|
Narrative
|
alt title(s): Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgement; No Fighting; Flame Bait Ninety-nine percent of the wiki are not looking for a fight.
You're editing an article, perhaps on, say, the pop-culture assessment of America. On seeing a description of the negative stereotypes that pop up, you decide to add a past President as an example of where those stereotypes come from.
Five minutes later that example is gone. It vanished as fast as spam. Why did it happen?
It happened because of The Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment. You stepped on the toes of the vast majority of the wiki, the people who really want to avoid flamewars. This doesn't mean that 99% of the wikians agree or disagree with your opinion on the past President. It just means that 99% do not care for side-issue battles.
Wikis are open to editing from all sides, which makes them self-correcting. For the most part (trolls aside), people want to maintain a peaceful environment. This means that anything that rubs a little too harshly will be wiped away.
While this wiki is built upon being relaxed and carefree, it is still not a forum, despite the presence of Subjective Tropes that might raise the blood pressure. We encourage opinions, not Natter.
When something is posted that stands firmly on one side of a hot-button debate (political bickering being the huge one, followed closely by religion), the editing machine will grind it back down or even kill it outright.
If your example was outright deleted instead of whittled away, maybe there is another method of getting your point across without stepping on anyone's toes. Wording is everything.
Nobody is saying that poking fun is forbidden — far from it. If our tongues weren't in our cheeks, then this wiki would never survive. But there are lines to acknowledge. When something comes to mind that makes sense to you but will stand out as a potential flame, judge it against the Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment — ninety-nine percent of the wiki-ans are not looking for a fight.
It goes both ways, too: please do not use the Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgement as an excuse to remove a viewpoint that merely goes against your personal beliefs. This doesn't seem to be as enforced nearly as much as the regular example, but keep this in mind.
See also Internet Backdraft.
|
This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
