"Arthur and Molly Weasley: Are they really the Good Parents everyone makes them out to be? One theory suggests that they're selfish and wanted to make life as hard for their children as theirs was, or at least they're irresponsible considering how many children they have. These theorists point to the fact that Arthur kept a menial job at the Ministry because he liked it so much, even though he could have been paid more elsewhere. (Then in Goblet of Fire it's suggested that he's being kept down there for liking Muggles too much.) They also look at the Unfortunate Implications of Molly apparently wanting a daughter so badly that she kept having children until she got one, which made the family bigger than it needed to be (and also left Ron as The Unfavorite)."
I personally don't believe the theories that Molly and Arthur are selfish people due to the boggart scene in Order Of The Phoenix.
- Most of the fandom blames Snape for the ruined friendship between him and Lily but some people have pointed out that neither were good friends to each other. Snape became a Death Eater whereas Lily knew he had been the victim of extreme bullying from James's hands, but did not do anything to stop it. She broke off her friendship with Snape after he fell to the dark side but never seemed that bothered by the fact that James had been a major factor in ruining Snape's life, and she later married him.
I know Alternate Character Interpretation are fines but this really feel like pulling a Ron the Death Eater by warping things or taking them out of proportion. Harry is a bad friend because he happened to disagree with Hermione a few times in the series and because he doesn't play favorite with Ron as captain of the team?
Edited by Silverblade2