Follow TV Tropes

Following

Unclear Description: The Heavy

Go To

Deadlock Clock: Aug 14th 2013 at 11:59:00 PM
Noaqiyeum Trans Siberian Anarchestra (it/they) from the gentle and welcoming dark (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: Arm chopping is not a love language!
Trans Siberian Anarchestra (it/they)
#76: Apr 15th 2013 at 7:57:46 PM

Villains Act, Heroes React is clearly listed under Omnipresent Tropes. And you clearly have no idea what Fan Myopia is if you're using the term like that.

...and I was wondering why it was listed under Omnipresent Tropes when it isn't omnipresent. Not even every work has heroes and villains, to begin with, and even in works that do I think it's mostly in specific genres in which that's considered a typical convention for their behaviour.

Sorry to distract the conversation, though. That was meant as an aside.

The Revolution Will Not Be Tropeable
EditorPallMall Don't Fear the Spiders from United States, East Coast Since: Feb, 2013
Don't Fear the Spiders
#77: Apr 15th 2013 at 9:29:03 PM

[up][up]It sounds like you are embellishing the article's definition of "The Heavy". Having a major presence in the story or taking part in the physical action of the story is not required.

Keep it breezy!
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#78: Apr 15th 2013 at 9:37:19 PM

If it's not a major presence in the work then it's not a heavy role. It's an important secondary role, which isn't the trope.

Check out my fanfiction!
Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#79: Apr 16th 2013 at 2:57:40 PM

[up]Exactly. The term, although only one definition among many, is not one we originated, and implies a major role in the work. Basically, what we have here is the theatrical definition of the term, which contradicts several other common definitions found in various works. Which is why we want to rename it, but not redefine it.

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
EditorPallMall Don't Fear the Spiders from United States, East Coast Since: Feb, 2013
Don't Fear the Spiders
#80: Apr 16th 2013 at 3:06:07 PM

We have to redefine it. As is? The "theatrical" definition is the same as the article's.

First line: "The Heavy is the villain whose actions drive the plot."

Laconic: "The villain who does the most stuff in the story."

So if we changed it to "a villain whose actions drive the plot and has an active presence is the story" that would justify having an article on the wiki but nonetheless change the definition.

Keep it breezy!
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#81: Apr 16th 2013 at 11:23:12 PM

And the second line is "This is a dominant role for an actor, frequently the largest role in a play or movie."

Redefine how?

Check out my fanfiction!
EditorPallMall Don't Fear the Spiders from United States, East Coast Since: Feb, 2013
Don't Fear the Spiders
#82: Apr 16th 2013 at 11:45:20 PM

Yes, that implies the character usually has a dominate presence but does not make it clear that it is required for the trope to be in use. Simply adding a clause to the first sentence would correct this and be a solution I would be in favor of.

Keep it breezy!
Xtifr World's Toughest Milkman Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
World's Toughest Milkman
#83: Apr 17th 2013 at 12:47:26 AM

[up]Ah, clarifying good. Redefining bad. Sounds like you're suggesting clarifying, and I fully support that. :)

Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#84: Apr 17th 2013 at 12:53:06 AM

Change the second line to, "This is a dominant role for an actor, and one the largest roles, if not the largest role, in a play or movie," or something like that?

edited 17th Apr '13 12:53:31 AM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
EditorPallMall Don't Fear the Spiders from United States, East Coast Since: Feb, 2013
Don't Fear the Spiders
#85: Apr 17th 2013 at 11:32:40 AM

Yes. This would clarify what the trope is and avoid it from coming off as a near-duplicate of Villains Act, Heroes React.

edited 17th Apr '13 11:33:53 AM by EditorPallMall

Keep it breezy!
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
MyTimingIsOff Since: Dec, 2011
#87: Apr 18th 2013 at 5:54:37 PM

Is this crowner ready to be called yet? Or is there not enough of a consensus?

WaxingName from Everywhere Since: Oct, 2010
#88: Apr 18th 2013 at 6:34:53 PM

[up]None of the ratios are good enough.

Please help out our The History Of Video Games page.
Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#89: Apr 19th 2013 at 6:24:41 PM

One is at 19:8. Plus, the 2:1 ratio thing is generally only for deciding whether or not to rename or take some other option, not the new name picked.

MyTimingIsOff Since: Dec, 2011
#90: Apr 19th 2013 at 10:01:41 PM

[up]It wasn't 19 to 8 when I asked, which is why he responded that the ratios weren't good enough. More people voted between his post and yours.

WaxingName from Everywhere Since: Oct, 2010
#91: Apr 20th 2013 at 12:17:45 PM

Okay, that ratio is good enough. It's even the name I came up with.

I personally don't think that name is particularly good, though.

Please help out our The History Of Video Games page.
WaxingName from Everywhere Since: Oct, 2010
#92: Apr 23rd 2013 at 8:56:01 PM

Are we ready to rename?

Please help out our The History Of Video Games page.
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#93: Apr 24th 2013 at 8:08:50 AM

My issue with Plot Driving Villain is that it sounds a LOT like The Villain Makes the Plot.

... which, admittedly, I'm having a bit of an issue distinguishing from this trope in any case.

edited 24th Apr '13 8:09:40 AM by Larkmarn

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Spark9 Since: Nov, 2010
#94: Apr 24th 2013 at 9:55:14 AM

[up] Now that you mention it, that does appear to be a duplicate trope.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#95: Apr 24th 2013 at 10:13:05 AM

Well, that one seems to be about the effect the villain has on the plot more than about "plot-affecting villain".

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Spark9 Since: Nov, 2010
#96: Apr 24th 2013 at 10:23:33 AM

In the header maybe, but if you look over the examples it's simply a list of proactive villains, which is the same as The Heavy here.

WaxingName from Everywhere Since: Oct, 2010
#97: Apr 24th 2013 at 2:18:49 PM

[up]How about make that a trope that only has exceptions?

But enough of that. The two pages are distinct enough to me.

I'm still ready to rename. I'll ask one more time: are we ready?

Please help out our The History Of Video Games page.
Spark9 Since: Nov, 2010
#98: Apr 24th 2013 at 2:52:31 PM

No, we're not ready. We're discussing whether this trope should be merged into the similar-looking trope with the identical examples.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#99: Apr 24th 2013 at 2:54:01 PM

"similar-looking trope with the identical examples. "

Conventionally, the first bit would outweigh the second one, but it's a bit ambiguous here.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Spark9 Since: Nov, 2010
#100: Apr 24th 2013 at 2:57:12 PM

Think about it practically. Even if there might be a theoretical difference, if you take two tropes that already attract the same examples and you name one of them Plot Driving Villain, and the other Villain Drives The Plot, then what do you expect is going to happen? No snark intended, just think about it.

AlternativeTitles: TheHeavy
2nd Feb '13 9:48:33 AM

Crown Description:

To vote, access the crowner directly.

Total posts: 187
Top