Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / HarryPotterAndTheDeathlyHallows

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** [[Series/StrangerThings Jamie Campbell Bower]] makes a split second appearance as a teenage Grindelwald.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Creator/DomnhallGleeson had a couple of supporting roles before appearing as Bill Weasley, but he'd really hit it big in TheNewTens.

to:

** Creator/DomnhallGleeson Creator/DomhnallGleeson had a couple of supporting roles before appearing as Bill Weasley, but he'd really hit it big in TheNewTens.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CatharsisFactor: Given that she killed Sirius Black, tortured Mr. and Mrs. Longbottom into insanity, and nearly killed Ginny (amongst countless other atrocities throughout the series), [[spoiler:watching Molly Weasley completely [[MadeOfExplodium obliterate]] Bellatrix Lestrange, is a very satisfying comeuppance to one of the series' most [[CompleteMonster vile]] characters.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Tastes Like Diabetes is no longer a trope. Moving examples to other tropes when applicable.


* TastesLikeDiabetes: [[spoiler:The epilogue is this to its detractors. All it was missing was "And they all lived happily ever after." Then again, "All was well" is basically another version of that phrase. Someone on Livejournal created an animated icon that displayed the words "rocks fall everyone dies"; then, against a fluffy cloud background: All Was Well.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Tastes Like Diabetes is no longer a trope. Moving examples to other tropes when applicable.


** It doesn't apply only to shippers. A [[BrokenBase substantial percentage of the fandom]] disliked the Epilogue for coming off as [[TastesLikeDiabetes overly cheerful]], as it depicts most of the characters settling down into traditional child-rearing and family roles. Rowling has pointed out that [[TruthInTelevision this is completely normal for post-war populations]] (it's where the Baby Boomers came from), as well as for Harry and his personal longing for a nuclear family, but some readers were still disappointed at how mundane it was. And then others found the whole thing felt like an EsotericHappyEnding, as [[StatusQuoIsGod nothing substantial really appears to have changed]] in the magical society with regards to the government or Muggle-born relations (some even point out that, without these significant changes, there really isn't anything to prevent the rise of a new Dark Lord in the future).

to:

** It doesn't apply only to shippers. A [[BrokenBase substantial percentage of the fandom]] disliked the Epilogue for coming off as [[TastesLikeDiabetes overly cheerful]], cheerful, as it depicts most of the characters settling down into traditional child-rearing and family roles. Rowling has pointed out that [[TruthInTelevision this is completely normal for post-war populations]] (it's where the Baby Boomers came from), as well as for Harry and his personal longing for a nuclear family, but some readers were still disappointed at how mundane it was. And then others found the whole thing felt like an EsotericHappyEnding, as [[StatusQuoIsGod nothing substantial really appears to have changed]] in the magical society with regards to the government or Muggle-born relations (some even point out that, without these significant changes, there really isn't anything to prevent the rise of a new Dark Lord in the future).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InformedWrongness: Hermione once again plays Sirius death at Kreacher's hands a cautionary tale and more or less states that Sirius suffered a KarmicDeath for his poor treatment of house-elves and even equates how Sirius treated house-elves with how Voldemort treated him. The stated false-equivalency strikes many readers as off-base since [[spoiler:Voldemort exploited Kreacher as a stooge and left him to die, while Sirius was merely cold and indifferent to him he would certainly not have killed him or treated him in such fashion, and the idea that being cold and indifferent to someone makes one the same as the main villain in the eyes of Kreacher makes it come across as completely unjustified]].

to:

* InformedWrongness: Hermione once again plays Sirius death at Kreacher's hands as a cautionary tale and more or less states that Sirius suffered a KarmicDeath for his poor treatment of house-elves house-elves, and even equates how Sirius treated house-elves with how Voldemort treated him. The stated false-equivalency strikes many readers as off-base since [[spoiler:Voldemort exploited Kreacher as a stooge and left him to die, while Sirius was merely cold and indifferent to him he him. [[EveryoneHasStandards Sirius would certainly not have killed him or treated him in such fashion, fashion]], and the idea that being cold and indifferent to someone makes one the same as the main villain in the eyes of Kreacher makes it come across as completely unjustified]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope-slashing is not allowed, and Foreshadowing is not YMMV.


* HarsherInHindsight[=/=]{{Foreshadowing}}: In ''Part II'', when Harry returns to Hogwarts and Ginny is predictably overjoyed to see him, passing right by Ron, who indignantly makes note of this to Seamus, who points out that Ginny has loads of brothers as opposed to only one [[LoveInterest Harry.]] Anyone who's read the books or seen the films before knows that line implying Ginny's brothers are expendable, is going to age ''very'' badly...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HarsherInHindsight[=/=]{{Foreshadowing}}: In ''Part II'', when Harry returns to Hogwarts and Ginny is predictably overjoyed to see him, passing right by Ron, who indignantly makes note of this to Seamus, who points out that Ginny has loads of brothers as opposed to only one [[LoveInterest Harry.]] Anyone who's read the books or seen the films before knows that line implying Ginny's brothers are expendable, is going to age ''very'' badly...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the book, Hermione beats up Ron after he returns. Many felt it was a huge case of DoubleStandardAbuseFemaleOnMale and that Ron wasn't entirely at fault for the situation that led to him leaving, and it wasn't helped that Ron felt he deserved to get beat up too. In the movie, Hermione only verbally berates him, and Ron has a DudeWheresMyRespect respone.

to:

** In the book, Hermione beats up Ron after he returns. Many felt it was a huge case of DoubleStandardAbuseFemaleOnMale and that Ron wasn't entirely at fault for the situation that led to him leaving, and it wasn't helped that Ron felt he deserved to get beat up too. In the movie, Hermione only verbally berates him, the beating was toned down to a few not-so-painful hits, and Ron has a DudeWheresMyRespect respone.response.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UnintentionallySympathetic: Ron departing from the group in a huff. While he was acting like a jerk, it was implied to be because the Horcrux he was holding was tainting his personality. Regardless, his beating at the hands of Hermione when he returns was meant to be karmic, and even Ron felt he deserved it.


Added DiffLines:

** In the book, Hermione beats up Ron after he returns. Many felt it was a huge case of DoubleStandardAbuseFemaleOnMale and that Ron wasn't entirely at fault for the situation that led to him leaving, and it wasn't helped that Ron felt he deserved to get beat up too. In the movie, Hermione only verbally berates him, and Ron has a DudeWheresMyRespect respone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Aunt Petunia’s actress Fiona Shaw would go on to play a witch on Series/TrueBlood [[spoiler: which can now be seen as Aunt Petunia getting what she wanted all those years ago.]]

to:

** Aunt Petunia’s actress Fiona Shaw Creator/FionaShaw would go on to play a witch on Series/TrueBlood ''Series/TrueBlood'' [[spoiler: which can now be seen as Aunt Petunia getting what she wanted all those years ago.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
About the ending making them stop caring about what happened prior. If the prior stuff is still well received/they just pull Fanon Discontinuity on the ending not this.


* EndingAversion: Downplayed. The epilogue wasn't received well, what with Harry [[spoiler: naming one of his children [[ManipulativeBastard Albus]] [[SadistTeacher Severus]]]] and how half-hearted it came off as compared to the rest of the book, but the final few chapters of the story itself were well-received.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Creator/RegeJeanPage has an uncredited appearance as a wedding guest who can be briefly seen next to Hermione.

Changed: 16

Removed: 216

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Draco in Leather Pants is a fan reaction, and the development of the character in canon hardly comes under it.


* DracoInLeatherPants: Well, it had to happen eventually. After the defeat of [[spoiler:Voldemort, Draco reforms and, in the epilogue, ends up being just another parent sending ''his'' wizard offspring to Hogwarts]].



** In this book, the Death Eaters become a legitimate nation-wide threat and take over the Wizarding Government, unleashing a campaign of terror against Muggle-born and Muggles. This is the perfect territory for any TheUnmasquedWorld scenarios, especially because the Death Eaters ''want'' Muggles to live in terror so they most likely wouldn't be using the enchantments designed to preserve TheMasquerade anyway. Muggle Society could have also helped the good wizards by providing resources. However, the Death Eater's coup is ''still'' not treated as good enough of a reason for the Order of the Phoenix, the Golden Trio, or any of the other wizards to at least warn the non-wizarding population about the danger to let them know what's going on and give them a chance to protect themselves. We're also never given any indication of what Muggle Society went through during Voldemort's year-long control of the Ministry or even if TheMasquerade was threatened because of the Death Eaters.
** While it's nice that the series ends with an unambiguously good minister (Kingsley Shacklebolt), Scrimgeour dying meant we never got to see him function as monster in the post-war world and actually realize his mistakes.

to:

** In this book, the Death Eaters become a legitimate nation-wide threat and take over the Wizarding Government, unleashing a campaign of terror against Muggle-born and Muggles. This is the perfect territory for any TheUnmasquedWorld scenarios, especially because the Death Eaters ''want'' Muggles to live in terror so they most likely wouldn't be using the enchantments designed to preserve TheMasquerade anyway. Muggle Society could have also helped the good wizards by providing resources. However, the Death Eater's Eaters' coup is ''still'' not treated as a good enough of a reason for the Order of the Phoenix, the Golden Trio, or any of the other wizards to at least warn the non-wizarding population about the danger to let them know what's going on and give them a chance to protect themselves. We're also never given any indication of what Muggle Society went through during Voldemort's year-long control of the Ministry or even if TheMasquerade was threatened because of the Death Eaters.
** While it's nice that the series ends with an unambiguously good minister (Kingsley Shacklebolt), Scrimgeour dying meant we never got to see him function as monster minister in the post-war world and actually realize his mistakes.



** The Gringott's Dragon, especially in the movie. The [[WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds poor little thing]] is extremely old, somewhat weak, and almost ''blind'', and by the time it escapes it seems to be absolutely astonished that it's finally free. The movie drives the point home by having it actually struggle to stay aloft at first, implying that it doesn't get out much (read: at all).
** The Dumbledore siblings are revealed to.have all been this at some point.

to:

** The Gringott's Gringotts' Dragon, especially in the movie. The [[WoobieDestroyerOfWorlds poor little thing]] is extremely old, somewhat weak, and almost ''blind'', and by the time it escapes it seems to be absolutely astonished that it's finally free. The movie drives the point home by having it actually struggle to stay aloft at first, implying that it doesn't get out much (read: at all).
** The Dumbledore siblings are revealed to.to have all been this at some point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Forgot someone already mentioned Crimes of Grindelwald


** And then there's the bit with Bathilda Bagshot [[spoiler: where Nagini is possessing her. [[Film/FantasticBeastsTheCrimesOfGrindelwald She got to be human again just for a time]]]].

to:

** And then there's the bit with Bathilda Bagshot [[spoiler: where Nagini is possessing her. [[Film/FantasticBeastsTheCrimesOfGrindelwald She got to be human again just for a time]]]].time]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** And then there's the bit with Bathilda Bagshot [[spoiler: where Nagini is possessing her. She got to be human again just for a time]].

to:

** And then there's the bit with Bathilda Bagshot [[spoiler: where Nagini is possessing her. [[Film/FantasticBeastsTheCrimesOfGrindelwald She got to be human again just for a time]].time]]]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This example failed to discuss both sides of the argument (i.e. Broken Base) and was just They Changed It Now It Sucks, so I attempted to fix it.


** Voldemort's death in the book is a confirmation of the fact that, for all his power and attempts to seek immortality, in the end he was just a man. In the film, he breaks up into pieces which float away, which rather detracts from that.

to:

** Voldemort's death in the book is a confirmation of the fact that, for all his power and attempts to seek immortality, in the end he was just a man. In the film, he dramatically breaks up into pieces which float away, which rather detracts away. Whether or not you like this change depends on whether you see it positively as Voldemort dying as even less than "just a man", or negatively as detracting from that.the book's themes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Some like the deleted scene with Petunia's last interaction with Harry, feeling that it adds more depth and complexity to her character. Others point out that for all Petunia's supposed grief for her sister, it never stopped her physically, verbally, and emotionally abusing said sister's son.
** Same with the scene of Snape crying over Lily's body: Some feel that it adds more to their doomed relationship, while others point out that it's a creepy stalker hugging the corpse of a married woman whom he pushed away through his own actions and utterly ignoring the only living person in the house. It depends on how you feel about Snape.
** Voldemort's death in the book is a confirmation of the fact that, for all his power and attempts to seek immortality, in the end he was just a man. In the film, he breaks up into pieces which float away, which rather detracts from that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[spoiler:"NOT MY DAUGHTER, YOU BITCH!!!!"]], which made Molly Weasley ascend to badass status.

to:

** [[spoiler:"NOT MY DAUGHTER, [[THISisforEMPHASISBITCH YOU BITCH!!!!"]], BITCH]]!!!!"]], which made Molly Weasley ascend to badass status.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Ron's Splinched shoulder and arm; the effect itself is very realistic looking, and his gasps and convulsions from the pain completely sell it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FollowTheLeader: It's painfully obvious that the developers were trying to cash in on the popularity of cover-based third-person shooters.


Added DiffLines:

* TheProblemWithLicensedGames: Both games have mediocre graphics, uninspired gameplay that is basically ''VideoGame/GearsOfWar'' [[RecycledInSpace but with magic spells]], and boring level design.

Added: 264

Removed: 284

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* FunnyAneurysmMoment: During the wedding, Fred comments that when he gets married, everything will be mellow and he'll put Molly in a Body-Bind Curse until it's all over. While this sort of speech is typical of Fred and George, it becomes quite tragic after you've finished the book.


Added DiffLines:

** During the wedding, Fred comments that when he gets married, everything will be mellow and he'll put Molly in a Body-Bind Curse until it's all over. While this sort of speech is typical of Fred and George, it becomes quite tragic after you've finished the book.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Snope, Headmaster of Higwarts.


** "How dare you stand where he stood!?"[[labelnote:Explanation]] Harry confronting Snape after the latter succeeds Dumbledore as Higwarts' headmaster. The quote has been repurposed by fans to express indignation whenever [[ReplacementScrappy a character is replaced by someone far less liked.]][[/labelnote]]

to:

** "How dare you stand where he stood!?"[[labelnote:Explanation]] Harry confronting Snape after the latter succeeds Dumbledore as Higwarts' Hogwarts' headmaster. The quote has been repurposed by fans to express indignation whenever [[ReplacementScrappy a character is replaced by someone far less liked.]][[/labelnote]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* While it's nice that the series ends with an unambiguously good minister (Kingsley Shacklebolt), Scrimgeour dying meant we never got to see him function as monster in the post-war world and actually realize his mistakes.
* Mad-Eye mentions his house, but we never get to visit it (in part because he is killed so early in the book).
* UntionallyUnsympathetic: The fact that none of the good wizards bother to break TheMasquerade to help the Muggles protect themselves from the Death Eaters makes it look like they value their isolationism over the fate of the world ''even when a world-ending threat will destroy both societies''. It also further establishes the belief most wizards hold that Muggles aren't remotely intelligent enough to even defend themselves from anything even though the wizards refuse to let them know magic exists. There is a line from Kingsley Shacklebolt when the trio listen to a Potterwatch radio broadcast where he reminds listeners to cast protective charms on the homes of Muggles they know, suggesting there was some protection being done in secret, but there are no active examples of this.

to:

* ** While it's nice that the series ends with an unambiguously good minister (Kingsley Shacklebolt), Scrimgeour dying meant we never got to see him function as monster in the post-war world and actually realize his mistakes.
* ** Mad-Eye mentions his house, but we never get to visit it (in part because he is killed so early in the book).
* UntionallyUnsympathetic: UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: The fact that none of the good wizards bother to break TheMasquerade to help the Muggles protect themselves from the Death Eaters makes it look like they value their isolationism over the fate of the world ''even when a world-ending threat will destroy both societies''. It also further establishes the belief most wizards hold that Muggles aren't remotely intelligent enough to even defend themselves from anything even though the wizards refuse to let them know magic exists. There is a line from Kingsley Shacklebolt when the trio listen to a Potterwatch radio broadcast where he reminds listeners to cast protective charms on the homes of Muggles they know, suggesting there was some protection being done in secret, but there are no active examples of this.

Added: 789

Changed: 801

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: The fact that none of the good wizards bother to break TheMasquerade to help the Muggles protect themselves from the Death Eaters makes it look like they value their isolationism over the fate of the world ''even when a world-ending threat will destroy both societies''. It also further establishes the belief most wizards hold that Muggles aren't remotely intelligent enough to even defend themselves from anything even though the wizards refuse to let them know magic exists. There is a line from Kingsley Shacklebolt when the trio listen to a Potterwatch radio broadcast where he reminds listeners to cast protective charms on the homes of Muggles they know, suggesting there was some protection being done in secret, but there are no active examples of this.

to:

* UnintentionallyUnsympathetic: Mad-Eye mentions his house, but we never get to visit it (in part because he is killed so early in the book).
* UntionallyUnsympathetic:
The fact that none of the good wizards bother to break TheMasquerade to help the Muggles protect themselves from the Death Eaters makes it look like they value their isolationism over the fate of the world ''even when a world-ending threat will destroy both societies''. It also further establishes the belief most wizards hold that Muggles aren't remotely intelligent enough to even defend themselves from anything even though the wizards refuse to let them know magic exists. There is a line from Kingsley Shacklebolt when the trio listen to a Potterwatch radio broadcast where he reminds listeners to cast protective charms on the homes of Muggles they know, suggesting there was some protection being done in secret, but there are no active examples of this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* While it's nice that the series ends with an unambiguously good minister (Kingsley Shacklebolt), Scrimgeour dying meant we never got to see him function as monster in the post-war world and actually realize his mistakes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Aberforth and Ariana Dumbledore. Don't believe us? Read "The Missing Mirror" again.

to:

** Aberforth and Ariana Dumbledore. Don't believe us? Read "The Missing Mirror" again.
The Dumbledore siblings are revealed to.have all been this at some point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FanNickname:
** This book is sometimes called ''Harry Potter and the Very Long Camping Trip''.
** The video games, which are basically {{Third Person Shooter}}s with wands instead of guns, are sometimes called ''[[VideoGame/GearsOfWar Gears of Potter]]'' or ''[[VideoGame/CallOfDuty Call of Potter]]: [[VideoGame/ModernWarfare Modern Wizardry]]''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Harry's BrokenPedestal moment when he learns that Dumbledore, someone he used to look up to, had once expressed uncharitable views towards a marginalized group, can come off harsher due to Rowling's controversial views on transgender people. Especially since Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Bonnie Wright and Katie Leung publicly disagreed with her views.

to:

** Harry's BrokenPedestal moment when he learns that Dumbledore, someone he used to look up to, had once expressed uncharitable views towards a marginalized group, can come off harsher due to Rowling's controversial views on transgender people. Especially since Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Bonnie Wright and Katie Leung publicly disagreed with her views.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CompleteMonster: [[YMMV/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone Voldemort]], [[YMMV/HarryPotterAndTheOrderOfThePhoenix Bellatrix, Umbridge]] and [[YMMV/HarryPotterAndTheHalfBloodPrince Greyback]] all return; see those pages for more details.

Top