Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

ThePope Since: Oct, 2010
#1126: May 1st 2015 at 1:07:58 PM

So can we go ahead and lock/act on all of the threads currently deadclocking?

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#1127: Jun 10th 2015 at 8:39:12 PM

Is there any reason why my thread here hasnt been opened?

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1128: Jun 11th 2015 at 6:52:52 AM

[up] I was hoping for some feedback in the hollers feed on that one but didn't get any so far. I'll take a look at the suggestion when I can get a chance.

ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#1129: Jun 11th 2015 at 8:01:46 AM

It's not a bad suggestion. A little too wide, maybe, but it gets the crazy driving across. Same work/character as the current, even.

Moon
Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#1130: Jun 11th 2015 at 10:36:50 AM

[up] Nah it not from Azumanga Daioh, I am a big fan of that and it isn't a moment from the anime or Yonkoma.

I don't actually know where it's from yet. I ran across it on another forum and have P Med the poster asking where it's from, I have yet to hear back.

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#1131: Jun 14th 2015 at 2:12:33 AM

So is the thread not up to snuff or something? It still isn't open.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1132: Jun 25th 2015 at 11:35:49 AM

Wanted to toss this up for discussion, from rodney's thread in Wiki Talk about the site's administration:

Some page image policies, for example, are officially "whatever the rules were when Eddie left, including his fiat decisions, until some unspecified point in the future when they will be reconsidered". Those decisions are explicitly being delayed and I don't know when (or even if, really) the unspecified point will occur.

Now's as good a time as any, so let's start with the most obvious questions - what, if anything, needs to change for IP to function better? What policies need to be revisited?

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1133: Jun 25th 2015 at 11:39:48 AM

For starters, I would like to review all the items on the "No pic" and "Don't change the pic" lists. Some of them make sense (especially "sexy" articles whose page image would escalate if they had one), some of them don't (the Streisand Effect image is totally JAFAAC).

Other topics I would like to discuss include the thread approval system (several IP regulars object to it very strongly, and as far as I know we've gotten zero mod response), updating (maybe just reiterating) the images-should-read-left-to-right policy, whether it's reasonable to demand a response to Image Uploader bug reports and requests (its current state is terrible), and standardizing copyright policy (I thought we never had to ask permission to use a dA image, and in general aren't responsible for finding out what someone's policy or preference is, though we will immediately honor any take-down requests, no worries... but AFAIK that's been applied inconsistently).

edited 25th Jun '15 11:49:38 AM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#1134: Jun 25th 2015 at 11:44:11 AM

Eh, Streisand Effect I'm more inclined to let slide. The caption's admittedly doing most of the work, but it gets the point across pretty succinctly.

Moon
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1135: Jun 25th 2015 at 11:48:38 AM

The main reason I've been holding off on that particular issue is that I've wanted to talk with the rest of the staff (or at least, those who are interested) about which pics we should attempt to do something about and which should be left alone, since we'd be overriding Eddie's decisions on a lot of them, but there's been so much going on with the various revamps to the site that have had more priority than that discussion that it's just been sitting on the back burner. It's been brought up a few times before in our behind-the-scenes gabbing, but not as a "let's tackle this issue and get it done" project. I'm very willing to have that discussion, but I don't want to try to attack them all in one fell swoop...that would be a nightmare.

edited 25th Jun '15 11:50:29 AM by Willbyr

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1136: Jun 25th 2015 at 11:51:57 AM

I don't think we are bogged down in tech discussions to the point that we can't rediscuss these images.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1137: Jun 25th 2015 at 11:52:54 AM

I hate the "want to talk it over with the staff first" approach to topic moderation. We should be able to take part in (or at least see) that discussion.

(Also, often from this end it just looks like nothing is happening at all, we don't even know an attempt to discuss an issue with other staff has been made. That is not my main objection, though.)

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1138: Jun 25th 2015 at 11:56:38 AM

Give me some time to get some stuff taken care of and take a look at the pages in question and I'll give my 2 cents.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1139: Jun 25th 2015 at 12:41:58 PM

Okay, sticking just with the "no pic" section for now:

edited 1st Jul '15 8:55:56 PM by Willbyr

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1140: Jun 25th 2015 at 12:55:16 PM

I completely agree, with the possible exceptions of Bound and Gagged and Naked Apron, though I'd be cool with the list being changed to "Probably no pic because the topic of the article is such that if it has a page image at all, it is very likely to invite image changes that are less and less appropriate" (something more succinct, though) instead of "No pic period". There is a big difference between very low probability and zero probability.

I still don't see the need for a BUPKIS list at all. Perhaps the "already been discussed" ("multiple threads", but rephrased) list should be longer, with links to the forum threads about that page.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1141: Jun 25th 2015 at 1:24:36 PM

[up] The point of labeling them "no pic" isn't that we can't come up with something, it's that the nature of the trope makes trying to pic it not worth the hassle, either for controversy or NSFW reasons. The BUPKIS list is for things that don't fall into that zone but are still hard enough to pic that a good suggestion hasn't surfaced...they'd be ideal for someone to draw a pic for.

edited 25th Jun '15 1:25:54 PM by Willbyr

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1142: Jun 25th 2015 at 2:37:31 PM

  1. Those are good reasons. But I would prefer "probably no pic" to "definitely no pic". In some cases a firm rule may be appropriate, but IMO this isn't one of those cases. Also it uses a standard that is difficult to quantify.
  2. I understand, I mean I think the "BUPKIS" and "multiple threads" lists are basically the same thing: "We've already talked about this, so please review the past conversations and only post if you have something to add." The only meaningful difference is that one is "stuff we already talked about and came up empty" and the other is "stuff we already talked about and decided on what's there". They should be combined.

edited 25th Jun '15 4:12:22 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
ThePope Since: Oct, 2010
#1143: Jun 25th 2015 at 2:50:57 PM

It's a shame; Kuroko of Murciélago is a great fit for Psycho Lesbian (being both insane and a lesbian, neither one a cause or effect for the other) and shows both aspects all the time, but I can't find a single image that gets across the concept at once.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1144: Jun 25th 2015 at 3:04:53 PM

With Bound and Gagged, would a stern "no change" note work? They are usually observed.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#1145: Jun 25th 2015 at 3:13:02 PM

A little surprised Bound and Gagged is even on the no-image list. I mean, sure, you could slip a bondage fetish image up there if you were feeling particularly sick, but there are plenty of straight, non-sexual examples out there to pick from, surely.

Moon
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1146: Jun 25th 2015 at 3:33:58 PM

IIRC it was one of those that people kept changing the pic on to make it racier and Eddie finally got tired of it.

[up][up] Anything that we change that's on one of these lists should get a very firm "do not mess with what's been done with this page" tag, with the threat of instant wiki bans if need be.

edited 25th Jun '15 3:34:58 PM by Willbyr

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1147: Jun 25th 2015 at 3:53:48 PM

Anyone who doubts the raciness or controversy escalation thing: it's not just anticipation of an imaginary problem, it actually happened a lot before the problem was articulated. Yes, it is possible to find a good image. That isn't the issue. A note/comment would probably work, though.

edited 25th Jun '15 4:01:58 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1148: Jun 25th 2015 at 4:20:30 PM

Here's the pic I had in mind for Bound and Gagged...it has subpages but in this case I think we can make an exception to that policy. I've got a variant on this in mind but I need to build it.

EDIT: Built it...smaller than I'd like but I think it's still legible. I've got another variant in mind, may run out of time to build it before we leave for the evening.

EDIT #2: Had time, cool.

  

edited 25th Jun '15 4:37:38 PM by Willbyr

ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#1149: Jun 25th 2015 at 6:51:15 PM

Oh, no, I don't doubt the claims of escalation, it sounds entirely plausible. It's more that they hadn't been made when I posted that, so I wasn't 100% certain what the problem was.

1148.1 is sufficient, IMO.

Moon
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1150: Jun 25th 2015 at 10:39:17 PM

That claim is made in the same sentence as something you responded to :)

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.

Total posts: 9,751
Top