The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

You shouldn't have done that without asking anybody. Pages are cut with reasons - restorations should be discussed about, not done unilaterally.

Rgarding the "clean" motion on Child Bride, I assume that the "topless nude" scene and tropes focused on it is the one that needs cleaning/removal, yeah?

I've also asked for the 5P Announcements post to be updated and will tag the discussions now.

As an aside, we don't have worked out a cleanup concept for Fluffy Pony yet.

The things other than Fluffy Pony and Child Bride can be checked off as done here.

Also, aside from repeating the questions from my previous post, are the 5P in agreement with axing the Encyclopedia and Quest redirects from Daily Life with Monster Girl?

I'm fine with giving those redirects the axe.

Ambivalent. If the rest of you have a strong feeling one way or the other that's fine. I'll go with it.

Aye, cut them. Unless anyone has any better suggestions of where to point them, I think we just need to accept the lost inbounds.

I think that this... thing might need a look. The page says it's mostly plot-based, but, uh, well...

Crossposting to announce that the Monster Girl Quest/Encyclopedia redirects have been axed. I'll reference the decisions.

Find something else to write about. We are not interested in giving you a step-by-step guide on how to write pedo-porn without getting busted for it.

In fact, fuck it. You're out of here.

Hi guys, remember Yoshizilla Rhedosaurus? We've got him (or someone like him) in webcomic form now! Fun!

I flagged Sonic Girls because the page was attracting some heat on Ask The Tropers (partly because the page itself appears to have been written one-handed, partly because it was strafed by a vandal).

Either way, the page has an assload of problems as a page, but I don't know if the work is kosher or not.

edited 9th Jul '14 10:31:19 PM by Ramidel

Yeah, I think we'd be better off without that work page. Like I said in its discussion page, it, along with the work, comes off as rather skeevy with its whole "farting" thing. There seems to be no other point to it but that—basically, it's porn for fart fetishists.

I don't mind. I was just trying (unsuccessfully) to pre-empt a rogue cutlisting and have it dealt with properly.

edited 10th Jul '14 7:35:49 AM by Ramidel

RE: Fluffy Ponies. I don't wanna touch this with a ten-foot pole but most of the torture and Gorn tropes in that articles aren't sexualized violence. So, I don't know if they can be cut on that ground.

Other than that, the False Rape Accusation entry can go. So can all the references to bowels, feces e.t.c.

I've just gone and made Horny Devils 2 to alphabetize and namespace everything on Horny Devils, as well as making workpage links (it's preferred for each work example to link to its work page, even if it doesn't exist, since someone may come and make a page there). Now, this has made a lot of red links, and while they aren't in and of themselves a problem, some of them may be works that we should not have pages about. Can someone check that?

Also, Chintsubu, Hooker Verse and Sonic Girls still need resolution (OK, technically, the latter was already cut - the vote is now only about whether to permanently forbid restoration).

Already voted on Sonic Girls. Haven't finished looking over Chintsubu but based on what I have seen so far, I'm getting more of an Oglaf sort of vibe than a porn one.

Anyone else with opinions on Sandbox.Horny Devils 2? It's a namespaced, alphabetized page with all examples linking to their work titles. My only worry is that some red links may be better off as not links.

Don't make the redlinks if you're not making the page. I think that's the usual rule?

Also, I'm surprised. That image is red-hot.

edited 17th Jul '14 2:24:59 PM by Ramidel

No, the usual rule is that examples should link to their works, even if they don't have a work page yet, since someone may make a page for it. The reason why I am bringing that up here is because works that shouldn't have pages here should not be linked.

Hello, everyone. Long time no see and all that.

We just got two new flags, one of them before this trope: All The Rapists Are Muggles — "This is a troll page copying an actual trope under a new trolly title."

... Okay, normally I'd zap this due to not being a P5 issue per se, but I'll leave it alone because I'm a little confused here. What's the original trope that this is supposedly copying? What is supposed to be about in the first place?

..It's not a copy. It's just a Pen Island thing - All Therapists Are Muggles has the same camelcase as All The Rapists Are Muggles.

Checking history shows that some guy has added Don't confuse this with "All The Rapists Are Muggles". to the page yesterday.

edited 18th Jul '14 4:26:30 AM by Adannor

It was launched by ~Star Valkyrie and orobably reported by ~StarSword. Can't check more from the phone.

... Oh, duh. I'll just zap the flag and inform the troper, then.

Star Sword? I'm not seeing anybody like that in the history. I think Star Valkyrie, the one who deleted the joke from the page, has probably reported it. I PM'd them.

The Problem with Pen Island, mate.