Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / TakahashiCouple

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 8:32:46 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Not Tropeworthy, started by shadowmanwkp on Oct 29th 2019 at 8:22:23 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
WillBGood Since: Jan, 2011
Feb 9th 2015 at 3:45:12 AM •••

Should this even be its own page, as opposed to being a subpage of Belligerent Sexual Tension?

Hide / Show Replies
WillBGood Since: Jan, 2011
Feb 9th 2015 at 4:23:40 AM •••

Note: removed all links to this page that weren't explicitly about Takahashi couples. It would be easy now to move all this page to Belligerent Sexual Tension / Rumiko Takahashi and then using redirects to point to it for the few genuine Takahashi Couple examples.

Freezer Since: Jan, 2001
Mar 1st 2020 at 2:54:49 PM •••

Good. I always thought separating the pages was unnecessary and redundant.

My name is Freezer and my anti-drug is porn.
Komodin TV Tropes' Sonic WikiCurator Since: Jan, 2001
JDCyrus Since: Mar, 2010
Dec 23rd 2010 at 9:54:54 PM •••

Why don't we redirect this to Belligerent Sexual Tension and just have all the examples there?

No signature at present. (Except for these two sentences fragments.)
SammySammich Since: Dec, 2009
Dec 24th 2010 at 3:32:29 PM •••

They should stay in Belligerent Sexual Tension because they are still examples. They just happen to be examples of both.

If the page stays that is. I'm a fan of Takahashi myself, but I'm not entirely sure this page is necessary except to give more detail on the Takahashi couples. At the very least the description should change to make it more clear that it's just Takahashi couples as examples. It isn't made clear until the last two lines and most of it is just the same description as Belligerent Sexual Tension anyway with slightly different wording in some places.

githyan Since: Jul, 2010
Feb 12th 2012 at 6:37:49 PM •••

I don't think we need this page. The page description in 90% identical to BST (in fact other than the first sentence and the later half of the second paragraph, the actual descriptive part is identical), and this page has a grand total of four examples. Just have this page name redirect to BST and fold these examples over.

whisp Since: Nov, 2009
Mar 4th 2010 at 1:18:56 PM •••

If the trope is now exclusively about couples by Rumiko Takahashi, with all other examples going into Belligerent Sexual Tension, shouldn't the top image have Rumiko Takahashi characters in it?

Hide / Show Replies
ccoa MOD Since: Jan, 2001
May 2nd 2010 at 9:42:36 AM •••

Yes, it should. Swap the pic with the one currently on Belligerent Sexual Tension, perhaps?

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
whisp Since: Nov, 2009
Jun 1st 2010 at 12:25:51 PM •••

To Sackett: This is the Takahashi Couple trope, for Takahashi characters. The Zero No Tsukaima characters don't belong here, but in Belligerent Sexual Tension. Stop swapping the pictures please.

Top