Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
We have a whole thread
for discussing this sort of thing.
There is no "normally" because there is no consensus about which style to use.
150 wicks is really not that high of a number anyway, articles with thousands of wicks get moved around in TRS all the time. And the inbounds are still valid too, they're just pointing to the disambig page now.
I dropped a line on the discussion page in question, but those tend to get ignored, so here we are.
Literature.The Way Of Kings was created in 2013 for Brandon Sanderson's book, the first in The Stormlight Archive. Two days ago, someone created a page for a new book by Louise Searl, Literature.The Way Of Kings 2021. So far so good. Except this person then moved Sanderson's book to Literature.The Way Of Kings 2010 and made Literature.The Way Of Kings a disambig.
I really, really question if moving the original page is necessary, especially considering the large number of wicks and huge number of inbounds Sanderson's book had. Normally, the older page gets to keep the title sans date, and the newer one gets the date. It seems like a lot of extra work, done by one troper with no discussion. Should this move be reverted?