the game's current publisher) gained the rights to use the artwork for much of the Unseen... except for Macross based designs, which Harmony Gold still retains control over. This deal promptly fell through, and which point Catalyst said "screw it, we're done dealing with this shit" and in 2013 it was announce that they were simply going to retcon the appearance of everything in the game who'd original used artwork that was created by anyone who was not FASA, [=FanPro=], or Catalyst Game Labs. They then set about creating new artwork for the Unseens that, while evocative of the old appearances, was created in-house and different enough that it was legally clear.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* For many years, there was an embargo of Franchise/WonderWoman-related characters due to an obscure clause in the licensing agreements that forbade their use in any project wherein they were not featured in a "starring" role. This has meant that the second ComicBook/WonderGirl, Donna Troy, was initially not able to appear in DC's ''WesternAnimation/YoungJustice''. Prior to this, Donna had been barred from appearing in ''WesternAnimation/TeenTitans'' and Wonder Woman was the only ''WesternAnimation/JusticeLeague'' cast member not to appear on ''WesternAnimation/StaticShock''. The Franchise/WonderWoman (and, by extension, Donna Troy and Cassie Sandsmark) embargo was eventually cleared up. Since then, Wonder Woman has appeared in ''WesternAnimation/BatmanTheBraveAndTheBold'', the Cassie Sandsmark version of Wonder Girl joined ''Young Justice'' in Season 2 (though Donna did not), and Donna Troy was featured in the ''WesternAnimation/SuperBestFriendsForever'' shorts.

to:

* For many years, there was an embargo of Franchise/WonderWoman-related characters due to an obscure clause in the licensing agreements that forbade their use in any project wherein they were not featured in a "starring" role. This has meant that the second ComicBook/WonderGirl, Donna Troy, was initially not able to appear in DC's ''WesternAnimation/YoungJustice''. Prior to this, Donna had been barred from appearing in ''WesternAnimation/TeenTitans'' and Wonder Woman was the only ''WesternAnimation/JusticeLeague'' cast member not to appear on ''WesternAnimation/StaticShock''. The Franchise/WonderWoman (and, by extension, Donna Troy and Cassie Sandsmark) embargo was eventually cleared up. Since then, Wonder Woman has appeared in ''WesternAnimation/BatmanTheBraveAndTheBold'', the Cassie Sandsmark version of Wonder Girl joined ''Young Justice'' in Season 2 (though Donna did not), not but did eventually appear in Season 3), and Donna Troy was featured in the ''WesternAnimation/SuperBestFriendsForever'' shorts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Series/DoctorWho'': The new series [[https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/a27269680/doctor-who-daleks-banned/ nearly wasn't able to use the Daleks]] due to difficult negotiations with the estate of Creator/TerryNation, their creator. Although the estate and Creator/TheBBC were eventually able to come to an agreement, the exact details are unknown. However, it was widely believed that part of the agreement was that the Daleks had to have at least one obligatory appearance in any given season of the new series, even if just a cameo appearance as was the case with [[Recap/DoctorWhoS30E16TheWatersOfMars "The Waters of Mars"]] in the 2009 specials and [[Recap/DoctorWhoS32E13TheWeddingOfRiverSong "The Wedding of River Song"]] in Series 6. However, former showrunner Creator/StevenMoffat debunked this not long before leaving the show, and it has been claimed that the Daleks' almost OnceASeason appearances are simply due to their popularity with those working on the show.

to:

** ''Series/DoctorWho'': The new series [[https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/a27269680/doctor-who-daleks-banned/ nearly wasn't able to use the Daleks]] due to difficult negotiations with the estate of Creator/TerryNation, their creator. Although the estate and Creator/TheBBC were eventually able to come to an agreement, the exact details are unknown. However, it was widely believed that part of the agreement was that the Daleks had to have at least one obligatory appearance in any given season of the new series, even if just a cameo appearance as was the case with [[Recap/DoctorWhoS30E16TheWatersOfMars "The Waters of Mars"]] in the 2009 specials and [[Recap/DoctorWhoS32E13TheWeddingOfRiverSong "The Wedding of River Song"]] in Series 6. However, former showrunner Creator/StevenMoffat debunked this not long before leaving the show, and it has been claimed that the Daleks' almost OnceASeason appearances are simply due to their popularity with those working on the show.show and in the fandom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Elements ExiledFromContinuity for legal reasons.
----
[[foldercontrol]]

[[folder:Anime and Manga]]
* ''Anime/GundamBuildFighters'' suffered an unusual version of this. Due to various legal agreements with Japanese TV networks, none of the ''Gundam'' shows that had aired on MBS or TBS within the past five years could be represented in ''Build Fighters'', which covered ''Anime/MobileSuitGundam00''[='s=] second season and [[Anime/Gundam00AWakeningOfTheTrailblazer movie]] as well as ''AGE'' itself. Reportedly, the contract on ''00 Second Season'' ended '''one day before''' the final episode of ''Build Fighters'' aired, which allowed the staff to include [[spoiler:Yuuki[=/=]Meijin turning his damaged Amazing Gundam Exia into a "Repair" version]]. As of the sequel ''Anime/GundamBuildFightersTry'', all licensing issues seem to be resolved, as references to ''AGE'' (namely [[spoiler:Kei Karima using the Vagan Gear SID and a [[Anime/MobileFighterGGundam Gundam Spiegel]] wielding AGE-1 Spallow's combat knife]]) have begun to crop up.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Comic Books]]
* The estates of Siegel & Shuster, original creators of Franchise/{{Superman}}, won a court ruling that the concept of ComicBook/{{Superboy}} belonged to them. This is believed to have led to the death of one character, UsefulNotes/{{the Modern Age|OfComicBooks}} clone ComicBook/{{Superboy|1994}}, and the renaming of another. Even the ''WesternAnimation/LegionOfSuperHeroes'' cartoon, which was ''based on'' the concept of Superboy, instead has a teenage "young Superman" as its star. And the DVD of the '60s Filmation Superman cartoons had the Superboy shorts deleted. A later ruling determined that Kon-El (the '90s clone Superboy) is different enough from the original Superboy ("our" Superman as a teenager) to be used with impunity. Even more, it's since been ruled that Superboy is now owned by DC Comics instead. However, there was the problem of ''Superman'', which started this mess and what many people think is the main reason for The Comicbook/{{New 52}}. Since then, it's been ruled that DC owns Superman and his concepts flat out.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Film — Animated]]
* Disney was unable to reuse Bowser from the ''Franchise/SuperMarioBros'' franchise in the ''Disney/WreckItRalph'' sequel ''Disney/RalphBreaksTheInternet'', whilst once again omitting Mario from the feature after having previously cut him from ''Wreck-it Ralph'', after the ''Super Mario Bros.'' franchise's movie rights were acquired by Creator/{{Universal}} Studios almost a year before its release. To make up for their absence, an EasterEgg was added to where the background of Spamley's shack has yellow question mark blocks hidden in a stash full of game items. It should be noted that Creator/{{Nintendo}} ''did'' give Disney permission to use Mario in ''Wreck-it Ralph'', but the filmmakers didn't know where to fit him without turning the whole movie into a full-blown ''Mario'' adaptation. On the flip side, [[Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog Sonic and Dr. Eggman]], both of whom appeared in the previous film and whose [[Film/SonicTheHedgehog2019 movie rights]] were tied up with Creator/{{Paramount}}, were allowed to appear in ''Ralph Breaks the Internet'' at Paramount's blessing.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Film — Live-Action]]
* The SPECTRE fracas in ''Film/JamesBond'' movies is a good non-comics example. The villainous terrorist organization debuted in ''Literature/{{Thunderball}}'', a book written by Creator/IanFleming based on a screenplay he worked on with several other people. One of said people, Kevin [=McClory=], brought him to court in a complicated brouhaha; eventually, it was settled out of court, but the terms prevented SPECTRE from appearing in ''Film/TheSpyWhoLovedMe''. This is also what led to the Creator/DanielCraig films using the {{Expy}} organization Quantum. This legal battle finally ended on November 15, 2013 when MGM and Danjaq, LLC (the owners of the ''James Bond'' franchise) acquired the rights and interests of the estate of Kevin [=McClory=] (who died in 2006, about ten years after [[http://variety.com/1998/film/news/mclory-makes-official-claims-to-bond-rights-1117478405/ trying to inflate how he much contributed to Bond]]), and the title of the next Bond movie ended up being...''Film/{{SPECTRE}}''.
* The prequel film ''Film/OzTheGreatAndPowerful'' pays homage to many aspects of the 1939 film ''Film/TheWizardOfOz'' due to its widespread popularity. However, ''Oz: The Great and Powerful'' is owned by Creator/{{Disney}}, ''The Wizard of Oz'' was made by [[Creator/MetroGoldwynMayer MGM]] (but owned by Creator/WarnerBros due to a [[ChannelHop complicated distributor change]]), and [[Literature/TheWonderfulWizardOfOz the original novel]] is in the public domain, so Disney could not use elements that originated in the MGM movie like the Ruby Slippers (they were silver in the book), the swirl of the Yellow Brick Road, and even the Wicked Witch of the West's green skin tone (they got around the last one by making it a ''slightly'' different shade of green). This was also the reason why ''Film/ReturnToOz'', Disney's [[DarkerAndEdgier surprisingly dark]] "sequel" to the 1939 film, emphasized characters and concepts from Creator/LFrankBaum's Oz books as opposed to the 1939 film. Baum's public domain characters who aid Dorothy in ''Return'', [[PoorMansSubstitute such as Tik-Tok and Belina the Chicken]], ended up alienating moviegoers who were otherwise familiar with the characters in the 1939 film, who either didn't appear or were [[DemotedToExtra "turned into stone"]] throughout most of the film. The Scarecrow does appear later in the movie,[[note]]the Lion and Tin Man make brief crowd appearances after the climax of the film[[/note]] as do Dorothy's ruby slippers,[[note]]which Disney had to pay MGM to use in the film[[/note]] but the reduced emphasis of many of the characters that appeared in ''The Wizard of Oz'', along with the film's nightmarish tone, caused ''Return to Oz'' to flop and be mostly forgotten among the wave of fantasy films of the 1980s.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Franchises]]
* In ''[[Franchise/TransformersGeneration1 The Transformers]]'', the Jetfire toy was a licensed reissue of the Bandai [[Anime/SuperDimensionFortressMacross VF-1S Valkyrie]] toy, and in [[Comicbook/TheTransformers the comics]] and [[WesternAnimation/TheTransformers the cartoon]], the character was to resemble the toy [[MerchandiseDriven for obvious reasons]]. However, difficulties with one of the entities involved with ''Anime/{{Macross}}''/''Anime/{{Robotech}}'' (It's not clear whether it was Big West, Creator/TatsunokoProduction or Harmony Gold who put their foot down) made it obvious to Creator/{{Hasbro}}, Sunbow and Creator/ToeiAnimation that the character could not be used without a major hassle. Instead, the cartoon featured "[[CaptainErsatz Skyfire]]"... and the comic books used Skyfire but ''called him Jetfire.'' Thanks to the multiversal nature of ''Transformers'' fiction, none of this is a ''problem''--Skyfire and Jetfire are considered AlternateUniverse counterparts who happen to be unusually divergent, and modern depictions tend to feature a "Jetfire" who [[CompositeCharacter combines elements of both]]--but it's still weird.
** Similarly, issues over the ownership of Comicbook/DeathsHead and Circuit Breaker; Marvel ramrodded both into non-''Transformers'' appearances (Circuit Breaker appeared in cameo in ''ComicBook/SecretWarsII'' and Death's Head in an editorial cartoon) before they "officially debuted" in their respective ''Transformers'' comics to ensure that they own the two characters and not Hasbro, meaning that their issues can't be reprinted by IDW Comics. Which in the case of Death's Head means that none of his UK stories ("Galvatron: Wanted Dead or Alive" and "The Legacy of Unicron") can be published in the United States (though both stories did see release via comic shops via importing of the UK published trade paperbacks). Circuit Breaker's situation is more complicated, as the first three [=TPBs=] had to replace her early appearances with text summaries, though apparently IDW was FINALLY able to strike some sort of deal with Marvel to reprint #72-80 in full come the release of volume #5 of their reprint series.
** The Deluxe Insecticons and the Deluxe Vehicles didn't appear in either the cartoon or the comic (though they did appear in the UK comic... [[NoExportForYou despite not being sold in the UK]]). Like with Jetfire, their toys were licensed from another company - in this case Bandai, who were the main competitor of Takara (whom Hasbro collaborated with for ''Transformers'') in Japan. Since including them would mean advertising a competitor's product, they were left out.
* ''Franchise/{{Whoniverse}}'':
** Creator/BigFinish could not use Grace in ''AudioPlay/BigFinishDoctorWho'' audios because the character is partly owned by Creator/{{Universal}}. (They could get her actress to voice different characters.)
*** Nor could BBC Books when they started the Literature/EighthDoctorAdventures, which led to a prologue to ''Vampire Science'' that hastily established the Eighth Doctor knew ''another'' [[{{Expy}} female doctor in San Francisco]].
*** Interestingly, the Magazine/DoctorWhoMagazine comic ''was'' able to get away with using Grace twice (in "The Fallen" and "The Glorious Dead").
*** And she appears in a 50th anniversary comic book series from IDW, ''ComicBook/DoctorWhoPrisonersOfTime''.
** ''Series/DoctorWho'': The new series [[https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/a27269680/doctor-who-daleks-banned/ nearly wasn't able to use the Daleks]] due to difficult negotiations with the estate of Creator/TerryNation, their creator. Although the estate and Creator/TheBBC were eventually able to come to an agreement, the exact details are unknown. However, it was widely believed that part of the agreement was that the Daleks had to have at least one obligatory appearance in any given season of the new series, even if just a cameo appearance as was the case with [[Recap/DoctorWhoS30E16TheWatersOfMars "The Waters of Mars"]] in the 2009 specials and [[Recap/DoctorWhoS32E13TheWeddingOfRiverSong "The Wedding of River Song"]] in Series 6. However, former showrunner Creator/StevenMoffat debunked this not long before leaving the show, and it has been claimed that the Daleks' almost OnceASeason appearances are simply due to their popularity with those working on the show.
%%** In the license agreement with the estate of Creator/TerryNation, the Daleks have to make regular appearances of some sort on the show (and Nation's estate has to be given final approval on any Dalek story) or the estate can exercise a clause allowing them to revoke all rights to the Daleks and shop the creatures around independent of ''Doctor Who''. Speaking of which, the Daleks' cameo in ''Film/LooneyTunesBackInAction'' (2003) [[WhatCouldHaveBeen nearly]] exiled the creatures from the new series (which began in 2005), because Creator/WarnerBros used them without the approval of the estate, which made them very angry to the point of burning bridges with Creator/TheBBC; it wasn't until Creator/SteveMartin (who would only do the movie if there were Daleks cameos) wrote an apology to the estate that the BBC was allowed usage of the Daleks. In retrospect, this helps explain the near-genocide of the Daleks in the Time War as a legal safety net.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Live-Action TV]]
* The embargo on ''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer'' and ''Series/{{Angel}}'' crossovers is a good example of this. When Buffy moved to Creator/{{UPN}}, Angel remained on Creator/TheWB, and until the networks came to agreement a season later, no crossovers could be done. This made things extremely difficult when Buffy wanted to meet and talk to Angel after her resurrection. Neither series could use the other network's character, so the meeting had to take place between Sunnydale and L.A. Additionally, by the time the ''Buffy'' tie-in novels set in season 3 were being released, Wesley had already left for ''Angel'' and that series had the rights to him. None of the season 3 set novels feature Wesley at all, only the episode novelizations do.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Puppet Shows]]
* In the years since the death of Creator/JimHenson, the rights to his various Muppet characters have been divided up among several different companies (key amongst them is Creator/{{Disney}}'s buyout of Franchise/TheMuppets, including the word "Muppet", and the Sesame Street Muppets being granted to Sesame Workshop), which affects modern productions featuring the characters. For example, Kermit the Frog doesn't appear much on ''Series/SesameStreet'' any more, and the characters from ''Series/FraggleRock'' are no longer allowed to be identified as Muppets (Sesame Workshop has a deal with Disney that allows them to continue to refer to their characters as Muppets).
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Tabletop Games]]
* Way back when, Creator/{{FASA}} had obtained a license to use a number of mecha from three anime shows -- ''LightNovel/CrusherJoe'', ''Anime/FangOfTheSunDougram'' and -- yep, you guessed it -- ''Anime/SuperDimensionFortressMacross'' for use in their ''[=BattleDroids=]'' wargame. Never heard of ''[=Battledroids=]''? That's because Creator/GeorgeLucas threatened a lawsuit over the word "Droid". So, the game became ''TabletopGame/BattleTech''. Then, in 1994, [[{{Anime/Robotech}} Harmony Gold]] complained and threatened a lawsuit over use of the ''Macross'' mecha in the game. The problem was that FASA had rights to the miniatures that originally came with the game, which were based on the aforementioned designs. But because of the way they were licensed, FASA did not necessarily have rights to the ''artwork'', which Harmony Gold took them to task over. The battlemechs based on those designs continued to be used (The Warhammer and Marauder are some of the most famous 3025-era battlemechs), but not depicted in images, being dubbed the "Unseen".
** A year or so ago, Catalyst Game Labs (the game's current publisher) gained the rights to use the artwork for much of the Unseen... except for Macross based designs, which Harmony Gold still retains control over.
** Another attempt to bypass problems with the Unseen was the ''Technical Readout: Project Phoenix'', which published updated, original artwork for the designs, using the art style for current-era Battlemechs. The different look is explained in-universe as a simple retooling of production lines to match current Inner Sphere tech standards, letting the new Reseen mechs exist alongside the original Unseen designs in the background and still allowing Reseen designs to be used in the art.
* In ''TabletopGame/{{Deadlands}}'', the town of Gomorra was extensively featured in the spinoff game ''Deadlands: Doomtown''. Unfortunately, all IP for the spinoff game wound up being transferred to AEG and because Gomorra was so heavily tied to the game, any reference to the town became a copyright gray area. Realizing they couldn't write about the town any more, future ''Deadlands'' RPG supplements from Pinnacle explained that there was "[[NoodleIncident the Gomorra Incident]]" resulting in the town getting [[StuffBlowingUp blown sky high]] with nothing left to tell a story about and nobody left to explain what happened.
* In the ''TabletopGame/{{Warhammer}}'' and ''TabletopGame/{{Warhammer 40000}}'' metaseries, Creator/GamesWorkshop ran into some issues with the fifth god of chaos, Malal. Rather than fight John Wagner and Alan Grant for his rights, however, they just dropped Malal entirely and stuck to "the Big Four". Malal has since crept back in as "Malice", who is either a rogue Daemon Prince or a minor deity in the Chaos pantheon depending on which FanWank you subscribe to.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Theme Parks]]
* A Theme Park example: Because of a perpetual licensing agreement Creator/MarvelComics made with Ride/UniversalStudios in 1994, Creator/{{Disney}}, Marvel's parent company since 2010, is not allowed to build anything Marvel-related, be it attractions or character experiences, in [[Ride/DisneyThemeParks Walt Disney World]] Resort in Orlando or the Tokyo Disney Resort in Japan (though they are allowed to preview Marvel films or sell Marvel merchandise, albeit without the "Marvel" branding) due to Universal having parks and Marvel attractions in both regions. This meant that while a monorail train themed after ''[[Film/TheAvengers2012 The Avengers]]'' was allowed to travel between the parking lot and the Magic Kingdom gate, it couldn't go to Epcot since it would entail actually entering the park. Averted with Disney's other resorts, in which they are free to build Marvel attractions whenever they please[[note]]In California, the Universal deal originally extended to their Hollywood park as well, but after the disastrous ''Spider Man Rocks'' and a licensing dispute between Marvel and Universal, the Hollywood rights reverted to Marvel in 2008, just a year before Disney acquired the company[[/note]].
* Ironically, Universal themselves got into a similar mess after acquiring Creator/DreamWorksAnimation in 2016. Since [=DreamWorks=] and The Rudolph Company licensed the 1964 likeness of ''WesternAnimation/RudolphTheRedNosedReindeer'' to Ride/SeaWorld months before Universal purchased the studio, Universal is unable to use the character or its related elements in their Orlando or Hollywood parks, where [=SeaWorld=] also has a presence. They ''can'' build ''Rudolph'' experiences in Japan and Singapore, of course, provided that they receive blessings from The Rudolph Company. Additionally, Universal also cannot use the characters in markets where [=DreamWorks=] has pre-acquisition licensing agreements in place, such as Australia, Dubai, Russia and China. On a side note, ''WesternAnimation/{{Madagascar}}'' characters would've ''also'' been banned from the Orlando and Hollywood parks as well... had [=SeaWorld=] [[LaserGuidedKarma chosen to renew its licensing agreement in late 2015]].
* ''Franchise/KingdomHearts'' itself is entirely absent from [[Ride/DisneyThemeParks Disneyland and Disneyworld]]. While Disney owns the rights to all ''Kingdom Hearts'' characters, they're still not included for a few reasons: [[PopCulturalOsmosisFailure a good number of people wouldn't know who the characters are]], the few that do know probably wouldn't care, and Disney doesn't want to run afoul of any licensing issues that might come up with Square Enix. Sora could be seen in the parks back when [[VideoGame/KingdomHeartsI the first game]] came out, but [[http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/disney/images/4/47/Sora_DLP.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20111030182254 the costume]] [[UncannyValley left much to be desired]]. The Mitsukoshi store at Epcot's Japan pavilion carries some ''Kingdom Hearts'' merchandise, but that's about it.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Video Games]]
* Similarly, characters that appeared in Creator/DICEntertainment-produced cartoons based on video games, such as [[WesternAnimation/SuperMarioBros Oogtar and the cavemen]], [[WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog Scratch, Grounder, and Coconuts]][[note]]Though Grounder is based on an existing design from ''Sonic 2'' onward, they were red in the games save one teal one meant as a ShoutOut.[[/note]], [[WesternAnimation/SonicSatAM Sally Acorn and the other Acorn characters]], and even [[WesternAnimation/CaptainNTheGameMaster Captain N]] are believed to be banned from appearing in their video game source material due to messy rights issues with the characters (though in the case of Captain N, he wasn't created by Nintendo nor appears in any Nintendo video games whatsoever). This is possibly the reason why they don't appear or get referenced at all in the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, and it also doesn't help that the characters often suffer from SnarkBait by fans. The only official game appearances the Acorn characters and Scratch, Grounder and Coconuts ever made were ''VideoGame/DoctorRobotniksMeanBeanMachine'' and ''VideoGame/SonicSpinball'', as both were essentially MerchandiseDriven fare for the TV shows and developed in the United States.
* Don't expect to see Deep Jungle, the world based on ''Disney/{{Tarzan}}'', ever again in any ''Franchise/KingdomHearts'' games past [[VideoGame/KingdomHeartsI the first]], [[CanonDiscontinuity even in the form of flashbacks or recaps]], as Creator/{{Disney}} is unable to secure the ''Literature/{{Tarzan}}'' trademarks from the Creator/EdgarRiceBurroughs estate[[note]]''Tarzan'' and all elements pertaining to it are in the public domain as the copyrights to the novels have expired, but the trademarks to these elements were retained by the Burroughs estate, thus subjecting them to similar restrictions[[/note]].
** Surprisingly, Creator/SquareEnix was able to produce a HD remaster for the original game ''and'' retain Deep Jungle, which would be otherwise impossible without cutting the world out. And since some items relating to the controversial world have appeared in ''coded'', it's possible that it's a sign saying that the trope could be [[TheBusCameBack averted one day]].
** Enforced in the games themselves to a certain degree; Disney has strict rules about how the franchises interact. This leads to both TheStationsOfTheCanon (in that the plots of the levels loosely follow the movies they're based on) and an AlienNonInterferenceClause (in that the natives of each world can't be told about other worlds). The rule of thumb seems to be that if you're tied to a particular movie, you're LockedOutOfTheLoop, though some characters get a bit of leeway in this, including [[spoiler: The Beast being a partner during Hollow Bastion]] in ''Kingdom Hearts I'', [[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVII Cloud, Zack]] and [[VideoGame/FinalFantasyX Auron]] being plot-critical in the Colosseum stages in ''1'', ''Birth By Sleep'', and ''2'', [[spoiler: and the TRON level being Hollow Bastion's operating system]] in ''Kingdom Hearts II''.
* Want to see the characters that only appear in ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaCDIGames'' appear in future games in the ''Franchise/TheLegendOfZelda'' series from Creator/{{Nintendo}}? Keep dreaming because it's highly unlikely that will happen. The games are property of Philips, not Nintendo, and the characters that were created strictly for the games (such as Gwonam from ''Link: The Faces of Evil'' and Duke Onkled from ''Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon'') are Philips' property. Of course, the games themselves [[CanonDiscontinuity are considered nonexistent]] by Nintendo, so the chances of ''anything'' pertaining to the CD-i games appearing in Nintendo's official canon, even if the legal problems weren't in play, are slim.
** Another casualty is King Harkinian, who appears in both [[WesternAnimation/TheLegendOfZelda the animated series]] and the CD-i games, but not in any of the Nintendo games. The legal status of said character is unknown since he's in a legal tangle with Philips, Nintendo, and Creator/DHXMedia (successors to Creator/DICEntertainment, the studio who made the animated series), so he is believed to be forbidden from appearing in any ''Zelda'' games.
** Also affected by this is the ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'' series, as none of the characters from the CD-i games or King Harkinian make any appearances in that series, nor are there any trophies, stickers or chronicles pertaining to either of them.
* ''VideoGame/StarTrekOnline'' has this imposed on the game. Because Paramount owns the rights to the movies, they can't use anything from the J.J. Abrams films with the sole exception of mentioning what happened to Spock (as that happened in the Prime universe). To circumvent that, they've created a number of ships based on the ''Narada'' (they did originally identify them ''as'' Narada-class -- presumably, the fact that technically the ''Narada'' was from the Prime Universe made it borderline legally allowable) and the U.S.S. ''Vengeance'' in theme, but not in look. As well, they also can't use the Kzinti and, as such, created the SuspiciouslySimilarSubstitute Ferasan. The whole problem with the J.J. Abrams films was ultimately solved in time for the third expansion, ''Agents of Yesterday'', which allowed players to hop into the "Kelvin Timeline", buddy up with the character 0718 and even get to fly that universe's ''Constitution''-class. It was also ultimately revealed that Paramount had no problems with this -- it was Bad Robot Cryptic had to deal with.
* ''Franchise/StarWars'':
** ''VideoGame/KnightsOfTheOldRepublic'' was originally going to include Vima Sunrider from the ''ComicBook/TalesOfTheJedi'' comic series as a companion character, but legal issues with other companies had since developed over the name "Sunrider" and so Bastila Shan, a new character, was created to replace her. Oddly enough, her mother Nomi Sunrider is still mentioned once in the first game, but the creators said it was an oversight.
** Creator/BioWare ran into this ''again'' with ''VideoGame/StarWarsTheOldRepublic''. The Noeticon (a holocron recorded from several Jedi Masters) had an entry from Nomi Sunrider... but, the rights were an issue. So, they cleverly dodged it by having the character called Nomi Da-Boda, which used the name of a descendant seen in the comics, and was handwaved as being her maiden name.
** And now that ''The Old Republic'' has been relegated to ''Franchise/StarWarsLegends'' (and is the only part of that continuity still in production due to a GrandfatherClause), this makes a trifecta for Creator/BioWare.
* Thanks to the complex status of VideoGame/{{Strider}} Hiryu, which requires the OK from both Capcom and manga studio Moto Kikaku to be used, he was beyond the grasp of U.S. Gold when they decided to create their own sequel to the original. Instead of bothering with that, they simply swapped the sprite's uniform white, named him "Hinjo" and called it a day. This was also the reason he was dropped from the roster in ''VideoGame/MarvelVsCapcom3''. Fortunately, thanks to all the fan support he received, Capcom decided to work things out and he was finally included in ''Ultimate''.
* Video games based on Franchise/TolkiensLegendarium have long faced similar restrictions from two opposite directions, because the licenses to adapt original literature works and {{Creator/Peter Jackson}}'s [[Film/TheLordOfTheRings movies]] were sold to separate studios. On one side were the games unable to use any of the designs, original lines or likeness of actors from the movies (''The Fellowship of the Ring'', ''VideoGame/TheHobbit2003'', ''VideoGame/TheLordOfTheRingsWarOfTheRing'', ''VideoGame/TheLordOfTheRingsOnline''). On the other side were the games unable to include anything from the books that wasn't explicitly referenced on-screen in the movies (''The Two Towers'', ''The Return of the King'', ''VideoGame/TheLordOfTheRingsTheThirdAge'', ''VideoGame/TheBattleForMiddleEarth''). And of course nobody at all has the rights to ''Literature/TheSilmarillion'' and ''Literature/UnfinishedTalesOfNumenorAndMiddleEarth'', placing events and characters exclusive to those books permanently off-limits.
** Eventually, some studios were able to obtain both licenses, allowing for the games ''The Battle for Middle-Earth II'' (and its expansion pack) and ''War in the North'' to combine the likeness of actors and design choices with various elements that were AdaptedOut from the movies. The general consensus is that (quality of the gameplay notwithstanding) this allows for a much more coherent Middle-Earth experience.
** Meanwhile, ''VideoGame/TheLordOfTheRingsOnline'' is still going after seven years, but its license is limited to ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings'' and its Appendices only. Rumours are, even ''Literature/TheHobbit'' material canot be used if it wasn't explicitly mentioned in LOTR as well. This, among other things, prevented the developers from making a proper tie-in to ''Film/TheHobbitAnUnexpectedJourney'' - players had to revisit Bilbo's path in the "present" days of the War of the Ring instead.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Websites]]
* The official Creator/{{Marvel|Comics}} Universe Wiki has a policy forbidding the creation of articles whose content is licensed to Marvel or is no longer owned by Marvel. This means any article based off ''ComicBook/TheTransformers'', ''WesternAnimation/TinyToonAdventures'', Creator/HannaBarbera or ''ComicBook/MarvelStarWars'' comics are forbidden. This could be either due to the Wiki being focused on characters explicitly in the Marvel Universe and created by Marvel, or due to fears of legal issues from the parent companies or artists of said licensed material. This is not the case with Wikia's Marvel Comics Database, which is not owned by Marvel.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Western Animation]]
* When Disney bought the rights to ''WesternAnimation/{{Doug}}'' in 1995, this included all the merchandising rights for the show. As such, Creator/{{Nickelodeon}} is not allowed to use any of the ''Doug'' characters in '90s Nick-related merchandise (however, Nick still owns the broadcasting and video rights for the original version of the show). To make up for it, Disney released a few ''Doug'' t-shirts in the late 2000s around the time Nick started releasing their '90s Nick related merchandise at stores such as Hot Topic and Spencers, but haven't ever since (granted, it's very rare for Disney to release any merchandise based off of their older television shows, and when they do it's normally only shows from the first few years of The Disney Afternoon).
* Don't expect to see Creator/{{Hasbro}}-co-owned Creator/DiscoveryFamily airing the ''WesternAnimation/DungeonsAndDragons'' cartoon anytime soon since Creator/{{Disney}} holds the rights to the series[[note]]Which they got by complete accident; it was part of the Marvel Productions library that Disney bought when they acquired the Fox Family channel in 2001, even though Disney had no interest in it.[[/note]]. Despite popular belief, Hasbro isn't buying the cartoon from Disney, and they're not willing to do so.
* Since the mid-2000s, Nickelodeon rarely acknowledges ''WesternAnimation/KaBlam'' and leaves the show's characters out of all '90s Nick-related merchandise. This is due to Nickelodeon losing ownership of the show's one-shot shorts (mainly rejected Nicktoon pilots) which had their rights reverted back to their original creators, as well as the music rights for the music video segments (Nick still owns the show's "regular" segments, such as ''Life With Loopy'' and ''Prometheus and Bob''). Thus making it difficult for Nick to ever air the show again or release it on DVD without having to make major edits to episodes to remove segments and music they can no longer use. As such, Nick tends to leave the show out of most of their promotional material, most likely as not to overpromote a series they legally can't do too much with anymore. While they finally began to acknowledge the series more around 2016, such as airing the show on [=NickSplat=] now and again, featuring fanart during breaks when the show does air, and showing a Loopy cosplayer's photo during Halloween 2016, the fact that they only have a very limited amount of episodes they can air without major edits makes the possibility of any merchandise extremely slim.
* Creator/LaurenFaust ran into this problem during the creation of ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic''. Turns out Hasbro lost the rights to nearly all of the 1980's ''Franchise/MyLittlePony'' character names (save for Applejack, Spike, and a few ponies whose names were reused for G3), so most of the main cast of the current cartoon ended up being {{Suspiciously Similar Substitute}}s of the originals with the G3 ponies' names. This seems to have improved as Tirek and Scorpan appear in the series, as has The Smooze and Grogar.
* For many years, there was an embargo of Franchise/WonderWoman-related characters due to an obscure clause in the licensing agreements that forbade their use in any project wherein they were not featured in a "starring" role. This has meant that the second ComicBook/WonderGirl, Donna Troy, was initially not able to appear in DC's ''WesternAnimation/YoungJustice''. Prior to this, Donna had been barred from appearing in ''WesternAnimation/TeenTitans'' and Wonder Woman was the only ''WesternAnimation/JusticeLeague'' cast member not to appear on ''WesternAnimation/StaticShock''. The Franchise/WonderWoman (and, by extension, Donna Troy and Cassie Sandsmark) embargo was eventually cleared up. Since then, Wonder Woman has appeared in ''WesternAnimation/BatmanTheBraveAndTheBold'', the Cassie Sandsmark version of Wonder Girl joined ''Young Justice'' in Season 2 (though Donna did not), and Donna Troy was featured in the ''WesternAnimation/SuperBestFriendsForever'' shorts.
[[/folder]]

----

Top