Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
I don't see why we would bother. No point encouraging a ban-evader over some irrelevant work. Not like anyone's going to read it, even if TVT is promoting it.
Courtesy link: Fallen Mani.
Edited by Larkmarn Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Regardless of the issue of whether that page "should" exist, there are issues with it as you created it now:
- Description text directly copied from work's synopsis —> this is considered plagarism per TvTropes' rules. You (or another Troper) should write an original description text.
- Only 2 tropes listed; minimum requirement for a work page is 3 tropes
- Those 2 tropes listed are Zero-Context Examples; need more context
- A text formatting error in the page quote
- The work's name is in bold font, but work names should be in italics, not bold, per the Text-Formatting Rules
Hope you could look into these issues, otherwise I'm sorry the page as it is now would be in danger of being cutlisted for not meeting How to Create a Work's Page requirements.
Edited by LB7979
Who's the ban evader? The creator of the work, or the original creator of the page?
In the case of the former, we have work pages for stuff made by ban evaders, like Ralph Hayes, Jr. and his works, for an off the cuff example. I also remember one got who keeps evading because of their work, and I think we kept the page but locked it to keep them out.
Edited by sgamer82
I'm assuming that means the answer is the ban evader is both creator of the work and original work page. If he evaded to create/recreate the original work page, theb yeah, it should be cut on general principle. Does the "valid edits can be remade by legitimate tropers" caveat apply here?
Edited by sgamer82
Targitaos' only edit so far is making this page, which makes me a bit suspicious.
Speaking of which, the book's page has also been edited by quite possibly the most blatant, not-even-trying-to-hide-it ban evader ever.
God help us all when evaders discover subtlety.
Banned, cut, locked. Brains are lacking in this one.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
I've actually read the book (eh), but the artist appears to be starving. I can add several examples.