As far I know (I don't know the series), Cerebus has no example of Knight of Cerebus either. It doesn't matter. In both case, the name is in reference to a previous trope (Cerebus Syndrome), not the work. That way, we can say Cerebus is not the Trope Namer of Cerebus Ending.
Wasn't there already a thread on this, or at least on Knight of Cerebus, for similar reasons?
Might be, I rarely visit this forum. Knight of Cerebus has always kinda bugged me in the same way, now that you mention it.
edited 18th Mar '11 3:51:50 AM by Willbyr
I think this works on a metaphorical level. Cerebus Syndrome is when a work that had a light tone suddenly turns darker. Thus, a Cerebus Ending is when this happens at the very end of a work.
Imagine if the publisher had canceled the Cerebus comic immediately after the syndrome first hit it. Then it would've been an example of this.
There is a fine line between recklessness and courage — Paul McCartneyI think it's more tolerable to snowclone of something that coined a term that orignated outside our wiki and taken a lfe of it's own, like Mary Sue.
edited 19th Apr '11 2:13:17 PM by DrStarky
Put me in motion, drink the potion, use the lotion, drain the ocean, cause commotion, fake devotion, entertain a notion, be Nova ScotianCan't we just get rid of this page? It's just a regular downer ending.
Nevermind, thought this was for Cerebus Syndrome.
edited 12th Aug '11 9:38:32 AM by Willbyr
actually, I think the distinction is that this is a deliberate ending. If the publisher had simply stopped publishing Cerebus after it turned dark, that wouldn't have qualified because it wouldn't have been written as an ending.
Note that this comment is neither for nor against the trope as it stands, just a point of clarification.
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.I think the page is valid. A Downer Ending can be in a work that was already dark and dramatic. A Cerebus Ending is a Downer Ending to a previously light-hearted work. (Such as the Kill Em All ending of Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy.)
It does not matter who I am. What matters is, who will you become? - motto of Omsk BirdIt's rather telling that the name doesn't fit when the series in question isn't even an example on the page.
Support Gravitaz on Kickstarter!That would work pretty well.
Support Gravitaz on Kickstarter!Jarring Downer Ending? Something to emphasize that it's an abrupt change in tone for the work?
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.Does it necessarily have to be a Downer Ending or is that Camp Lazlo example just misplaced?
Cerberus Syndrome is a case of a happy comic becoming far more depressing. Even if this has nothing to do with Cerberus, the comic, it has everything to do with Cerberus, the trope. I say it stays.
Since there's no justification for calling the original trope "Cerebus Syndrome," there's particularly little for this one's current name. Sure, rename.
edited 2nd Nov '11 11:31:30 PM by Routerie
Were it not for the way it has caught on (and I think it's a preexisting term, too), I would be advocating the rename of Cerebus Syndrome itself - it's a work-named trope that can have multiple possible meanings - Cerebus underwent both Cerebus Syndrome and a later Creator Breakdown, so someone with no knowledge of the trope might see it as being either one - and people constantly spell it "Cerberus".
Cerebus Syndrome, of course, has caught on massively and it would be shooting this site in the foot to rename it, even if I'm wrong and it isn't a preexisting term. But Cerebus Ending has no such merits going for it, so I think it probably should be renamed.
edited 2nd Nov '11 11:20:25 PM by nrjxll
If we're accepting Cerebus Syndrome as a preexisting term, then why not just tweak this one out of snowclone territory? Cerebus Syndrome Ending works just as well as the current.
Yeah, unwritten rule number one: follow all the unwritten procedures. - CamacanSorry for being so late to this thread, but there is now a single proposition rename crowner for this trope here.
Since January 1, 2011 this article has brought 206 people to the wiki from non-search engine links.
How old is TV Tropes? Cerebus Syndrome (and its sister term First and Ten Syndrome) was coined by Eric Burns of Websnark; the oldest use of the term I can find is from Aug 25, 2004.
edited 9th Jan '12 1:39:35 PM by tbarrie
Everythings Worse With Snowclones.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!Bump for backlog clearing. Are we renaming this or do not enough people care?
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.I think we should cut/merge it. What isn't covered by Cerebus Syndrome, Drama Bomb Finale or Downer Ending?
We're not just men of science, we're men of TROPE!Calling in favour of rename.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Crown Description:
Previous crowner showed consensus support for a rename.
Alright, I'm glad that Cerebus is getting love with the snowclones, but this is one case where it may not work. The trope is all about a light series that has a really dark ending, but it specifically says that if the series was dark to begin with, it doesn't count. Cerebus, being the Trope Namer for Cerebus Syndrome, doesn't really fit this, does it?