Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Ask the Tropers is for:
- • General questions about the wiki, how it works, and how to do things.
- • Reports of problems with wiki articles, or requests for help with wiki articles.
- • Reports of misbehavior or abuse by other tropers.
Ask the Tropers is not for:
- • Help identifying a trope. See TropeFinder.
- • Help identifying a work. See MediaFinder.
- • Asking if a trope example is valid. See the Trope Talk forum.
- • Proposing new tropes. See TropeLaunchPad.
- • Making bug reports. See QueryBugs.
- • Asking for new wiki features. See QueryWishlist.
- • Chatting with other tropers. See our forums.
- • Reporting problems with advertisements. See this forum topic.
- • Reporting issues on the forums. Send a Holler instead.
Ask the Tropers:
resolved Is Chuuni Chant a thing? Anime
Just wondering if there was a trope called like "chuuni chant" or something where the chuuni character does their little spellcasting series of phrases.
Prime example would be megumin's explosion spellcasting phrases.
resolved What do we do with a Fridge entry that gets a canonical resolution? Literature
Seen examples for both Reign of the Seven Spellblades and Trapped in a Dating Sim: The World of Otome Games is Tough for Mobs, respectively Fridge Logic and Fridge Horror, where there's a preexisting entry on a Fridge page that then got explained away in a later volume.
Should these be deleted with an edit reason to that effect, or treated like WMG where we note there's now a canonical resolution?
Edited by StarSwordresolved Thomas and the Magic Railroad in the wrong namespace (?) Film
Currently, Thomas and the Magic Railroad resides in the Western Animation namespace like the original show. However, I question this. While it makes sense for the original show and the other films to be in the namespace, since they either use claymation/Supermarionation for the early stuff or CGI for the later stuff, Thomas and the Magic Railroad is a unique case as it features real humans in real settings for major chunks of the film, so I wonder if the "film" namespace is better suited for it.
I mean, if Who Framed Roger Rabbit, a film that is more animated than Magic Railroad is in the film namespace for having real humans and stuff, than Magic Railroad probably fits there too. What do you think?
Edited by Tylerbear12resolved Troper removed redlink, want permission to restore
Dark Storm removed a redlink for a voice actor who does not have a creator page yet, Jean Vander Pyl. I had originally created the redlink, which as I understand it is standard TV Tropes policy except in rare circumstances. This occurred on the page for Winsome Witch, and the history for the page is here.
I'm asking permission to revert their change, as I don't want to be accused of an Edit War.
Many thanks.
resolved Historically Disproven = Speculative?
Over in TLP someone mentioned that historical examples that have since been revealed to be wrong or at least inaccurate (i.e. Dated History, in this case the idea that Spartans regularly committed infanticide) is speculative troping and so shouldn't be included at all.
Is that the actual policy?
Edited by Chabal2resolved WMG for a song without a page Music
I just found out that WMG.Youre So Vain Theories exists (because someone mentioned it here) and there are a couple of things I find concerning about this page:
1- It's a WMG page for a song that does not currently have its own page in the wiki.
2- The entire page is dedicated to speculation regarding who the song is addressed at (the song is about bad relationships Carly Simon had and she refuses to disclose which relationships inspired the song). While many are joke theories, I fear this might cross into RL troping territory?
So I wanted to ask, is this allowed? The page dates as back as 2011 (possibly older) so I think it might be a trace of the wild west days, but I'm not sure.
Edited by UchuuFlamencoresolved Peter and Company trope restoration Webcomic
So...after creating Peter & Company (1998), there are select tropes I wish to bring back to the reboot page that got removed two weeks ago, some which bridge the gap between the reboot and its original.
The following tropes I would like permission to put back:
- Adaptational Jerkass: In the 2005 reboot, Chelsea gets turned from being a Cheerful Child with too much of a sweet tooth to a snarky contrarian who dabbles in stalking and bullying for a short period.
- Age Lift: Seth was a kid and an ordinary person in the original comic, while in the 2005 release he's an adult.
- Almighty Janitor: While a rank lower than a guardian, Eddy is basically their fixer and frequently takes care of anyone who might cause them an issue, as demonstrated with his handling of Dr. Victor and Dr. Fritz. Subverted later after the Birthday Party arc reveals that Eddy was actually their leader the entire time.
- Canon Foreigner: Whitney and Tracy enter the cast later on in the comic, with the former serving as Peter's first crush and the latter being included as a Take That! at someone in the author's childhood.
- Continuity Nod: Peter sabotaging Chelsea's sleepover with the worms wasn't the first time he decided to subject her to his antics. Only, unlike in the original continuity where he pelted her and her friends with water balloons, this time it wasn't played for laughs and was done out of boredom rather than playfulness.
If there are any modifications you believe should be made, don't hesitate to ask
I would also like permission to restore certain bits and pieces of mentions of the original comic on this page so that it ties in with the original's page. I'll make sure it doesn't overtake the subject of the current comic but given parts that I wish to add were previously deleted, I would like a consensus before going through with anything.
Edited by Stardust5099resolved "Broken Base" removal for remake? Videogame
Was checking my followed pages and saw a Broken Base entry removed from YMMV.Paper Mario The Thousand Year Door since the remake just released on Switch and thus hasn't passed the six month threshold at this point... despite the entry in question being written exclusively about the original game which is nearly 20 years old. I restored it on that basis, but I do believe the other user could potentially have a point here, so I'd like to ask for second opinions here.
- Broken Base: The overall quality of Chapter 4 is heavily contested. While almost no one will defend the gameplay part, with all its back-and-forth between Twilight Town and the Creepy Steeple, there's the argument of whether or not everything else in the chapter makes up for it. People who like Chapter 4 point to the atmosphere and visuals being some of the best in the game (particularly Twilight Trail), Doopliss being a great villain who provides lots of laughs while also coming dangerously close to ending Mario's adventure, this being the part where the much-lauded Vivian joins your party, and the "end of chapter" twist being an effective Player Punch. On the other hand, detractors are quick to point out how a good story arc doesn't mean anything if the act of playing through it all isn't fun or engaging. All in all, while it's agreed the chapter excels at everything besides the gameplay, whether you think it's good or bad depends on what you consider more important to the experience.
resolved Capitalization of the AIR Visual Novel.
I've seen that some subpages of AIR are inconsistent in the wikiwords. By forcing the auto-disambiguation with a link like Foo.AIR, some of them are Air and others are AIR in all-caps. Additionaly, the title in packaging and marketing is always stylized as AIR. What should I do in the capitalization fix thread? Turn all of the wikiwords of the subpages into Air and add a custom title in all-caps, or turn all wikiwords into all-caps?
Edited by animuacidresolved Daemon10 and ZCE
On this page, Daemon 10 added a few examples with zero context. After I commented them out, they un-commented them out without adding any context to them and added more ZCEs on top. So I sent them a ZCE notifier, and it seems like they listened (because when they uncommented out the examples again, they did add more context to them)...but they then created a characters page for the same work and added ZCEs to that page instead.
resolved Undo edit reverts for Anakin Skywalker page
Greetings. I've noticed that Tuvor reverted a good deal of my edits on Anakin Skywalker's page. Some of them were understandable, but others I don't feel were necessary, such as this one, this one, and this one, to name a few.
Any thoughts on this?
Edited by zakitaroresolved Change of plans: wishing to Launch Peter and Company 1998 Webcomic
After speaking with BoltDMC on the matter, and Amonimus prior to that briefly, I think that my current page is ready enough for it to launch and given that Work Pages Are a Free Launch this was all optional to begin with, but I wanted to make sure that there was atleast some supervision given what a sensitive topic it was.
Do I have the permission of both the community and staff to go through with posting this page? Or do I still have to wait for the hats given that I already made a proposal for it in TLP? Either way, it's fine, I just wish to know if I can bypass the hat system given this is a webcomic page inspite of running it through TLP.
Edited by Stardust5099resolved Transference/Implementation of Appearance folders Print Comic
As dictated by an earlier ATT entry, appearance bars have been culled from character pages that are known to have them. I'd like to propose that instead of culling them full-stop, they get changed into collapsible appearance folders since the original issue was that they cluttered up the page as well as the fact that most other character pages seem to already have appearance folders anyway. The following is an example that's already implemented on a few pages (not by me, they were already present before this proposal)
- XXX Vol 1 #Y-WZ
- XXX Vol 1 #Z-XZZ
- YYY Vol 2 #YY-ZZZ
resolved Does Mystique counts as DracoInLeatherPants Print Comic
Hey guys, a while ago I added X-Men’s Mystique to the Draco in Leather Pants Marvel page of villains who are beloved and forgiven by fans despite their heinous crimes.
Troper Cylon took issue with this as they don’t consider Mystique an abusive mother or sadistic villain even though she has had decades of written to be just that. They removed the example, I put it back, they removed it again. Que the ensuing arguments where even where I provided evidence Cylon would either ignore it or tried justify it or claim it’s bad writing that Mystique was written that way.
I believe same as Magneto, Mystique definitely counts for the trope. What do you guys think?
Edited by Yellow20resolved Is DefectiveDetective jhonsogflint ban evading again?
I'm suspicious about Defective Detective, who only has activity since May 19th. They have the same editing patterns as jhonsogflint, who was discovered in a previous ATT to be a ban evader. Defective Detective often edits and crosswicks on Scarface (1983) just like jhonsogflint used to do. And they are currently adopting and posting TLP drafts about languages: 1, 2. That's the same fixation jhonsogflint had, with many sandboxes about language tropes.
Please check if Defective Detective is a sock.
Edited by animuacidresolved TRS crowner
There is an active crowner for Daddy System at the Trope Repair Shop. Click here if you want to join the discussion.
resolved Revert Edit on "Cursed Princess Club"
Can we revert the most recent edit made to the Cursed Princess Club page? The edit contains extensive spelling and grammar mistakes (...and (in my opinion) it adds a lot of unnecessary cruft to the work description).
(I've privately messaged the editor and confirmed that English is not their primary language. They have been made aware that corrections/ changes will be made to the page.)
(Apologies if this isn't the right venue to request edit reversions - if not, please direct me to the correct forum or thread.)
resolved Irredeemable Exception, below exceptional threshold?
- My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic: Over the show's course, a significant portion of its antagonists are redeemed and brought to the heroes' side or, at least, convinced to drop their antagonism to them. The most notable exceptions to this are Cozy Glow, Queen Chrysalis, Lord Tirek, and King Sombra, half of whom scorn redemption at various points in their personal histories and who all eventually band together to serve as the final season's main villains, where they're eventually defeated for good and turned to stone (or completely vaporized by friendship magic, in the case of King Sombra).
If counting major villains (Luna, Discord, Starlight Glimmer, Stygian, Tempest Shadow and the unredeemed Storm King), that's only 50% redeemed. Counting minor antagonists that 14 to 16 redeemed (2 were a Hazy-Feel Turn) and 34 to 22 (if one discounts those not bad enough to be full villains), so that between 58% to 71% who remained unredeemed.
Does this trope not apply non-redemption is not that uncommon/exceptional? What is the threshold amount/ration to be considered the exception here?
On VestigialEmpire.Real Life, I noticed this was added:
I think this is misuse. Mind if I remove it?
Edited by Siegfried1337