Follow TV Tropes

Following

Misused (needs wicks moved): Accidentally Accurate

Go To

crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#26: Jan 18th 2017 at 2:52:17 PM

Not an inversion

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Getta Since: Apr, 2016
#27: Jan 18th 2017 at 4:49:44 PM

What? People don't want to merge this? Why?

And, well, "successful future forecast" could be a good trope, I think.

"in the former the writers didn't do the research but got the facts right by coincidence, while in the latter they did an extensive research and it shows."

It doesn't have to be extensive. Doing just a bit of fact-checking can count for the trope.

We don't need justice when we can forgive. We don't need tolerance when we can love.
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#28: Jan 19th 2017 at 5:34:54 AM

[up] Yeah, I didn't mean a month-long research. tongue Just proper checking of obscure facts instead of rushing it or making it up. Updated the distinction in the crowner. Still think that a merge would be better, too, if we can't really tell when it's Accidentally Accurate and when it's Shown Their Work without Word of God.

Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#29: Jan 29th 2017 at 11:57:19 AM

Yeah, I can't imagine why people wouldn't want to merge two completely unrelated concepts simply because they can overlap.

Someone in 1897 writing "Man first landed on the moon in 1969" is not a case of Shown Their Work. It's not even close!

edit: typo

edited 29th Jan '17 11:57:42 AM by Xtifr

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#30: Jan 29th 2017 at 1:04:35 PM

I think we're mixing four different tropes here:

  1. Authors who make predictions or simply make up future events and fail (Failed Future Forecast)
  2. Authors who make predictions or simply make up future events and nail it (we don't have a trope for that yet, but examples are being shoehorned in Accidentally Accurate)
  3. Authors who put in obscure facts, didn't do the research and got it right by fluke (what Accidentally Accurate is right now)
  4. Authors who put in obscure facts and did the research, so obviously the facts coincide with reality (Shown Their Work)

I'd like to merge 3 and 4 because the only possible way to tell them apart is through Word of God. Of course [up] wouldn't be part of the merge; that would rather be the trope we don't have yet (2).

edited 29th Jan '17 1:10:13 PM by Gosicrystal

Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#31: Jan 29th 2017 at 1:27:06 PM

Huh. That's not what I got out of reading the description, but it is pretty ambiguous, and on a re-read, I can see how you got that, and maybe even see that as being the original intent.

Honestly, I don't think 3 is even a trope (which may be why it wasn't my initial interpretation). It's the blurry area between 2 and 4. And, of course, since we now have a bunch of examples of 2, the most obvious solution is to broaden the definition to include 2, and keep those examples.

That's how I'd interpret the intent behind the votes so far. (And I do think it needs a rename in any case, to clarify that it's about what writers do, rather than about what characters do.)

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
crazysamaritan NaNo 4328 / 50,000 from Lupin III Since: Apr, 2010
NaNo 4328 / 50,000
#32: Jan 29th 2017 at 2:12:27 PM

3&4 are identical to the following:

5) Authors who put in obscure facts, and got it right (what Shown Their Work is right now)

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#33: Jan 29th 2017 at 2:19:39 PM

I see 2 as the Opposite Trope of Failed Future Forecast, rather than part of 3. Accidentally Accurate could mention it in the "compare/contrast" section.

Getta Since: Apr, 2016
#34: Jan 29th 2017 at 7:51:10 PM

Writers Got It Right would theoretically cover 2 to 4. Perhaps it's too broad then?

I agree that we should have Successful Future Forecast (2). If we were to merge 2 and 3 I'd call it "Writer's Lucky Guess", but I don't think we need to do that.

We don't need justice when we can forgive. We don't need tolerance when we can love.
SeptimusHeap MOD from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#35: Feb 28th 2017 at 11:35:15 AM

Calling page action crowner in favour of rename. Attached an empty alt names crowner; please fill it.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#36: Mar 28th 2017 at 4:29:02 PM

Bumping for votes. The leading option only has six.

Berrenta MOD How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#37: Jun 6th 2017 at 7:23:05 PM

Calling in favor of Accidentally-Correct Writing. Let's get the rename rolling.

edited 6th Jun '17 7:23:19 PM by Berrenta

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#38: Jun 17th 2017 at 6:39:36 AM

Can a moderator please move the contents of Accidentally Accurate to Accidentally-Correct Writing? Then we'll start the wick migration.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#40: Jun 19th 2017 at 9:10:19 AM

Down to 300 wicks. The old page still needs to become a redirect to the new page.

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#41: Jun 19th 2017 at 9:45:20 AM

Going to bring up 1 more problem I see before we close this.

Looking at the examples on the page and more than a few in universe fiction examples like all of the Star Trek The Next Generation examples or Continuity examples that might have just been tidbits of the show's bible such as the CSINY example.

Those in-universe and show bible things IMO are not this and more of a Continuity Porn type thing.

edited 19th Jun '17 10:20:44 AM by Memers

Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#42: Jun 19th 2017 at 9:51:50 AM

[up] Compare Life Imitates Art.

edited 19th Jun '17 9:52:12 AM by Gosicrystal

Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#43: Jun 19th 2017 at 7:09:51 PM

Old location is now a redirect.

Will also cutlist the old laconic and quotes pages.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#44: Jun 21st 2017 at 5:19:54 AM

Under 200 wicks.

By far, the absolute biggest source of misuse is "someone makes a joke that is or becomes real later on", especially in stuff like Web Videos and Let's Plays. I've gathered 25 or so examples; does this merit a TLP?

edited 21st Jun '17 5:21:05 AM by Gosicrystal

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#45: Jun 21st 2017 at 5:36:10 PM

^ I haven't seen those examples but it sounds close to "Funny Aneurysm" Moment.

Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#46: Jun 21st 2017 at 6:03:19 PM

[up] "Funny Aneurysm" Moment is what used to be funny that ends up being painful to remember.

Perhaps it's either I Knew It! or Hilarious in Hindsight?

edited 21st Jun '17 6:03:54 PM by Berrenta

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#47: Jun 22nd 2017 at 5:30:02 AM

Here's a sample of what I mean:

  • Midnight Screenings: In the review for Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales, Brian mentions his confusion over Barbossa having a peg-leg, to which Brad suggests he go to the Pirates wiki, jokingly saying it probably has its own page.
  • Not Always Right:
    • This customer forgets what he's looking for. An employee jokingly asks if he's looking for memory aids, which turns out to be correct.
    • A customer pays for a $70 purchase with 70 single-dollar bills; the cashier jokingly asks if the customer is a stripper, and is surprised by the "yes" answer.
  • In Lucifer (2016), Chloe jokes about Lucifer having Daddy Issues. She's not wrong...
  • Mock the Week:
    • Between Dara and Josh in one episode:
      Dara: What did the Queen invent with a dachshund and a corgi?
      Josh Widdicombe: The dorgi!
      Dara: That's absolutely right.
      Josh: Really?! I was joking!
    • In the 2016 Christmas episode:
      Dara: What might you expect to eat at Christmas in Japan?... A bucket of...
      Nish: Fried chicken?
      Dara: Fried chicken!
      Nish: Is it fried chicken?
      Dara: It's fried chicken.
  • Weird Video Games: In "Rock 'n' Rage", after expressing disbelief at the random weirdness of the first Ancient Egypt level (such as Cleopatra giving you a forcefield powerup) he sarcastically suggests that the next level, Mediaeval Great Britain, will include Dracula as an enemy. It actually turns out to have Nosferatu as an enemy...
  • MAD once did a parody of Cathy called Amy!, which depicted Amy Winehouse hiding drugs in her beehive hairdo. Then someone filmed her pulling a vial of cocaine from her hair, and suddenly it's like, "They knew!".

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
Berrenta How sweet it is from Texas Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Can't buy me love
How sweet it is
#49: Jun 22nd 2017 at 6:33:22 AM

In that case, those can be TLP'd, since we don't have that trope, I don't think.

she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#50: Jun 22nd 2017 at 6:56:39 AM

Well, there's I Was Just Joking, which is close, but that requires a second person to take the first one's joke seriously (and maybe even apply it, if it was a sarcastic suggestion). Our case is the first person just finding out that the universe has made their joke real.

edited 22nd Jun '17 7:00:37 AM by Gosicrystal

PageAction: AccidentallyAccurate
18th Jan '17 9:16:13 AM

Crown Description:

What would be the best way to fix the page?

Total posts: 56
Top