Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
There Is No Such Thing as Notability, but there is such a thing as a page being too stubby to keep. It can't stay as-is.
Trouble Cube continues to be a general-purpose forum for those who desire such a thing.Yeah, it needs to be cut if we can't get more meat on it.
Current Project: Incorruptible Pure PurenessDid some diggin around to see if they might be making other stub pages and I found this
Maybe keep? It's also kinda stubby
Also they haven't been active for 2 years now so who knows if they'll come back to fix it
They won't. They never do.
Current Project: Incorruptible Pure PurenessWhat do we do with these 2 pages then
Here is the thread for reporting stubby pages.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanThe page is created 2 years ago. In such cases, I usually send them straight to the cutlist, but if you know enough about the work, you can try to expand it, I suppose.
This looks like an easy decision to cut. It looks like a tropeable work, but there isn't even a link to the work itself. There aren't enough tropes to save this page, imo. Someone could do a better job starting from scratch.
As far as Patrick Gill goes, it seems fine. There's a stubby description but overall the page isn't a stub. Plus, it'll increase the chances of someone remaking Please Retweet into something more substantial.
Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they prettyThe work page has been cut.
Please Retweet
Is it worth keeping?