Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ScienceMarchesOn / Astronomy

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[AC:{{Music}}]]

to:

[[AC:{{Music}}]][[AC:Music]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the late 1950s and 60s, one of Mars's moons, Phobos, was thought to be hollow, for esoteric scienc-y reasons (the moon was/is falling toward Mars). President Eisenhower even went on record, saying, "Its purpose would probably be to sweep up radiation in Mars's atmosphere, so that Martians could safely operate around their planet."
* The whole "life on Mars" hype got going after Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli claimed to have seen 'canali' (actually means 'channels' or 'grooves', not 'canals' as it was mistranslated as) on the surface during the opposition of 1877, a claim later backed up by other astronomers of the day. However, as better telescopes became available in the early years of the 20th century, these 'channels' proved to be optical illusions. This ''should'' have become a DiscreditedTrope as early as '''[[http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S730.htm 1907]]''', but science fiction writers ignored this until the ''Mariner'' probes destroyed the last scraps of PlausibleDeniability.

to:

* In the late 1950s and 60s, one of Mars's moons, Phobos, was thought to be hollow, for esoteric scienc-y sciencey reasons (the moon was/is falling toward Mars). President Eisenhower even went on record, saying, "Its purpose would probably be to sweep up radiation in Mars's atmosphere, so that Martians could safely operate around their planet."
* The whole "life on Mars" hype got going after Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli claimed to have seen 'canali' (actually (which actually means 'channels' or 'grooves', not 'canals' as it was mistranslated as) mistranslated) on the surface during the opposition of 1877, a claim later backed up by other astronomers of the day. However, as better telescopes became available in the early years of the 20th century, these 'channels' proved to be optical illusions. This ''should'' have become a DiscreditedTrope as early as '''[[http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S730.htm 1907]]''', but science fiction writers ignored this until the ''Mariner'' probes destroyed the last scraps of PlausibleDeniability.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Also in "Literature/BetweenPlanets" by the same author; the fifth planet is the source of advanced technology that the rebels discover remnants of on Mars and use to win freedom from the tyrannical Earth.

to:

*** Also in "Literature/BetweenPlanets" ''Literature/BetweenPlanets'' by the same author; the fifth planet is the source of advanced technology that the rebels discover remnants of on Mars and use to win freedom from the tyrannical Earth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Most works of fiction depicting the Milky Way galaxy portray it as a regular [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_galaxy spiral galaxy]], a shape taken for granted given our understanding of it However, there has been evidence discovered of (what is currently believed to be) its true shape, which is a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barred_spiral_galaxy barred spiral galaxy]].

to:

* Most works of fiction depicting the Milky Way galaxy portray it as a regular [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_galaxy spiral galaxy]], a shape taken for granted given our understanding of it it. However, there has been evidence discovered of (what is currently believed to be) its true shape, which is a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barred_spiral_galaxy barred spiral galaxy]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A previously held position about Mercury recognised that the side perpetually facing the Sun would be a boiling Hell far too hot to support life. Whereas the side perpetually facing away from the sun would be as cold and frozen as the Seventh Circle of Hell. much speculation was made in both scientific and science-fiction circles about the boundary zone between light and dark being - potentially - capable of sustaining life and if so what life might be found there. Much ink was spilt concerning the Temperate Zone of Mercury. This lasted until closer observation revealed that this planet also turns on its axis. Very slowly. But no life would ever have a chance to colonise the Twilight Belt before it either froze or fried.

to:

* A previously held position about Mercury recognised that the side perpetually facing the Sun would be a boiling Hell far too hot to support life. Whereas life, whereas the side perpetually facing away from the sun would be as cold and frozen as the Seventh Circle of Hell. much Much speculation was made in both scientific and science-fiction circles about the boundary zone between light and dark being - potentially - capable of sustaining life and if so what life might be found there. Much ink was spilt concerning the Temperate Zone of Mercury. This lasted until closer observation revealed that this planet also turns on its axis. Very slowly. But no life would ever have a chance to colonise the Twilight Belt before it either froze or fried.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The Titus-Bode Law essentially stated that each planet's distance from the Sun must be double the previous planet's distance. This law was reinforced when Uranus was discovered and found to follow the same pattern as the five classical planets, but there was one notable problem; under this rule there should be a planet in between Mars and Jupiter. Attempts to find this missing planet led to the discovery of the dwarf planet Ceres and the rest of the asteroid belt. While Ceres's discovery was initially taken as proof of the law, once it was demoted from planet status it became harder to justify, especially because just a few years before Ceres's demotion, Neptune was discovered and clearly too close. This law was damaged further when Pluto was discovered where Neptune was "supposed" to be, and eventually annihilated by the discovery of the Kuiper Belt and extrasolar planets. Ultimately, the Titus-Bode Law is no longer considered credible, and the fact that it appeared consistent up to Uranus was a complete coincidence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/RobertHeinlein indulges in a swampy jungle Venus in ''Literature/BetweenPlanets'', ''Literature/PodkayneOfMars'' and ''Literature/SpaceCadet''.

to:

* Creator/RobertHeinlein indulges in a swampy jungle Venus in ''Literature/BetweenPlanets'', ''Literature/PodkayneOfMars'' and ''Literature/SpaceCadet''.''Literature/{{Space Cadet|Heinlein}}''.



** In ''Series/DoctorWho'', the Fourth Doctor once faced off with [[Recap/DoctorWhoS15E3ImageOfTheFendahl an alien menace from the Fifth Planet]]. It was explained that this race was so dangerous that the [[SufficientlyAdvancedAliens Time Lords]] “time looped” the planet, making it ''never have existed''. But an alien survived.
** Similar to the asteroid belt theory, Varley's ''Titan'' suggests that Saturn's rings are the remnants of a moon that shattered because giant living space stations kept using it as a nursery.

to:

** In ''Series/DoctorWho'', the Fourth Doctor once faced off with [[Recap/DoctorWhoS15E3ImageOfTheFendahl an alien menace from the Fifth Planet]]. It was explained that this race was so dangerous that the [[SufficientlyAdvancedAliens Time Lords]] “time looped” "time looped" the planet, making it ''never have existed''. But an alien survived.
** Similar to the asteroid belt theory, Varley's ''Titan'' Creator/JohnVarley's ''[[Literature/GaeaTrilogy Titan]]'' suggests that Saturn's rings are the remnants of a moon that shattered because giant living space stations kept using it as a nursery.



** In Heinlein's ''Literature/SpaceCadet'' it is discovered that the intelligent natives [[EarthShatteringKaboom destroyed]] their planet through a nuclear war and created the asteroid belt. The mass problem is actually addressed by saying the belt represents less than one percent of the planet.

to:

** In Heinlein's ''Literature/SpaceCadet'' ''Literature/{{Space Cadet|Heinlein}}'', it is discovered that the intelligent natives [[EarthShatteringKaboom destroyed]] their planet through a nuclear war and created the asteroid belt. The mass problem is actually addressed by saying the belt represents less than one percent of the planet.

Added: 780

Changed: 726

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''Literature/HayyIbnYaqzan'' is a twelfth-century novel about a man who discovers truths about the world through observation and rational thought. Not all of his discoveries have held up to modern science, such as his belief that the celestial bodies orbit the Earth and are contained in spheres.



* ''Literature/HayyIbnYaqzan'' is a twelfth-century novel about a man who discovers truths about the world through observation and rational thought. Not all of his discoveries have held up to modern science, such as his belief that the celestial bodies orbit the Earth and are contained in spheres.

to:

* ''Literature/HayyIbnYaqzan'' is a twelfth-century novel about a man who discovers truths about the world through observation and rational thought. Not all of his discoveries have held up to modern science, such as his belief It was once believed that the Milky Way was the only galaxy. However, the early 20th century saw the discovery that celestial bodies orbit once thought to be nebulae were actually other galaxies, which incidentally also proved that the universe was far larger than previously thought.
* The geocentric model of the universe, where all celestial bodies orbited
the Earth in "spheres", was accepted as fact for over a thousand years. It has, of course, long been superseded.
* Since the 17th century, it was theorized that there must be an unknown planet (known as "[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulcan_(hypothetical_planet) Vulcan]]") closer to the sun than Mercury. This idea was given a boost in the 19th century after irregularities in the orbit of Uranus were found to be due to another planet further out: Neptune. Similar irregularities in Mercury's orbit were thought to have the same cause. Reported discoveries were consistently disproven, however,
and are contained in spheres.the Mercurial orbital irregularities were later explained using Albert Einstein's theory of relativity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One scene in Creator/{{Disney}}'s ''Mars and Beyond'' was about the other planets in our Solar System, and when we focus on Venus, the narrator says "There ''may'' be life on Venus...", but that film was made long before spacecraft had actually discovered the fact that Venus is actually too hot to support life.

to:

* One scene in Creator/{{Disney}}'s ''Mars and Beyond'' was about the other planets in our Solar System, and when we focus on Venus, the narrator says "There ''may'' be life on Venus...", but that film was made long five years before spacecraft had actually ''Mariner 2'' discovered the fact that Venus is actually too hot to support life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/WilliamHopeHodgson's ''Literature/TheNightLand'' is built around the premise that the Sun would cease to shine some time in the distant future. This idea was actually accepted as scientific fact at the time the book was written-based upon the idea that the Sun got its luminosity from chemical fuel compressed by gravity, and that said source would run out in a few million years. Then came along the idea of nuclear fusion... The current prediction is that the Sun ''will'' cease to shine in the distant future, but it's ''very'' distant and the Earth will become utterly uninhabitable long before then.

to:

* Creator/WilliamHopeHodgson's ''Literature/TheNightLand'' is built around the premise that the Sun would cease to shine some time in the distant future. This idea was actually accepted as scientific fact at the time the book was written-based written- based upon the idea that the Sun got its luminosity from chemical fuel compressed by gravity, and that said source would run out in a few million years. Then came along the idea of nuclear fusion... The current prediction is that the Sun ''will'' cease to shine in the distant future, but it's ''very'' distant and the Earth will become utterly uninhabitable long before then.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/51_Pegasi_b 51 Pegasi b]], the first extrasolar planet orbiting a Sun-like star, was discovered its closeness to its star (seven times closer than Mercury's distance to the Sun) led the discoverers to suggest it was the stripped, solid, core of a brown dwarf -a body intermediate in mass between a star and a planet and unable to fuse hydrogen as a star- since at the time it was thought no planet so massive could orbit so close to a star (the rocky planet scenario was used for the Creator/HalClement's novel ''Exchange Rate''). Today, after the discovery of hundreds of similar planets, it's thought 51 Pegasi is a gas giant planet similar to Jupiter that ended orbiting so close after forming much farther away and [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_migration migrating there]].

to:

* When [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/51_Pegasi_b 51 Pegasi b]], the first extrasolar planet orbiting a Sun-like star, was discovered its closeness to its star (seven times closer than Mercury's distance to the Sun) led the discoverers to suggest it was the stripped, solid, core of a brown dwarf -a dwarf- a body intermediate in mass between a star and a planet and unable to fuse hydrogen as a star- since at the time it was thought no planet so massive could orbit so close to a star (the rocky planet scenario was used for the Creator/HalClement's novel ''Exchange Rate''). Today, after the discovery of hundreds of similar planets, it's thought 51 Pegasi is a gas giant planet similar to Jupiter that ended orbiting so close after forming much farther away and [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_migration migrating there]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:350: Top: UsefulNotes/{{Mars}} as imagined in ''Literature/TheMartianChronicles''\\
Bottom: Mars as it actually is]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:350: Top: UsefulNotes/{{Mars}} as imagined in ''Literature/TheMartianChronicles''\\
''Literature/TheMartianChronicles''.\\
Bottom: Mars as it actually is]]is.]]

Changed: 218

Removed: 64

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Creator/ArthurCClarke's novel ''Literature/TwoThousandOneASpaceOdyssey'', it's stated that samples of Moon rock and dust apparently proved that the Moon was never part of Earth. In fact, real world Moon samples provided proof that the opposite was true.
* Clarke's novel ''A Fall of Moondust'' assumed that the alternate heating and cooling of the dust on the Moon, due to the stark contrast between lunar daylight and lunar night, would eventually result in a miles-thick layer of dust so fine it acted like a liquid. The actual lunar dust that the Apollo astronauts observed was only a few inches thick, and indeed behaved more like dust. While Moon dust indeed turned out as fine as predicted, Clarke failed to consider the vacuum cementing that occurs between particles of the dust in the airless environment of the Moon. Even the slightest pressure cause the particles to fuse together into a dense and stable structure, making it to behave like any other dust. Further, the effects of weathering are diminished on the Moon due to the lack of air and water, so the particles of dust on the Moon are jagged and irregular (on Earth, any such particles would become smooth and rounded over time), allowing them to lock together far better than, say, sand on Earth (which is also why the footprints left by the astronauts are so clear).
* In an Creator/HGWells novel, ''Literature/TheFirstMenInTheMoon'', the Moon actually has air and food, and is actually ''richer in oxygen'' than Earth.
* In Heinlein's "Literature/TheManWhoSoldTheMoon", the first manned expedition to the Moon discovers [[spoiler:uranium and diamonds]]. Heinlein also made several wrong predictions regarding human exploration of the Moon. In an introduction to the short story collection featuring "The Man Who Sold The Moon", Heinlein stated he would be very surprised if men walked on the Moon before the end of the 20th Century. He must have been very pleasantly surprised on July 20th, 1969. He didn't seem to have any compunctions about writing stories involving men landing on the Moon earlier, however, as ''Literature/TheMoonIsAHarshMistress'' mentions that the Moon first became a colony some time in the 80s.
** Of course the former was written in 1949; the latter in 1966.

to:

* In Creator/ArthurCClarke's novel ''Literature/TwoThousandOneASpaceOdyssey'', ''[[Literature/TheSpaceOdysseySeries 2001: A Space Odyssey]]'', it's stated that samples of Moon rock and dust apparently proved that the Moon was never part of Earth. In fact, real world Moon samples provided proof that the opposite was true.
* Clarke's Creator/ArthurCClarke's novel ''A Fall of Moondust'' assumed that the alternate heating and cooling of the dust on the Moon, due to the stark contrast between lunar daylight and lunar night, would eventually result in a miles-thick layer of dust so fine it acted like a liquid. The actual lunar dust that the Apollo astronauts observed was only a few inches thick, and indeed behaved more like dust. While Moon dust indeed turned out as fine as predicted, Clarke failed to consider the vacuum cementing that occurs between particles of the dust in the airless environment of the Moon. Even the slightest pressure cause causes the particles to fuse together into a dense and stable structure, making it to behave like any other dust. Further, the effects of weathering are diminished on the Moon due to the lack of air and water, so the particles of dust on the Moon are jagged and irregular (on Earth, any such particles would become smooth and rounded over time), allowing them to lock together far better than, say, sand on Earth (which is also why the footprints left by the astronauts are so clear).
* In an Creator/HGWells novel, ''Literature/TheFirstMenInTheMoon'', the Moon actually has air and food, and is actually ''richer in oxygen'' than Earth.
* In Heinlein's Creator/RobertAHeinlein's "Literature/TheManWhoSoldTheMoon", the first manned expedition to the Moon discovers [[spoiler:uranium and diamonds]]. Heinlein also made several wrong predictions regarding human exploration of the Moon. In an introduction to the short story collection featuring "The Man Who Sold The Moon", Heinlein stated he would be very surprised if men walked on the Moon before the end of the 20th Century. He must have been very pleasantly surprised on July 20th, 1969. He didn't seem to have any compunctions about writing stories involving men landing on the Moon earlier, however, as ''Literature/TheMoonIsAHarshMistress'' mentions that the Moon first became a colony some time sometime in the 80s.
**
1980s. Of course course, the former was written in 1949; the latter in 1966.



* Any number of stories, beginning with ''Literature/TheWarOfTheWorlds'' and continuing into the mid-'60s,[[note]]but see "Other", below[[/note]] featuring intelligent life on Mars, were effectively scuttled when the Mariner 4 probe revealed Mars to be a barren desert. Since then, most SpeculativeFiction featuring Martians has been more tongue-in-cheek (see ''Film/MarsAttacks'') than previously. Subsequently, many stories now say the Martians simply [[https://youtu.be/8AoAJOF5GVQ spoof the probe's sensors]], just to [[{{Masquerade}} maintain the façade]].
** In some stories (also beginning with ''Literature/TheWarOfTheWorlds''), Mars' inhospitable conditions are used as the ''reason'' why Martians are invading. Their world is used up, so they want a fresh one.

to:

* Any number of stories, beginning with ''Literature/TheWarOfTheWorlds'' ''Literature/TheWarOfTheWorlds1898'' and continuing into the mid-'60s,[[note]]but see "Other", below[[/note]] featuring intelligent life on Mars, were effectively scuttled when the Mariner 4 probe revealed Mars to be a barren desert. Since then, most SpeculativeFiction featuring Martians has been more tongue-in-cheek (see ''Film/MarsAttacks'') than previously. Subsequently, many stories now say the Martians simply [[https://youtu.be/8AoAJOF5GVQ spoof the probe's sensors]], just to [[{{Masquerade}} maintain the façade]].
** In some stories (also beginning with ''Literature/TheWarOfTheWorlds''), ''The War of the Worlds''), Mars' inhospitable conditions are used as the ''reason'' why Martians are invading. Their world is used up, so they want a fresh one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** The corresponding book does address all of these things in prints made after 2006. The educational asides address such facts as Pluto's demotion, Ceres's lesser-known promotion from asteroid to dwarf planet, and the existence of the rest of the Kuiper Belt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The first time it was asked, regular contestant Alan Davies answers (resigned, knowing such an easy question can only be a setup) "One" and gets flashing lights, klaxons, and Creator/StephenFry with "Sorry, that is incorrect. The correct answer, of course, is ''2''": Luna and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne Cruithne]] (an asteroid that has a peculiar orbit around the Sun that sometimes interacts with Earth's gravity). Note that no scientist has ever considered Cruithne to be a moon, since it is not permanently locked in orbit around the Earth; the show was deliberately using an extremely loose definition of "moon" to mess with the contestants.

to:

** The first time it was asked, regular contestant Alan Davies answers (resigned, knowing such an easy question can only be a setup) "One" and gets flashing lights, klaxons, and Creator/StephenFry with "Sorry, that is incorrect. The correct answer, of course, is ''2''": Luna and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne Cruithne]] (an asteroid that has a peculiar orbit around the Sun that sometimes interacts with Earth's gravity).temporarily brings it into a "quasi-orbit" around Earth). Note that no scientist has ever considered Cruithne to be a moon, since it is not permanently locked in orbit around the Earth; the show was deliberately using an extremely loose definition of "moon" to mess with the contestants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The first time it was asked, regular contestant Alan Davies answers (resigned, knowing such an easy question can only be a setup) "One" and gets flashing lights, klaxons, and Creator/StephenFry with "Sorry, that is incorrect. The correct answer, of course, is ''2''": Luna and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne Cruithne]] (an asteroid that had been temporarily captured by Earth's gravity at the time[[note]]It's a ''little'' more complicated than that, and "temporarily ... at the time" includes "all of human history and the reasonably foreseeable future"; see the link to The Other Wiki for more details[[/note]]). Note that no scientist has ever considered Cruithne to be a moon, since it is not permanently locked in orbit around the Earth; the show was deliberately using an extremely loose definition of "moon" to mess with the contestants.

to:

** The first time it was asked, regular contestant Alan Davies answers (resigned, knowing such an easy question can only be a setup) "One" and gets flashing lights, klaxons, and Creator/StephenFry with "Sorry, that is incorrect. The correct answer, of course, is ''2''": Luna and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne Cruithne]] (an asteroid that had been temporarily captured by has a peculiar orbit around the Sun that sometimes interacts with Earth's gravity at the time[[note]]It's a ''little'' more complicated than that, and "temporarily ... at the time" includes "all of human history and the reasonably foreseeable future"; see the link to The Other Wiki for more details[[/note]]).gravity). Note that no scientist has ever considered Cruithne to be a moon, since it is not permanently locked in orbit around the Earth; the show was deliberately using an extremely loose definition of "moon" to mess with the contestants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/HayyIbnYaqzan'' is a twelfth-century novel about a man who discovers truths about the world through observation and rational thought. Not all of his discoveries have held up to modern science, such as his belief that the celestial bodies orbit the Earth and are contained in spheres.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
author came out as trans after this example was originally written


* ''Literature/Aeon14'': M.D. Cooper tries to use the most current astronomy and astrophysics information available, but sometimes this happens. Some stars near Earth that the series visits have since been discovered to have planetary systems (they appear to be far more common than previously thought) that sometimes don't match what earlier books said--notably [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_1061 LHS 1565]], which features prominently in the second book, ''A Path in the Darkness'', and is said to have no planets at all (Cooper [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/aeon14fans/permalink/2464502813784967/?comment_id=2464633540438561 commented]] that he worked really hard to pick a star not likely to have any). The setting does have a built-in handwave, however, as many star systems have been extensively {{terraform}}ed, the technology for which is advanced enough to rearrange planets, break them up, or form entirely new ones by mashing rocks together.

to:

* ''Literature/Aeon14'': M.D. Cooper tries to use the most current astronomy and astrophysics information available, but sometimes this happens. Some stars near Earth that the series visits have since been discovered to have planetary systems (they appear to be far more common than previously thought) that sometimes don't match what earlier books said--notably [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_1061 LHS 1565]], which features prominently in the second book, ''A Path in the Darkness'', and is said to have no planets at all (Cooper [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/aeon14fans/permalink/2464502813784967/?comment_id=2464633540438561 commented]] that he she worked really hard to pick a star not likely to have any). The setting does have a built-in handwave, however, as many star systems have been extensively {{terraform}}ed, the technology for which is advanced enough to rearrange planets, break them up, or form entirely new ones by mashing rocks together.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
messed up my own link, fixed


* Whitley Strieber and James Kunetka's 1984 novel ''Literature/Warday}} has a satellite discover five planets orbiting Barnard's Star in 1985, with one of them possibly being Earth-like. As of 2023, there are no confirmed exoplanets in the system, with [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnard%27s_Star_b Barnard's Star b]] being disproven in 2021–2022, and if any do exist, they are bound to be much smaller than the Earth.

to:

* Whitley Strieber and James Kunetka's 1984 novel ''Literature/Warday}} ''Literature/{{Warday}}'' has a satellite discover five planets orbiting Barnard's Star in 1985, with one of them possibly being Earth-like. As of 2023, there are no confirmed exoplanets in the system, with [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnard%27s_Star_b Barnard's Star b]] being disproven in 2021–2022, and if any do exist, they are bound to be much smaller than the Earth.

Added: 6348

Changed: 4054

Removed: 5817

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





* Creator/IsaacAsimov often based plots on then-current scientific information that was later proven incorrect. He typically noted cases of this in later printings (sometimes with a snarky comment that the scientists should have gotten it right to begin with).
** ''Literature/TheCompleteAdventuresOfLuckyStarr'': Dr Asimov wrote these stories to [[JuvenileFiction teach kids]] what the solar system is like. Twenty years after first publishing them, many aspects were proven inaccurate, so Dr Asimov included a preface to each story which gave the currently correct information. Some of which is wrong ''again'' by now.
** ''Literature/TheStarsLikeDust'': The climactic scenes take place on a type of planet (breathable atmosphere and Earthlike gravity, but no organic life or liquid water) which later science determined was extremely unlikely to exist in the real world. Again, later editions of the book contained an afterword by Dr Asimov, apologizing to the reader for the error and stating he hadn't been able to find a way to correct it without rewriting the entire climax.
** ''Literature/TheCurrentsOfSpace'': The plot is based around a theory that [[EarthShatteringKaboom stars go nova]] as a result of runaway nuclear fusion catalyzed by clouds of carbon atoms. Like many of his other stories, when this was proved incorrect Dr Asimov included an afterword explaining the error, as well as the science behind the new scientifically accepted theory, but pointed out that he could not change the story without re-writing the entire plot.
* Creator/StephenBaxter's ''Literature/XeeleeSequence'' climax was somewhat hit hard when studies of the Great Attractor showed not only it's both less massive than was thought and has an even more massive cluster behind it whose gravity is pulling our galaxy towards there but also that [[spoiler: no looped cosmic strings have been found to date there]]. On a related note, cosmic strings [[spoiler: -- what the Xeelee use as building blocks]] are unlikely to exist, having had at best a very limited role in forming the structure of the Universe and instead it having growth from quantum fluctuations left from either cosmic inflation or the Big Bang itself.



* Creator/CarlSagan's ''Literature/{{Contact}}'' has being in space extend the lives of mammals and leave them with fewer diseases, so near the turn of the millenium there's a whole industry of wealthy older people trying to prolong their lives by living on glamorous, specially built space stations. Since then it's proven that living in space results in massive degradation of a lot of the human body, plus bacteria becomes more virulent, ''and'' living in space is miserable.

to:

* Creator/CarlSagan's ''Literature/{{Contact}}'' has ''Literature/Aeon14'': M.D. Cooper tries to use the most current astronomy and astrophysics information available, but sometimes this happens. Some stars near Earth that the series visits have since been discovered to have planetary systems (they appear to be far more common than previously thought) that sometimes don't match what earlier books said--notably [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_1061 LHS 1565]], which features prominently in the second book, ''A Path in the Darkness'', and is said to have no planets at all (Cooper [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/aeon14fans/permalink/2464502813784967/?comment_id=2464633540438561 commented]] that he worked really hard to pick a star not likely to have any). The setting does have a built-in handwave, however, as many star systems have been extensively {{terraform}}ed, the technology for which is advanced enough to rearrange planets, break them up, or form entirely new ones by mashing rocks together.
* Robert Heinlein figured out how to get something to navigate within the solar system back in the 1950s in his juvenile novel ''Literature/TheRollingStones1952'', by lining up the locations of known stars and mirrors to form a type of parallax to get your location, which is now used for satellites and probes for positioning. Since the novel was printed in serialized chapter format within the Boy Scouts of America's ''Boy's Life'' magazine, it was intended as an interesting intellectual exercise (land navigation
being in space extend the lives of mammals and leave them a skill that was heavily stressed with fewer diseases, so near the turn Boy Scouts). He also mentioned that the health benefits of zero-g (itself a mistaken term, now replaced with microgravity) were well known. These days, long term exposure to microgravity is well known to be bad for one's long term health, and not just because of bone and muscle atrophy, but also because of the millenium there's a whole industry of wealthy older people trying to prolong their lives by living detrimental effects it has on glamorous, specially built space stations. Since then it's proven that living in space results in massive degradation of a lot of the human body, plus bacteria becomes more virulent, ''and'' living in space is miserable.immune system.



* Creator/WilliamHopeHodgson's ''Literature/TheNightLand'' is built around the premise that the Sun would cease to shine some time in the distant future. This idea was actually accepted as scientific fact at the time the book was written-based upon the idea that the Sun got its luminosity from chemical fuel compressed by gravity, and that said source would run out in a few million years. Then came along the idea of nuclear fusion... The current prediction is that the Sun ''will'' cease to shine in the distant future, but it's ''very'' distant and the Earth will become utterly uninhabitable long before then.
** Later authors writing in the same universe have rectified this by suggesting that the EldritchAbomination[=s=] had something to do with the Sun going out.
%% * ''Literature/{{Solaris}}'' uses science and technology that was cutting-edge when the book was written, but which has since become either incredibly outdated or has been outright contradicted. %% how is that about astronomy?
* In Melisa Michael's ''Skyrider'', the protagonist lives in the Belt and is constantly dodging rocks, requiring excellent flying to get through rocks and hiding from the patrol in a dense patch of rocks. Unfortunately the asteroid Belt is just not dense enough. Even in the densest part, if you were standing on one rock you wouldn't be able to see a single other rock.
* Some Creator/LarryNiven stories include mention of the Moon's gravity "skimming off" some of the Earth's atmosphere, without which it would be as inhabitable as Venus. This was later discredited, and is noted in his collections.
* In ''Search the Sky'', by Creator/FrederikPohl, Azor's sun has "an unpleasant bluish cast to it", and is therefore a low-end A star. Therefore Azor, as a Goldilocks planet, has to have a much longer year than Earth's. Yet Ms. Cavallo speaks of another FTL traveler who arrived "seventy-five years ago", and who died about the time Ross and Helena arrived. Even on the gerontocratic world of Gemser, people do not live that long.
* Creator/CarlSagan's ''Literature/{{Contact}}'' has being in space extend the lives of mammals and leave them with fewer diseases, so near the turn of the millenium there's a whole industry of wealthy older people trying to prolong their lives by living on glamorous, specially built space stations. Since then it's proven that living in space results in massive degradation of a lot of the human body, plus bacteria becomes more virulent, ''and'' living in space is miserable.
* Creator/CordwainerSmith's "Literature/ScannersLiveInVain" uses the fanciful premise that unscreened radiations present in space would leave space travelers in unbearable pain, such that only condemned criminals whose sensory nerves had been cut could function there. [[https://www.nasa.gov/analogs/nsrl/why-space-radiation-matters While radiation in space is a real threat]], it's not immediately painful and there are other ways of protecting against it (indeed, cutting sensory nerves would actually be worse than useless, since it would interfere with people's senses without protecting them against radiation).



* Creator/IsaacAsimov often based plots on then-current scientific information that was later proven incorrect. He typically noted cases of this in later printings (sometimes with a snarky comment that the scientists should have gotten it right to begin with).
** ''Literature/TheCompleteAdventuresOfLuckyStarr'': Dr Asimov wrote these stories to [[JuvenileFiction teach kids]] what the solar system is like. Twenty years after first publishing them, many aspects were proven inaccurate, so Dr Asimov included a preface to each story which gave the currently correct information. Some of which is wrong ''again'' by now.
** ''Literature/TheStarsLikeDust'': The climactic scenes take place on a type of planet (breathable atmosphere and Earthlike gravity, but no organic life or liquid water) which later science determined was extremely unlikely to exist in the real world. Again, later editions of the book contained an afterword by Dr Asimov, apologizing to the reader for the error and stating he hadn't been able to find a way to correct it without rewriting the entire climax.
** ''Literature/TheCurrentsOfSpace'': The plot is based around a theory that [[EarthShatteringKaboom stars go nova]] as a result of runaway nuclear fusion catalyzed by clouds of carbon atoms. Like many of his other stories, when this was proved incorrect Dr Asimov included an afterword explaining the error, as well as the science behind the new scientifically accepted theory, but pointed out that he could not change the story without re-writing the entire plot.
* Creator/WilliamHopeHodgson's ''Literature/TheNightLand'' is built around the premise that the Sun would cease to shine some time in the distant future. This idea was actually accepted as scientific fact at the time the book was written-based upon the idea that the Sun got its luminosity from chemical fuel compressed by gravity, and that said source would run out in a few million years. Then came along the idea of nuclear fusion... The current prediction is that the Sun ''will'' cease to shine in the distant future, but it's ''very'' distant and the Earth will become utterly uninhabitable long before then.
** Later authors writing in the same universe have rectified this by suggesting that the EldritchAbomination[=s=] had something to do with the Sun going out.
* Some Creator/LarryNiven stories include mention of the Moon's gravity "skimming off" some of the Earth's atmosphere, without which it would be as inhabitable as Venus. This was later discredited, and is noted in his collections.
* Heinlein figured out how to get something to navigate within the solar system back in the 1950s in his juvenile novel ''Literature/TheRollingStones1952'', by lining up the locations of known stars and mirrors to form a type of parallax to get your location, which is now used for satellites and probes for positioning. Since the novel was printed in serialized chapter format within the Boy Scouts of America's Boy's Life magazine, it was intended as an interesting intellectual exercise (land navigation being a skill that was heavily stressed with the Boy Scouts). He also mentioned that the health benefits of zero-g (itself a mistaken term, now replaced with microgravity) were well known. These days, long term exposure to microgravity is well known to be bad for one's long term health, and not just because of bone and muscle atrophy, but also because of the detrimental effects it has on the human immune system.
* Creator/CordwainerSmith's "Literature/ScannersLiveInVain" uses the fanciful premise that unscreened radiations present in space would leave space travelers in unbearable pain, such that only condemned criminals whose sensory nerves had been cut could function there. [[https://www.nasa.gov/analogs/nsrl/why-space-radiation-matters While radiation in space is a real threat]], it's not immediately painful and there are other ways of protecting against it (indeed, cutting sensory nerves would actually be worse than useless, since it would interfere with people's senses without protecting them against radiation).
* In ''Search the Sky'', by Creator/FrederikPohl, Azor's sun has "an unpleasant bluish cast to it", and is therefore a low-end A star. Therefore Azor, as a Goldilocks planet, has to have a much longer year than Earth's. Yet Ms. Cavallo speaks of another FTL traveler who arrived "seventy-five years ago", and who died about the time Ross and Helena arrived. Even on the gerontocratic world of Gemser, people do not live that long.
* In Melisa Michael's ''Skyrider'', the protagonist lives in the Belt and is constantly dodging rocks, requiring excellent flying to get through rocks and hiding from the patrol in a dense patch of rocks. Unfortunately the asteroid Belt is just not dense enough. Even in the densest part, if you were standing on one rock you wouldn't be able to see a single other rock.
%% * ''Literature/{{Solaris}}'' uses science and technology that was cutting-edge when the book was written, but which has since become either incredibly outdated or has been outright contradicted. %% how is that about astronomy?
* ''Literature/Aeon14'': M.D. Cooper tries to use the most current astronomy and astrophysics information available, but sometimes this happens. Some stars near Earth that the series visits have since been discovered to have planetary systems (they appear to be far more common than previously thought) that sometimes don't match what earlier books said--notably [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_1061 LHS 1565]], which features prominently in the second book, ''A Path in the Darkness'', and is said to have no planets at all (Cooper [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/aeon14fans/permalink/2464502813784967/?comment_id=2464633540438561 commented]] that he worked really hard to pick a star not likely to have any). The setting does have a built-in handwave, however, as many star systems have been extensively {{terraform}}ed, the technology for which is advanced enough to rearrange planets, break them up, or form entirely new ones by mashing rocks together.

to:

* Creator/IsaacAsimov often based plots on then-current scientific information that was later proven incorrect. He typically noted cases of this in later printings (sometimes with a snarky comment that the scientists should have gotten it right to begin with).
** ''Literature/TheCompleteAdventuresOfLuckyStarr'': Dr Asimov wrote these stories to [[JuvenileFiction teach kids]] what the solar system is like. Twenty years after first publishing them, many aspects were proven inaccurate, so Dr Asimov included a preface to each story which gave the currently correct information. Some of which is wrong ''again'' by now.
** ''Literature/TheStarsLikeDust'': The climactic scenes take place on a type of planet (breathable atmosphere
Whitley Strieber and Earthlike gravity, but no organic life or liquid water) which later science determined was extremely unlikely to exist in the real world. Again, later editions of the book contained an afterword by Dr Asimov, apologizing to the reader for the error and stating he hadn't been able to find a way to correct it without rewriting the entire climax.
** ''Literature/TheCurrentsOfSpace'': The plot is based around a theory that [[EarthShatteringKaboom stars go nova]] as a result of runaway nuclear fusion catalyzed by clouds of carbon atoms. Like many of his other stories, when this was proved incorrect Dr Asimov included an afterword explaining the error, as well as the science behind the new scientifically accepted theory, but pointed out that he could not change the story without re-writing the entire plot.
* Creator/WilliamHopeHodgson's ''Literature/TheNightLand'' is built around the premise that the Sun would cease to shine some time in the distant future. This idea was actually accepted as scientific fact at the time the book was written-based upon the idea that the Sun got its luminosity from chemical fuel compressed by gravity, and that said source would run out in a few million years. Then came along the idea of nuclear fusion... The current prediction is that the Sun ''will'' cease to shine in the distant future, but it's ''very'' distant and the Earth will become utterly uninhabitable long before then.
** Later authors writing in the same universe have rectified this by suggesting that the EldritchAbomination[=s=] had something to do with the Sun going out.
* Some Creator/LarryNiven stories include mention of the Moon's gravity "skimming off" some of the Earth's atmosphere, without which it would be as inhabitable as Venus. This was later discredited, and is noted in his collections.
* Heinlein figured out how to get something to navigate within the solar system back in the 1950s in his juvenile
James Kunetka's 1984 novel ''Literature/TheRollingStones1952'', by lining up the locations ''Literature/Warday}} has a satellite discover five planets orbiting Barnard's Star in 1985, with one of known stars and mirrors to form a type of parallax to get your location, which is now used for satellites and probes for positioning. Since the novel was printed in serialized chapter format within the Boy Scouts of America's Boy's Life magazine, it was intended as an interesting intellectual exercise (land navigation them possibly being a skill that was heavily stressed with the Boy Scouts). He also mentioned that the health benefits Earth-like. As of zero-g (itself a mistaken term, now replaced with microgravity) were well known. These days, long term exposure to microgravity is well known to be bad for one's long term health, and not just because of bone and muscle atrophy, but also because of the detrimental effects it has on the human immune system.
* Creator/CordwainerSmith's "Literature/ScannersLiveInVain" uses the fanciful premise that unscreened radiations present in space would leave space travelers in unbearable pain, such that only condemned criminals whose sensory nerves had been cut could function there. [[https://www.nasa.gov/analogs/nsrl/why-space-radiation-matters While radiation in space is a real threat]], it's not immediately painful and
2023, there are other ways of protecting against it (indeed, cutting sensory nerves would actually be worse than useless, since it would interfere with people's senses without protecting them against radiation).
* In ''Search the Sky'', by Creator/FrederikPohl, Azor's sun has "an unpleasant bluish cast to it", and is therefore a low-end A star. Therefore Azor, as a Goldilocks planet, has to have a much longer year than Earth's. Yet Ms. Cavallo speaks of another FTL traveler who arrived "seventy-five years ago", and who died about the time Ross and Helena arrived. Even on the gerontocratic world of Gemser, people do not live that long.
* In Melisa Michael's ''Skyrider'', the protagonist lives
no confirmed exoplanets in the Belt and is constantly dodging rocks, requiring excellent flying to get through rocks and hiding from the patrol in a dense patch of rocks. Unfortunately the asteroid Belt is just not dense enough. Even in the densest part, if you were standing on one rock you wouldn't be able to see a single other rock.
%% * ''Literature/{{Solaris}}'' uses science and technology that was cutting-edge when the book was written, but which has since become either incredibly outdated or has been outright contradicted. %% how is that about astronomy?
* ''Literature/Aeon14'': M.D. Cooper tries to use the most current astronomy and astrophysics information available, but sometimes this happens. Some stars near Earth that the series visits have since been discovered to have planetary systems (they appear to be far more common than previously thought) that sometimes don't match what earlier books said--notably
system, with [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_1061 LHS 1565]], which features prominently org/wiki/Barnard%27s_Star_b Barnard's Star b]] being disproven in 2021–2022, and if any do exist, they are bound to be much smaller than the second book, ''A Path in the Darkness'', and is said to have no planets at all (Cooper [[https://www.facebook.com/groups/aeon14fans/permalink/2464502813784967/?comment_id=2464633540438561 commented]] that he worked really hard to pick a star not likely to have any). The setting does have a built-in handwave, however, as many star systems have been extensively {{terraform}}ed, the technology for which is advanced enough to rearrange planets, break them up, or form entirely new ones by mashing rocks together.Earth.



* Creator/StephenBaxter's ''Literature/XeeleeSequence'' climax was somewhat hit hard when studies of the Great Attractor showed not only it's both less massive than was thought and has an even more massive cluster behind it whose gravity is pulling our galaxy towards there but also that [[spoiler: no looped cosmic strings have been found to date there]]. On a related note, cosmic strings [[spoiler: -- what the Xeelee use as building blocks]] are unlikely to exist, having had at best a very limited role in forming the structure of the Universe and instead it having growth from quantum fluctuations left from either cosmic inflation or the Big Bang itself.

to:

* Creator/StephenBaxter's ''Literature/XeeleeSequence'' climax was somewhat hit hard when studies of the Great Attractor showed not only it's both less massive than was thought and has an even more massive cluster behind it whose gravity is pulling our galaxy towards there but also that [[spoiler: no looped cosmic strings have been found to date there]]. On a related note, cosmic strings [[spoiler: -- what the Xeelee use as building blocks]] are unlikely to exist, having had at best a very limited role in forming the structure of the Universe and instead it having growth from quantum fluctuations left from either cosmic inflation or the Big Bang itself.



* Most works of fiction depicting the Milky Way galaxy portray it as a regular [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_galaxy spiral galaxy]], a shape taken for granted given our understanding of it, however, there has been evidence discovered of (what is currently believed to be) its true shape. ''Franchise/MassEffect'' is an example that portrays our galaxy as a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barred_spiral_galaxy barred spiral galaxy]]. The franchise also managed to avert this by making the player unable to visit the Solar System's nearby stars (like Alpha Centauri or Sirius), giving the {{handwave}} that "Mass Relays allow to colonize more suitable systems that are much farther", since it's very likely that in the next few years we will discover whether those stars have planets or not. But there's a straight play with the space between galaxies, known as "Dark Space", which is depicted as a lightless void where nothing can survive [[spoiler:except for the cosmically powerful Reapers]]; in the years since the last game came out, astronomers have discovered a significant number of "rogue stars" floating around in intergalactic space, some of which may even have habitable planets.
* ''VideoGame/Halo3'' got the shape of the Milky Way right, when showing a view of the galaxy cluster in the sky of the Ark.

to:

* Most works of fiction depicting the Milky Way galaxy portray it as a regular [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_galaxy spiral galaxy]], a shape taken for granted given our understanding of it, however, it However, there has been evidence discovered of (what is currently believed to be) its true shape. ''Franchise/MassEffect'' shape, which is an example that portrays our galaxy as a a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barred_spiral_galaxy barred spiral galaxy]]. galaxy]].
** ''Franchise/MassEffect'' is an example that portrays our galaxy right.
The franchise also managed to avert this the issue of potentially soon-to-be-proven-incorrect planetary systems by making the player unable to visit the stars nearest to our Solar System's nearby stars (like Alpha Centauri or Sirius), System, giving the {{handwave}} that "Mass Relays allow to colonize more suitable systems that are much farther", since it's very likely that in the next few years we will discover whether those stars have planets or not. But farther". However, there's a straight play with the space between galaxies, known as "Dark Space", which is depicted as a lightless void where nothing can survive [[spoiler:except for the cosmically powerful Reapers]]; in the years since the last game came out, astronomers have discovered a significant number of "rogue stars" floating around in intergalactic space, some of which may even have habitable planets.
* ''VideoGame/Halo3'' got ** Another game that did get the shape of the Milky Way right, when showing a view of the galaxy cluster in the sky of the Ark.right was ''VideoGame/Halo3''.



* As noted above works that feature nearby stars are hit particularly hard as while they are found to have planets more than often said planetary systems are quite different to what authors imagined. Only time will tell what will end happening to media depictions of said planets done with current state-of-the-art knowledge.

to:

* As noted above above, works that feature nearby stars are hit particularly hard hard, as while they are found to have planets more than often often, said planetary systems are quite different to what authors imagined. Only time will tell what will end happening to media depictions of said planets done with current state-of-the-art knowledge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Vacuum cementing occurs naturally on the Moon: fine dust particles from lunar impacts are converted to rock over time since they lack a layer of adsorbed gas. Creator/LarryNiven cunningly extrapolated from this discovery to Mars, which does have an atmosphere. In ''Literature/{{Protector}}'' (and other ''Literature/KnownSpace'' stories) Mars is covered in a deep layer of dust so fine it acts as a liquid, since vacuum cementing can't occur. Since this story was written, Mars landers and rovers have conspicuously failed to disappear with a "gloop".

to:

* Vacuum cementing occurs naturally on the Moon: fine dust particles from lunar impacts are converted to rock over time since they lack a layer of adsorbed absorbed gas. Creator/LarryNiven cunningly extrapolated from this discovery to Mars, which does have an atmosphere. In ''Literature/{{Protector}}'' (and other ''Literature/KnownSpace'' stories) Mars is covered in a deep layer of dust so fine it acts as a liquid, since vacuum cementing can't occur. Since this story was written, Mars landers and rovers have conspicuously failed to disappear with a "gloop".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* Wiki/TheOtherWiki [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_in_fiction puts]] "Old Mercury" and "New Mercury" in separate sections on their "Mercury in fiction" page. The dividing line is 1965, when astronomers showed using radar observations that Mercury was not [[TidallyLockedPlanet tidally locked to the Sun]] as previously believed, but actually rotates 3 times per 2 local years (for a sidereal day of 58.7 Earth days, and a solar day of about 176 Earth days).

to:

* Wiki/TheOtherWiki Website/TheOtherWiki [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_in_fiction puts]] "Old Mercury" and "New Mercury" in separate sections on their "Mercury in fiction" page. The dividing line is 1965, when astronomers showed using radar observations that Mercury was not [[TidallyLockedPlanet tidally locked to the Sun]] as previously believed, but actually rotates 3 times per 2 local years (for a sidereal day of 58.7 Earth days, and a solar day of about 176 Earth days).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prix_Guzman Pierre Guzman Prize]] was announced in 1900, and was to be given to the first person to initiate two-way conversation with an alien civilization... except for Martians. The creators of the prize were so confident in the "life on Mars" hypothesis that they specifically excluded Mars because they assumed communicating with the planet would be too easy. The prize sat unclaimed for most of the 20th century,[[note]]although UsefulNotes/NikolaTesla did contest it in the 1930s[[/note]] long after the Martian canal theory had been discredited by scientists. Finally, in 1969, it was decided to award the prize to UsefulNotes/NeilArmstrong and UsefulNotes/BuzzAldrin, who achieved the next best thing: direct physical contact with the surface of another world.

Top