So the device in the episode 0-8-4 was made by Hydra, commissioned by the Peruvian government during WWII. Then how did Fitzsimmons mistake it for a several thousand year old artifact? The thing that tipped them off wasn't carbon dating or whatever, but just that the design looked German.
It had embedded itself in rock and soil in a way that made it look like the millenia-old rock had formed around it. Probably wouldn't have fooled a geologist, but neither Fitz nor Simmons is a geologist.
She was sensing the Tesseract energy in it, which IS thousands of years old.
Alternatively, this is all a Timey-Wimey Ball and it IS millenia-old, teleported back in time to the same place where it imbedded into the rock and a temple was built around it.
Kang the Conqueror, anyone?
Reyes stated outright that it was commissioned by the Peruvian government after WWII, and later lost in the jungle.
And it was also stated in the episode that it emitted a beam powerful enough to melt the rock to embed itself into the wall.
Throughout "The Asset", Skye complains that Ward is riding her too hard as her training officer until she comes around to understand why he's putting so much pressure on her. Yet if you look closely at her boxing at the end of the episode her hands are improperly wrapped (i.e. she should have wrapped in between the knuckles not simply around them). Why would Ward not teach her a very basic part of training if he's being such a dick about it?
Most likely the creators just didn't bother to check the proper technique.
Or she wasn't paying attention when he did teach her.
In "The Asset", Ward disarms a man of a double-barrel shotgun. In the few seconds during the scuffle that Ward is offscreen, what sounds like a pump-action shotgun being racked is heard, despite the weapon having no such mechanism. Does anyone know if there is a means by which a double barrel shotgun can make such a sound, or is this simply a production mistake? This troper is inclined to think the latter, but is not very familiar with that particular type of firearm.
Production mistake. The sound is unmistakably a pump action, and is not something any double barreled shotgun is going to make.
While pretending to be Akela, how did Ward drive to the building without seeing his hands on the steering wheel or looking into a car mirror?
He held the bottom of the steering wheel, sat up very tall, and moved the seat as far forward as it would go.
He actually looked at his hands a few times while talking to that guard and certainly looked at himself while beating him up.
Also, 'man hands', Skye? Really? That's the worry? Not the fact that Ward's hands are the wrong skin color?
Also, Akela's backscatter function activated when she closed her eyes. Did the team build a "blink" function into the glasses to briefly turn on the backscatter at appropriate intervals, or did the handler watch "Akela" appear to not blink during her entire mission?
It might be that the backscatter is already designed not to activate on short intervals such as blinks.
If you can see yourself in your car mirror while driving, then either you aren't facing the road or the mirror isn't aimed correctly.
For that matter, how did Akela's handlers never notice the height difference when Ward put on the glasses? Especially when towering over the guard she was meant to seduce.
Skye says that their backscatter glasses, based on Akela's eye, would allow her to see Fitz and Ward naked. But when Akela uses her backscatter while fighting Melinda, all she sees is a silhouette.
She either improved the technology or was trolling Fitz.
It's possible the silohuette was some form of censoring for the audience and Akela really did see May without clothes.
This seems likely. In the same scene with May, we can see through a bed mattress and a footlocker. And the entire premise of the plot is that Akela could see through briefcases, which are much thicker than clothes. If anything, the images are a little too transparent for Skye to be leering at Ward. They should not only be seeing through clothes, but skin. (Someone write that fanfic.)
Timeline of the show & films
So, Joss says the show is "now" in the Marvel Universe, so are they saying that it's something like Avengers = late spring, early summer 2013, Iron Man 3 = Christmas 2013, Thor The Dark World = Roughly same as Iron Man 3, six months after Avengers? Coulson recognizes Extremis and names it in the pilot, but at the end says the person who sold it off is "still out there." We can assume assume he was referring unknowingly to AIM and Killian, but it still seems confusing; how did he know the name unless he knew about AIM?. Wouldn't they mention the events of Iron Man 3 if it had happened already, but if the show is proceeding in real time, maybe they will around Christmas? But if Thor takes place before Iron Man 3, it would seem weird for the government to be so concerned with the Mandarin and not the invasion that looks like it will take place in T:TDW.
By the time of this show, Killian has been defeated. Someone else recovered his data on extremis and used it.
Then why no mention of the Mandarin or Air Force One's destruction or Tony Stark's brief "death"? Everyone is talking about New York solely. If SHIELD knew about Killian they would have said so in the pilot, and the evil doctor implies she got it from people who don't want to be exposed, just like AIM.
Not wanting to be found does not single out AIM. Not wanting to be exposed includes, well, everyone. They don't talk about Tony Stark's "death" because New York was so much bigger.
Maybe, but it circumstantially supports AIM ( assuming this is before Iron Man 3). Skye acts like "centipede" is completely new and no one references Killian at all. Just seems like too much of an oversight for them to ignore the events of Iron Man 3 if this takes place afterwards, especially for a show with so many Easter eggs.
Centipede is new. The series explicitly takes place after Iron Man 3. They're not going to go into a full recap and name a character who's dead and can't possibly be involved in it. Especially when nobody on the show was involved in the movie—Coulson wasn't there, and everyone else is a Canon Foreigner. Just because the show didn't make all the shout outs you expected it to doesn't mean the timeline is screwed up.
They explicitly named Extremis, which Maya had already named back in 1999. They didn't explicitly refer to any of Iron Man 3's events in the past tense. You're very likely right but it's possible the show has started between Avengers and Iron Man 3. Phase I didn't come out in chronological order, so it's hard to synch up these Phase II films and the show to each other time-wise.
Extremis only became known in the sense of it being 'healing powers that give you fire powers' during Iron Man 3. Iron Man 3 takes place over the course of, maybe, a week. So unless you're positing that the series takes place during that week, it takes place after Iron Man 3. It does not make sense any other way.
There is nothing that says Extremis has not been leaked well before the events of Iron Man 3. Killian was researching the product for years, it is fairly certain he had contacted other people and agencies before trying Stark Industries. As for the timeline, it is Post Avengers for sure, and the reason no one mentions the events of Iron Man 3 is that they are not the events that SHIELD is concerned with. The agency and specifically the agents that the show is following have their mission orders and are following them (mostly). From a narrative perspective, there is no need to mention events that they are not connected to. Why no mention of Killian or AIM? No need/need to know. It is not important to events who developed Extremis, only what it does and how to stop it (or make it more volatile).
There's nothing that has to say Extremis hasn't been leaked, because it should be plainly obvious by the fact in Iron Man 3 that nobody has any idea what Extremis is. Killian clearly states he built up his own company, he didn't shop it around, and only came to Stark so he could beat down and humiliate Tony in particular. The idea that Extremis was at all known as giving superpowers before Iron Man 3 is just plain faulty. Iron Man 3 is pretty darn clearly the first time anyone, outside of Killian's group, ever realized what Extremis could do.
Tony and Pepper don't know about it, but Tony's not SHIELD, and Rhodey more or less states that the US government doesn't want SHIELD interference at the moment. Given SHIELD's ability to cover up notable events (like New Mexico, in which extra-terrestrials leveled a small town) it would be relatively easy for them to cover up say, Mike Peterson and with Tony's reclusiveness and PTSD following New York, he may just be behind the times. As Coulson (or was it Maria Hill?) states, he and the other Avengers are not level 7.
You're grasping at straws now. The very, very, very clear implication in the first episode is this is someone else who somehow got hold of Extremis, not AIM. Killian was playing Extremis very close to the vest, which is plainly and completely obvious from Iron Man 3. He wasn't randomly giving it to people on the street. He had a specific plan, and was giving it to specific people for specific purposes. Everything about Killian and AIM as presented in Iron Man 3 is completely different from how the show is treating Centipede's methods. It is plainly obvious that Centipede is not AIM, and the show takes place after Iron Man 3. Just because they didn't namedrop someone who was, by this point, already dead and couldn't possibly be part of events, doesn't put it in the utterly impossible place in the timeline you want to place it in.
Utterly impossible? If the writers had wanted it to be so clear they could have easily had a line in the pilot explaining when the show takes place. Melinda May even asks "Who has the tech to do that"-i.e. create a super soldier, and nobody mentions AIM, even though Extremis soldiers were running around all over the place in Iron Man 3. Either the writers were lazy or didn't care about clarifying the post-IM 3 timeline or intentionally wrote the line that way to leave open the other possibility. As for Killian, he wasn't always that close to the vest. AIM had a public website, were the publicly recognized modifiers of Iron Patriot, Savin gave Taggart Extremis in public, and he and Brandt were running around that town in Tennessee wreaking havoc. Also, Killian himself states that there was a presidential ban on biotech enhancement research which AIM had been dodging for years, suggesting that people know such research is being done. How is it utterly impossible that someone in AIM leaked Extremis to Centipede, or that the two groups are one in the same? How can SHIELD not know about this stuff pre-Iron Man 3? And if it's post Iron Man 3, how can someone have gotten a hold of Killian's data if he's so super secretive, and probably has had SHIELD or someone confiscate most of his data? And this doesn't even touch on things like Ward's September 2013 ID badge which he obtained in the pilot and the December 23 2013 newspaper date in IM 3.
Yes, May asks who has the tech—AIM no longer has the tech, because AIM fell apart when Killian died. At this point in the timeline, AIM is a non-entity. SHIELD knowing everything there is to know about Extremis—remember, part of the reason they recognize it is because the operatives explode eventually—has to place it after Iron Man 3, because it's a major plot point in that movie that nobody knows what Extremis is or how it works. Do you seriously think that SHIELD would have known that something being developed by a public company with direct ties to the US government gives people superpowers and makes them explode, and would never think to mention it to anybody? Like, say, after all these people who had signed up for experiments with AIM started exploding, which began happening several months before Iron Man 3 takes place? No matter which direction you're coming from, SHIELD knowing everything about Extremis and how it works before Iron Man 3 makes very little sense.
Again, SHIELD had no need to inform the characters in Iron Man 3. They're the relatively secret spy organization which has been rejected by the US government. They don't answer to America or Tony Stark and mentioning Extremis to either of them before Iron Man 3 would have been pointless. The movie happens over a very short time frame so they would have small opportunity to help anyway. As for the exploding, Extremis has been blowing up plants since 1999 and people possibly before the first Iron Man. Just because Tony doesn't know about Extremis before Iron Man 3 doesn't mean SHIELD couldn't.
They don't have to "answer to America or Tony Stark." Mentioning Extremis to the US when Extremis people were exploding and killing people all over the US would be the exact and complete opposite of pointless. SHIELD's mission is, if there is someone with superpowers, they go out and they do something about it. You're positing that they knew for a fact that these superpowers were out there, that they made people explode, and then out of some kind of petty spite they proceeded to do absolutely nothing about it and let people get killed. You're positing that SHIELD is acting like complete morons here for no reason.
What can the US government do to track Extremis soldiers down that SHIELD can't? Wordof God and Rhodey more or less say that Uncle Sam is beating its chest and trying to show they can handle their own problems. Rhodes rejects Tony's offer to help, saying the situation is American business. If they reject Tony, it's quite possible they'd reject SHIELD, especially if the US blames them for New York. You didn't see SHIELD calling in the US in that movie, either. And which is less probable, that SHIELD knows absolutely nothing about Extremis or that they're dealing with it off screen instead of helping the people who explicitly don't want help who they never were shown to call in previously?
The government can keep track of them if they know about it. And no, Rhodey refusing Tony's help is not at all indicative that they'd refuse SHIELD's help, and the suggestion is ridiculous. Tony is a playboy glory-hound millionaire with a smartass and independent streak who figuratively and literally flipped off the US government directly, while SHIELD is a semi-governmental organization that direction works with the US government already. It's like saying that you'd refuse a cop's help investigating a robbery just because you didn't ask a street thug to help you out. Hell, look at all the trailers for The Winter Soldier—the bits where Nick Fury is meeting with and making a deal with what appears to be a US Government official. Again: The idea that SHIELD knows all this about Extremis and never once spoke to the US government about the exact problem that is killing people in their country when "Find superpowered people and stop them before they kill someone" is one of the pillars of the organization, is not only ridiculous but paints SHIELD as grossly incompetent.
I'm not sure what you mean by keeping track of them if they know about it. You're right about Tony being a jerk, but a SHIELD fighter jet almost nuked Manhattan, and even people who've worked closely with them blame them for their research on the Tesseract triggering the invasion (Dr. Hall). The US wanting to distance themselves from SHIELD makes some sense at least. Can't recall SHIELD working directly with the US, in previous films, though. Iron Man: They claim to be a separate division from American intelligence agencies, and don't work with them directly. TIH: They help Ross track down Banner, but then turn around and put people off his trail. IM 2: They put Tony under house arrest, and Fury clearly has enough pull to twist Stern's arm, but it's still unclear. Thor: SHIELD handles everything themselves. Ditto TFA and Avengers, except they answer to the WSC, who apparently are comprised of multiple nationalities (maybe a division of Marvel Earth's UN?) Samuel L Jackson said that Robert Redford's character is also one of the WSC, so he may or may not be a US government official. And while I still don't feel it's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, I'll concede for now that you're probably right about it being post-Iron Man 3, although I still feel that some evidence (Ward's ID badge, among other things) hints otherwise.
Looks like an upcoming episode will deal with Thor 2. Since it doesn't make much sense for Thor 2 to be before IM 3, I guess that confirms the timeline. So maybe Ao S and Thor take place in 2014.
Why doesn't it make sense for Thor 2 to be after IM 3?
They probably just didn't want to get too deep into Canon such that you had Continuity Lock-Out. My interpretation of Joss's quote is less about "it's 2013" and more about "the movies have all happened".
Thor 2 definitely takes place in between The Hub and The Well. Interviews claim that it takes place a year after Avengers.
SHIELD's Earth Defense Policy
So did SHIELD just give up on Phase II? They're not gonna study the Tesseract weapon despite the existence of aliens and Norse gods against whom we have no counter save the Avengers? They don't recruit the unemployed guy with Extremis enhancements? who manhandled some of their best agents?
They had to remove the enhancements from him to keep him from exploding, so he's not going to be worth much as an operative. SHIELD wants to develop weapons, and the Tesseract weapon they found was deemed too dangerous.
Who says they won't recruit him? The fourth episode takes place, what, maybe a month after the pilot? He could still be undergoing therapy to come down off the Extremis cocktail and will show up later. And while his powers were unstable in the pilot, there's nothing stopping the writers from coming up with an excuse to let him keep them later. Maybe SHIELD can whip up a special injection that will keep him from exploding if he takes it every 6 hours (good way to add suspense if he gets stuck without it on a long mission). Maybe the Extremis cocktail altered his physiology and now he has inborn superpowers. Maybe the Extremis activated his latent metagene or something. People in comic book universes fall backwards into superpowers just like this all the time.
You have your answer - Mike Petersen was indeed recruited.
There's no point in studying the Tesseract weapon. They know exactly how it works. Phase II is dead because Tesseract weapons require the Tesseract, which they do not have.
The videogame Marvel Avengers Alliance had an interesting idea: what if they reverse-engineer it, and create an artificial one? Sure, it won't work, but it would be dangerous...
No good. The Tesseract was taken away from them before they even understood how it worked, nevermind reverse-engineering it.
This option has been well and thoroughly killed by Thor 2, because one does not simply build your own Infinity Gem.
Earth is fully capable of creating a low-end proto-Tesseract. That's what an arc reactor is. Of course, it's also doubtful that Stark would be willing to provide a batch of reactors small enough to be used in a gun to a group that he knows is going to use them to power weapons.
Shield did recruit Mike, officially recruited Captain America and seems to make it clear it welcomes superpowered people that want to work for them. That could be their plan for now, since things seem to have blown over for the moment (no massive world ending crisises since the Avengers) and they no longer can weaponize the Tesseract. The show goes alongside the MCU and it's "quiet" for the moment. If it's still running when Avengers 2 is out then maybe we'll see some action on that front.
The Night-Night Pistol
Why in the world did Coulson, after seeing the first three or four bullets from the night-night pistol not hit Scorch, continue to fire until he was out of ammo? And why wasn't he carrying a reload? The whole thing just smacks of contrivance.
Because he might get lucky and one of the bullets will go through. He was wrong, but he didn't have the benefit of Bullet Time to see precisely what was happening. As for the ammo, it's a new gun with a new type of ammo, bullets for it probably aren't cheap.
Truth in Television: Law enforcement agencies train people to keep firing until either the target goes down or the clip runs dry.
There are even reported cases of police officers continuing to pull the trigger after they've long since run out of ammo, even when the suspect is already down. Even large amounts of training sometimes isn't enough to overcome basic human instincts.
The explanations do not work well for a weapon intended to be non-lethal that uses a toxin. Giving a human a dose that will take down an elephant will kill him. If you are going to empty an entire clip into him, you might as well use bullets.
Except this isn't a normal toxin. It's a magic comic book super-science toxin. For all we know your average human could eat five clips of night-night rounds before dying. It makes exactly as much sense as a billionaire inventing superpowered exo-suit to fight international terrorism.
Let's Blow Him Up!!!
Why did Coulson and May feel it was necessary to inject Scorch with more Extremis until he blew up, as opposed to just shooting him? Especially considering that by blowing him up, they destroyed much of the facility, and all of the valuable information contained within.
Nobody is probably quite sure just what it takes to bring down someone with Extremis. In Iron Man 3, it took some kind of massive trauma to actually disable someone, and Killian had to be blown up like three times. So for all they knew, just shooting him wouldn't have worked. But they knew for a fact that blowing him up would finish him.
In the first episode, they seemed pretty sure that Ward could kill Peterson. However, this time around, they don't have a sniper with a high powered rifle ready to explode the guy's head. I'm uncertain whether a pistol shot to the head would do the trick.
Don't forget that he made a flame shield that destroyed the shots Coulson shot at him.
You're also forgetting the part where they had Miles seal the doors in such a way that the fire would take the path of least resistance. They destroyed very little of the building, and they certainly didn't damage the labs or most of the offices.
Here's another question: Why was their approach, after Instant Sedation failed, to immediate move to lethal tactics? It seems uncharacteristic for the "don't ever tell me there's no other way" guy.
Because he denied the non-lethal option. Explicitly and repeatedly. He had no need to kill Agent Qwan, no need to reject May's attempts to reconcile, and no need to block the stun bullets. Not to mention that they might not have had any other non-lethal options left. The point is that he decided he didn't want SHIELD's help. They tried to help him anyway, but when none of those worked, they knew the choice was between running around looking for another way while he was trying to kill them, or disposing of a nascent supervillain. They chose the latter.
Further to above, Coulson states outright after the stun bullets failed that it was Scorch's last out. It wasn't anger in his voice, it was dejection - he simply had run out of alternatives.
It's also summed up in Coulson's last line to him: "We don't want to hurt you... but we have to."
Centipede vs Extremis vs Super Serum etc
What is the difference between Centipede, Extremis, Super Serum and any other things related to the current mainline macguffin (or is it phlebotinum?) of the show? Centipede seems like the name of the new serum being developed by the as yet unnamed bad guy group. And Extremis and the Super Soldier Serum were simply a part of that new serum. But it seems as of Girl in the Flower Dress, that the organization is named Centipede and people are calling the serum Extremis...
Extremis is a part of the Centipede serum. Centipede is just the code name for the serum (based on the delivery device seen in the first episode, which is a bracer that looks like a centipede). So when Miles traced Raina and found out she worked for some company researching centipedes, he didn't look farther.
Based on memory from the first episode: Centipede is the name SHIELD has given to the secret organization, as they do not have much info on them yet (and because the device resembles a centipede). Apparently, it is a mixture of the three known methods of gaining superpowers in the MCU (gamma radiation, the supersoldier serum, and the Extremis formula), with the device itself being created from Chitauri materials. There was focus on Extremis in "The Girl in the Flower Dress" because it is currently an unstable component, and results in explosions if the test subject cannot regulate its usage effectively.
Actually, IIRC, they identified the serum in the pilot saying it contained gamma radiation, alien metal and an Erskine-esque formula before Coulson named it as Extremis. It's possible that it is just Extremis and they're only now explaining what's inside it.
No, because Extremis is established in Iron Man 3 as having nothing at all to do with any of those, having been developed completely independently before half of those things came to light.
If the Englishman was being controlled by the same ocular implant then presumably all his orders came to him by being typed out in the same way. If so why would he bother changing the wording to British English. I'd understand automatically putting extra 'U's in words such as color/colour but completely changing the words he sees typed out into their British equivalents (trunk to boot) seems unlikely. Basically I'm saying that the assumption about him being English should not have payed off and yet he was revealed to be a former mi6 agent. (Perhaps I've just taken the logic one step further and discovered that the person next up the chain is also English, if so SHIELD can hire me as a consultant.)
We don't know what his orders were. It could have been as simple as "Retrieve this; these are the assets you have to do it." Then he'd come up with the majority of the plans himself. There's no need to have him directly puppeteer by another handler. That would be far too inefficient, and it would take too long for orders to trickle down the chain of command.
Fridge Brilliance: The Englishman's espionage experience and skill at on-the-fly improvisation is probably why they "recruited" him in the first place.
Chan's blood platelets
Is removing all of a person's blood platelets even a thing? Is that even possible?
Apparently it is, via a method called apheresis which siphons off the desired blood product and returns the rest to the patient.
Some people who donate blood only donate platelets. It has the advantage of a much smaller recuperation time before you can donate again - generally 2 weeks instead of 8 for full blood.
Yeah, but...all their platelets? Without filtering every drop of blood through some sort of platelet-removing machine, how would that even work? And wouldn't Chan's body start producing new platelets after a while?
The Centipede group clearly wasn't worried about him surviving the process, so yes, they took all his platelets (or enough that it made no difference). And as noted above, he'd be back to normal after a couple weeks. It's just that SHIELD found him after a couple minutes. He simply didn't have time to replenish his platelet count.
If you don't care about the patient's survival, just take all the blood and leave. You can centrifuge out all the platelets later, and the rest of the blood might be useful. Putting it back is really nice for an organization that basically left him for dead. Giving him back the platelet-less blood only makes sense if you plan to lock him up and keep him as a resource, since those platelets come back.
Think about it. They have him locked in a sterile place. Of course they'd keep him alive. Then, when he produces more platelets, he can be drained again ... and again ... and again ... Nightmare Fuel of the Fridge Horror variety, isn't it?
They can't have taken all of his platelets because even after the operation when he was no longer fully immune to the burning, he was still handling it rather well. Especially when he pumps out enough fire/heat to turn the doctor woman into a pile of ash without turning his own arms into ash as well.
Bear in mind, this was after he was treated with the Centipede cocktail. We know from Mike that one of its benefits is fast healing; I suspect what was happening was that Chan's powers were burning him, and his new regenerative capacity was healing the damage. Thus he could still function without incapacitating himself from burns, but it now hurt like hell.
So we're led to assume that Skye is someone we shouldn't trust and Whedon does this all the time. But Coulson's role in this is odd. It goes against his character on a very fundamental level to distrust people or the group he's trying to build. If he wants his own Avengers, and bring this young woman—who has been trying and building a close connection—him acting in this manner is very much against his nature. May and Ward? Certainly. Not Coulson.
She betrayed his trust by acting as a mole and warning a suspect (who turned out to be guilty) that they were coming after him. Anger at betrayal is far from uncommon. There's a reason most murders are committed by friends and family members. Note though, that the second she showed him the reason she distrusted SHIELD, he turned around, let her stay on the team, and even agreed to help her find what she was looking for. The bracelet is the equivalent of grounding a teenage girl for sneaking out to a party with booze and boys.
The bracelet is certainly a grounding, but it's more than that. It comes with connotations of loss of free-will, that your thoughts and feelings are not your own. This is not the right time for Coulson to be playing Big Brother, this is the time for Coulson to be the hero we know him to be. And you're saying its a simple reprimand without weight behind it, but if one of the other characters had pulled something like this off, I seriously doubt they'd be getting watched from on-high. They're with SHIELD, she isn't.
You're forgetting that both Skye and Miles have committed numerous accounts of computer fraud and related crimes, and Miles could possibly get hung up as an accessory to kidnapping or murder. Skye's (and Miles') punishment really is a simple reprimand, because the very likely alternative is being behind bars for a really long time with no freedom. Him giving her no punishment at all just isn't remotely realistic.
This. Coulson specifically tells Miles, "You can take what's in this box, or we can put you in a slightly bigger box" — i.e., wear the bracelet or they'll put him in prison. As for Skye: Yes, she has a tragic backstory. But she also just admitted to joining the team under false pretenses, in order to act as a mole for an openly antagonistic organization. Coulson's main job is to take care of the team she betrayed. Part of that job is ensuring that there are consequences for that kind of thing. Keeping her on the team at all and offering to help her was being "the hero we know him to be". He is compassionate. He is also a professional.
Also, don't forget that Coulson never actually says to her 'put on this bracelet as your punishment.' He brings the box into the room, puts it down on his desk, and never even refers to it. Skye put it on herself, without any prompting.
I have a bit of a gripe with what Coulson was expecting from Skye. I know he's portrayed as idealistic, but did Skye at any point mention that she had cut ties with Rising Tide?
Generally speaking, if you willingly join with one covert group, you're kinda sorta expected to stop working with the covert group that's explicitly working against the one you just joined.
Plus he found out Skye had ulterior motives for joining other than wanting to help people and see strange stuff. He was initially furious, apprantly assuming she was working to take down Shield. If that was true he'd likely have tossed her, but her reason, wanting to find out the truth about her family was innocent enough for him to accept she meant no harm. Same with the Hub. If she was just impatient/selfish to get to the parent looking that she'd try hacking Shield as soon as she could, Coulson would have booted her off the team, but since her reason for hacking the database was because she was worried for Fitz and Ward, he accepted it, especially since this ended up saving them. The Bracelet was probably something he needed to have used to justify not tossing her, and to make sure she wasn't lying. Once it was clear she really WAS the relatively good person she appeared to be and went above and beyond the call of duty to save Coulson he took it off, seemingly satisfied that he made the right choice. As did the rest of the team, as even May seemed to finally start trusting her.
I'm sorry if I didn't make it clear. My gripe isn't so much with Coulson being angry, so much as how he didn't suspect it or anticipate any risks.
The makeup of the crew
Why doesn't the main team have a medic?
It would be very surprising if Ward, May and Coulson didn't have at least some training in field medicine. And Simmons is a biochemist, so poisons and things like that are pretty well covered — and she's proven able to perform complex and delicate surgery under less-than-ideal conditions.
Based on her performance in FZZT it would seem that Simmons is indeed a medical doctor in addition to being a biochemist.
But why would a medical doctor have so much trouble injecting someone with a syringe? (As seen in "Eye Spy").
It wasn't injecting someone with a syringe she had trouble with. It was injecting it into her eyeball.
And Simmons spent most of her time in the lab before joining the team. She's like a medical intern who has suddenly been thrown into an ER. It's not surprising she would be squeamish about operating on a real live person's eyeball, while a bomb is also ticking down. EDIT: Also, during that scene Simmons specifically says that ocular surgery is not something she's trained for. So in addition to the ticking clock and her general inexperience, Simmons was also being called on to perform a procedure she was never trained to do. If you asked a heart surgeon to perform brain surgery he'd probably be equally nervous.
Simmons is probably not technically a medical doctor. A medical degree is not just passing classes, it is, at minimum, three years of residency and other hands-on training. She'd probably that would suck up years of valuable time she could be doing research. She might have the knowledge, but she's never 'practiced medicine', at least not beyond some basic medic training.
Is Coulson's survival supposed to be a big secret?
In the first episode, it's stated that only level 7 and higher agents know Coulson is alive. Ward doesn't find out until he gets promoted, and the Avengers don't know because "they're not level 7." In every episode after that, Coulson doesn't seem to care about keeping his survival a secret, and The Hub reveals that Simmons is only level 5. So is it a secret or not?
It was a level 7 secret, but it appears it's not quite as big a deal now. The main point is keeping it a secret from the Avengers, and maybe limiting his exposure in case the dark secret behind his resurrection turns out to be something dangerous.
Also, Coulson stated that he didn't want to manage his team without all that red tape (secrets).
Ward says that at level 6, he knew Coulson died which implies that at lower levels, there are people who don't know he died at all.
It's not that people below didn't know he died—what Ward's saying is he's got really high security clearance so he should know if Coulson survived.
To elaborate further, assuming SHIELD follows a similar system to the US, your security clearance (Level 1-8) determines what information you may access, but it does not mean you will get all information at that level. So, Coulson's survival is Level 7, which means that any agents below that level will not be privy to those details, and Level 7 and above agents will be privy to the fact that Coulson survived.
For the SHIELD agents that Coulson is openly interacting with, they are probably Level 7 or otherwise authorised for that information; for example, Kwan is suggested to be fairly high up, and Sitwell is implied to be a Level 8 like Coulson, Victoria Hand, and the team at the Hub.
As for Simmons (and presumably Fitz as well) who's Level 5, this means that she'd be restricted from ever getting any information on Coulson's survival by normal means. However, given that Coulson recruited Fitz-Simmons to his team, while they're still Level 5 agents, they've been read in on Coulson's survival - this information has been made known to them because it is deemed necessary in order for them to carry out their duties.
It makes sense with what Maria Hill said about the Avengers not being level 7 even though Captain America was seen looking at files on the Tesseract that were labeled level 7. He already knew about, so he probably got special clearance for those files but nothing else at that level.
More importantly if his death was really supposed to be a big secret then he should be holed away somewhere where nobody can find him and only Level 7 and above can read the paperwork proving he's still alive. Or if he's such an important asset that he has to keep working then stick him with Fury on the Helicarrier with high level agents and those sworn to secrecy about it. Having running around all over the globe in plain sight and talking to people kind of invalidates the super secret. Let alone having him walk around Shield central in plain view of all personel regardless of clearance. People will notice. It would be one thing if they changed his apperance and gave him a new ID but he's still walking around in plain sight and going by Phil Coulson.
No point. Captain America fought in the Battle of New York. His heroism was hugely public, with cops taking orders from him to get people to safety, and even him personally saving a group of people holed up in a building - afterward, a woman even thanks him for saving her on a newscast. The fact that Captain America (and for those who know his identity, Steve Rogers) is alive is public knowledge. No amount of clearance level is going to keep that a secret. The goal here is to keep Coulson a secret from Steve, and all SHIELD has to do there is make sure Coulson and Rogers never have a mission in the same place together.
That brings up another very important point though. Now that The Black Widow has released all the information on Shield wouldn't all the Avengers know that Coulson's alive?
Skye deleted all their info before anyone could notice.
Back in The Consultant, Sitwell was Level 6, and was surprised to find out about the existence of Level 7. Then we see him again in The Hub, and he is already Level 8. This is supposed to take place around 2 years later. How did he advance so fast?
Considering the casualties SHIELD suffered at the hands of Loki as well as their operations being expanded, him being promoted to take on more responsibilities as an experienced agent makes sense.
Also Sitwell appeared Item 47 as a level 7 agent, so he was probably promoted soon after The Consultant to level 7 then promoted to level 8 after the Avengers.
It could be that before the Battle of New York, the highest commonly known level was 6, with people like Coulson and Hand secretly Level 7, and Commander Hill and Director Fury at Levels 8 and 9, respectively. Once knowledge of aliens and such became wide spread, there would have been a need for even higher security clearances. note Sitwell goes from 6 to 7, Coulson from 7 to 8, Hill from 8 to 9, and Fury from 9 to 10, however not everyone would necessarily warrant a bump in clearance. This would make sense seeing as how the theft of the Tesseract only rated a Level 7 while later on the Overkill device was a Level 8. Also, Sitwell never said what his rating was in The Hub. He seems to be working under Agent Hand now, so he might still only be a Level 7, much like May and Ward, but he's higher up on the Level 7 pecking order because of who his superior officer is.
If you still think Sitwell was advancing too fast then Winter Soldier pretty much clears that right up Sitwell being devout member of Hydra and Hydra pretty much controlling SHIELD, hence devout members get advancements to high places.
The Norse-Pagan Transportation
How did the Norse Pagans travel from Oslo to Sevilla, with their entire group, despite being sighted and identified in Oslo and thus logically expected for the authorities to be informed and airports on a lookout, and than from Sevilla to Ireland again with no delay and even faster than the Bus?
A group claiming responsibility =/= individual members are known and identified everywhere.
The members were identified, and logically their images and names would be handed to everyone. Also unless they can fly a plane themselves or hijacked one, the latter just making them easy targets, they would still be kept from leaving Norway or Spain.
What I'm wondering is how they can have their faces plastered all over international television with the word "TERRORIST" underneath, yet they're able to walk nonchalantly down a public street in Europe. It's like if Osama bin Laden took a stroll through Los Angeles and nobody noticed. You'd think somebody would have called the cops on them.
Then you send more cops. And then some more cops. And if that doesn't work, escalate to an armored division. I'm not saying they would have succeeded, I'm asking why they apparently didn't even bother to try. And if these guys are really so dangerous that the government is afraid to send law enforcement after them, why haven't the streets been cleared? Why is the government allowing completely defenseless civilians to walk into the path of these dangerous superpowered terrorists?
In a normal world, maybe. In the MCU, there's a point past which you step back and say, "Let's just let SHIELD take this one, guys." That said...I'm still struggling to remember where it's ever said that individual members of this group are named and identified by the authorities.
I don't know if they were named, but their faces were clearly shown on international television and they were identified as the ringleaders of the neo-pagan terrorist group. EDIT: Also, I'm not saying we should have had scenes of cops being murdered in droves by the terrorists. It does make sense that the local authorities would have pulled back and let the military and/or SHIELD handle it (although a scene where they established this would have been nice). What bothers me is all the other people who were just nonchalantly milling around the streets with a pair of internationally-known terrorists standing right in plain sight. Like I said, it's like if Osama bin Laden walked down a street in LA and nobody even noticed he was there. At the very least the people on the streets should have been pointing and running at the sight of them. And the cops may not be able to take these guys in a fight, but they can still clear the streets to minimize civilian casualties.
The Asgardian guy
If that Asgardian guy is trying to stay in Earth without attracting attention, why the hell does he have a steady job? Sure, it's not a high profile work as being a superhero or a film star, but it gets people to know him on a regular basis. And it won't take much more than a decade for people to notice that he does not age, that time passes and he stays the same, and what will he say? He will have to Un-Person himself and begin again in another place, all the time. In the middle ages it was easy, he just had to leave the city, go to another a pair of countries away, and that's it. But now, with all the systems of identification and public databases, it's not such an easy thing. In fact, several secret organizations may notice the pattern: someone appears from out of nowhere at X place, and strangely dissapears a few years later, same thing at Y place after it, same thing at Z place after it... and all those guys are very similar. It won't take long before they would realize that there is an immortal running around.
While there is a risk, it's more like 10-20 years each time, not a few years. He's old enough that lack of aging is less noticeable until many years have passed, especially since it's not odd for people to look younger than they really are. Heck, a quick check shows that Peter MacNicol is 59 while the professor looks more like he's in his 40s. And it's not that odd for someone to find a new job or new stomping grounds every 10-20 years or so. His only flaw was more the bad luck of posing as a Norse mythology expert right when Asgardians decided to return out of the blue, making him more known to SHIELD this time around.
And even if the government catches on to him, what does he have to fear from them? We're talking about a guy who can bend steel with his bare hand and bounce back from a three inch hole in his chest. God only knows what else he can do. Unless they sic the Avengers on him (which they probably won't do, since SHIELD doesn't consider him a threat) I dare say he can handle almost anything they can throw at him.
The key words: he's an alien. A human-like alien, an alien with technology and biological properties that were considered magical or divine by ancient folks, but an alien nonetheless. Do I really have to explain why would the government be interested in capturing him?
Interested? Sure. Able to? Not so sure.
SHIELD still has that weapon that Coulson used against Loki, right?
Probably, but SHIELD isn't interested in killing or capturing him and they wouldn't just hand over the weapon to anyone that might be.
Why not? It was a main point of The Avengers that SHIELD considers the Asgardians a potential threat. And with good reason. So, the knowledge of the Asgardian anatomy, and how to be able to kill an Asgardian would be invaluable strategic info. Yes, this Asgardian poses no threat to anyone, but SHIELD must watch the bigger picture. What if for some reason two Asgardians begin to battle themselves in a populated area here on Earth? And what if an Asgardian tries to use his might to take over the world, or just cause random senseless destruction? Oh, wait... both things have already happened.
And it's a main point of the whole MCU that SHIELD is not the kind of organization that's going to capture an innocent, non-threat person and experiment on them against their will.
According to whom? Let me quote:
—Nick Fury: We're going to neutralize a lot of threats before they happen
—Captain America: Punishment usually came after the crime
—Nick Fury: SHIELD takes the world as it is, not as we would like it to be
SHIELD isn't stupid. This guy isn't interested in taking over the world, and they know this, and even if he was he doesn't have the resources to even try. He is categorically not a threat and never going to be a threat. In fact he's the exact opposite of a threat. He's a valuable asset who can provide lots of valuable intelligence if they treat him fairly. You seem to have completely misjudged what kind of organization SHIELD is if you think they would happily abduct and vivisect this guy just to find out the best way to kill an Asgardian.
In fairness Simmons did suggest vivisecting him, but she was in giddy Mad Scientist mode. They never would have actually allowed it.
Every mention of The List suggests that he would not be detained, just kept under watch. SHIELD does monitor for potential threats, but it would be crazy to assume the guy that has been running around for centuries with only one historical blip is going to decide to take over the world. It would also mean angering Thor if he ever found out. "Sure, Thor, you can see your Asgardian brother. He's right here, here, there, and some of him is down the hall."
Should I remind you that we talk about the SHIELD that created weapons of mass destruction from the tesseract?
Which is irrelevant. Creating weapons out of a power source is not related at all to kidnapping an innocent person and vivisecting him just to find a way to kill him.
There is also the possible issue that Asgard knows he is on Earth and at this time doesn't care since he isn't causing any trouble. If SHIELD were to capture and start experimenting on him for no reason that wouldn't sit well with Asgard or Thor. Thor did not react well when he found out humans were experimenting with the Tesseract since it implies Earth is ready to stand on its own. If he were to find out an organization he (Thor) were allied with and experimenting on his own people how could he convince Asgard to maintain protective of Earth. It might very well decide with withdraw and allow the other realms to start attacking Earth which is worse in the long run.
The Asgardean staff has "INSPIRE", "RAGE", "FIGHT" and "POWER" engraved onto it in Futhark runes. Why on earth would it have (modern) English words on it?
I don't understand the question. Do you think that "inspire", "rage", fight" or "power" are modern concepts that the ancient folks could not understand?
What he means is that the Futhark runes are phonetically spelling the English words themselves, and not their Norse equivalents. So instead of whatever the actual Norse word for "Inspire" would be, it's instead the rune for the "i" sound, the rune for the "n" sound, the rune for the "s" sound, etc.
See the other wiki for a description of runes, which are an actual alphabet. If you saw someone reading "an I", "an N" and so on, it's a translator of runes "explaining" his work for the laymen who does not have a clue on what is he really doing (wich is both the other characters, and us spectators; just as in the episode, only a specialist would actually understand runes)
Yes, we know what runes are. The original question is not about the guy explaining what runes are, because he doesn't do that in the episode. The original question is saying that the ancient Asgardian staff—which was made long before the English language—has runes on it that, phonetically, spell out words that did not exist until centuries later.
It's a Genius Bonus gag that probably didn't have a lot of thought put into it. Someone just thought it'd be a cool idea for the design, so they did it.
Where the hell were Ward's parents when he was growing up? I mean, I can understand them dismissing the occasional fistfight between brothers as a sort of "Boys will be boys" thing. But the things his oldest brother was doing? No parent can ignore or dismiss that.
From later episodes, it appears as if Ward came from a wealthy messed up family a la the Kennedys. His older brother was a bully who tormented Ward and their youngest brother, even forcing Ward to abuse their brother. Their parents were probably blind to it all and, according to Ward's description of them, probably harsh disciplinarians when they did pay attention to their children. Ward apparently started acting out and instead of trying to figure out why, his parents sent him to military school, where he apparently snapped and tried to set fire to his family home while his older brother was in it. He was caught, jailed, and his parents were going to have him prosecuted. This was where Garret found Ward and used Ward's need for a semi-sympathetic authority figure to manipulate the young man into becoming a sleeper agent.
It's possible they weren't aware of it beforehand and might been told by the older brother it was an accident, as we didn't see what happened afterwards.
Unfortunately, parents can and do dismiss that kind of behavior, and for a variety of reasons — straight-up denial being one of the most common. It's not uncommon at all for an entire family to be aware that one member is abusing another, and to do and say absolutely nothing about it.
Knowing that Ward is actually a member of HYDRA, it is possible that his entire family were members as well. That could explain his parents' not punishing the elder Ward brother.
The brothers may have grown up in the foster care system, which is usually depicted as uncaring on TV.
Doubtful. He likely would have brought it up when Skye mentioned she was in foster care.
Ward also later says his parents were "even worse." They might not have cared that their oldest son was abusing his brothers if they were doing it too.
What could possibly be the advantage of not telling your field operatives they'll need to extract themselves? Coulson was spot-on when he told off Agent Hand; when people like Romanov & Barton go on no-extraction missions, they're told in advance, so when the time comes, they aren't completely clueless on how they're going to get out. I understand & appreciate how security levels & need-to-know policies work, but it's one thing not to tell an spy what's in the file he's stealing, and quite another not to tell him whether or not they'll have help escaping with the file. Who needs-to-know that more than the guy going in!? That wasn't Classified Information; that was Poor Communication Kills.
That whole bit was a tad odd. She had no real reason not to tell them, but at the end of the episode when she's talking to Sitwell she seemed to imply she knew Coulson would go after them regardless.
I thought the point was for them to die. It was a suicide mission from the start. If they can get themselves out on their own that's a nice bonus, but they weren't expected to come back.
See the Batman Gambit entry on the main page. She was counting on Coulson's team finding out about the lack of extraction and providing their own. They do have the Cavalry with them, after all.
That doesn't make much sense either. If the plan was always for Coulson's team to provide the extraction, why didn't they just tell Coulson's team about it? That way they would have had time to carefully concoct an extraction plan that was sure to work, instead of having to slap together a last-minute improvised plan that had a very good chance of failing catastrophically.
The purpose was convincing Fitz that the whole thing was planned out, because their mission relied on sending a non-com into a combat situation. Fitz is not a hardened soldier. Telling him that there is a full plan for getting in and out gave him a sense of security in the mission. If he'd known that once the mission was complete, he was going to be SOL, it would have affected his ability to perform his job. Even Ward recognized this; he waited until Fitz was almost done before mentioning that they're screwed. For Ward, he's been played up to be the badass that Romanov and Barton are; an assumption was made that he can recognize what needs to be done and get himself out alive. For Fitz, either Ward can get him out alive, or he won't; Fitz is Level 5. He's kind of expendable. It's cold and kind of cruel, but that's the calculus that an officer like what we've seen Hand to be like would make.
That would make plenty of sense if Ward had been told, but he hadn't. It just appeared that he had figured it out on his own right at that moment. As is, Ward & Fitz's only hope of survival was the rest of the team defying orders to find & retrieve them. Which Hand seemed to be counting on. Which is idiotic, unless the whole freaking hierarchy of SHIELD (save Fury & maybe Hill) is out to get Coulson.
Except if Ward had been told he might have told Fitz, defeating the purpose of keeping Fitz in the dark. As for Hand apparently having expected Coulson and team to save the day, she had probably not told them about the lack of extraction as a test of the team's resourcefulness. She wanted to know if these relatively untested agents and non-agent were as good as Coulson claimed. Maybe a little professional jealousy was mixed in, too, based on her referring to Coulson as Fury's "favorite" and acting as if his assignment on the Bus isn't important. What she did wasn't nice, ethical, and quite possibly broke a few SHIELD codes of conduct, but she wouldn't be the first person ever to abuse a position of power.
That would mean Hand was willing to waste the lives of two valuable SHIELD agents for no good reason. If this was all a "test" for Coulson's team it goes way beyond unethical or against SHIELD regulations. It was straight up reckless and stupid, and brushes up against downright evil.
Another case in point: Skye shouldn't have hacked into the database in the first place. She wouldn't have had access full stop if it hadn't have been for Simmons. What if Skye had decided to do the right thing, or Simmons hadn't been as worried? Ward would have probably survived, but Fitz probably wouldn't have made it out. So, why not tell Coulson that he has to provide Ward and Fitz with extraction because all other assets are needed elsewhere? This would have meant that Ward and Fitz would know exactly what they should expect for the extraction (a big hovering plane), so they would have also been able to get to a more suitable extraction point on time. Also, Hand wouldn't have had a very understandably angry Coulson barge in during the middle of a major operation, Simmons wouldn't be as worried about Fitz, and Skye wouldn't have tried to hack into the SHIELD Database. Agent Hand is not a good right hand to have.
Additionally, consider what Coulson and co. had to do in order to extract their people. Skye illegally hacked the SHIELD database (again). Simmons assaulted a senior SHIELD agent and broke into a secure area. Coulson willfully disobeyed a direct order and committed a very public act of insubordination. And May went AWOL to rescue Ward and Fitz. In most military organizations these are court martial offenses (and in Skye's case would normally have landed her in federal prison). Every member of Coulson's team, and Coulson himself, had to basically break the law in order to extract Ward and Fitz. If that was the plan all along, then that's a fucking terrible plan.
It could be that Agent Hand was running a gambit to try to gain ammunition to use against the team at a later date. The first half of season one showed that the characters on The Bus operate with a high level of autonomy within SHIELD and that Coulson's way of running his team is starting to rub some people the wrong way. This promo seems to show Hand coming in to run the team during Coulson's absence. She might use the incident in South Ossetia to her advantage here and try and bring the characters more in line with SHIELD doctrine.
Well given the reveal that Hand is either Hydra, working for the Clairvoyant, or IS the Clairvoyant, this suddenly makes a lot more sense. The plan was stupid because she was likely trying to get Ward and Fitz killed, while using acceptable losses as an excuse. That's also probably why she was being so obstructive when it came to helping get Coulson back. She didn't want him returned.
Now an unreveal. Hand was loyal all along, but apparently suspected Coulson. This makes her actions in retrospect somewhat understandable; rather than carrying the Idiot Ball and/or the Conflict Ball this whole time, she thought that Coulson was a traitor and his entire team was compromised, but lacked the evidence to make a formal accusation. Hence her actions not to get them outright killed, but to leave them in situations where they had to keep themselves from getting killed. Once the civil war in SHIELD began she ended up on the right side. Kinda makes you feel bad that Ward shot her dead, doesn't it?.
Wait doesn't that imply Hand was perfectly willing to send two people into a situation that could get them killed, because of a hunch that was wrong?
Truth in Television for the espionage world. Sad to say, spies are hung out to dry all the time by their own side for reasons no better than this. Ward was capable of dealing with it, Fitz not so much. Also, her hunch wasn't 100% wrong; Coulson's team is infiltrated. It's just not Coulson who's with HYDRA. And Coulson did lead the Clairvoyant to TAHITI. And if Coulson hadn't saved Garrett from the drone attack at the beginning of the episode, the Clairvoyant would have been killed right then. Oops.
If Victoria Hand's plan was to sabotage Coulson's team because she thought he was the Clairvoyant then why didn't she try to have the team arrested. I mean, Skye had hacked a government database, Simmons shot a superior officer, albeit non-fatally, and Coulson went AWOL. All these things could have Coulson and his team some major jail-time. Hand missed a perfectly good opportunity to take down someone who she thought was the leader of a terrorist organization.
Maybe she did try that, but Fury protected Coulson. Or maybe she knew Fury was protecting Coulson already, so this was basically a zany scheme to either get some of Coulson's traitorous team killed, or have them do illegal reckless things that would cause others to realize something was wrong with Fury protecting them. (Hell, maybe she thought Fury was the Clairvoyant.)
Mike and Centipede
So it's been firmly established now that the group developing Centipede technology are the same group that nabbed Akela. And it seems like it's standard procedure for them to give their "recruits" an eyeball bomb to enforce cooperation. Why didn't they do that to Mike? As the only Centipede test subject to actually survive the early stages of development, he seems like a pretty valuable asset that they'd want to keep on a tight leash.
Mike only survived the early stages of development because SHIELD grabbed him. Before then, he was set to explode like anyone else.
Okay, but while he was a test subject, Mike was still just out there in the world, living his normal everyday life...with experimental weapons technology implanted in him. The Centipede group didn't seem to be monitoring him other than regularly scheduled check-ins with his doctor. That seems awfully lax in comparison to their behavior later on.
Eyeball implants may be expensive, so they didn't want to waste it on a test subject who was unlikely to survive long enough to be an actual asset. Or alternatively, something in the Centipede process was believed to interfere with the eyeball implants, but now they've fixed that bug.
SHIELD was barely aware of Centipede before the events of the Pilot. The lab explosion plus Mike's very public superheroics focused SHIELD's attention on them, and Coulson's team proved surprisingly adept at hunting them. The bionic eyes are an extra precaution now that Coulson and co. are dogging Centipede's steps.
In "Eye Spy", we only saw eyeball implants in characters without Centipede serum: Akela and the Englishman. We don't see actual Centipede soldiers with eyeball implants until "The Bridge", well after the serum is stabilized. Centipede didn't want to waste their time putting the implants into people who could still explode all on their own at any moment.
Given that Ward knows that Centipede is in the habit of wiring their soldiers to self-destruct, why does he automatically decide that Peterson being with Centipede is a sign of treason rather than considering that he might be acting under duress due to being wired to blow?
I see two reasons. 1st-Same reason Akelah was still getting the book thrown at her. Mike was a SHIELD agent trainee. One of SHIELD's rules is likely not to assist known enemies under duress, EVEN with the penalty of death. Remember SHIELD agents are expected to die for the cause if needed, so it would probably be expected that Mike should have defied Centipede and gotten his head blown up. Added to the fact that he's seemingly doing their bidding to see his son again, which they'd already established was a potential conflict of interest. SHIELD agents are expected to put the mission before family, and family is discouraged. That's why they prefer people like Skye who have no family as their favored recruits, and even Coulson lost his father by the time he was an adult and deliberately chose not to have a family for the sake of SHIELD. Coulson even said Mike would have to make a choice, and he did, he chose his son over SHIELD and what they swore to protect. The other example is the same reason Fitz was willing to kill every Centipede agent in their way to get Coulson back, even though he knew it wasn't really their fault. It was personal because one of their own was involved. Mike chose not to help Skye and she was nearly killed as a result, and Ward took that personally. Yes it's somewhat selfish and hypocritical of Ward to think like that, but he and the team (except Skye so far) already have shown they value their own higher than others, when they were willing kill Quinn if Skye died, and they went against orders and killed those Guest House guards to save her. Plus Ward never really liked Mike to start with. He was weary of him, and Mike blew their second chance they gave him by turning on the team for his own personal interests. It's might be hard to remember because Ward is usually with the team, who he likes and trusts, but Ward isn't exactly Mr. Sympathetic to people he doesn't really know.
On the other hand, it seemed like Mike could have killed Skye himself when Quinn told him to, but was allowed to choose not to kill her since it wasn't a direct order from his eyepiece. Having just woken up from stasis, he might not even have known that Quinn would shoot Skye after he left the room.
His orders were to kill the other people, not Skye, and he has to obey them. A moot point though because Quinn had a gun, and announced intentions to hurt her, so Mike was still leaving Skye captive and unarmed in a room with Quinn. It was common sense they were going to hurt her. So Ward's point still stands. Mike left Skye at the mercy of a guy who had a grudge against her with a gun, to go do the Clairvoyant's dirty work to save his own skin instead, when he could have taken Quinn out with one punch before his implant killed him. Mike wouldn't have known that Quinn would only slowly fatally wound her so Coulson would go looking for his miracle cure, but that only makes it worse as he would have expected Quinn to shoot her in the head and kill her.
"An 0-8- 4 supercedes all national claims."
That line from the second episode puzzles me. If it was some weird quasi-magical artifact that fell from the sky like Thor's hammer, then it would make sense that SHIELD gets dibs. But how can the Peruvian government have no claim to an object they personally commissioned?
They never admitted they had it commissioned, and given who they tapped to do it, they wouldn't exactly look good for doing so.
Okay, maybe the 0-8-4 in Peru is a bad example. What I mean is, in general, what gives SHIELD the authority to simply ignore the wishes of a sovereign nation? Unless I'm mistaken "0-8-4" just means "we don't know what this thing is or what it does". Does SHIELD really have the authority to drop into any sovereign nation and take any unknown object they find? Even if that nation built it themselves?
SHIELD answers to the World Security Council, which has the authority to do things like launch nuclear weapons at a major American city in minutes without, apparently, going through any of the US Government's regular channels. So, yes, it seems that SHIELD has exactly that much authority. Also, the 0-8-4 doesn't just mean SHIELD doesn't know what it is—it means nobody knows what it is. Nobody's claiming responsibility for it, nobody's admitting to building it, nobody is even coming forward to say what it is. An 0-8-4 is, basically, shit that fell out of the sky and nobody knows what to do with it, and apparently SHIELD is who you call when that happens.
It's actually a clever set up. Either somebody has to fess up to what the 0-8-4 is (which means if its a superweapon someone has to admit they had an alien tech superweapon willingly in their possesion and face the consequences) or Shield gets it. That makes it impossible for someone to have an 0-8-4 type object they don't want Shield to know they know they have without trying some complex plan like the Peru government feigning ignorance while having a small team try to steal it from Shield.
But they do know where it came from. HYDRA scientists built it for the Peruvian government and misfired during testing. The Peruvian leader explains all this to Coulson.
Yes—after she took over the Bus to steal it. No one claimed it originally, and the Peruvian government never officially said a word on it. Reyes was just indulging in some Evil Gloating. If asked, the Peruvians could have easily disavowed all knowledge of her and the device. And actually, Coulson implies that she was planning to use it to take over the country (thought she didn't answer), so maybe they really didn't have any knowledge of it, and she just stumbled on some WWII records and got lucky.
As far as the national sovereignty question, nations that allow SHIELD to operate on their soil at all probably have treaty obligations that spell out its areas of authority and responsibility. And they probably agree to those terms for the same reasons that there are American military bases all over the world: they get the benefits without having to pick up the check.
Coulson's Resurrection *CONTAINS SPOILERS*
After the events of "A Magical Place" it seems to be confirmed that Coulson was very very dead in The Avengers. The doctor (Ron Glass) seen in the pilot was one of those who was involved in bringing him back from death, and it looked like he was called in partway through the process, while Phil's brain was being rebuilt (for lack of a better word) and Phil himself was wide awake on the operating table, begging them to let him die. And it isn't All Just a Dream this time, because there is independent confirmation from the doctor. The most obvious questions to arise from this are:
Why did they not call this doctor in to start with? With S.H.I.E.L.D.'s level of transportation technology, it seems like he could be fetched from anywhere on the planet within hours, yet the implication is that he was not brought in for days. Yes, there was a surgeon already present, but the implication is that Shepherd Book, sorry, Ron Glass' character was the best, otherwise why call him in at that point?
Given the doctor's reaction during the flash back and once Coulson confronted him, they may have decided that he would have been so against what they wanted to do, that it would be easier to bypass him, hoping that they wouldn't need him at all. Seeing as they brought him into the loop after Coulson was 'alive', his own morality and ethics wouldn't let him kill Coulson all over again even though that's what he was begging for. So instead he did the only thing could could do in the situation, tried to lessen Coulson's suffering as best he could, performing the 'lesser of two evils' by altering his memories to give him something to live for.
Why the hell would it be required for the patient to be awake during this apparently excruciating procedure? Doesn't the brain do everything asleep that it does awake? If your technology can trace the neurons well enough to rebuld them days after death, then shouldn't it be able to do that while you have a nice nap?
It is, in fact, Truth in Television to do brain surgery on an awake patient (sometimes). There are no nerve endings in the brain so it only takes a local anesthetic to open the scalp and cranium. Why? So that you can monitor the patient's cognitive processes and make sure that a) you're not breaking anything important and b) that you're operating on the correct area. The surgical team stimulates localized parts of the brain and the patient's reactions tells them what they're working on. Presumably, Coulson's agony was from the extent of his ordeal, as just the brain surgery shouldn't have done it; unless they were stimulating the pain center of his brain.
Why weren't the doctors wearing surgical masks? During open-brain surgery?
For the same reason TV and movie astronauts don't have sun visors on their helmets but do have those silly interior lights that illuminate their faces.
The fact that Fury would order this for Coulson makes it clear how valuable he really is (was); but at the same time doesn't it make Fury seem extremely selfish, to put Phil through this process "for the greater good"? Or is there truly nobody else who can do Coulson's job? (And could this be a Take That at fans who "refused to let Coulson die"?)
That's if we assume that keeping Coulson alive was the true end goal of the experiment. That might have just been a bonus.
While there is no evidence that they are borrowing any of the back story of Coulson and Fury from the main continuity of the comics, if they are going with a variation of the two having known each other for years and being best friends prior to joining SHIELD, then one could maybe see that Nick was willing to do anything to save his best friend, even if he went to some truly horrible means to achieve it. Terrible things have happened for the sake of loved ones before in the MCU, and Fury's shown that he isn't above going to extremes for what he believes is right. With all that technology at his fingertips, he may not have even thought twice about trying to save his friend once the danger was over. It certainly doesn't justify the lengths to which he went, but it could explain his reasoning.
Fury: Just stay awake. Eyes on me. Coulson: No, I'm clockin' out here. Fury: Not an option.
Taking the events of Captain America: The Winter Soldier into the account, perhaps Fury was already suspicious that S.H.I.E.L.D. might have been compromised (hence establishing secret bases like Providence). Given the possibility, he'd definitely want someone he could completely trust to help him rebuild things if things went sideways.
What happened to Coulson's heart? It is said that the cause of death was his heart being torn into several pieces, so shouldn't he be getting heart surgery rather than brain surgery? (Sorry if it sounds stupid.)
Wasn't he supposedly dead for several days? Meaning he'd have suffered brain death as well. Fixing a heart is comparatively easy, you could probably get a replacement from an organ donor, fixing a brain is less so.
There are 6 brief shots of various types of medical/scientific equipment that are implied to be each of the previous attempts to save him; #3 looks an awful lot◊ like an artificial heart◊. It, among other things, could have been what Akela Amandour saw inside of him with her cybernetic eye.
This is a great answer, but causes an additional Headscratcher for the O.P. Would it not have been better, medically speaking, to bring Coulson's brain back to life first, then rebuild his heart? If they have the technology to rebuild him, they should have the technology on the carrier to get oxygenated blood flowing to the brain almost instantly, thus preventing brain death; or else to put Coulson in suspended animation until he can be put into surgery. (I know we're in Joss Whedon's 'verse, so Break the Cutie is in full effect here, but still...)
The GH-325 was shown to have properties of cellular regeneration. Surely it was used to heal his heart. But, considering the source of that thing, a blue humanoid creature, it is possible that Coulson healed but that his body is now slowly become an hybrid between human and whatever that thing was (Atlantean, Kree, Na'vi, place your bet), and that's what horrified Akela so much.
In "The Hub" her entire plan requires Skye and Simmons to commit several crimes to save Fitz and Ward. However, in "The Magical Place", she insists on doing everything by the book, to the point of kicking Skye off the bus. Why?
There are a number of possibilities. It's been noted that she doesn't seem to like Coulson's team and Skye in particular (which might be why she claimed Skye shot Sitwell, when it was Simmons), so she might just be acting generally obstructive, but not enough so that she'll actually get in trouble if they come out on top.
It's also not clear that she ever intended for Skye and Simmons to save Fitz and Ward. Hand is a very ruthless individual. She may not have intended Ward and Fitz to come back at all; not maliciously, I'll note, she just didn't prioritize their survival as being particularly important. If Ward can get himself and/or Fitz out alive, that's a bonus, but not a required mission parameter. By her own admission, this is how Hawkeye and Widow operate.
As was pointed out in the "Extraction Plan" folder above, though, Hawkeye and Widow are told there won't be extraction before they end up in a position where the only chance of survival is another agent defying orders.
The bottom line is that Victoria Hand had the Conflict Ball super-glued to her forehead to set her up as a Red Herring to be the Clairvoyant. The fact that it didn't really work and just made her seem badly written is because she was just badly written.
Mike and Centipede, round 2
Okay, I'll believe that Mike's advanced healing could've saved him from the explosion at the end of "The Bridge". But how the crap did Centipede get Mike to put an eye implant into him? After the explosion, the Centipede team left & the SHIELD team stayed. How could Centipede possibly have gotten to the body first? By all accounts, it doesn't make sense.
Centipede has shown to be very resourceful, they probably took him from the ambulance and faked his death at the hospital.
Or, since he's apparently the new Deathlok, they may not have faked his death at all.
Nope. If they could bring him back that easily, they wouldn't have needed to question Coulson about his resurrection.
The stinger where Mike appears minus a leg and an eye happens after Coulson is rescued from Centipede. And we don't know how much time passed between Coulson's rescue and Mike's reawakening. They could have learned just enough from interrogating Coulson to reanimate Mike after a few weeks of experimentation.
We see exactly what Coulson tells them. Nothing that Coulson says is actually helpful, and the only person he says it to is immediately captured by SHIELD. There is nothing they could have gotten from Coulson that would have helped in reviving Mike.
We only see part of Coulson's interrogation. We actually don't know what Centipede learned from him. And if the Clairvoyant is as all-seeing as his name implies it wouldn't matter if the Centipede agents on the scene were captured by SHIELD. At the very least they may have learned from Coulson's interrogation the name of the doctors who revived Coulson, and that piece of information could have easily led them to the secret of how to reanimate the dead. The bottom line is this: Mike is Deathlok, and Deathlok in the comics is traditionally a dead man brought back to life and turned into a cyborg. If he wasn't killed and brought back then there would be no point in the writers turning him into Deathlok at all. Ergo, it is at least probable that he was killed and brought back to life.
And "traditionally" in the comics Hulk got that way because he jumped on a gamma nuclear bomb. "Traditionally" in the comics, Nick Fury was a white guy who was active in WWII and kept getting youth serums and stuff to keep him active to today. "Traditionally" in the comics, Hank Pim creates Ultron. There's plenty of "point" to them using a character's name without using every single detail from their comics backstory. And the whole point of Coulson's interrogation was that the Clairvoyant couldn't see how he'd been brought back, and what we're shown of the interrogation makes it pretty clear he wasn't giving them a detailed play-by-play of everything that happened.
Watching "The Bridge" again, it's not 100% clear how many teams the Centipede project may have had on site. It's also not clear exactly what happened to Mike. They blow up the tankers as a diversion to cover moving Coulson from the limo to their helicopter, then blow up the limo as well. It's entirely possible, or even probable, that they had another team we never even saw at the scene, and they were the ones who not only triggered the limo explosion, but retrieved Mike. Alternate theory- when the tankers exploded, Mike was actually thrown clear, landing in the same area where the Centipede team was busy moving Coulson from vehicle to vehicle, and he was picked up at the same time. So Mike was in the back of the chopper, at the same time Coulson was in the front.
Why doesn't the eyepiece have a microphone in it, so that the "handler" can listen in on their victim in addition to watching through their eyes? It seems like an easy thing to implement, and if so, Skye and Ward's scheme at the end of the episode "Eye Spy" never would have had a chance.
There probably just wasn't enough room inside the eyepiece (though there might be if they took out the kill switch device). The fact that they were even able to miniaturize it that much is a minor miracle. Even if they could do it, a tiny microphone would be pretty easy to disable. It would have to be placed on the outside of the head (as opposed to inside the mouth or the ear canal, where it would be drowning in ambient noise) so all Akela would have had to do is plant her finger over the microphone and she could talk to whoever she wants.
Why is Centipede so interested in questioning Coulson?
The technology that allowed SHIELD to revive him and alter his memory is certainly something interesting in its own right, but there is no way Centipede could learn anything interesting about it by merely interrogating the patient. Even if there was something interesting to be learnt from Coulson in that regard, why would Centipede care about such technology? Centipede is a horrible boss and often kills its own employees when they disappoint him. Reviving dying employees is just not their style.
Raina told us the reason (or the reason she was told, anyway): The Clairvoyant wants to be able to bring his soldiers back from the dead. While it is unlikely they could get the full details out of Coulson, it's also likely that he's the only one they know for certain was involved in the project. So even if he can't give the full details, he can provide enough clues to know who to grab and interrogate next—and they will likely know more, and so on. What probably happened was that they just saw an opportunity to nab Coulson and took it. If it was a choice between him and Fury, they would have grabbed Fury.
They needed to know what he knew so they could perfect their Deathlok project.
Grabbed Fury? Easier said that done. The guy kicks all kinds of ass on his own and, as the director of SHIELD, he's probably surrounded by at least half-a-dozen agents at all times just in the ordinary course of his business. They might as well try to abduct Captain America.
Well, yes, of course, that's why they didn't. But the opportunity could have conceivably arisen. In reality, it was far easier to grab Coulson. If they knew more about the project, they would have grabbed Dr. Streiten, since he has even less protection.
But as we've seen in the stinger for The End of the Beginning and in The Winter Soldier, Fury actually does just drive himself around in an ass-kicking SUV with no escort. Remembering that he is head of a covert, mainly non-existent organization who wants as little attention as possible, therefore, no "SHIELD Secret Service agents". And when HYDRA does try to assassinate him, as it turns out, it's still not that easy.
Don't forget the simpler explaination — Centipede doesn't want to interrogate Coulson for the answers, they want to dissect Coulson.
"Ragtag" explains things: Garret is the first Dethlok, and is dying from organ failure. His interest in Coulson is because he believes whatever brought Coulson back will keep him alive. Making an army of Centipede supersoldiers for Hydra along the way is, as Skye said, triple bonus points.
Putting the team on a plane
What is the point of having a team that lives on a plane that flies everywhere? SHIELD is an international organization. If there is a problem in, say, China why not just let a Chinese SHIELD team handle it? Why wait hours to fly in this particular team?
They're a fireteam, supporting other cells. They need to be able to move quickly.
Mike Peterson Powers and Injuries
Why hasn't the Extremis virus regenerated his leg (or eye)? Wasn't that one of the plot points of Iron Man 3?
This version is watered down with other elements. It does vastly reduce the Healing Factor and mean they don't have pyro powers, but it also makes them much less likely to explode.
Also, since he's now Deathlok, he may have been killed and brought back to life, so he might not have any regenerative powers anymore, if he had any to start with.
Why didn't he just shoot her?
In "Yes Men", during the fight at the biker bar, Ward had Lorelei dead to rights with the night-night gun. Why didn't he shoot her right there?
Probably because he asked her to surrender out of force of habit, and while it took physical contact to overpower him, her speaking must have been enough to unbalance him until she could grab him.
It also probably wouldn't have worked. Asgardians are immune to regular bullets. It was unlikely a night-night round would have worked. He probably knew this and was hoping he could just scare her into giving up.
In light of the lengths Ward has gone through to gain the teams trust as an infiltrating HYDRA agent, its possible that he let Lorelei capture him on purpose in order to make the team save him as a trust builder.
What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas?
Setting aside how pointless the scene was in general, are the characters going to completely ignore the fact that Ward was effectively Raped while under Lorelei's mind control?
Yes and no. Yes, that was a horrible thing she did, but, honestly, it's the exact same thing she was doing the rest of the episode. Every time she uses her powers, she's raping men, it's just Mind Rape rather than physical rape. So what's the point of bringing it up? The only person who needs to discuss it is May, and Ward and May have that whole "I'm totally more stoic than you" thing going on, so when he tried to apologize for hurting her (even though it wasn't his fault), she just brushed it off instead of discussing it, admitting she was hurt, but eventually forgiving him because he was mind controlled and thus not responsible for his actions.
If that's even what May was hurt by—I got the sense what hurt her was when Lorelei said that May wasn't Ward's "first choice," implying that he had feelings for someone else on the team.
Unfortunately, it appears that Double Standard: Rape, Female on Male is in effect to some degree here. Ward's a tough guy, and it seems that he's being expected to just suck it up and move on.
The Clairvoyant and Rising Tide
If the source of the Clairvoyant's powers is having an astronomically high clearance level within SHIELD, why was there any need to hire a hacker to get a hold of a SHIELD datafeed?
Raina hired Miles and Raina obviously doesn't have access. It's obvious that the Clairvoyant wants to keep everyone in the dark about being high up in SHIELD, so it makes sense that they wouldn't just arbitrarily give away secrets to subordinates, which would tip off people fast.
Victoria Hand's test
So... Victoria Hand tests people to see if they're HYDRA by pretending to be HYDRA herself and then demanding they swear allegiance. This seems like a terribly flawed way of rooting out HYDRA agents, because a) we've seen that HYDRA members recognize one another within SHIELD, so real members of the group would know she wasn't one of them; and b) Loyal SHIELD agents might just immediately decide to go down shooting (Agent Triplett could easily have killed one of her men, for example) or they might decide to take the chance to infiltrate HYDRA by faking loyalty. Either way, she's putting herself, her men, and the good agents at great risk and it doesn't seem like she's actually going to catch any HYDRA spies.
It's foolish to assume every Hydra agent in SHIELD knows every single other Hydra member in SHIELD by name and sight. Aside from compartmentalization (if one agent's captured, he can give everyone away; you think every grunt is going to know the top people?), there are thousands of Hydra members in SHIELD. That is just way too damn many of them for every individual to keep track of. And putting them at risk? They're all already at risk; they've reached a point where everyone's at risk of death at any moment.
When the guards bust in on Coulson and his team (and Garrett), Garrett says that he knows some of them had to have been recruited by Sitwell, and they know what to do. The implication is that the two guards who were HYDRA assumed (correctly) that since Garrett knew who one of their leaders was, he had to be HYDRA himself, but didn't know he was until that moment.
How many options does she have? (Given that she is once more forced to carry the Idiot Ball and Conflict Ball at the same time (one could say she has her Hands full), but that's plot related, not character, so it's not really relevant to why she did what she did.) She is aware that another organization has infiltrated her own, but has no real idea who is in it or even how many members there are. She needs a quick and dirty test to determine who might belong to this enemy group, or maybe even more importantly, who doesn't belong to it and might still be loyal to her. So, she uses the method seen. Maybe she was planning to arrest all those who agreed to pledge to HYDRA and sort it out later, but she figured that anyone who refused as vehemently as Simmons and Triplett, and then fought for S.H.I.E.L.D., was a safe bet to be loyal. Except for an agent in deep deep cover like Ward, who was so committed to his superior's survival that he would actually help capture him alive, so he could rescue him later....
It was pretty implied Hand killed honest SHIELD agents because she thought they might be Hydra (ie, anyone who resisted being taken) and she had guys attacking Coulson's team with lethal force throughout the ep, even though her hunch had been wrong. It's kind of a jerkish way to go about it but that's Hand for you. Hand probably figured 1. mook Hydra plants wouldn't know the higher ups involved so they'd expose themselves by saying "No wait boss I'm Hydra too see." and show off their Hydra union cards or whatever. and 2. Anyone that easily caved to Hydra was a traitor that couldn't hack it and deserved death. Granted Triplett passed her test a little too well when he almost killed that clean guy, but Hand likely decided anyone that picked the death option, even if they just sat back and prepared to eat bullets without resistance rather than futilely try to fight back was trustworthy.
Nick Fury has secret bases, presumably dozens all over the planet. That makes perfect sense. He or someone very high up contacted Coulson with coordinates to said secret base. Still makes perfect sense. There are serious problem with this though. First the base is so well hidden that Coulson is literally standing on top of it and only notices it because he hurls his badge in frustration. (The turret was designed to shoot fast moving metalic objects and might never have given away its position to them just wandering around and despite looking for it everybody present Failed a Spot Check pretty spectacularly. A base you can't find with directions to the front door is a bit too well hidden. Then worse, when they get in the caretaker is still keeping secrets from the team but allows Skye to call out on her cell phone of all things to an agent in the field? It's not like she snuck away she did it in plain sight and he asks who's she calling instead of just stopping her. Even if Ward wasn't with Hydra calling out on a cell phone from a secured location is some serious amateur hour bullshit that someone should have stopped.
It's probably some crazy untraceable SHIELD cell phone. Also the caretaker is in the other room with Coulson when she makes the call.
He saw her start making the call, though which was the point. He probably just thought better of trying to go over Coulson's head on that.
Why didn't Coulson or May stop her?! Even if it us some crazy untraceable SHIELD cell phone the current arc is about how SHIELD has been very heavily compromised by HYDRA. Far enough up the chain that Coulson, May and Ward have all have various fingers pointed at them. I think SHIELD compromised trumps untraceable cell phone that they created. Even then they knew that the Fridge was under attack and Ward could very easily have been I dunno, acting under duress? There are so many reasons why someone should have stopped Skye that have absolutely nothing to do with Ward's current status that it screams collective Idiot Ball.
Because she's the paranoid uber-hacker who just erased all their information. All of it. By herself. If she thinks the phone's secure, it's secure, and she'd be able to tell if Ward was talking under duress—not to mention he has training to resist torture. And of course, they trust him, so they don't think him knowing where they are is a problem.
The same paranoid uber-hacker that they caught in the pilot episode? We know it's plausible she allowed herself to be caught but Coulson doesn't know that and the custodian probably doesn't know any of them except May and Coulson. And he doesn't even attempt to stop her he just asks who's she calling.
Coulson gave her the phone earlier in the ep, which was given to him by Hand, who assured him it would be untracable and the best secure way to stay in contact with her and Ward. What more can Coulson trust than that? He NEEDS to stay in contact with them in order for them to still coordinate. And the only reason it isn't secure is because Ward is Hydra, but that's not Skye's fault, the whole team still trusts him and don't know they were played so badly. After Ward's been made, then maybe Coulson will start operating with the assumption that they cannot trust or contact anyone outside their small unit (and even then...man...they just might not even be able to trust each other. Damn you Ward.) ever again. But for the time being they still thought it was safe to call Ward and bring him to their base.
I think the team minus Ward will still be able to trust each other. Coulson was clean enough to get the coordinates to Providence, Fury trusted May enough to give her a direct line to him, FitzSimmons and Triplett all defied HYDRA in the battle at the Hub (Simmons and Triplett even expecting to die in their defiance), and Skye should want to stay as far from HYDRA as possible after they've directly threatened her.
So exactly why has all of SHIELD been declared a terrorist organization? HYDRA may have infiltrated SHIELD but that doesn't make SHIELD itself evil.
HYDRA is SHIELD. If you haven't seen Winter Soldier, do so. The organization is rotten to the core. There are good guys, obviously, and they may even be the majority, but SHIELD needs to be burned to the ground. Now, the problem here is that the various world governments are less interested in making sure that HYDRA has been completely purged from the remnants as they are in stealing all of SHIELD's supertech.
Also all the governments have basically had to deal with SHIELD acting holier than everyone and being above reproach and everyone else's jurisdiction for the last 70 years. They are probably THRILLED to finally get the chance to crack down on the, from their POV, arrogant suits that forced their way above everything and did what they wanted in the name of "peace" but were too stupid to notice Hydra sitting right under their noses all along. Plus we saw in Winter Soldier that the guys who basically admitted they screwed up and ditched SHIELD for greener pastures like Hill and Sharon were allowed to relocate with no apparent fuss. It's the SHIELD guys that stubbornly insist on continuing to try to operate like they were and trying to ignore or downplay what just happened they are going after, because they feel SHIELD just cannot be trusted at all anymore, and anyone who refuses to realize that is dangerous.
The declaration they'd been made a terrorist organization happened after Coulson told everyone to bail out and ran himself. Just as they were leaving, he mentioned that most of the personnel at the Hub had decided to surrender when the American forces came. If you were a government, a quick and dirty assumption is that the honest people would surrender and distance themselves from SHIELD, and the ones who refused to and ran could be threats, and possibly HYDRA themselves.
Winter Soldier also revealed that Hydra had penetrated the civilian government(s). It's entirely possible that Hydra's deep-cover agents were influential enough to add a push for SHIELD to be labeled a terrorist organization, just to make things more difficult for their enemy, if not destroy it totally.
Real world government do that all the time. When you want to wage a war against an group of persons and not call it a war, you label them "terrorists" (whether they are doing any terrorist activities or not) and say you fight terrorism. It may just be a reference to that. Besides, it is politically much more comfortable for world leaders to say "They are terrorists and we are fighting them" than "They are an international spying agency which we let operate for years with almost no control or supervision, and now most of their assets and technology have been taken over by real terrorists by our fault."
Does Garret's line "Don't forget to follow your dreams", said to a random prisoner escaping from The Fridge, mean anything significant?
You'll find out next week.
It most likely might be relevant, but also consider that he released those prisoners as a general distraction. It doesn't matter what "dreams" they follow, just so long as they cause some mayhem that the good guys have to deal with.
Considering he knows about the Cellist thanks to Ward however, he probably was addressing Daniels in particular, knowing he'd go after her and Coulson would spring to the rescue.
Okay, so I've seen plenty of plots where the villain is "a woman who can use mind control powers only against men." Sif EXPLICITLY tells Coulson and the team that Lorelei can mind control men AND ONLY MEN. SHIELD has plenty of female agents, but brazenly opts to send in Grant instead of Melinda, or Maria Hill, or Agent 13, or any other SHIELD agent who is not male. But I guess the episode would have been boring if Lorelei just gets tackled by an all-female SWAT team.
There was a time limit, and women are still a minority in any type of armed forces. They just couldn't get an all-female team together fast enough. The plan was to have the men (and the women who were present, like May) handle the brainwashed guys while Sif slapped the collar on her. But then the collar got damaged, so that went out the window.
It also seemed possible Coulson and co just didn't take the warning too seriously at first. "Oh she can control weak minded men with her voice and others with a touch? No problem. We're not weak minded so just don't let her touch you and we'll be fine." Once they lost Ward, Coulson proceeds to send in an all woman team and keep himself away from the scene until they'd confirmed she was gone, so he'd learned his lesson. They were just careless at first.
Ward and Lorelei *CONTAINS SPOILERS from 1x17+*
Now that we know that Ward was Evil All Along, his behaviour with Lorelei seems weird. It seems quite clear that Lorelei's control totally overrides any previous loyalty and makes the victim her devoted slave while preserving his skills. So why didn't Ward tell her everything about HYDRA and the Clairvoyant?
We can of course speculate that he did tell her but it is never revealed to the viewer. But it is not likely for at least two reasons:
Lorelei's only goal in life is taking over powerful men to play sadistic games of power and domination with whole countries and worlds. Which means that if Ward had told her about HYDRA and the Clairvoyant, she would likely have been extremely interested. I can imagine the scene: "Oh, by the way, I was never truly loyal to those people, I was just inflitrating their team. I am a high-ranking member of HYDRA, an evil conspiration that infiltrated SHIELD and plans to take over the world. I followed one of their leaders, his name is John Garrett but those days he styles himself the Clairvoyant. But of course now I only care about you." What would Lorelei do? She would ask to be taken to the Clairvoyant at once so she can control him and take over HYDRA.
If Ward had spilled the beans, he would likely have been very upset about that after he is released from Lorelei's control, but he shows no such concern. And probably Lorelei would have tried to use that information as a way to destabilize the team or to bargain for her freedom when things were turning sour for her.
While it's possible Ward managed to remain in a position where he never had to be prompted to reveal that info to her, he could have told her. We don't know what their plan specifically was after taking the bus and taking out Sif. It could have been to go straight to Garrett to get him and HYDRA under their control. As for why Lorelei didn't immediately blurt it out, why bring it up when she was seemingly going to win anyway? And afterwards she couldn't talk.
On another topic, the Lorelei episode and its epilogue show that even though he is HYDRA, Ward does care for someone in the team (likely Skye).
Additionally, would Lorelei even know what to do with that information anyway? She doesn't seem to understand Earth politics well enough to even realize how valuable intel like that could be. She's not the most skilled tactician; her evil plan boils down to, "Make the strongest guy do what I say, then send him to break things."
Lorelei is not the smartest person around, that's granted. But HYDRA's goal is quite straightforward, and we can observe than people under Lorelei's control are extremely enthusiastic and eager to serve her. Phrases like "conspiracy infiltrated in any possible organization and government" and "taking over the world", spoken by someone like Ward which is quite credible and convincing, are understandable by anyone.
The answer to this entire thing: Lorelei is dumber than a bag of hammers. Men hold the majority of power on this planet, and she could have trivially taken over the world with a tiny bit of work. Asking why she didn't take over HYDRA is the wrong question...why didn't she take over SHIELD? Or the US government? Instead, she took over a small roadside diner. She could have had every man on the planet writing her checks, or handing over diamonds. Instead she takes over a frickin diner and sends some guys out on raiding parties, to get things she could have just asked for and they would have been provided. And then, when she teams up with Ward, she takes over...a hotel room? And then an airplane? She doesn't even bother to try to figure out how the world works, or anything useful. Her plan is to 'Find strong guys, make them go out and steal stuff for me', which is an absurdly unambitious plan for someone with her powers who can get half the population to freely give her all their stuff!
The bottom line is that Ward likely didn't tell Lorelei because she simply never asked. Her puppets react to her immediate wants and desires without using their own initiative. Thinking about long-term strategy, even on her behalf, is probably out of the question if she doesn't task them with it. Also, let's give Lorelei the benefit of the doubt. Asgardians have a lifespan of millenia and their culture hasn't changed appreciably since the viking age — and Lorelei has been in a dungeon for centuries. She probably hasn't realized that there's more to Earth now than "strongest guy rules" because that's the way it was the last she knew.
Even if Lorelei was stuck in the mindset of the Viking Age, she would still understand that SHIELD was after her. She would at least ask Ward some basic questions about SHIELD, which would have revealed that HYDRA was the one really running the show.
Ward did not mention Hydra because Hydra was not, at that moment, in condition to help his mistress. They would change that when they execute Order 66, but at that moment, Hydra was still vulnerable: the top-level agents who were not involved (such as Fury) were still alive, SHIELD was still operating in order, and the insight project was still under construction. If Ward goes to the Clairvoyant and asks for support to the evil Lorelei (who was already being seeked by SHIELD), he would accomplish nothing but just get them all in jail and ruin the whole conspiracy for nothing. He also knows that he can't get his mistress to replace Pierce or Garret in the conspiracy: it relies in subtlety, and Lorelei is anything but subtle (and it was stated that, even mind controlled, Ward is still Ward, so he won't make such huge strategic mistakes because of having his mind clouded). And of course he would never have Hydra exploit her, as his loyalty will now lie with her and only her.
Talbot and Providence
One problem with Colonel Talbot leading the raid on Providence - he's a member of the US Air Force Special Forces. Providence is in Canada. It's usually not considered good form to run military ops in other people's countries if you're not at war with them. Shouldn't that op have been run by the Canadian military? If nothing else the Canadian government should have insisted that they be informed of the operation and be provided with copies of the intelligence, and a cut of any captured SHIELD tech. After all, the base was on their soil.
Maybe they were. It's not like they showed every step of the mission.
Agent Coulson and Project T.A.H.I.T.I. Again
Ok, let me get this straight and explain detail-by-detail as to how this made me scratch my head so here. We all know that Agent Coulson died at the hands of Loki by the 2012 Avengers movie. We all saw how Loki thrusted his sharp scepter in a gruesome manner. That tore his heart literally which is enough to say that he is gone. Nick Fury did some meticulous scheme on the aftermath. Yes we know it because he is the man of SHIELD. Fast forward to the 1st episode, By the time Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. came in, he was brought back from the dead thanks be to Project T.A.H.I.T.I. thru numerous tests as seen on that episode. Now, there are some of our beloved Agents that are questioning who are those behind the project besides Nick Fury, who is obvious, that doctor, his assistants, and those folks there. We go to this episode and found out who did what transpired after all of that and what Agent May took from the false grave of Coulson. Agent Coulson himself was the one who requested Nick Fury to stop i because of the adverse effects that it had. How is Coulson doing that after he himself is still dead? I mean, much as we learnt the memory alterations that it had, shouldn't Agent Coulson be still dead by that time? What is going on here?
He was in Charge of Project T.A.H.I.T.I. before the events of the Avengers, when the Avengers Initative was still around. He sent that message recommending the project to be cancelled. It was, but then Coulson dies and Fury for whatever reason needs to revive him. So he dusts off T.A.H.I.T.I. and revives Coulson.
Specifically, T.A.H.I.T.I. was Fury being Crazy-Prepared: It's not an exaggeration to say that the Avengers are the most important people on the planet, in the most dangerous roles. So he was trying to find a way to revive them if the worst should happen, and put his most trusted man (Coulson, his "one good eye") on it. Coulson did his duty, oversaw the project, and eventually recommended it be shut down. Fury complied. Then Coulson died, and Fury used T.A.H.I.T.I. to bring him back, as well as using Coulson's own recommendations about the treatment to wipe all memory of it from Coulson's mind, including being in charge of it originally.
The only problem with this theory is that the Avengers only existed on paper at this point. The project still makes some degree of sense in the case of just being Crazy-Prepared but Thor was off world with no way to contact him, Banner didn't want to work with the government, Stark was found wanting (and with War Machine/Iron Patriot running around he was kinda replaceable as an Avenger. One might even go as far as to argue he's too important to send out into the field where he might die. We appear to still be missing a major player in this scenario one that will probably be revealed in the next few episodes.
Those theoretical team members weren't looking likely, but the Avengers Initiative had been on the book since at least the first Iron Man movie. "Bring together a group of extraordinary people to fight the battles we never could" was still the plan, and it's a plan that could result in casualties among said extraordinary people. Hell, best case scenario for the T.A.H.I.T.I. project is that it works on anyone without side effects and they figure out how to synthesize the serum. There were a million reasons to research the drug whether or not Tony, Banner, and Thor were willing/able to be recruited.
Now we also know why Coulson was asking them to let him die: he knew he would come back wrong; he'd seen it before. Question now becomes, does Skye have the same thing hanging over her? She wasn't "dead for days," (ok, seconds maybe), but probably not long enough to get brain damage.
Skye took to the drug very well, which is speculated to be because she's an 0-8-4. So it's unlikely she'll suffer any side effects that won't end up benefiting her in the end.
Either the above or she was gone for such a short period of time that it didn't count. People in real life have been brought back from being dead longer than Skye was gone.
Talbot and the Providence Interrogations
Why didn't Talbott try to act on the intelligence that Team Coulson gave him willingly? I can understand him holding on to the team and trying to pry more information out of them, but as I understand it, his mission is to detain everyone in S.H.I.E.L.D. until the powers that be can figure out which ones are really HYDRA and what they should be doing with the rest of them. He was just handed the location of two more agents on a plate. All he would have to do is make a phone call to some military base in or near Los Angeles to follow up the lead he was given while he handled things in Providence and as far as he knew (Deathlok being a complication he would have no way of knowing about), he's soon have secured two more S.H.I.E.L.D. agents, their very nifty aircraft (There's only so many places you can park an airliner in a major city, and the extra engines mean that nobody who sees the Bus would mistake it for a civilian aircraft, so it's pathetically easy to find if you know where to look), and possibly (Assuming Coulson told him about the drive) kept a lot of juicy S.H.I.E.L.D. secrets out of HYDRA's hands and (Pending an interrogation of Skye for the encryption key) placed them in the hands of the US government. Add in an order to keep the two agents locked up in separate locations, and he would have also protected the allegedly good agent from the allegedly evil agent, which would earn him some goodwill and cooperation from the people he's trying to question. And all it would have cost him was a five minute phone call. So why didn't he try? Even after Team Coulson escaped, he still could have acted on that intelligence after waking up from the I.C.Er shot, at which point Ward's attempts to leave LA would have been easily thwarted by a flight of F-16s circling the airport and squawking something on the order of "S.H.I.E.L.D.-616, this is the Air Force. Power down and exit your aircraft and surrender to the company of Marines surrounding the runway or we will blow you to smithereens," followed by capturing all of Team Coulson (Where they would be going when they staged a breakout because he wouldn't act on their intel would be a no-brainer).
He knows Coulson personally. As we see just from the episode in question Coulson has people who are loyal to him who are willing to go outside the law to help him. He has access to at least one base that government might never have found or infiltrated without help from May and Maria Hill. He doesn't know that Coulson isn't Hydra, what he does know is that Coulson is a clever sonbitch who's Crazy-Prepared to boot. Making a phone call to send troops after his supposed lead might actually somehow summon a strike team, lock down the base or dozens of other things. When dealing with high tier SHIELD or Hydra agents the best move is to never surrender a single inch.
If you're going to be that paranoid about it, then there's no point in interrogating the team at all, as anything they say could be a lead-in to a trap.
If you're not going to be that Genre Savvy you might as well leave him alone with Maria Hill long enough to plea his case. With Fury and to a lesser extent with Coulson it's not paranoia it's actually knowing who you're dealing with and taking appropriate measures.
Why is Coulson allowed to be a field agent?
If Coulson's resurrection is such a big secret, why is he allowed to go on missions that constantly expose the fact he's alive? For example, in "Yes Men" Sif found out he wasn't dead. She's likely going to tell Thor, who will probably tell the other Avengers. If SHIELD is being so lax about Coulson's resurrection, why bother keeping it a secret?
Because he's still part of SHIELD. The list of people that Coulson knows that aren't on the take is extremely small, and it's easy enough to make sure he never interacts with them. The Sif example was easily solved with "let me tell him".
Also, although it is never stated, it seems likely that Coulson's resurrection was an important secret in the beginning but is not so important now. Probably the main point was to keep the enemy of SHIELD off the tracks of project T.A.H.I.T.I., and that has obviously failed since the Clairvoyant has been aware of it in the main lines for a long time (possibly from the beginning) and looking for more information ever since. The secondary reason is that Fury used Coulson's death to manipulate and inspire the Avengers in The Avengers (and may also have used it in the gods only know how many similar twisted plots and schemes), and he obviously doesn't want those people to know they have been fooled, and that one still more or less stands, but the Avengers are a very small group of persons and the rest of SHIELD is in chaos.
Still all valid points, but just want to point out that technically, Fury never fooled the Avengers. Coulson really did die, so Fury never lied to them about that.....he just made sure Coulson didn't stay dead.
And Coulson being a field agent could be Fury's way to try to get him to heal. Instead of being stuck in an office all day, he could be active again and rediscover a reason to live.
Exactly how long was Ward in the woods?
Ward was first found by Garrett 15 years before the present, making him about 16 or 17. Six months later, he's still played by the young actor. But in the next scene, he's played by Brett Dalton. How much time went by?
Watch the time stamp. When Garrett first breaks him out of juvenile detention, that was 10 years ago. At the end, right before he joined S.H.I.E.L.D. and when he was played by Brett Dalton, that was 5 years ago. That doesn't necessarily mean he spent the whole 5 years living in the woods though. That may have just become where they went to relax. In any case, by that point Ward certainly knew how to survive.
After 6 months in the woods, young Ward mentioned planning to build a cabin. By the final scene in the woods 5 years later, there was a small cabin built, which suggests Ward did spend a substantial amount of time living out there.
Actually, the timestamps show the Ward from juvenile hall was "fifteen years ago." And then six months passes in the woods. And then, later on, when he's played by Brett Dalton, it's "ten years ago." Which means that he trained for five years before being accepted into SHIELD's Operations Division.
Powers of Lorelei over a LGBT population.
Lady Sif says that Lorelei's powers only work on men, but what if the man is gay? Or if the woman is lesbian?
Vulnerability might be based on possessing a Y chromosome, which is independent of sexuality.
Nothing Sif said implied it had anything to do with sexuality or attraction, which does imply it's a Y chromosome thing. It might have been nice to get a explicitly gay man facing her so we had an answer one way or another, though.
In the same vein (and especially with the whole 'men are weak' refrain throughout that episode), it would be rather interesting to find out what happens with someone who's trans*, or genderqueer, or intersex. So many options!
So they really leave Garrett's body at Cybertek after Mike stomped his head? Why was it not collected by the military? Did Coulson know that he would have gotten up?
Addressed when Coulson blasts Garrett into oblivion right as he gets up and tries to implant more cybernetics onto himself.
They were still in the middle of cleaning up. They probably thought, reasonably enough, that a dead guy would stay where they left him while they dealt with capturing the living people still on the base.
A friend and I were also talking about this exact thing when it happened. We came to the conclusion that either Coulson didn't know Garrett was still alive and just grabbed the 0-8-4 to dispose of the body. Or Coulson suspected that Garrett was still alive and waited outside the room with the 0-8-4 until he heard Garrett begin to monologue, at which point he just blasted Garrett. Either fit Coulson because he's Genre Savvy and knows how to deal with things like this.
Does anyone get the point of centipede combining gamma rays, the super soldier serum, extremis, and alien tech when the result is inferior to pretty much all those processes? The centipede soldiers didn't have all the features of a super soldier like Captain America or the Winter Soldier, much less those injected with extremis, and they are hardly hulks. Considering the connections it was revealed the centipede operation had, I can't see them only having access to substandard versions.
No one has the full super soldier serum anymore, so a partial version of that is all anyone could get. Though why no one else could find a way to recreate it is another matter. I don't think anyone actually knows why the gamma rays made Bruce Banner the Hulk instead of just killing him. So that may be why those things weren't tried by themselves. As for combing them all, the point was probably to create the ultimate super-soldier, which was still a work in progress.
Well I haven't seen Winter Soldier yet, but wouldn't the winter soldier process be a Hydra recreation of the supersoldier serum? And Hydra has had his blood to test since WW2, even if you assume that Hydra somehow lost the science. So that should be a huge head start in making a supersoldier serum at the very least. As for gamma radiation, in the cinematic universe I believe the Hulk was actually the result of a gamma ray mutation based supersoldier serum. Now it's a good bet that Bruce didn't leave that many notes behind, but I bet that Centipede would have the connections to get a blood sample from the Abomination. As for the extremis virus, I would assume they would have access to the full development of AIM, I'm sure Tony isn't sharing his iteration of the extremis virus though. So even if one assumes that they decided to sacrifice raw power for stability, one would assume that combining three different supersoldier methods combined would result in something as impressive as a single method they copied.
Each individual Centipede soldier is inferior to Captain America, the Hulk, etc., this is true. But the fact that they can be mass produced is a huge leap forward in supersoldier technology. And the Centipede soldiers have the added benefit of being more controllable than a guy like Cap would be if he ever decided to go rogue. In that sense Captain America was the experimental Super Prototype, and the Centipede soldiers are the current-gen production model.
Extremis makes you a but stronger, and way tougher, but has a tendency to make you explode. Hulk serum makes you way stronger, but leaves you uncontrollable. Super Soldier Serum has no side effects, but since they would only be knockoffs, the effect wouldn't be as noticable. Combining a weakened version of all three would reduce the side effects, and still be pretty effective.
Fun with Acronyms
So, what is "T.A.H.I.T.I." supposed to mean?
Maybe nothing. It could just be a codename someone came up with. Like HYDRA doesn't mean anything either, it's a reference to the Hydra of Greek myth.
"T.A.H.I.T.I.", however, has the periods after every letter while HYDRA does not, implying that it's an acronym for something. Generally, in real life, project names like that happen in one of two ways: Either they chose a random codename so that outsiders wouldn't know what they were talking about and later someone found a way to make the real project title fit as an acronym, or the real project name acronym was close (maybe it spelled TAHT or TATI or something) and they whimsically added a couple words so it actually spelled something.
How about Transverse Alien-Human Interactive Treatment Initiative? This could count as fridge brilliance if the fluid had some ability to rebuild the patient's "transverse tubules; structures in myofibers which run transversely to the long axis of the myofibrils in skeletal and cardiac muscle" according to the online medical dictionary. Repairing the fibers in the cardiac muscles would have helped to rebuild Coulson's heart.
It means that someone really wanted the [project name] to spell [Tahiti].
The Guest House guards not knowing about Coulson's memory alteration.
Okay, so Coulson comes to the Guest House and asks for medical help. The guards follow protocol and ask him for a call-sign. He doesn't know it, so they prepare to defend themselves. Understandable enough, since Coulson used to be their boss and his lack of knowledge of the call-sign could be a sign that he has been compromised in some way. The only problem is, they have to know that Coulson went through Project T.A.H.I.T.I., since this would have required Fury to bring him into the Guest House to have the procedure performed. Were they not made aware that Coulson's memories had been changed? It was an explicit part of the project, after all.
The guys who guard the front door don't necessarily know every detail about the project. They may not have known anything more than that they were guarding something very important.
The guy only thought Coulson was sort of familiar looking to him. This implies he didn't really totally recognize him. He probably didn't have much interaction with him, or was even brought over after Coulson left and only remember him as a patient or from the list of people that had been there. So they wouldn't know him from the video screen only.
Ward and the Clairvoyant
Ward knows from the begining that Garret is secretly an HYDRA agent, infiltrated in SHIELD like many others, himself included. But, when Skye was shot, did he know that, besides that, Garret was also the elusive clairvoyant? After all, one thing does not imply the other: even if he knew that the clairvoyant would be an HYDRA agent, it could have been some other agent, such as Pierce. Did he kill Nash because it was according to plan, or because he really thought it was the guy who ordered to shoot Skye? In fact, if he knew it when it was happening I don't think he would think twice about killing Garret. Of course, Ward called him on it later... when Garret had already revealed himself, and Skye was saved by the miracle drug (and so the "you ordered to shoot her!" scene would be a bt pointless). When she had just been shot, they did not know if they could save her, and Garret suddenly pays a visit to the bus, the discussion would have had a very different outcome.
Ward seemed to be in on it from start. Not the shooting Skye part, but he was probably under orders from Garrett to use Skye as an excuse to kill "the Clairvoyant" and put the case the rest. Since Coulson was determined to bring them down, making it look like he'd died would mean they'd have to write him off as dead and move onto other cases (and thus stay out of Garrett's business) At best he'd get a slap on the wrist. At worse SHIELD would throw the book at him but they could use their Hydra pull to get him out. Of course Garrett wasn't expecting them all to be exposed only a few hours later, so in that respect the whole plan looks kind of pointless.
Erik Koenig: Idiot
In "The Only Light in the Darkness", why does Erik Koenig, trained S.H.I.E.L.D. agent, expert interrogator, and Nick Fury's hand-picked housesitter, turn into a total idiot when he's interrogating Ward? He was properly paranoid about not being able to trust Coulson's team when they first arrive, refuses to give them any sensitive information until after they pass debriefing, and is even savvy enough to draw a gun on Ward when he suspects him to be a HYDRA agent... yet even with his super-sensitive lie detector flashing red lights all over the place, he easily lets bygones be bygones after one oddly-worded answer. At the very least, why didn't he talk to Coulson, May, or one of the other agents he's already established as trustworthy to keep an eye on Ward?
In-universe, he accepted that Ward was hiding personal feelings as the reason for the lie-detector readings, vs. the fact that he was a traitor. Koenig not being terribly good at personal interaction himself (at least that's how he came off), he was convinced that this led to high enough stress levels to set off all the red lights. Story-wise, Eric was carrying the Idiot Ball because otherwise, Ward was caught at that point and would be shot through the forehead. An even better question would be why Koenig was conducting interrogations on suspected traitors solo and unobserved, once he had cleared the first agent. You would think at least one agent would be on the other side of a one-way mirror or observing through a camera, in case a traitor was suddenly identified and managed to be quick enough to take out Eric (who was honestly not that intimidating). Again- Idiot Ball.
How does SHIELD manage to have an income? They don't get government funding like the MIB as they are a independent agency, SHIELD universities also seem to be free... Do they steal their marks' wallet?
I think it's pretty clear that SHIELD gets government (or governments) funding. They have official jurisdiction in certain cases so it makes sense they would have official funding.
I don't recall that the MIB got government funding. The movie explanation was that they sold off alien tech to fund their operations. Maybe S.H.I.E.L.D. sells 0-8-4s to the highest bidding government, once they determine they aren't something that has to be put on the Slingshot to preserve world safety? But it seems most likely that the member nations of the World Security Council are also the ones that fund S.H.I.E.L.D., which is why they get so irked when Fury does things without asking their permission (like sending the Tesseract back to Asgard). Otherwise it makes no sense that Fury would answer to anybody, unless he needed their money.
Coulson's and Garrett's Fridge and Slingshot Knowledge
Coulson knew that the Fridge had a subbasement, but had no idea the Slingshot was a decoy. Garrett knew the Slingshot was a decoy, but had no knowledge of the Fridge's subbasement. They were both level eight agents. Why would their knowledge be so different.
In real life classified information is given out to people who have the correct security clearance and have a "Need To Know" (An official reason why they need that information). So if SHIELD runs the same way then it would be possible (and probably common) for agents with the same security level knowing different bits of classified information.