Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WMG / Shrek

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* He was hardened, but not by much. It didn't take a whole lot to convince him that Shrek didn't deserve to die.

to:

* He was hardened, but not by much. wasn't really all that hardened. It didn't take a whole lot to convince him that Shrek didn't actually deserve to die.
die. For all we know, the king probably made Puss think that Shrek was a traditional, evil ogre. Puss stopped trying to kill Shrek almost as soon as Shrek showed even slight kindness. Doesn't sound like a hardened criminal to me, more lie somebody was mislead to think that somebody else was evil.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* He was hardened, but not by much. It didn't take a whole lot to convince him that Shrek didn't deserve to die.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: Shrek actually does eat people]]
All those eyes in the jars you see lying around have to come from ''somewhere''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* It depends if you count Film/PussInBoots as a Shrek movie or not...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** So? It's not like incest is anything new to royalty. Or maybe Artie is just related to Fiona on his mother's side.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing wick to Did Not Do The Research per rename at TRS.


* [[DidNotDoTheResearch Narcolepsy doesn't work like that.]]

to:

* [[DidNotDoTheResearch Narcolepsy doesn't work like that.]]
that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: A Puss in Boots sequel would be DarkerAndEdgier than the first film.]]
The Puss we saw in Shrek 2 was much more hardened, killing ogres for money. Obviously something big happened to him between the first Puss in Boots film and Shrek 2.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: Charming's father died (Possibly like a knight by dragon or monster) or travelled to an alternate dimension.]]
The former comes from the fact that he's never seen, unless this is a case of there's always one parent in fairy tales.
The latter comes from the fact that Charming is called Junior at times by Godmother. I assume that his father either still died, or travelled to Disney's Cinderella's dimension while Godmother was pregnant and married Cinderella.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Changed: 11

Removed: 26

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: A Puss in Boots sequel will feature a plot inspired by a princess tale like TheLittleMermaid]]

to:

[[WMG: A Puss in Boots sequel will feature a plot inspired by a princess tale like TheLittleMermaid]]Disney/TheLittleMermaid]]





----
<<|WildMassGuessing|>>

to:

\n\n----\n<<|WildMassGuessing|>>----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


All of the other creatures seem to be from a fairy tale or story. In chapters 31 and 32 of Carlo Collodi's ''The Adventures of {{Pinocchio}}'', children who stayed in Toyland would turn into donkeys.

to:

All of the other creatures seem to be from a fairy tale or story. In chapters 31 and 32 of Carlo Collodi's ''The Adventures of {{Pinocchio}}'', ''Literature/TheAdventuresOfPinocchio'', children who stayed in Toyland would turn into donkeys.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* This is further supported by the fact that Donkey says he received wedgies in school. This could be a nonsense throwaway joke, or it could mean to imply he once had human form.

Added: 111

Changed: 101

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[WMG: A Puss in Boots sequel will feature a plot inspired by a princess tale like TheLittleMermaid]]
The villain will be a female who is a queen or a witch trying to take over the kingdom (possibly Far Far Away).

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Based on context is sounds like one and it was one in the secondn movie.


* They actually do hint at this in the second film. Since it was FG who turned King Harold [[spoiler: into a human after Lillian fell in love with him as the Frog Prince]], he figured he owed her a favor, so they set up a XanatosRoulette so that Fiona and Charming would wed as soon as he got to the tower (but as we all know, Shrek beat him to the punch) - the Roulette is even more played into the theory as Fiona actually had no idea about Harold's plan beyond sending her away to the tower - which she calls school in her girlhood diary.

to:

* They actually do hint at this in the second film. Since it was FG who turned King Harold [[spoiler: into a human after Lillian fell in love with him as the Frog Prince]], he figured he owed her a favor, so they set up a XanatosRoulette GambitRoulette so that Fiona and Charming would wed as soon as he got to the tower (but as we all know, Shrek beat him to the punch) - the Roulette is even more played into the theory as Fiona actually had no idea about Harold's plan beyond sending her away to the tower - which she calls school in her girlhood diary.



Since Fiona's father was a frog despite his human form he still carries frog genes as such Fiona's true form is that of an Ogre her "cure" was actually Fairy Godmother's blessing as it allowed her to have a normal childhood as a human during the day but due to either the Fairy Tale nature of the Fairy Godmother's magic or as a XanatosGambit to take control over Far Far Away the "curse" would turn her into the form closest to her true love with their first kiss.

to:

Since Fiona's father was a frog despite his human form he still carries frog genes as such Fiona's true form is that of an Ogre her "cure" was actually Fairy Godmother's blessing as it allowed her to have a normal childhood as a human during the day but due to either the Fairy Tale nature of the Fairy Godmother's magic or as a XanatosGambit an EvilPlan to take control over Far Far Away the "curse" would turn her into the form closest to her true love with their first kiss.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The spin-off film was just an orgin story explaing how he became a hero and got his boots, and why he is spanish. If their is a sequel it will have him venturing out of San Ricardo with Kitty Softpaws and finding themeselves in a Far Far Away type kingdom tormented by an evil oger.


to:

The spin-off film was just an orgin story explaing how he became a hero and got his boots, and why he is spanish. If their is a sequel it will have him venturing out of San Ricardo with Kitty Softpaws and finding themeselves in a Far Far Away type kingdom tormented by an evil shapeshifting oger.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: If their is a sequel to Puss and Boots it will be based on the orginal Puss and Boots story]]
The spin-off film was just an orgin story explaing how he became a hero and got his boots, and why he is spanish. If their is a sequel it will have him venturing out of San Ricardo with Kitty Softpaws and finding themeselves in a Far Far Away type kingdom tormented by an evil oger.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


He was a runt. Listen when he goes to the AU, one of the ogres says he's kind of small. He definitely looks much smaller than them

to:

He was a runt. Listen when he goes to the AU, one of the ogres says he's kind of small. He definitely looks much smaller than themthem.



* I always figured he was one of the Town Musicians of Bremen. For those not in the know, it's a German tale about a bunch of TalkingAnimals who want to go to Bremen and become...er...musicians. Hence Donkey's singing, humming and generally just being annoying.

to:

* I always figured he was one of the Town Musicians of Bremen. For those not in the know, it's a German tale about a bunch of TalkingAnimals {{Talking Animal}}s who want to go to Bremen and become...er...musicians. Hence Donkey's singing, humming and generally just being annoying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: All of the fairy tale folk not seen in later movies were killed by the villains]]
That's why we don't see them anymore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: The Fairy Godmother is the one who placed the curse on Fiona.]]
She cursed Fiona with a spell that could only be broken by true love's kiss. Basically, whoever rescued her would be the true love in Fiona's eyes, as seen in the first movie. The Godmother wanted her son, Charming, to marry Fiona so he could become king because she only wants the absolute best she can give to her son.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: The Fairy Godmother is the one who placed the curse on Fiona.]]
She cursed Fiona with a spell that could only be broken by true love's kiss. Basically, whoever rescued her would be the true love in Fiona's eyes, as seen in the first movie. The Godmother wanted her son, Charming, to marry Fiona so he could become king because she only wants the absolute best she can give to her son.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Donkey isn't intelligent enough to be a jester. Court jesters, contrary to popular belief, were actually brilliant(and careful!) satirists who [[ObfuscatingStupidity acted under the guise of foolishness]] in order to criticize the king without being executed. Now does that sound like Donkey to y-...[[FridgeBrilliance Wait.]]

Added: 403

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



[[WMG: The new movie about Puss in Boots will not be set anywhere near Far Far Away.]]
Look at the [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcxL43SircA teaser trailer]] and you'll see that the humans look slightly cartoonier than in the previous films. Either we're in a different country in the Shrek universe, or the movie is about another of Puss's nine lives and we might not be in the Shrek universe at all.



<<|WildMassGuessing|>>)

to:

<<|WildMassGuessing|>>)<<|WildMassGuessing|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Also, Rumple could've worked Shrek into his plot. The request was to free Fiona from the tower, right? Delay it by one day and they'd have signed the contract already, he could let things progress almost exactly as they had and he'd be keeping his end of the bargin, as Fiona is still freed and technically speaking the curse is broken because of true loves kiss with Shrek, so by letting things progress just a little later than he did, he'd have been completeing the contract. And Donkey still could've met Shrek because all the magical creatures were sent to Shrek's swamp, so they'd have met that way. However, the key difference here is Far Far Away was only visited in the second movie because Fiona's parents summoned them. If Rumple rules Far Far Away, then they never leave the swamp and live happily ever after there without interfering with Rumple so long as he prevents them from knowing about it. So in a way, by erasing Shrek from time and preventing him from rescuing Fiona, he put the SpannerInTheWorks in place where as if he'd taken that day instead, that would've delayed Shrek by a single day or maybe even a few more minutes after the contract had been signed, then he'd probably have won. Scary.

Added: 1520

Changed: 6332

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: There were worse days to lose.]]
Losing a day implies that the traded day never existed to the character who traded it. Everyone else continues on as if the day was there, but the character seems to be erased from existence that day. As well as any memories of that day being erased. In the movie, Rumple takes the day Shrek was born because it extends the effect for all time. But there was at least one other day Rumple could have taken away that would have caused plenty of problems. Shrek mentions taking away the day he met Donkey. Think about it. The day Shrek and Donkey met was also the day he started his trek to DuLoc. So, Shrek wouldn't have be able to start the first movie's quest until after that day. Meaning assuming he would still decide to leave his swamp to go to DuLoc, there's no guarantee he even becomes friends with Donkey, which in turns means he might have to deal with Dragon alone. But even if, he still manages to become friends with Donkey and the plot still turns out exactly as it did in the movie or if he manages to save Fiona by himself the damage would be done. Delaying his quest by a single day means the Rumple would succeed in his deal with the King and Queen because it took them until last second to receive the new originally. So effectively, Far Far Away would turn into what we saw in the alternate timeline in 4 anyway, but with differences. The most likely forms of alternate timeless are like this:
1. Shrek and Donkey don't become friends. Shrek fails at saving Fiona without Donkey distracting Dragon. This pretty much replicates the AU in Shrek 4, the only difference being that Shrek disappears not because he never exist but instead he died trying to save Fiona.
2. Shrek and Donkey become friends. Shrek succeeds in saving Fiona. Shrek and Fiona share true loves kiss. Rumple completes the deal with King and Queen. Shrek 2 and 3 never happen. In this timeline, despite Shrek never saving Donkey, Donkey still attaches himself with Shrek. Because of this, there is nothing stopping the story from continueing like in the first Shrek. Ultimately, though Rumple would most likely try to capture the Ogre's like in the AU in 4. Shrek would be a part of the resistance from the beginning. In this timeline, Shrek would continue to exist after the day was over, but the new world would persist just like Rumple mentioned the AU in 4 would. In this version, Donkey would also already be a part of the resistance too. As a result, Donkey may not know how to figure out the exit clause (which would need to be different from True Love's Kiss as Fiona and Shrek would still be in love).
3. Shrek and Donkey don't become friends. Shrek succeeds in saving Fiona. Shrek and Fiona never kiss. Donkey is one of the key reason both Shrek and Fiona finally admit their true feelings. It is possible without Donkey there to convince both of them to open their shells, they may never had. This causes a future similar to the AU 4, but once again Shrek will not disappear at the end of the day. Fiona would disappear when True Love's Kiss doesn't happen between her an Farquuad. She'd eventually fall in with the Ogre resistance, which Shrek would eventually be brought into as well. They get a second chance at True Love, but this time instead of starting from scratch they have previous relationship wrinkles to iron out.
4. Shrek and Donkey don't become friends. Shrek succeeds in saving Fiona. Shrek and Fiona share True Love's Kiss. Same as what I said in 2 above, but without Donkey.

Another problem can arise if the only reason Shrek's memory remains unaltered in the fourth movie is because Rumple took the day he was born and therefore Shrek is an outsider in the timeline. If Rumple took a day, that does write Shrek out of time then its possible that Shrek's memory could have been overwritten. So taking away the day Donkey met Shrek could have made Shrek completely forget his friendship with Donkey. Without knowledge of his and Donkey's friendship he may have not have picked-up Donkey during His Day as an Ogre. Which funnily enough, completely changes the events of the fourth movie in Rumple's favor as Donkey is a key element in saving Shrek at least twice and maybe three times. So if any of the possible futures I mention above happen (except number 2), it would have ended with the events being stuck as an AU, if Donkey hadn't been there to help Shrek. It shows how important Donkey and Shrek's friendship is. And to think Shrek was the one who suggested that day. Luckily, Rumple was more worried about writing Shrek out of existence and didn't realize the significance of Donkey. Otherwise, most of the alternate timelines I can think of actually give Rumple a better chance of winning. Though granted it is impossible to say how exactly things would have ended. It just goes to show you how much an effect a single day can have.

to:

[[WMG: There were worse days to lose.In Shrek 4, there was one other day Rumpelstiltskin could have taken for great effect.]]
Losing a day implies that the traded day never existed to the character who traded it. Everyone else continues on as if the day was there, but the character seems to be erased from existence that day. As well as any memories of that day being erased. In the movie, Rumple takes the day Shrek was born because it extends the effect for all time. But there was at least one other day Rumple could have taken away that would have caused plenty of problems. Shrek mentions taking away problems: the day he Shrek met Donkey. Donkey.
Think about it. The day Shrek and Donkey met was also the day (or night as the case was) he started his trek to DuLoc. So, Shrek wouldn't have be able to start the first movie's quest until after that day. Meaning assuming he would still decide to leave his swamp to go to DuLoc, there's no guarantee he even becomes friends with Donkey, which in turns means he might have to deal with Dragon alone. But even if, he still manages to become friends with Donkey and the plot still turns out exactly as it did in the movie or if he manages to save Fiona by himself the damage would be done. Delaying his quest by a single day means the Rumple would succeed in his deal with the King and Queen because it took them until last second to receive the new originally. originally.
*
So effectively, Far Far Away would turn into what we saw in the alternate timeline in 4 anyway, but with differences. The most likely forms of alternate timeless are like this:
this
**
1. Shrek and Donkey don't become friends. Shrek fails at saving Fiona without Donkey distracting Dragon. This pretty much replicates the AU in Shrek 4, the only difference being that Shrek disappears not because he never exist but instead he died trying to save Fiona.
Fiona.
**
2. Shrek and Donkey become friends. Shrek succeeds in saving Fiona. Shrek and Fiona share true loves kiss. Rumple completes the deal with King and Queen. Shrek 2 and 3 never happen. In this timeline, despite Shrek never saving Donkey, Donkey still attaches himself with Shrek. Because of this, there is nothing stopping the story from continueing like in the first Shrek. Ultimately, though Rumple would most likely try to capture the Ogre's like in the AU in 4. Shrek would be a part of the resistance from the beginning. In this timeline, Shrek would continue to exist after the day was over, but the new world would persist just like Rumple mentioned the AU in 4 would. In this version, Donkey would also already be a part of the resistance too. As a result, Donkey may not know how to figure out the exit clause (which would need to be different from True Love's Kiss as Fiona and Shrek would still be in love).
love).
**
3. Shrek and Donkey don't become friends. Shrek succeeds in saving Fiona. Shrek and Fiona never kiss. Donkey is one of the key reason both Shrek and Fiona finally admit their true feelings. It is possible without Donkey there to convince both of them to open their shells, they may never had. This causes a future similar to the AU 4, but once again Shrek will not disappear at the end of the day. Fiona would disappear when True Love's Kiss doesn't happen between her an Farquuad. She'd eventually fall in with the Ogre resistance, which Shrek would eventually be brought into as well. They get a second chance at True Love, but this time instead of starting from scratch they have previous relationship wrinkles to iron out.
** 4. Shrek and Donkey don't become friends. Shrek succeeds in saving Fiona. Shrek and Fiona share True Love's Kiss. Same as what I said in 2 above, but without Donkey.

* Another problem can arise if the only reason Shrek's memory remains unaltered in the fourth movie is because Rumple took the day he was born and therefore Shrek is an outsider in the timeline. If Rumple took a day, that does write Shrek out of time then its possible that Shrek's memory could have been overwritten. So taking away the day Donkey met Shrek could have made Shrek completely forget his friendship with Donkey. Without knowledge of his and Donkey's friendship he may have not have picked-up Donkey during His Day as an Ogre. Which funnily enough, completely changes the events of the fourth movie in Rumple's favor as Donkey is a key element in saving Shrek at least twice and maybe three times. So if any of the possible futures I mention above happen (except number 2), it would have ended with the events being stuck as an AU, if Donkey hadn't been there to help Shrek. It shows how important Donkey and Shrek's friendship is. And to think Shrek was the one who suggested that day. Luckily, Rumple was more worried about writing Shrek out of existence and didn't realize the significance of Donkey. Otherwise, most of the alternate timelines I can think of actually give Rumple a better chance of winning. Though granted it is impossible to say how exactly things would have ended. It just goes to show you how much an effect a single day can have.have.
* Wow. This is awesome. This not only shows just how important a day can be, but how important 1 friendship can be for altering history. Excellent theory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It\'s \"Nor\" not \"Or\" when you use neither


[[WMG: Neither Farquaad kissing Fiona at their wedding or Prince Charming kissing Fiona at the ball would have worked to keep her human.]]

to:

[[WMG: Neither Farquaad kissing Fiona at their wedding or nor Prince Charming kissing Fiona at the ball would have worked to keep her human.]]

Added: 4894

Changed: 92

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*Or Charming simply had no reason to save Fiona once Far Far Away was signed over to Rumple.


Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: There were worse days to lose.]]
Losing a day implies that the traded day never existed to the character who traded it. Everyone else continues on as if the day was there, but the character seems to be erased from existence that day. As well as any memories of that day being erased. In the movie, Rumple takes the day Shrek was born because it extends the effect for all time. But there was at least one other day Rumple could have taken away that would have caused plenty of problems. Shrek mentions taking away the day he met Donkey. Think about it. The day Shrek and Donkey met was also the day he started his trek to DuLoc. So, Shrek wouldn't have be able to start the first movie's quest until after that day. Meaning assuming he would still decide to leave his swamp to go to DuLoc, there's no guarantee he even becomes friends with Donkey, which in turns means he might have to deal with Dragon alone. But even if, he still manages to become friends with Donkey and the plot still turns out exactly as it did in the movie or if he manages to save Fiona by himself the damage would be done. Delaying his quest by a single day means the Rumple would succeed in his deal with the King and Queen because it took them until last second to receive the new originally. So effectively, Far Far Away would turn into what we saw in the alternate timeline in 4 anyway, but with differences. The most likely forms of alternate timeless are like this:
1. Shrek and Donkey don't become friends. Shrek fails at saving Fiona without Donkey distracting Dragon. This pretty much replicates the AU in Shrek 4, the only difference being that Shrek disappears not because he never exist but instead he died trying to save Fiona.
2. Shrek and Donkey become friends. Shrek succeeds in saving Fiona. Shrek and Fiona share true loves kiss. Rumple completes the deal with King and Queen. Shrek 2 and 3 never happen. In this timeline, despite Shrek never saving Donkey, Donkey still attaches himself with Shrek. Because of this, there is nothing stopping the story from continueing like in the first Shrek. Ultimately, though Rumple would most likely try to capture the Ogre's like in the AU in 4. Shrek would be a part of the resistance from the beginning. In this timeline, Shrek would continue to exist after the day was over, but the new world would persist just like Rumple mentioned the AU in 4 would. In this version, Donkey would also already be a part of the resistance too. As a result, Donkey may not know how to figure out the exit clause (which would need to be different from True Love's Kiss as Fiona and Shrek would still be in love).
3. Shrek and Donkey don't become friends. Shrek succeeds in saving Fiona. Shrek and Fiona never kiss. Donkey is one of the key reason both Shrek and Fiona finally admit their true feelings. It is possible without Donkey there to convince both of them to open their shells, they may never had. This causes a future similar to the AU 4, but once again Shrek will not disappear at the end of the day. Fiona would disappear when True Love's Kiss doesn't happen between her an Farquuad. She'd eventually fall in with the Ogre resistance, which Shrek would eventually be brought into as well. They get a second chance at True Love, but this time instead of starting from scratch they have previous relationship wrinkles to iron out.
4. Shrek and Donkey don't become friends. Shrek succeeds in saving Fiona. Shrek and Fiona share True Love's Kiss. Same as what I said in 2 above, but without Donkey.

Another problem can arise if the only reason Shrek's memory remains unaltered in the fourth movie is because Rumple took the day he was born and therefore Shrek is an outsider in the timeline. If Rumple took a day, that does write Shrek out of time then its possible that Shrek's memory could have been overwritten. So taking away the day Donkey met Shrek could have made Shrek completely forget his friendship with Donkey. Without knowledge of his and Donkey's friendship he may have not have picked-up Donkey during His Day as an Ogre. Which funnily enough, completely changes the events of the fourth movie in Rumple's favor as Donkey is a key element in saving Shrek at least twice and maybe three times. So if any of the possible futures I mention above happen (except number 2), it would have ended with the events being stuck as an AU, if Donkey hadn't been there to help Shrek. It shows how important Donkey and Shrek's friendship is. And to think Shrek was the one who suggested that day. Luckily, Rumple was more worried about writing Shrek out of existence and didn't realize the significance of Donkey. Otherwise, most of the alternate timelines I can think of actually give Rumple a better chance of winning. Though granted it is impossible to say how exactly things would have ended. It just goes to show you how much an effect a single day can have.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Oh, for God's sake. If you're looking for seriously thought-out theories, you have come to the definitve Wrong Place.


* [[DidNotDoTheResearch You guys obviously haven't read the original Shrek book.]] There was an actual talking Donkey in it which gave way to the character in the film.

to:

* [[DidNotDoTheResearch You guys obviously haven't read the original Shrek book.]] There was an actual talking Donkey in it which gave way to the character in the film.

Added: 224

Changed: 198

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Both Artie and Prince Charming also give pretty long speeches to people. I'm thinking of Charming give his speech at the Poison Apple bar and Artie's speeches at his school and at the stage play.


Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: Donkey is Bottom, from Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream.]]
The spell that was placed on Bottom to make his head look like a donkey's slowly started to effect his whole body, so he ended up looking like a donkey.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** But wait........[[{{Squick}} FIONA WANTED TO MARRY CHARMING IN THE FIRST MOVIE]]!!!!!

Top