He states in his Beastly review that Disney's version of Beauty and the Beast was "perfect" and no one should ever make it again because of that. Contrast that to OancitizenandJerk's review where they say, anything can and should be remade as stories gain power through retelling and stories are owned by no one.
He continually complains about Into the Woods being a musical, even commenting rather idiotically that "just because the stage production was a musical, it doesn't mean the movie has to be!". Not surprisingly, most of the comments for that review took umbrage with him for that.
Shows many signs of this towards the MCU. He also seems to dislike everything he hears and sees about any DC movie, given how his Deadpool vs Suicide Squad video contained around 7 minutes of bashing the comic-con trailer for the latter, with the remaining time spent praising the former's comic con trailer. This is because he REALLY dislikes the direction Warner Bros went with the Man of Steel and Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice as he wanted/feels they should had gone with an idealistic and adventurous tone and faithfull characterization rather than a darker, cynical and intense one (examples: Superman is doubtfull, angsty and less intelligent than his comics' counterpart and Batman is a Blood Knight that kills criminals when in the comics he has a moral code that doesn't allow him to take a life or let someone die no matter what), he has even said that Superman killing Zod in Man of Steel made him lose hope in the franchise and Warner Bros and feels is too late for them to recover.
The base is basically soaked with gasoline, lit on fire, pissed on, nuked, and thrown into a black hole with his version of Uatu.
The reviews where he's wearing a straitjacket and spouting non-sequiturs are either his funniest reviews or his dumbest reviews, depending on who you ask.
Almost most of his videos are treated like this. While he's very informed about subject matters he likes and knows how to explain his issues with movies well, when he has to talk about things he knows little of he comes off as very ignorant and biased (his moronic comments about Into the Woods "sucking" JUST because it's a musical, or that Beauty and the Beast should never be remade again...).
Cargo Ship: In his Jason X review, ERod tries to deny being "Robo-sexual", only for him to grab his toaster and get defensive.
In his review of Shrek 2, he criticizes the film for, among other things, betraying the tone of the original film by having songs in it, noting that the only song in the first film (sung by Robin Hood and his gang) was a parody, and interrupted mid-way through by Fiona. Except that not counting pop song covers (which were also in the first film), there is only one actual musical-style song in Shrek 2 (sung by the Fairy Godmother), and it's just as clearly a parody as the equivalent song in Shrek, being a pretty obvious riff on "Bibbidi-Bobbidi-Boo" from Cinderella. And, in fact, the song is also protested against and ultimately interrupted by Fiona.
In the same video, he also refers to the Fairy Godmother and Prince Charming as "pretty much the closest thing" the film has to a villain, implying that they're not wholly villainous antagonists... which is odd given that they attempt to brainwash, frame and murder the main characters and attempt to commit a coup, identity theft and implicitly rape by deception by getting Charming fraudulently married to Fiona and making him the heir to Far Far Away. Not a lot of viewers paying attention would doubt that they are full villains.
In his Dudley Do-Right review, he claims that Nell being in love with Horse was being off-character because she loved Dudley. Actually, this is in-character for Nell since that was one of the main running gags in the original Dudley Do-Right cartoon.
In his Planet of the Apes (2001) review, he claims that the concept of a super-intelligent ape forming an army to conquer the Earth from Rise of the Planet of the Apes was a rip-off of The Powerpuff GirlsMovie. Except that they have little to nothing in common with each other. Caesar was born from a virus-infested monkey while Mojo Jojo was a mischievous monkey who accidentally had a dose of Chemical X after pushing the professor. Also, Caesar was treated horribly at a primate shelter which resulted in him forming an army of apes to rebel and get out of the city. Mojo, on the other hand, created an army of super-intelligent apes just so he could take over Townsville. On the other hand, it's likely just a joke about how the two products came out close together.
In his Turbo A Power Rangers Movie review, he claims that the movie was non-canon and the show did its own version of how they got their Turbo powers. Except, it is canon and the Turbo season starts with them already having their powers and the premiere even uses clips from the movie as a flashback, the first episode starts with the Big Bad preparing revenge for what the Rangers did in the movie. He's most likely confusing it with the firstPower Rangers movie which was non-canon and the third season did its own story of how the Rangers got their ninja powers. Furthermore his complaints about using spandex and the Megazord being a guy in a suit becomes annoying knowing that the Turbo movie was meant to fit in with the series.
In his Honest Review of The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes!, Erod stated the theory that Hulk Vs. take place in the same universe and that the latter happened during "Panther's Quest" (explaining why Thor was absent) and "Gamma World, Part 1" (why Hulk was in Canada). Even barring the fact that Word of God confirmed EMH and the "Wolverine" short of Hulk Vs., as well as Wolverine and the X-Menare set in the same universe, there's two flaws with this—one: "Masters of Evil" already explains why Thor was absent during "Panther's Quest" (namely, he didn't know how the ID cards worked) and two: the Loki subplot makes placing the "Thor" short of Vs during Season 1 completely incompatible (including the fact that both the EMH!Loki subplot and the "Thor" short have the Odinsleep as a major elementnote the former is dependent on Odin being trapped in it after Loki takes over, while the latter has him come out of it after the Hulk is stopped).
A minor one, but in expressing his thoughts on the Marvel Studios-Sony deal with Spider-Man, he said the deal was like the what Disney has with Marvel in that they distribute the movies—expect the Disney/Marvel deal is that Disney outright owns Marvel, including Marvel Studios.
Sometimes when he says a movie bombed at the box office, a quick Google search would inform him that the movie actually made back its budget or made a profit. It seems he's confused "box office" and "critical reception"
In his review Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed, he was surprised the criminology museum was opening an exhibit on the Scooby gang, and asked if they'd ever actually caught a criminal. He pointed out that dressing up in a mask to scare people was not illegal. Firstly, dressing up in a mask and scaring people could easily be considered harassment at minimum. Secondly, the Monsters frequently tried to kill the Scoobies, which is very much illegal. Thirdly, in the vast majority of cases the Scoobies solved the villain was a criminal trying to scare people away so they wouldn't find out about his actual criminal activities.
In his review of Land of the Lost, he repeatedly says that Enik was the main villain of the show. But he wasn't a villain; he was a time traveler who wanted to go back to his own time to prevent the collapse of his civilization. Although Enik was a jerk whose goals sometimes conflicted with the Marshalls' goals, he always helped them when their lives depended on it.
In his review of Dark Shadows he refers to Victoria Winters as a F.R.I (Forced Romantic Interest) despite the fact that she was his love interest in the original series, so of course she would still be his love interest in the film. Also, in his review of the Cirque Du Freak movie, he makes several comments about how stupid the name Vampaneze is, Mr. Crepsely's red hair and pale skin colour, how the vampiric nature is passed on to a human (Pressing your bleeding hand up to the vampire's bleeding hand to switch blood) as well as Steve becoming a villain despite the fact that these are all elements from the book series.
He often confuses comic book canon with animated canon. For example, in his review of X-Men: Days of Future Past, he made mention that in the film, Wolverine is sent back in time instead of Bishop as in the original comic. That happened in the 90's X-Men animated series. In the comic book, Kitty Pryde was sent back. Bishop wouldn't even be created for another 10 years.
In his review for the film version of Ratchet & Clank he voices displeasure when the characters uses outlandish guns such as a the sheep ray and the storm maker thinking they were add ons in the movie...despite the fact that the series is practically known for crazy weaponry and are both featured within the games he keeps comparing the movie to. He likewise seem to have forgotten the movie is set in its own continuity from the game series and thus doesn't follow the original game's story, hence the changes. As well as the fact the game of the movie filled in the plot holes he pointed out.
In his review of Unfriended, he states that the main characters are idiots who could have avoided all the dangers of the vengeful internet ghost had they just turned off their computers. What he fails to understand is that it was established even in the trailers that any attempts to avoid the ghost, even by leaving their computers, would have resulted in their deaths anyway.
His review of Dune has a lot of examples of this trope (likely for not having read the books). His most glaring example is him stating that the Spice Melange has no real relevance to the film and isn't really important, when in fact it is the most important part of the films universe for being vital to the Empire's economy, allowing interstellar travel, prolonging life, can give people physic and mental powers and what allows the protagonist, Paul Atreides, to become the Kwisatz Haderach.
More to the point, while he mentions how exposition heavy the film is (including the inner-monologues), apparently he didn't pay it much attention to it as much of his review is crticizing things he didn't understand, but was actually in all that exposition.
In his video describing his problem with the various upcoming (at the time) DC movies, he complained that Wonder Woman "just" fighting World War I soldiers was "lame" because her main thing was supposed to be fighting and interacting with beings from Greek Mythology. While Wonder Woman is indeed primarily associated with Greek Mythology, and has plenty of characters coming from it in both her Rogues Gallery and her Supporting cast, she has been fighting plenty of other opponents over the course of her adventures, and plenty of her villains, including two of her most iconic nemeses (Cheetah and Dr Psycho), have nothing to do with Greek Myths at all.
As much as he tries playing himself off as a superhero, he acts a lot more like a bully to movies. The reviews for The Little Vampire and Robots come to mind, but honestly just watch the Robots one to see his running gag just for celebrity cameo-voices.
Even more hilarious when you realize that the supposed "Evil" version of him actually did less than he implies he does. What exactly did he do when he's first introduced? He admits he likes Spider-Man 3 most of all out of the Spider-Man Trilogy. Apparently just doing that is punishable by being trapped in the Phantom Zone. The rest of his actions could easily be described as a revenge trip.
Genius Bonus: While most people can tell that ERod is Latin just by his name (Eric Rodriguez), savvy viewers can tell he's specifically Puerto Rican from various hints in his videos.
In one video, he's wearing a shirt for El Conquistador, one of Puerto Rico's most luxurious hotels.
El Lover. His English is very Puerto Rican-accented (his talking speed and pronunciation of certain words are giveaways), his Spanish is completely Puerto Rican in accent and vocabulary, and he's shown from time to time reading Turey El Taino, a popular 90s Puerto Rican comic book.
In the Elektra review, he needs to give a woman's perspective and becomes SHE-Rod before we find out that SHE-Rod is actually a Distaff Counterpart. The first thing SHE-Rod notes is "I'm gorgeous!" and it seems like an Attractive Bent-Gender joke. Then you find out that they're married in Real Life.
Not only Doug Jones doing a cameo for ERod's review of Rocky and Bullwinkle is awesome and adorable when Doug recognized ERod's appreciation for his filmography, ERod also highlighted Jones' participation in Rock Jocks, which was directed by Paul (Panda Bear / Dr. Nemesis), his best friend.
In his DC Animated Movies Of 2014 Honest Review, one of his rules he gave out at the beginning was not doing the animated LEGO DC Films which he called "bullshit" and a overly long toy commercial. You can imagine how fans of LEGO reacted.
While he technically didn't bust that many in this category, he has a bad habit to categorize all movies depicting vampires in a more sympathetic light as Twilight-like movies, with the implication he believes they should be Always Chaotic Evil in every media they appear in, Angel being apparently the sole exception to the rule (most notably, he accused Interview with the Vampire of having turned them into "pussies", and his Vampire Academy referred to the good-aligned Moroi as "Lame-pires" while the evil Strigoi were called "Real vampires"). Those who actually enjoy stories about good vampires aren't necessary pleased.
Not many people approved of his Into the Woods review, finding his complaints shallow and nonsensical.
His pessimistic opinion on the upcoming DC Extended Universe when the movies haven't even come out yet has started to be grating for DC fans. Especially since he has developed a bad habit to repeatedly bash Man of Steel in his latter Honest Reviews about Marvel.
Likewise didn't win over many gamers with his review of Ratchet & Clank as many found his claims of being a fan of the series hypocritical since he didn't seem to realize most of his complaints against the film (such as the guns and supposed personality changes) were true to the game.
In his review on The Smurfs 2, he wishes that would make a movie set in the fantasy setting the Smurfs are known for rather than the New York setting. In 2017, a new computer animated Smurfs movie that's closer to the source material will be released.
They Changed It, Now It Sucks: Many dislike the reboot due to removing the original format and has now become a series of skit reviews much like some of the new Nostalgia Critic reviews (which also gets a fair share of dislikes)
Tear Jerker: His review ofMan of Steel. He refuses to go by ERod or give it a score, just addressing with a sad and down voice the major failures of the movie and how every time he watched it, he liked it even less.