Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / JohnnyTheWalrus

Go To

OR

Added: 4

Changed: 33

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BileFascination: Amongst Walsh's critics, the main reason to read the book is to see how absurdly it handles its message, as well as to laugh about the idea of conservative propaganda for children. That and mock the [[TerribleArtist horrible art]].

to:

* BileFascination: Amongst Walsh's critics, the main reason to read the book is to see how absurdly it handles its message, as well as to laugh about the idea of conservative propaganda for children. That and mock the [[TerribleArtist horrible art]].art.



** Some have mockingly referred to the book as "transphobic ''Film/{{Tusk}}''," a BlackComedy horror film about a man who is forced to undergo brutal surgery transforming him into a walrus.

to:

** Some have mockingly referred to the book as "transphobic ''Film/{{Tusk}}''," ''Film/{{Tusk|2014}}''," a BlackComedy horror film about a man who is forced to undergo brutal surgery transforming him into a walrus.



* TheWoobie: This is how we're meant to see Johnny, as he's a kid who pretended to be a walrus one day, so his mother forces him to wear itchy greasy makeup and eat worms, making him miserable.

to:

* TheWoobie: This is how we're meant to see Johnny, as he's a kid who pretended to be a walrus one day, so his mother forces him to wear itchy greasy makeup and eat worms, making him miserable.miserable.
----

Added: 274

Changed: 83

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyCopiedItSoItSucks: Other right-wing writers of similar books complained about it lacking originality.

to:

* TheyCopiedItSoItSucks: TheyCopiedItSoItSucks:
**
Other right-wing writers of similar books complained about it lacking originality.originality.
** Some have mockingly referred to the book as "transphobic ''Film/{{Tusk}}''," a BlackComedy horror film about a man who is forced to undergo brutal surgery transforming him into a walrus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BrokenAesop: Walsh's argument is supposed to be that children aren't mature enough to choose their own gender, but Johnny isn't the one who asks to be a walrus or genuinely believes himself to be one. In fact, he loudly complains about the transition process, something which would cause any trans healthcare specialist to immediately discontinue treatment. Furthermore, Johnny's in grade school, and while some trans kids do come out at a young age and start going by a new name and pronouns and might go on puberty blockers, they certainly aren't getting ''surgery''. In general, doctors don't approve of gender reassignment surgery or even hormones until the patient is a legal adult and can thus make a medically informed decision. None of this particularly matters in terms of the narrative the book is trying to convey (specifically the idea that being trans is itself the problem).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed one trope.


* TheyCopiedItNowItSucks: Other right-wing writers of similar books complained about it lacking originality.

to:

* TheyCopiedItNowItSucks: TheyCopiedItSoItSucks: Other right-wing writers of similar books complained about it lacking originality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateAesopInterpretation: Because Johnny himself isn't the one who says he identifies as a walrus, and he constantly complains about how the transition process is making him miserable, it's very easy to draw the complete opposite message from this book than what was intended: you should listen to your kids when they say they are uncomfortable with their body, and not force them to present in a way that doesn't match their identity. Of course, this implies that Matt Walsh thought about anything in this book further than “trans people are bad”.

to:

* AlternateAesopInterpretation: Because Johnny himself isn't the one who says he identifies as a walrus, and he constantly complains about how the transition process is making him miserable, it's very easy to draw the complete opposite message from this book than what was intended: you should listen to your kids when they say they are uncomfortable with their body, and not force them to present in a way that doesn't match their identity. The transition process is forced on him by his mother, as she was afraid of being labeled a bigot by ignorant internet people who decided that Johnny had to be a boy who identified as a walrus and not just a kid playing pretend, so another Aesop could be: don't do things because you're afraid of what people will think or because of what people who you have never even met are yelling at you to do, and don't assume things about people when their isn't any real basis in fact for them. Of course, this implies that Matt Walsh thought about anything in this book further than “trans people are bad”.

Changed: 234

Removed: 236

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: The book is written in a way that would appeal to young children in pre-school or kindergarten, [[UncertainAudience who aren't likely to pick up on the subtext regarding transgender issues]]. Furthermore, when Walsh read it to a group of kids, he had to explain several words like "Bigot" and "Phobic". There's also the nightmarish drawing of the doctor trying to cut off Johnny's legs.
** It’s more likely that this book was written for conservative parents who want to instill their own beliefs into their children at an early age and/or are terrified of the concept of progressive values appearing in works for children.

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: The book is written in a way that would appeal to young children in pre-school or kindergarten, [[UncertainAudience who aren't likely to pick up on the subtext regarding transgender issues]]. Furthermore, when Walsh read it to a group of kids, he had to explain several words like "Bigot" and "Phobic". There's also the nightmarish drawing of the doctor trying to cut off Johnny's legs. \n** It’s more likely that this book was written for conservative parents who want to instill their own beliefs into their children at an early age and/or are terrified of the concept of progressive values appearing in works for children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BileFascination: Amongst Walsh’s critics, the main reason to read the book is to see how absurdly it handles its message, as well as to laugh about the idea of conservative propaganda for children.

to:

* BileFascination: Amongst Walsh’s critics, the main reason to read the book is to see how absurdly it handles its message, as well as to laugh about the idea of conservative propaganda for children. That and mock the [[TerribleArtist horrible art]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This is not valid criticism, this is crude slander.


** In one of the pages there is a picture of Matt Walsh's head on a baby wearing only a diaper next to a young Johnny who's also only wearing a diaper. It makes it seem like Matt Walsh is trying to show his diaper fetish to children.

to:

** In one of the pages there is a picture of Matt Walsh's head on a baby wearing only a diaper next to a young Johnny who's also only wearing a diaper. It makes it seem like Matt Walsh is trying to show his diaper fetish to children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NarmCharm: The zookeeper AuthorAvatar looking like Matt Walsh is something that fans of the book consistently praise or fine oddly charming in its ridiculousness.

to:

* NarmCharm: The zookeeper AuthorAvatar looking like Matt Walsh is something that fans of the book consistently praise or fine find oddly charming in its ridiculousness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Restoring Narm Charm entry per here though with a little more context. Entry was previous removed under the biased belief that the book has no fans. But it very much does.

Added DiffLines:

* NarmCharm: The zookeeper AuthorAvatar looking like Matt Walsh is something that fans of the book consistently praise or fine oddly charming in its ridiculousness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
trans medication isn't "ideology" and opposition to that is transphobic


* AudienceAlienatingPremise: The book tells the story of a little boy named Johnny who loves to role-play as different animals and objects. One day, he decides that he wants to be a walrus. This (somehow) causes everyone to treat him as if he actually wants to become a walrus, culminating in a doctor suggesting that Johnny [[InsaneTrollLogic eat worms and have his limbs cut off]] in an allegory for hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery — a metaphor that would only be understood by adults in Walsh's audience who would purchase it, despite the book being illustrated and ostensibly presented as a children's book. Walsh boasted that it was the best-selling book in Amazon's LGBTQ+ category, only for Amazon to recategorize it to Political and Social Commentary and for Target to completely remove it from its online storefront.

to:

* AudienceAlienatingPremise: The book tells the story of a little boy named Johnny who loves to role-play as different animals and objects. One day, he decides that he wants to be a walrus. This (somehow) causes everyone to treat him as if he actually wants to become a walrus, culminating in a doctor suggesting that Johnny [[InsaneTrollLogic eat worms and have his limbs cut off]] in an allegory for hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery — a metaphor that would only be understood by transphobic adults in Walsh's audience who would purchase it, despite the book being illustrated and ostensibly presented as a children's book. Walsh boasted that it was the best-selling book in Amazon's LGBTQ+ category, only for Amazon to recategorize it to Political and Social Commentary and for Target to completely remove it from its online storefront.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Arguing against an ideology is not transphobic, just like not following a religion doesn't mean you hate people of that religion.


* AudienceAlienatingPremise: The book tells the story of a little boy named Johnny who loves to role-play as different animals and objects. One day, he decides that he wants to be a walrus. This (somehow) causes everyone to treat him as if he actually wants to become a walrus, culminating in a doctor suggesting that Johnny [[InsaneTrollLogic eat worms and have his limbs cut off]] in an allegory for hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery — a metaphor that would only be understood by the transphobic adults in Walsh's audience who would purchase it, despite the book being illustrated and ostensibly presented as a children's book. Walsh boasted that it was the best-selling book in Amazon's LGBTQ+ category, only for Amazon to recategorize it to Political and Social Commentary and for Target to completely remove it from its online storefront.

to:

* AudienceAlienatingPremise: The book tells the story of a little boy named Johnny who loves to role-play as different animals and objects. One day, he decides that he wants to be a walrus. This (somehow) causes everyone to treat him as if he actually wants to become a walrus, culminating in a doctor suggesting that Johnny [[InsaneTrollLogic eat worms and have his limbs cut off]] in an allegory for hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery — a metaphor that would only be understood by the transphobic adults in Walsh's audience who would purchase it, despite the book being illustrated and ostensibly presented as a children's book. Walsh boasted that it was the best-selling book in Amazon's LGBTQ+ category, only for Amazon to recategorize it to Political and Social Commentary and for Target to completely remove it from its online storefront.

Added: 318

Changed: 241

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Squick: In one of the pages there is a picture of Matt Walsh's adult head on a baby wearing only a diaper next to a young Johnny who's also only wearing a diaper. It makes it seem like Matt Walsh is trying to show his diaper fetish to children.

to:

* Squick: {{Squick}}:
**
In one of the pages there is a picture of Matt Walsh's adult head on a baby wearing only a diaper next to a young Johnny who's also only wearing a diaper. It makes it seem like Matt Walsh is trying to show his diaper fetish to children.children.
** Johnny is forced to eat worms in one page, and is looks like he is about to vomit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This book has no actual "fans"


* NarmCharm: The Zookeeper AuthorAvatar looking like Walsh is something that fans of the book consistently praise.

to:

* NarmCharm: The Zookeeper AuthorAvatar looking Squick: In one of the pages there is a picture of Matt Walsh's adult head on a baby wearing only a diaper next to a young Johnny who's also only wearing a diaper. It makes it seem like Matt Walsh is something that fans of the book consistently praise.trying to show his diaper fetish to children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateAesopInterpretation: Because Johnny himself isn't the one who says he identifies as a walrus, and he constantly complains about how the transition process is making him miserable, it's very easy to draw the complete opposite message from this book than what was intended: you should listen to your kids when they say they are uncomfortable with their body, and not force them to present in a way that doesn't match their identity. Of course, this implies that Matt Walsh even thought this book through beyond “trans people are bad”.

to:

* AlternateAesopInterpretation: Because Johnny himself isn't the one who says he identifies as a walrus, and he constantly complains about how the transition process is making him miserable, it's very easy to draw the complete opposite message from this book than what was intended: you should listen to your kids when they say they are uncomfortable with their body, and not force them to present in a way that doesn't match their identity. Of course, this implies that Matt Walsh even thought about anything in this book through beyond further than “trans people are bad”.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AudienceAlienatingPremise: The book tells the story of a little boy named Johnny who loves to role-play as different animals and objects. One day, he decides that he wants to be a walrus. This (somehow) causes everyone to treat him as if he actually wants to become a walrus, culminating in a doctor suggesting that Johnny [[InsaneTrollLogic eat worms and have his limbs cut off]] in an allegory for hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery — a metaphor that would only be understood by the transphobic adults in Walsh's audience who would purchase it, despite the book being illustrated and ostensibly presented as a children's book. Walsh boasted that it was the best-selling book in Amazon's LGBTQ+ category, only for Amazon to recategorize it to Political and Social Commentary and for Target to completely remove it from its online storefront.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It’s more likely that this book was written for conservative parents who want to instill their own beliefs into their children at an early age and/or are terrified of the concept of progressive values appearing in works for children. The horror.

to:

** It’s more likely that this book was written for conservative parents who want to instill their own beliefs into their children at an early age and/or are terrified of the concept of progressive values appearing in works for children. The horror.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BileFascination: Amongst Walsh’s critics, the main reason to read the book is to see how absurdly it handles its message.

to:

* BileFascination: Amongst Walsh’s critics, the main reason to read the book is to see how absurdly it handles its message. message, as well as to laugh about the idea of conservative propaganda for children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It’s more likely that this book was written for conservative parents who want to instill their own beliefs into their children at an early age.

to:

It’s **It’s more likely that this book was written for conservative parents who want to instill their own beliefs into their children at an early age.age and/or are terrified of the concept of progressive values appearing in works for children. The horror.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

It’s more likely that this book was written for conservative parents who want to instill their own beliefs into their children at an early age.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateAesopInterpretation: Because Johnny himself isn't the one who says he identifies as a walrus, and he constantly complains about how the transition process is making him miserable, it's very easy to draw the complete opposite message from this book than what was intended: you should listen to your kids when they say they are uncomfortable with their body, and not force them to present in a way that doesn't match their identity.
* BileFascination: Amongst Walsh’s critics, the main reason to read the book is to see how absurdly it handles its message.

to:

* AlternateAesopInterpretation: Because Johnny himself isn't the one who says he identifies as a walrus, and he constantly complains about how the transition process is making him miserable, it's very easy to draw the complete opposite message from this book than what was intended: you should listen to your kids when they say they are uncomfortable with their body, and not force them to present in a way that doesn't match their identity.
identity. Of course, this implies that Matt Walsh even thought this book through beyond “trans people are bad”.
* BileFascination: Amongst Walsh’s critics, the main reason to read the book is to see how absurdly it handles its message.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Index.


* AcceptableTargets:
** The doctor is presented as being a sadist that wants to cut off Johnny's legs, likely reflecting Walsh's dislike for the medical community being supportive of gender transition.
** Progressive activists are also negatively portrayed.

Changed: 16

Removed: 193

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Wrong-way hindsight, which is far from the biggest problem with this page.


* HilariousInHindsight: This could easily pass a SpinoffBabies adaptation of '' {{Film/Tusk}}'', down to a MadDoctor who wants to saw off a human's legs and "transform" the human into a walrus.



*{{Narm Charm}}: The Zookeeper {{author avatar}} looking like Walsh is something that fans of the book consistently praise.

to:

*{{Narm Charm}}: * NarmCharm: The Zookeeper {{author avatar}} AuthorAvatar looking like Walsh is something that fans of the book consistently praise.

Top