Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
This is the first time ever I've heard "polyamory slander", I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
Anyway, "Possibly one of the most bizarre and literal examples ever" is called Word Cruft, it's pointless and should be removed. What's left doesn't really describe Love Triangle, it describes Marry Them All.
To be honest, the entire page looks like it went through a Zero-Context Example cleaning yesterday, but by a quick look at it, it definitely needs another one, since most entries don't explain how the attached tropes apply.
Edited by Amonimus TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
Yeah, if you take out the Word Cruft before it, it doesn't explain the trope at all. At the least, the first part should be removed, and at the most the entire thing should be hidden/scrubbed.
I'm going to take a few more whacks at this page, because the ZCE infestation has spread ... you have things like:
- Barbarian Tribe: There is one in Idhún.
Now that we're are talking about the page in general, it should be noted that "The Idhún's Memories" is not at all an official translation, since the novels have never been published in english, and the adaptations that have had an English release (the comic books and the Netflix series) go by "The Idhun Chronicles".
Edited by Belfe
The page could probably be moved to be in the same title space as The Idhun Chronicles, unless it de iates too much. Also ask here
about regarding that.
In The Idhún's Memories page, it calls the resolution for the main love triangle, and I quote, "Possibly one of the most bizarre and literal examples ever", just to say that they end up in a polyamorous relationship. Isn't this basically polyamory slander? Shouldn't it be changed?
Edited by Belfe