TV Tropes Org

Forums

Projects: Long Term/Perpetual:
P 5 Cleanup pile and lewdness issues
search forum titles
google site search
Total posts: [257]  1 ...  5  6  7  8  9
10
11

P5 Cleanup pile and lewdness issues:

 226 Deboss, Sat, 20th Oct '12 6:11:20 PM from Awesomeville Texas
I see the Awesomeness.
nrjxll, I think it would be better to modify it to Seductive Villainy or some such.
The majority of the examples for Hot Scientist are gonna have to be moved to the discussion page. There's a lot gushing, a lot talking about actors, and zero context examples.

Edit: Hot Scientist is clean. I have to move the majority of the examples to the discussion but it's clean.

edited 10th Nov '12 3:37:47 PM by captainpat

I was looking at The Three Faces of Eve and there are pre-pubescents listed in the "seductress" role in some examples. Can those be cut?

 229 Septimus Heap, Fri, 4th Jan '13 4:24:02 PM from Zurich, Switzerland Relationship Status: Mu
A Wizard boy
Well, if the prepubescent are sexually agressive, they might need a trip to 5P, but otherwise I see no issue. Just remove creepy gushing and shoehorning.

 230 Willbyr, Mon, 28th Jan '13 10:32:02 PM from North Little Rock, AR Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Anime-ted
Per a SE thread that I just closed (and tgoodrich's suggestion), SoBadItsGood.Fan Fic needs a check-over and possible scrubbing of fics that don't meet the content policy.
Should be reviewed: Out with a Bang examples from more than a couple of P5-cut works.

 232 Willbyr, Mon, 4th Feb '13 7:22:25 PM from North Little Rock, AR Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Anime-ted
[up] I cut that down to a general-purpose one-line note about Urotsukidoji and added the hidden tag about it being cut...half of those don't count anyway since no one died.
Pronounced YAK-you-luss
Female Gaze is looking a bit drooly, and has a lot of examples that aren't 'the camera emphasises this character's assets' as much as 'my god this guy is so hot'. Didn't give Male Gaze a look - how's that doing?

edited 5th Feb '13 8:53:25 AM by Iaculus

Freedom of speech includes the freedom for other people to call you out on your bullshit.
 234 Hodor, Wed, 20th Feb '13 8:50:50 AM from Westeros
Cleric of Banjo
Blake Lively seems overall really drooly. I especially question the Celebrity Resemblance entry, but basically wondering about the page as a whole- most of the tropes are about the actress's legs or otherwise commenting on her being physically attractive.
Edit, edit, edit, edit the wiki
 235 Septimus Heap, Wed, 20th Feb '13 8:53:24 AM from Zurich, Switzerland Relationship Status: Mu
A Wizard boy
What is the term used for this in the past? "Masturbatory shrine"? Also, way too many Zero Context Examples there for my liking.

I suggest to trim away all the bad examples, move it to Creator/ and change the page image.

 236 Hodor, Wed, 20th Feb '13 8:54:45 AM from Westeros
Cleric of Banjo
I was going to use the term "one handed editing", but wasn't sure that was true of the page as a whole (although probably a fair characterization of the Celebrity Resemblance entry).
Edit, edit, edit, edit the wiki
 237 lu 127, Wed, 20th Feb '13 9:29:55 AM from the Forest of Thorns Relationship Status: Loves me...loves me not
Mopped the drooling off Blake Lively.
小さく揺れた向日葵
 238 Willbyr, Wed, 20th Feb '13 9:30:20 AM from North Little Rock, AR Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Anime-ted
Lu's edits seem to have fixed the problems with that page. I don't see an issue with the image.
 239 Komodin, Thu, 21st Feb '13 11:50:41 PM from Somewhere in Windy Hill Zone Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
 240 Septimus Heap, Thu, 7th Mar '13 12:30:37 PM from Zurich, Switzerland Relationship Status: Mu
A Wizard boy
I do not agree with mentioning ass size and drooling fan boys on Kim Kardashian. Agree/Disagree?

The Image Links page looks very fishy as well.

I removed the drool-y text. The images linked to are not nudes. Shouldn't be an issue.
Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
 242 Willbyr, Thu, 7th Mar '13 8:12:21 PM from North Little Rock, AR Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Anime-ted
I downsized the pic a bit, the page was forcing a resize.
Teacher/Student Romance might need looked at. I changed up one really gross (Fetish Fuel was mentioned while describing a situation that, in the work, is unambiguously sexual abuse of a teenager) example that I was vaguely familiar with, but it's a long page and I doubt that was the only creepy example.

There are a couple porn/hentai examples on the part of the page I skimmed too, but they're not explicit and don't link to the work so those are left alone, right?

Edit: Is that a page that should have a RL section (let alone multiple)?

edited 26th Mar '13 1:53:57 PM by InsanityPrelude

The RL section doesn't seem to be causing any problems.
Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
No complaints from this end, then.

Pronounced YAK-you-luss
Mentioned it a few months back, but Female Gaze still needs work. I'd do it myself, but frankly, I'm not sure where to start.
Freedom of speech includes the freedom for other people to call you out on your bullshit.
[up] A TRS thread because I have no idea what exactly that trope is supposed to be and there is not a single line in that description that makes that clear.

 248 Septimus Heap, Mon, 29th Jul '13 8:16:25 AM from Zurich, Switzerland Relationship Status: Mu
A Wizard boy
The relevant sentence is: "The Female Gaze is a Gaze trope about the way a work is presented as from a female perspective or reflects female attitudes, either because of the creator's gender or because it is deliberately aimed at a female audience. "

[up] That sounds really vague and somewhat similar to Eating the Eye Candy.

 250 Septimus Heap, Mon, 29th Jul '13 10:33:18 AM from Zurich, Switzerland Relationship Status: Mu
A Wizard boy
Well, Eating the Eye Candy is about the character reaction. Male Gaze and Female Gaze are similar to Viewers Are Morons - it's about how the expected audience reaction affects the work during the production process.

Total posts: 257
 1 ...  5  6  7  8  9
10
11


TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy