"Never durst poet touch a pen to write, until his ink were tempered with Love's sighs."
And why anyone should say that Love's Labour's Lost
Love's Labour's Lost is a bad play, the Lord He knoweth; for to my mind it is one of the most
réussi things of its kind ever made ... it is all pure fairy-tale; and some of the loveliest lines in the lyrical-witty mode ever written.
is one of William Shakespeare
's earliest plays, possibly his first comedy. The King of Navarre and his attendant lords make a vow to devote themselves to scholarship and put away interest in women for three years—just before the Princess of France and her attendant ladies arrive for a visit. Hilarity Ensues
It's not among Shakespeare's most popular plays. This may be largely due to the style, which has been described as "flamboyantly intellectual", full of wordplay and references to contemporary scholarly interests, many of which have not dated well. The script is 90% poetry and jokes and 10% plot. Also, for a romantic comedy it has a romantically-unsatisfying ending, with all the lovers separated, to (maybe) be reunited in the future.
This latter point probably fed the popularity of the rumor/theory (depending on your view) that Shakespeare wrote a now-lost sequel titled Love's Labour's Wonnote
There was a film adaptation in 2000, directed by and starring Kenneth Branagh
as well as Nathan Lane, Allesandro Nivolla, Alicia Silverstone, Timothy Spall
, and Adrian Lester.
Love's Labour's Lost provides examples of:
The 2000 film adaptation provides examples of: