I fixed the link; the hyphens aren't needed. I'm good to pull the current, it's definitely relying on the caption.
Pull.
(Annoyed grunt)Pull. It appears to be an example of No Biological Sex rather than of this trope.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!Pull.
back lolPull.
Runaways (a different crop of this image used to be on Sex Shifter, and it's the same character that's on there so it might cause confusion)
Edited by Synchronicity on Feb 26th 2020 at 10:18:22 AM
6.1 is great, 6.2 is too but I'd avoid it for the reasons you said.
"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."
6.1; I like the size of that image better than that of 6.2 as well.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!6.1.
back lol(Annoyed grunt)
Current is bad; 6.1 is an improvement but too text-reliant for my liking.
Edited by rjd1922 on Feb 26th 2020 at 12:17:12 PM
Keet cleanupYeah, 6.1 is a little text-heavy for me too. I'll since it's better than current. But It'd be nice if we could find something else.
When I first made this post I considered the nonbinary flag put in/on a picture of Fl4k or BMO (you know, like those tumblr icons that have the flag under a character), maybe that would be a little better with less words? The only problem with that is flag recognition and image macro-ism might be bad...thoughts?
Yeah. It'd be one thing if there was official art of him like that - but I think an edit would go too far in terms of image macro-ing.
Edited by rachiebird on Feb 26th 2020 at 8:02:50 AM
Not a fan of 6.1. The visuals don't add anything and it might as well be a page quote.
Definitely pull current.
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?6.1 and 6.2 are both Talking Heads. Current is even worse. I lean towards BUPKIS.
The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us.Clock is set.
Unsurprisingly, I do not think this is a BUPKIS case. We just need a clearly nonhuman character expressing their gender identity, or as mentioned official art of a clearly nonhuman character with nonbinary/genderfluid indicators like a flag. 6.1 I think works on that point; it just may be too texty for some
Edited by Synchronicity on Mar 5th 2020 at 11:24:28 AM
Got it.
Votes bump; two in the green right now.
None. It's texty enough
Crown Description:
Nominations for replacement images:
Text unreadable, no indication of anything. I love fl4k and they could definitely still be the face of this, but this ain't it, chief.
Suggestions?
Edited by charun on Feb 25th 2020 at 8:44:43 AM