Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / TheTalmud

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EldritchLocation: The Rabbis enter the realm of Pardes and encunter a palace made of marble so pure that it looks like water. Those who did not understand what they saw went mad.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WateringDown: It claims that in ancient Israel and Babylonia, wine was made so strong that it was actually undrinkable unless mixed with water in a ratio of about 2 parts water to 1 part wine.

to:

* WateringDown: It claims that in ancient Israel and Babylonia, wine was made so strong that it was actually undrinkable unless mixed with water in a ratio of about 2 parts water to 1 part wine. This is backed by historical evidence from other Mediterranean civilizations: the Greeks and Romans both reported that their wine was meant to be mixed with water, with the Greeks in particular regarding it a sign of barbarism or alcoholism that someone would drink wine that ''wasn't'' watered down.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Nezikin, Moed, and Nashim, being the most practical of the three, are the most commonly studied; Kodshim is virtually useless, as there is no temple in Jerusalem right now, and much of Zeraim is considered to apply only to ''Eretz Yisrael'' and as such non-Israeli rabbis don't have much use for it (Israeli rabbis, on the other hand, do have some use, particularly since religious Jews started taking up farming as part of the Religious Zionist movement). As for Tohorot...

to:

Nezikin, Moed, and Nashim, being the most practical of the three, are the most commonly studied; Kodshim is virtually useless, as there is no temple in Jerusalem right now, and much of Zeraim is considered to apply only to ''Eretz Yisrael'' and as such non-Israeli rabbis don't have much use for it (Israeli rabbis, on the other hand, do have some use, particularly since religious Jews started taking up farming as part of the Religious Zionist movement).movement...although not ''that'' much use, since modern mechanized farming reduces the number of people needed to run a farm). As for Tohorot...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Nezikin, Moed, and Nashim, being the most practical of the three, are the most commonly studied; Kodshim is virtually useless, as there is no temple in Jerusalem right now, and much of Zeraim is considered to apply only to ''Eretz Yisrael'' and as such non-Israeli rabbis don't have much use for it (Israeli rabbis, on the other hand, do have some use, particularly since religious Jews started taking up farming in the settlements). As for Tohorot...

to:

Nezikin, Moed, and Nashim, being the most practical of the three, are the most commonly studied; Kodshim is virtually useless, as there is no temple in Jerusalem right now, and much of Zeraim is considered to apply only to ''Eretz Yisrael'' and as such non-Israeli rabbis don't have much use for it (Israeli rabbis, on the other hand, do have some use, particularly since religious Jews started taking up farming in as part of the settlements).Religious Zionist movement). As for Tohorot...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Nezikin, Moed, and Nashim, being the most practical of the three, are the most commonly studied; Kodshim is virtually useless, as there is no temple in Jerusalem right now, and much of Zeraim is considered to apply only to ''Eretz Yisrael'' and as such non-Israeli rabbis don't have much use for it (Israeli rabbis, on the other hand...). As for Tohorot...

to:

Nezikin, Moed, and Nashim, being the most practical of the three, are the most commonly studied; Kodshim is virtually useless, as there is no temple in Jerusalem right now, and much of Zeraim is considered to apply only to ''Eretz Yisrael'' and as such non-Israeli rabbis don't have much use for it (Israeli rabbis, on the other hand...).hand, do have some use, particularly since religious Jews started taking up farming in the settlements). As for Tohorot...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Shelf, not self.


* {{Doorstopper}}: Some editions can fill an entire bookcase. No, not a book''self''. An entire ''case''.

to:

* {{Doorstopper}}: Some editions can fill an entire bookcase. No, not a book''self''.book''shelf''. An entire ''case''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Doorstopper}}: Some editions can fill an entire bookcase. No, not a book''self''. An entire ''case''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Subverted and played straight in the film ''A Stranger Among Us'', and in the novel TheChosen. In ''A Stranger Among Us'' there is a young as well as an old Talmudic genius. In TheChosen, all the main characters, old and young are quite formidable with it.

to:

** Subverted and played straight in the film ''A Stranger Among Us'', and in the novel TheChosen.''Literature/TheChosen''. In ''A Stranger Among Us'' there is a young as well as an old Talmudic genius. In TheChosen, ''Literature/TheChosen'', all the main characters, old and young are quite formidable with it.



* WhenYouSnatchThePebble: this book has often been used as a collection of pebbles to be snatched as in TheChosen. That is after all how [[TeenGenius young scholars]] are trained.

to:

* WhenYouSnatchThePebble: this book has often been used as a collection of pebbles to be snatched as in TheChosen.''Literature/TheChosen''. That is after all how [[TeenGenius young scholars]] are trained.
Willbyr MOD

Changed: 9

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Zeraim (Plants), relating to laws regarding growing things, like tithes and harvesting, or blessings in general.

to:

* Zeraim (Plants), (Seeds), relating to laws regarding growing things, like tithes and harvesting, or blessings in general.
Willbyr MOD

Changed: 60

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt: God desires this, believe it or not, in Tractate Sanhedrin. Narrowly averted when He catches sight of Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah - the three righteous men from the [[Literature/TheBible Book of Daniel]].

to:

* TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt: God desires this, believe it or not, this in Tractate Sanhedrin. Narrowly averted when He catches sight of Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah - the three righteous men from the [[Literature/TheBible Book of Daniel]].



* JewsLoveToArgue: The Talmud is arguably the reason for that trope.

to:

* JewsLoveToArgue: The Talmud is arguably the reason for that trope.



* LoopholeAbuse: Defied. Some Talmudic arguments get into laws relating to cases which could never actually happen, in order to deduce the exact criteria and details of a particular ruling. However, as TechnologyMarchesOn, some of these rulings may actually become relevant later - the Talmud contains laws concerning situations which could be compared to in vitro fertilization and even artificial intelligence ([[JewsLoveToArgue arguably]]).

to:

* LoopholeAbuse: Defied. Some Talmudic arguments get into laws relating to cases which could never actually happen, in order to deduce the exact criteria and details of a particular ruling. However, as TechnologyMarchesOn, some of these rulings may actually become relevant later - the Talmud contains laws concerning situations which could be compared to in vitro fertilization and even artificial intelligence ([[JewsLoveToArgue arguably]]).intelligence.
Willbyr MOD

Removed: 206

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moving to discussion page


* SealedEvilInACan: As Yossi Gurvitz, a noted leftist blogger who was raised as an Orthodox Jew, explains, you do NOT want to be around [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSy6ENVAJlY When Israel Is Mighty]].
Willbyr MOD

Changed: 24

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Nightmare Fuel cleanup; see the thread for details


* ScienceMarchesOn / ArtisticLicenseBiology: The Talmud gets anatomical descriptions of animals grossly wrong, including, for instance, getting the number of a cow’s stomachs wrong, as well as things like saying that only pigs have split hooves without being ruminant and that girls' hymens restore themselves after penetration if they're younger than three years and a day, so [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel molesting one]] is not halachically punishable the same way molesting an older child would be.

to:

* ScienceMarchesOn / ArtisticLicenseBiology: The Talmud gets anatomical descriptions of animals grossly wrong, including, for instance, getting the number of a cow’s stomachs wrong, as well as things like saying that only pigs have split hooves without being ruminant and that girls' hymens restore themselves after penetration if they're younger than three years and a day, so [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel molesting one]] one is not halachically punishable the same way molesting an older child would be.

Changed: 256

Removed: 1214

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
sigh. religions.


* AnachronicOrder: Although Berachos is usually shown as the first tractate, every single tractate cross-references others. Often you will see tractate A assuming you are familiar with tractate B ''and vice versa''. Even within single tractates (e.g. Makkot), sometimes the first part of a chapter will discuss minutiae of a law, while the law itself is not actually given until later on.
** Some say this is why the first page of each tractate is ''page 2'' (bet) rather than page 1 (alef). They say that the Talmud really has no beginning or end, so you need to keep that in mind before going in. Others simply say that page 1 is the cover page.

to:

* AnachronicOrder: Although Berachos is usually shown as the first tractate, every single tractate cross-references others. Often you will see tractate A assuming you are familiar with tractate B ''and vice versa''. Even within single tractates (e.g. Makkot), sometimes the first part of a chapter will discuss minutiae of a law, while the law itself is not actually given until later on.
**
on. Some say this is why the first page of each tractate is ''page 2'' (bet) rather than page 1 (alef). They say that the Talmud really has no beginning or end, so you need to keep that in mind before going in. Others simply say that page 1 is the cover page.



** StrawmanHasAPoint: There are many aspects of the Talmud that can easily be criticized in modern times, such as attitudes towards slavery, treatment of women as second-class citizens, and the allowance of fathers to forcibly marry off their very young daughters. While some criticisms are justified, others are given without the context of the time it was written (early years A.D.) or the fact that some laws are essentially only "on the books" and were never really practiced (although some of them still affect the mindsets of some extremist Jews regardless). The true nature of the Talmud is somewhere between the assertions of its most ardent proponents and detractors. Only someone who has studied it extensively with an open mind can really interpret which of its statements are meant to be taken at face value and which are allegory, although those interpretations can vary with the culture of the time and the attitude of the person in question.

Changed: 608

Removed: 339

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
1: Don\'t confuse morality with halacha. 2: No blatant troll bait, please, especially as regards Jesus. 3: Modern Israeli politics have little to do with this. 4: Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment.


** The Talmud was written by the Pharisees (yes, the same Pharisees who turned the Jewish population against Jesus and eventually got him crucified), who were very intolerant towards other Jewish sects, especially the Saducees. [[CaptainObvious This reflects also on their treatment of early Christians, and, of course, on Jesus himself]].



* ScienceMarchesOn / ArtisticLicenseBiology: The Talmud gets anatomical descriptions of animals grossly wrong, even for people of the time (including, for instance, getting the number of a cow’s stomachs wrong), as well as things like saying that only pigs have split hooves without being ruminant and that girls’ hymens restore themselves after penetration if they’re younger than three years and a day, so [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel molesting one]] [[InsaneTrollLogic isn’t considered actually molesting one]].

to:

* ScienceMarchesOn / ArtisticLicenseBiology: The Talmud gets anatomical descriptions of animals grossly wrong, even for people of the time (including, including, for instance, getting the number of a cow’s stomachs wrong), wrong, as well as things like saying that only pigs have split hooves without being ruminant and that girls’ girls' hymens restore themselves after penetration if they’re they're younger than three years and a day, so [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel molesting one]] [[InsaneTrollLogic isn’t considered actually is not halachically punishable the same way molesting one]].an older child would be.



** StrawmanHasAPoint: There are many aspects of the Talmud that can easily be criticized in modern times, such as attitudes towards slavery, treatment of women as second-class citizens, and the allowance of fathers to forcibly marry off their very young daughters. While some criticisms are justified, others are given without the context of the time it was written (early years A.D.) or the fact that some laws are essentially only "on the books" and were never really practiced (although some of them still affect the mindsets of modern ultra-Orthodox Jews or Israeli National Religious Jews regardless[[hottip:*:This is mostly a problem if you aren’t a practicing Orthodox Jewish man and living in Israel, where not only do those two groups have consistently growing political power, but is also located in the Land of Israel, where they’re supposed to be extra-strict, which results in things like separation of women and men on the bus and blatant hostility towards Christians, which is ''de facto'' supported by the police.]]). The true nature of the Talmud is somewhere between the assertions of its most ardent proponents and detractors. Only someone who has studied it extensively with an open mind can really interpret which of its statements are meant to be taken at face value and which are allegory, although those interpretations can vary with the culture of the time and the attitude of the person in question.

to:

** StrawmanHasAPoint: There are many aspects of the Talmud that can easily be criticized in modern times, such as attitudes towards slavery, treatment of women as second-class citizens, and the allowance of fathers to forcibly marry off their very young daughters. While some criticisms are justified, others are given without the context of the time it was written (early years A.D.) or the fact that some laws are essentially only "on the books" and were never really practiced (although some of them still affect the mindsets of modern ultra-Orthodox some extremist Jews or Israeli National Religious Jews regardless[[hottip:*:This is mostly a problem if you aren’t a practicing Orthodox Jewish man and living in Israel, where not only do those two groups have consistently growing political power, but is also located in the Land of Israel, where they’re supposed to be extra-strict, which results in things like separation of women and men on the bus and blatant hostility towards Christians, which is ''de facto'' supported by the police.]]).regardless). The true nature of the Talmud is somewhere between the assertions of its most ardent proponents and detractors. Only someone who has studied it extensively with an open mind can really interpret which of its statements are meant to be taken at face value and which are allegory, although those interpretations can vary with the culture of the time and the attitude of the person in question.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The Talmud was written by the Pharisees (yes, the same Pharisees who turned the Jewish population against Jesus and eventually got him crucified), who were very intolerant towards other Jewish sects, especially the Saducees. [[CaptainObvious This reflects also on their treatment of early Christians, and, of course, on Jesus himself]].

Added: 511

Changed: 462

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ScienceMarchesOn / ArtisticLicenseBiology: The Talmud gets anatomical descriptions of animals grossly wrong, even for people of the time (including, for instance, getting the number of a cow’s stomachs wrong), as well as things like saying that only pigs have split hooves without being ruminant and that girls’ hymens restore themselves after penetration if they’re younger than three years and a day, so [[HighOctaneNightmareFuel molesting one]] [[InsaneTrollLogic isn’t considered actually molesting one]].



** StrawmanHasAPoint: There are many aspects of the Talmud that can easily be criticized in modern times, such as attitudes towards slavery, treatment of women as second-class citizens, and the allowance of fathers to forcibly marry off their very young daughters. While some criticisms are justified, others are given without the context of the time it was written (early years A.D.) or the fact that some laws are essentially only "on the books" and were never really practiced (although some of them still affect the mindsets of modern ultra-Orthodox Jews regardless). The true nature of the Talmud is somewhere between the assertions of its most ardent proponents and detractors. Only someone who has studied it extensively with an open mind can really interpret which of its statements are meant to be taken at face value and which are allegory, although those interpretations can vary with the culture of the time and the attitude of the person in question.

to:

** StrawmanHasAPoint: There are many aspects of the Talmud that can easily be criticized in modern times, such as attitudes towards slavery, treatment of women as second-class citizens, and the allowance of fathers to forcibly marry off their very young daughters. While some criticisms are justified, others are given without the context of the time it was written (early years A.D.) or the fact that some laws are essentially only "on the books" and were never really practiced (although some of them still affect the mindsets of modern ultra-Orthodox Jews regardless).or Israeli National Religious Jews regardless[[hottip:*:This is mostly a problem if you aren’t a practicing Orthodox Jewish man and living in Israel, where not only do those two groups have consistently growing political power, but is also located in the Land of Israel, where they’re supposed to be extra-strict, which results in things like separation of women and men on the bus and blatant hostility towards Christians, which is ''de facto'' supported by the police.]]). The true nature of the Talmud is somewhere between the assertions of its most ardent proponents and detractors. Only someone who has studied it extensively with an open mind can really interpret which of its statements are meant to be taken at face value and which are allegory, although those interpretations can vary with the culture of the time and the attitude of the person in question.

Changed: 241

Removed: 1338

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Talmud was written by the Pharisees (yes, the same Pharisees who turned the Jewish population against Jesus and eventually got him crucified), who were very intolerant towards other Jewish sects, especially the Saducees.



** StrawmanHasAPoint: There are many aspects of the Talmud that can easily be criticized in modern times, such as attitudes towards slavery, treatment of women as second-class citizens, and the allowance of fathers to forcibly marry off their very young daughters. While some criticisms are justified, others are given without the context of the time it was written (early years A.D.) or the fact that many laws are essentially only "on the books" and were never really practiced. The true nature of the Talmud is somewhere between the assertions of its most ardent proponents and detractors, and only someone who has studied it extensively with an open mind can really interpret which of its statements are meant to be taken at face value.
*** This, however, depends on whom you’re asking, as the interpretation of which parts were to be taken at face value and which ones are allegorical seem to change from time to time (Maïmonides, for instance, lived in the relatively Jew-friendly 11th century Muslim Morocco, and claimed only the supernatural legends are allegorical, while the rulings should be interpeted literally; later on, in much less Jew-friendly 14th century Europe, these legends were interpreted more literally as a sort of escapism from the harsher reality). Also, as mentioned in Sealed Evil in a Can above, the fact that the more harrowing laws aren’t executed is just because this era is not ‘When Israel Is Mighty’, and, in fact, those rules are still very relevant to the way of thought of way too many Orthodox Jews (as the occasional slip of the tongue of way too many rabbis, that is too easily overlooked, can indicate). And ItGotWorse, as the Talmud firmly establishes that while gentiles get wiser with every generations, Jews get dumber (‘''Yeridat haDorot''’), which pretty much prevents any overruling of Talmud rulings.

to:

** StrawmanHasAPoint: There are many aspects of the Talmud that can easily be criticized in modern times, such as attitudes towards slavery, treatment of women as second-class citizens, and the allowance of fathers to forcibly marry off their very young daughters. While some criticisms are justified, others are given without the context of the time it was written (early years A.D.) or the fact that many some laws are essentially only "on the books" and were never really practiced. practiced (although some of them still affect the mindsets of modern ultra-Orthodox Jews regardless). The true nature of the Talmud is somewhere between the assertions of its most ardent proponents and detractors, and only detractors. Only someone who has studied it extensively with an open mind can really interpret which of its statements are meant to be taken at face value.
*** This, however, depends on whom you’re asking, as the interpretation of which parts were to be taken at face
value and which ones are allegorical seem to change from time to time (Maïmonides, for instance, lived in the relatively Jew-friendly 11th century Muslim Morocco, and claimed only the supernatural legends are allegorical, while the rulings should be interpeted literally; later on, in much less Jew-friendly 14th century Europe, these legends were interpreted more literally as a sort of escapism from the harsher reality). Also, as mentioned in Sealed Evil in a Can above, the fact that the more harrowing laws aren’t executed is just because this era is not ‘When Israel Is Mighty’, and, in fact, allegory, although those rules are still very relevant to interpretations can vary with the way of thought of way too many Orthodox Jews (as the occasional slip culture of the tongue of way too many rabbis, that is too easily overlooked, can indicate). And ItGotWorse, as time and the Talmud firmly establishes that while gentiles get wiser with every generations, Jews get dumber (‘''Yeridat haDorot''’), which pretty much prevents any overruling attitude of Talmud rulings.the person in question.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The Talmud was written by the Pharisees (yes, the same Pharisees who turned the Jewish population against Jesus and eventually got him crucified), who were very intolerant towards other Jewish sects, especially the Saducees.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** This, however, depends on whom you’re asking: as mentioned in Sealed Evil in a Can above, the fact that the more harrowing laws aren’t executed is just because this is not ‘When Israel Is Mighty’, and, in fact, those rules are still very relevant to the way of thought of way too many Orthodox Jews (as the occasional slip of the tongue of way too many rabbis, that is too easily overlooked, can indicate). And ItGotWorse, as the Talmud firmly establishes that while gentiles get wiser with every generations, Jews get dumber (‘''Yeridat haDorot''’), which pretty much prevents any overruling of Talmud rulings.

to:

*** This, however, depends on whom you’re asking: asking, as the interpretation of which parts were to be taken at face value and which ones are allegorical seem to change from time to time (Maïmonides, for instance, lived in the relatively Jew-friendly 11th century Muslim Morocco, and claimed only the supernatural legends are allegorical, while the rulings should be interpeted literally; later on, in much less Jew-friendly 14th century Europe, these legends were interpreted more literally as a sort of escapism from the harsher reality). Also, as mentioned in Sealed Evil in a Can above, the fact that the more harrowing laws aren’t executed is just because this era is not ‘When Israel Is Mighty’, and, in fact, those rules are still very relevant to the way of thought of way too many Orthodox Jews (as the occasional slip of the tongue of way too many rabbis, that is too easily overlooked, can indicate). And ItGotWorse, as the Talmud firmly establishes that while gentiles get wiser with every generations, Jews get dumber (‘''Yeridat haDorot''’), which pretty much prevents any overruling of Talmud rulings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** This, however, depends on whom you’re asking: as mentioned in Sealed Evil in a Can above, the fact that the more harrowing laws aren’t executed is just because this is not ‘When Israel Is Mighty’, and, in fact, those rules are still very relevant to the way of thought of way too many Orthodox Jews (as the occasional slip of the tongue of way too many rabbis, that is too easily overlooked, can indicate). And ItGotWorse, as the Talmud firmly establishes that while gentiles get wiser with every generations, Jews get dumber (‘''Yeridat haDorot''’), which pretty much prevents any overruling of Talmud rulings.

Changed: 980

Removed: 702

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** StrawmanHasAPoint: The Talmud really is filled to the brim with misogyny, xenophobia, anti-democratic attitudes, and lots of other horrific things like permission of rape of girls under three-years-and-a-day old by their own fathers. Also, [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking it is grossly unscientific, using explanations such as ‘mice can be formed out of earth and snails can be formed out of rain’ to justify the belief in the Resurrection in Jewish eschatology]]. You can look up more about the subject [[http://www.daatemet.org/?LANG=en here]].
*** However, it should be said the vast majority of Jews aren’t that well-versed in the Talmud, if they ever even tried reading it, but Orthodox Jews definitely have more experience with it and more faith in it, and the fact that they are growing in number and influence in Israel is not very encouraging, to say the least... And then again, they often claim that the Talmud should not be taken literally, but often seem to act as if it does (disallowing women to sit in the front of the bus, refusing to rent apartments to Arabs, &c.) and have the occasional slip of the tongue that show extremely disturbing states of mind. To sum it up, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment this is a complicated issue]].

to:

** StrawmanHasAPoint: The There are many aspects of the Talmud really is filled to the brim with misogyny, xenophobia, anti-democratic attitudes, and lots of other horrific things like permission of rape of girls under three-years-and-a-day old by their own fathers. Also, [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking it is grossly unscientific, using explanations that can easily be criticized in modern times, such as ‘mice can be formed out attitudes towards slavery, treatment of earth women as second-class citizens, and snails can be formed out of rain’ to justify the belief in allowance of fathers to forcibly marry off their very young daughters. While some criticisms are justified, others are given without the Resurrection in Jewish eschatology]]. You can look up more about context of the subject [[http://www.daatemet.org/?LANG=en here]].
*** However,
time it should be said the vast majority of Jews aren’t that well-versed in the Talmud, if they ever even tried reading it, but Orthodox Jews definitely have more experience with it and more faith in it, and was written (early years A.D.) or the fact that they many laws are growing in number essentially only "on the books" and influence in Israel is not very encouraging, to say the least... And then again, they often claim that were never really practiced. The true nature of the Talmud should not is somewhere between the assertions of its most ardent proponents and detractors, and only someone who has studied it extensively with an open mind can really interpret which of its statements are meant to be taken literally, but often seem to act as if it does (disallowing women to sit in the front of the bus, refusing to rent apartments to Arabs, &c.) and have the occasional slip of the tongue that show extremely disturbing states of mind. To sum it up, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment this is a complicated issue]].at face value.

Added: 908

Changed: 19

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SealedEvilInACan: As Yossi Gurvitz, a noted leftist blogger who was raised as an Orthodox Jew, explains, you do NOT want to be around [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSy6ENVAJlY When Israel Is Mighty]].



** StrawmanHasAPoint: The Talmud really is filled to the brim with misogyny, xenophobia, and lots of other horrific things like permission of rape of girls under three-years-and-a-day old by their own fathers. Also, [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking it is grossly unscientific, using explanations such as ‘mice can be formed out of earth and snails can be formed out of rain’ to justify the belief in the Resurrection in Jewish eschatology]]. You can look up more about the subject [[http://www.daatemet.org/?LANG=en here]].

to:

** StrawmanHasAPoint: The Talmud really is filled to the brim with misogyny, xenophobia, anti-democratic attitudes, and lots of other horrific things like permission of rape of girls under three-years-and-a-day old by their own fathers. Also, [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking it is grossly unscientific, using explanations such as ‘mice can be formed out of earth and snails can be formed out of rain’ to justify the belief in the Resurrection in Jewish eschatology]]. You can look up more about the subject [[http://www.daatemet.org/?LANG=en here]].here]].
*** However, it should be said the vast majority of Jews aren’t that well-versed in the Talmud, if they ever even tried reading it, but Orthodox Jews definitely have more experience with it and more faith in it, and the fact that they are growing in number and influence in Israel is not very encouraging, to say the least... And then again, they often claim that the Talmud should not be taken literally, but often seem to act as if it does (disallowing women to sit in the front of the bus, refusing to rent apartments to Arabs, &c.) and have the occasional slip of the tongue that show extremely disturbing states of mind. To sum it up, [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment this is a complicated issue]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** StrawmanHasAPoint: The Talmud really is filled to the brim with misogyny, xenophobia, and lots of other horrific things like permission of rape of girls under three-years-and-a-day old by their own fathers. Also, [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking it is grossly unscientific, using explanations such as ‘mice can be formed out of earth and snails can be formed out of rain’ to justify the belief in the Resurrection in Jewish eschatology]]. You can look up more about the subject [[http://www.daatemet.org/?LANG=en here]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though most of the Talmud is rated G, some areas are incredibly explicit, such as Kesubos, which has sections dealing with minute details of sex acts.
** And Niddah has all you ever wanted to know about menstruation.
** The holy books are where you learn [[GettingCrapPastTheRadar all the cool things your parents would never let you read otherwise]]. Dina and Tamar and all those concubines, oh my!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HoYay: Rabbi Yohanan and Resh Lakish in Bava Metzia 84a. Resh Lakish sees Rabbi Yohanan bathing in the Jordan, thinks he's a woman, and pole vaults the river on his lance. When he discovers his gender mistake, he says to Rabbi Yohanan, "Your beauty for women!". They become at the very least HeterosexualLifePartners, and brothers-in-law to boot, as Resh Lakish marries Rabbi Yohanan's sister.


Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
namespace Changing.


A collection of rabbinical discussions of Jewish customs and theology. It is divided into the Mishnah (written about 200 AD), which is the first written collection of Jewish laws; and the Gemara (about 500 AD), which is a discussion of the Mishnah and Jewish works, including what Christians know as [[TheBible the Old Testament]]. Intellectual study and discussion of the Talmud has an important role among the customs and history of many Jews. If you have a story in which one of the characters is a [[GoodShepherd rabbi]], you can be fairly sure that they [[TheSmartGuy know a lot]] about the Talmud. And if you [[SchmuckBait wish to debate them or hear them expound]], you will [[SesquipedalianLoquaciousness get what you ask for]].

to:

A collection of rabbinical discussions of Jewish customs and theology. It is divided into the Mishnah (written about 200 AD), which is the first written collection of Jewish laws; and the Gemara (about 500 AD), which is a discussion of the Mishnah and Jewish works, including what Christians know as [[TheBible [[Literature/TheBible the Old Testament]]. Intellectual study and discussion of the Talmud has an important role among the customs and history of many Jews. If you have a story in which one of the characters is a [[GoodShepherd rabbi]], you can be fairly sure that they [[TheSmartGuy know a lot]] about the Talmud. And if you [[SchmuckBait wish to debate them or hear them expound]], you will [[SesquipedalianLoquaciousness get what you ask for]].



Oh, and did we mention that there are no vowels or punctuation in the classic text? (In fairness, that's a lot easier with Semitic languages; to this day, Arabs get by on just the long vowels and ''very'' sparse punctuation). New versions, like those printed by [[http://www.artscroll.com/ ArtScroll]], provide them along with translations, though that's sometimes considered cheating by serious studiers.

to:

Oh, and did we mention that there are no vowels or punctuation in the classic text? (In fairness, that's a lot easier with Semitic languages; to this day, Arabs get by on just the long vowels and ''very'' sparse punctuation). New versions, like those printed by [[http://www.artscroll.com/ ArtScroll]], provide them along with translations, though that's sometimes considered cheating by serious studiers.
studiers.



* TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt: God desires this, believe it or not, in Tractate Sanhedrin. Narrowly averted when He catches sight of Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah - the three righteous men from the [[TheBible Book of Daniel]].
* GoMadFromTheRevelation: Rabbi Akiva, Ben Azzai, Ben Zoma, and Elisha ben Avuyah travel to the mystical realm of Pardes. Ben Azzai dies, Ben Zoma goes insane, and Elisha ben Avuyah does a FaceHeelTurn. Only Rabbi Akiva entered in peace and left in peace.

to:

* TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt: God desires this, believe it or not, in Tractate Sanhedrin. Narrowly averted when He catches sight of Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah - the three righteous men from the [[TheBible [[Literature/TheBible Book of Daniel]].
* GoMadFromTheRevelation: Rabbi Akiva, Ben Azzai, Ben Zoma, and Elisha ben Avuyah travel to the mystical realm of Pardes. Ben Azzai dies, Ben Zoma goes insane, and Elisha ben Avuyah does a FaceHeelTurn. Only Rabbi Akiva entered in peace and left in peace.



* TheJudge : Much advice for arbitrating civil disputes between Jews is contained within.

to:

* TheJudge : Much advice for arbitrating civil disputes between Jews is contained within.



** Played with: When Rabbi Elazar ben Azaryah is appointed as leader of all the Rabbis of Israel, he explains that he doesn't want the job because all of the other Rabbis will mock him for his young age. God steps in and makes him look like a seventy year old man.

to:

** Played with: When Rabbi Elazar ben Azaryah is appointed as leader of all the Rabbis of Israel, he explains that he doesn't want the job because all of the other Rabbis will mock him for his young age. God steps in and makes him look like a seventy year old man.



* WikiWalk: Due to the rather unusual set-up, these happen quite frequently. For example, Tractate Shabbos includes a discussion that starts with asking whether it is permissible to perform a circumcision on the Sabbath, and ends up discussing [[CrazyPrepared what to do if a baby is born with no anus]].

to:

* WikiWalk: Due to the rather unusual set-up, these happen quite frequently. For example, Tractate Shabbos includes a discussion that starts with asking whether it is permissible to perform a circumcision on the Sabbath, and ends up discussing [[CrazyPrepared what to do if a baby is born with no anus]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* GoMadFromTheRevelation: Rabbi Akiva, Ben Azzai, Ben Zoma, and Elisha ben Avuyah travel to the mystical realm of Pardes. Ben Azzai dies, Ben Zoma goes insane, and Elisha ben Avuyah does a FaceHeelTurn. Only Rabbi Akiva entered in peace and left in peace.

Added: 443

Changed: 13

Removed: 441

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BeyondTheImpossible: Some Talmudic arguments get into laws relating to cases which could never actually happen, in order to deduce the exact criteria and details of a particular ruling. However, as TechnologyMarchesOn, some of these rulings may actually become relevant later - the Talmud contains laws concerning situations which could be compared to in vitro fertilization and even artificial intelligence ([[JewsLoveToArgue arguably]]).



* JesusWasWayCool: Averted; none of the Talmud editions have much good to say about him, and some specifically say (in Gittin 57) that he's being [[FireAndBrimstoneHell punished in Hell]] for [[ValuesDissonance being an apostate]].

to:

* JesusWasWayCool: Averted; Averted and inverted; none of the Talmud editions have much good to say about him, and some specifically say (in Gittin 57) that he's being [[FireAndBrimstoneHell punished in Hell]] for [[ValuesDissonance being an apostate]].


Added DiffLines:

* LoopholeAbuse: Defied. Some Talmudic arguments get into laws relating to cases which could never actually happen, in order to deduce the exact criteria and details of a particular ruling. However, as TechnologyMarchesOn, some of these rulings may actually become relevant later - the Talmud contains laws concerning situations which could be compared to in vitro fertilization and even artificial intelligence ([[JewsLoveToArgue arguably]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* JewsLoveToArgue: TheTalmud is arguably the reason for that trope.

to:

* JewsLoveToArgue: TheTalmud The Talmud is arguably the reason for that trope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace move.

Added DiffLines:

A collection of rabbinical discussions of Jewish customs and theology. It is divided into the Mishnah (written about 200 AD), which is the first written collection of Jewish laws; and the Gemara (about 500 AD), which is a discussion of the Mishnah and Jewish works, including what Christians know as [[TheBible the Old Testament]]. Intellectual study and discussion of the Talmud has an important role among the customs and history of many Jews. If you have a story in which one of the characters is a [[GoodShepherd rabbi]], you can be fairly sure that they [[TheSmartGuy know a lot]] about the Talmud. And if you [[SchmuckBait wish to debate them or hear them expound]], you will [[SesquipedalianLoquaciousness get what you ask for]].

The Mishnah is written in Hebrew, while the Gemara is a mixture of Hebrew and Aramaic. The Talmud is about 2,800 pages long and is composed of six "orders", each of which is further comprised of several "tractates". The orders are:

* Zeraim (Plants), relating to laws regarding growing things, like tithes and harvesting, or blessings in general.
* Moed (Appointed Times), relating to various holidays like Sabbath, Rosh Hashana, Purim, Passover, etc. Chanukah is almost completely unmentioned in the Talmud, getting only a few pages' worth of material in Tractate Megillah, which deals with Purim.
* Nashim (Women), relating to things like marriage and divorce as well as laws about vows.
* Nezikin (Damages), relating to monetary laws and court procedures. This is the most popular order to learn in Orthodox ''yeshivas'', as it provides a wealth of depth and logic.
* Kodshim (Holy Things), which deals mainly with the laws of Temple sacrifices.
* Taharos/Tohorot (Purities), which deals with the incredibly obscure laws of purity and impurity.

Nezikin, Moed, and Nashim, being the most practical of the three, are the most commonly studied; Kodshim is virtually useless, as there is no temple in Jerusalem right now, and much of Zeraim is considered to apply only to ''Eretz Yisrael'' and as such non-Israeli rabbis don't have much use for it (Israeli rabbis, on the other hand...). As for Tohorot...

Although there is only one Mishnah, there are technically two Gemaras: The Talmud Bavli (Babylonian Talmud) and Talmud Yerushalmi (Jerusalem Talmud). Almost universally, whenever anyone talks about the Talmud, they are referring to the Talmud Bavli. Most of the Jewish scholars of the time were in Babylonia, and the vast majority of commentaries and places of study revolve around the Babylonian Talmud.

The Talmud is not simply a list of laws. It has an entirely unique style, being culled from notes and conversations spanning decades, and is an attempt at codifying the Oral Torah. There are plenty of arguments (most unresolved), much back-and-forth (you will probably need charts to keep track of some of it), many detours and anecdotes, a smattering of mysticism and a whole lot of stories that make practically no immediate sense, and to which commentators have devoted volumes to deciphering the deeper meaning. To give a secular comparison, the written Torah is like written statute law, while the Talmud is more like a collection of case law and law review articles; the comparison to TheCommonLaw is apt, as the Oral Torah operates much like the American legal system in that precedent is usually followed ''unless'' there is a reason in the Torah to arrive at a different conclusion.

Oh, and did we mention that there are no vowels or punctuation in the classic text? (In fairness, that's a lot easier with Semitic languages; to this day, Arabs get by on just the long vowels and ''very'' sparse punctuation). New versions, like those printed by [[http://www.artscroll.com/ ArtScroll]], provide them along with translations, though that's sometimes considered cheating by serious studiers.

While much of the text can be dry, every so often one will find unusually entertaining pieces where Talmudic rabbis creatively insult one another or tell wild stories. Even the basic text is practically built on irony and sarcasm, with some of the challenge being figuring out what's meant seriously ("b'nichusa") and what's being sarcastic ("bitmiya").

There are literally entire libraries dedicated to commenting on the Talmud, commenting on other commentators, etc. Some places of study can literally spend an entire semester studying a single page of Talmud. For those who want a broader perspective, the "Daf Yomi" movement is built to spend an hour a day studying two pages (an "amud" is what we call a page, while a "daf" means both sides of a page, i.e. two pages). Under this program, the entire Talmud is finished once every seven and a half years.

The existence of an "oral" Torah was a hotly contested issue before the Roman conquest of Judah; the Sadducees (an extinct political/religious entity tied to the priesthood and Hasamonean kings of Judah) vigorously denied any oral law. Their opponents, the Pharisees (the ancestors of modern-day rabbinical Judaism) accepted the oral law. Today, there are still groups of Jews (Karaites, and the dwindling Samaritan community) that reject the validity of the Talmud.

The Talmud was a frequent target of anti-semitic pogroms in the European Middle Ages, due to its denial of Jesus' divinity and a possible claim that he was an illegitimate son of a Roman soldier.
----
!!Tropes in or about the Talmud include:

* AnachronicOrder: Although Berachos is usually shown as the first tractate, every single tractate cross-references others. Often you will see tractate A assuming you are familiar with tractate B ''and vice versa''. Even within single tractates (e.g. Makkot), sometimes the first part of a chapter will discuss minutiae of a law, while the law itself is not actually given until later on.
** Some say this is why the first page of each tractate is ''page 2'' (bet) rather than page 1 (alef). They say that the Talmud really has no beginning or end, so you need to keep that in mind before going in. Others simply say that page 1 is the cover page.
* BeyondTheImpossible: Some Talmudic arguments get into laws relating to cases which could never actually happen, in order to deduce the exact criteria and details of a particular ruling. However, as TechnologyMarchesOn, some of these rulings may actually become relevant later - the Talmud contains laws concerning situations which could be compared to in vitro fertilization and even artificial intelligence ([[JewsLoveToArgue arguably]]).
* DarkerAndEdgier: The Jerusalem Talmud as compared to the Babylonian Talmud. Comparable stories are often more intense and explicit. Technically the Jerusalem Talmud predates the Babylonian Talmud, making the latter LighterAndSofter, but most people start studying with the Babylonian, and many never come to the Jerusalem.
* TheEndOfTheWorldAsWeKnowIt: God desires this, believe it or not, in Tractate Sanhedrin. Narrowly averted when He catches sight of Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah - the three righteous men from the [[TheBible Book of Daniel]].
* HoistByHisOwnPetard: Known as "measure against measure", this crops up all over the place. A famous example is in Avot 2:7:
-->(Hillel) also saw a skull floating on the water. He said to it, "Because you drowned someone you were drowned, and in the end those who drowned you will be drowned."
* HoYay: Rabbi Yohanan and Resh Lakish in Bava Metzia 84a. Resh Lakish sees Rabbi Yohanan bathing in the Jordan, thinks he's a woman, and pole vaults the river on his lance. When he discovers his gender mistake, he says to Rabbi Yohanan, "Your beauty for women!". They become at the very least HeterosexualLifePartners, and brothers-in-law to boot, as Resh Lakish marries Rabbi Yohanan's sister.
* JesusWasWayCool: Averted; none of the Talmud editions have much good to say about him, and some specifically say (in Gittin 57) that he's being [[FireAndBrimstoneHell punished in Hell]] for [[ValuesDissonance being an apostate]].
* JewsLoveToArgue: TheTalmud is arguably the reason for that trope.
* TheJudge : Much advice for arbitrating civil disputes between Jews is contained within.
* OldMaster : a stereotyped master of Talmud is always old.
** Subverted and played straight in the film ''A Stranger Among Us'', and in the novel TheChosen. In ''A Stranger Among Us'' there is a young as well as an old Talmudic genius. In TheChosen, all the main characters, old and young are quite formidable with it.
** Played with: When Rabbi Elazar ben Azaryah is appointed as leader of all the Rabbis of Israel, he explains that he doesn't want the job because all of the other Rabbis will mock him for his young age. God steps in and makes him look like a seventy year old man.
* OneSteveLimit: Averted. Because the Talmud includes rabbis from several generations, there are several rabbis who share names (like the various Rabbi Yose's and Rabbi Yehuda's) while others (like Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Elazar) differ only by one letter. Often they are described as "Rabbi X son of Y"; sometimes they are given adjectives, like "Rabbi Yochanan the Shoemaker".
* {{Revenge}}: A man invited his friend Kamtza to a feast, but his servant accidentally invited ''Bar'' Kamtza, a mortal enemy. Bar Kamtza thought that the other man wanted to make peace, and so came to the party, where he was ordered away. Trying to save himself from humiliation, he offered to pay, first for his own portion, then for two, and eventually for the entire party, but the host refused to listen and kicked Bar Kamtza out. Bar Kamtza therefore hatched a plot which ended in the enemy king coming to Jerusalem, the Temple being destroyed, and the Jews being sent into exile.
* RevengeSVP: See the parable of Kamtza.
* StrawmanPolitical: The Talmud often gets cited by anti-Semites as the source of pretty much any [[BlatantLies crazy shit]] [[{{Demonization}} they want to make up]] about Jews and their beliefs (from medieval times to Yahoo! Answers), presumably because it's assumed [[ComplainingAboutShowsYouDontWatch not many non-Jews will have read it]] and are thus less likely to spot BS. Plus attacking the actual Torah would (or at least ''should'') alienate Christians and Muslims.
* TheStoryteller: there are several parables contained inside.
* TricksterArchetype: Yehudit. In b. Yemavot 65b, she doesn't wish to have any more children after a difficult birth, but knows that her husband, Rabbi Hiyya, is not thrilled with the idea. So she disguises herself and comes before Hiyya seeking legal advice. She asks if women are commanded in procreation. Hiyya answers that they are not, and so having received legal approval from her husband of all people, she drinks a sterilizing drug. Rabbi Hiyya is not amused.
* WateringDown: It claims that in ancient Israel and Babylonia, wine was made so strong that it was actually undrinkable unless mixed with water in a ratio of about 2 parts water to 1 part wine.
* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids: Though most of the Talmud is rated G, some areas are incredibly explicit, such as Kesubos, which has sections dealing with minute details of sex acts.
** And Niddah has all you ever wanted to know about menstruation.
** The holy books are where you learn [[GettingCrapPastTheRadar all the cool things your parents would never let you read otherwise]]. Dina and Tamar and all those concubines, oh my!
* WhenYouSnatchThePebble: this book has often been used as a collection of pebbles to be snatched as in TheChosen. That is after all how [[TeenGenius young scholars]] are trained.
* WikiWalk: Due to the rather unusual set-up, these happen quite frequently. For example, Tractate Shabbos includes a discussion that starts with asking whether it is permissible to perform a circumcision on the Sabbath, and ends up discussing [[CrazyPrepared what to do if a baby is born with no anus]].
----

Top