Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / TheDeclineOfTheWest

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* WeimarRepublic: Spengler didn't like it too much and pointed out that a few small altercations would be enough to give one leader unlimited power. And [[UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler who]] came to power in 1933? Exactly.



* WorldWarOne: Spengler wrote the book during it. Originally he had expected ImperialGermany to win.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''The Decline of the West''' is a philosophical book by [[DichterUndDenker German philosopher]] Oswald Spengler. While the title suggests being mainly about the fate of western civilization, it actually covers a lot of topics - the history of the other great cultures (Chinese, Indian, Aztecs, Classical, Babylonian, Middle Eastern, Egyptian, Russian); the development of arts, science and religions; also, that of politics, economy, technics and war; and finally, tying everything together with "morphology", i.e. comparing the shapes of different cultures and find the equivalents of, let's say, UsefulNotes/NapoleonBonaparte, in them [[note]]In the Greco-Roman culture, that would be Alexander the Great[[/note]]. Yes, Spengler was a bit of a RenaissanceMan in that.

to:

'''The Decline of the West''' is a philosophical book by [[DichterUndDenker [[UsefulNotes/DichterAndDenker German philosopher]] Oswald Spengler. While the title suggests being mainly about the fate of western civilization, it actually covers a lot of topics - the history of the other great cultures (Chinese, Indian, Aztecs, Classical, Babylonian, Middle Eastern, Egyptian, Russian); the development of arts, science and religions; also, that of politics, economy, technics and war; and finally, tying everything together with "morphology", i.e. comparing the shapes of different cultures and find the equivalents of, let's say, UsefulNotes/NapoleonBonaparte, in them [[note]]In the Greco-Roman culture, that would be Alexander the Great[[/note]]. Yes, Spengler was a bit of a RenaissanceMan in that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misuse. It's Genre Savvy, not just "savvy".


* GenreSavvy: Spengler's work had the aim of finding out how the western world would develop in the future and thus be able to become this, if not DangerouslyGenreSavvy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HistoryRepeats: i.e. in every major culture: A culture emerges among the barbarian peoples and fuses them together to create nations. The great myths, art styles and religions develop. At the beginning, [[TheKingdom strong kings rule]], but their power soon is weakened by their noble vassals. A great movement reforms the religion. Meanwhile, in the cities a somewhat-privileged middle class has risen, replacing feudalism economy slowly but steadily by capitalism. By cooperating with them, the crown can weaken nobility and the church, forming an absolutist state. Science and capitalism develop further, and an enlightened philosophy spreads, weakening the hold of religion. Then, the middle class will decide to get rid of the old system, usually in the form of a revolution - which starts civilization. This marks the fall of the culture - wars will get worse and worse (NapoleonicWars -> UsefulNotes/TheAmericanCivilWar -> WorldWarOne -> WorldWarII), art will become more and more offensive, and capitalism runs rampant (not without provoking [[DirtyCommies counter movements]]). At the end, one state will conquer/control all other states, and one man will rise to the top of this state - voila, TheEmpire.

to:

* HistoryRepeats: i.e. in every major culture: A culture emerges among the barbarian peoples and fuses them together to create nations. The great myths, art styles and religions develop. At the beginning, [[TheKingdom strong kings rule]], but their power soon is weakened by their noble vassals. A great movement reforms the religion. Meanwhile, in the cities a somewhat-privileged middle class has risen, replacing feudalism economy slowly but steadily by capitalism. By cooperating with them, the crown can weaken nobility and the church, forming an absolutist state. Science and capitalism develop further, and an enlightened philosophy spreads, weakening the hold of religion. Then, the middle class will decide to get rid of the old system, usually in the form of a revolution - which starts civilization. This marks the fall of the culture - wars will get worse and worse (NapoleonicWars (UsefulNotes/TheNapoleonicWars -> UsefulNotes/TheAmericanCivilWar -> WorldWarOne -> WorldWarII), art will become more and more offensive, and capitalism runs rampant (not without provoking [[DirtyCommies counter movements]]). At the end, one state will conquer/control all other states, and one man will rise to the top of this state - voila, TheEmpire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''The Decline of the West''' is a philosophical book by [[DichterUndDenker German philosopher]] Oswald Spengler. While the title suggests being mainly about the fate of western civilization, it actually covers a lot of topics - the history of the other great cultures (Chinese, Indian, Aztecs, Classical, Babylonian, Middle Eastern, Egyptian, Russian); the development of arts, science and religions; also, that of politics, economy, technics and war; and finally, tying everything together with "morphology", i.e. comparing the shapes of different cultures and find the equivalents of, let's say, NapoleonBonaparte, in them [[note]]In the Greco-Roman culture, that would be Alexander the Great[[/note]]. Yes, Spengler was a bit of a RenaissanceMan in that.

to:

'''The Decline of the West''' is a philosophical book by [[DichterUndDenker German philosopher]] Oswald Spengler. While the title suggests being mainly about the fate of western civilization, it actually covers a lot of topics - the history of the other great cultures (Chinese, Indian, Aztecs, Classical, Babylonian, Middle Eastern, Egyptian, Russian); the development of arts, science and religions; also, that of politics, economy, technics and war; and finally, tying everything together with "morphology", i.e. comparing the shapes of different cultures and find the equivalents of, let's say, NapoleonBonaparte, UsefulNotes/NapoleonBonaparte, in them [[note]]In the Greco-Roman culture, that would be Alexander the Great[[/note]]. Yes, Spengler was a bit of a RenaissanceMan in that.

Added: 437

Removed: 439

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BlueAndOrangeMorality: This is every major culture from the POV of most other major cultures.
** The Byzantine Empire e.g. was surprisingly free from racism; an Irishman and a black African woman had no problem marrying - as long as they had the same religion. If however a Monophysite man had wanted a Nestorian woman from the same Syrian village, things likely would have ended like ''Theatre/RomeoAndJuliet'', and by that we mean: Bad.


Added DiffLines:

* CultureClash: Every major culture is seen as alien from the POV of most other major cultures. The Byzantine Empire e.g. was surprisingly free from racism; an Irishman and a black African woman had no problem marrying - as long as they had the same religion. If however a Monophysite man had wanted a Nestorian woman from the same Syrian village, things likely would have ended like ''Theatre/RomeoAndJuliet'', and by that we mean: Bad.

Added: 95

Changed: 63

Removed: 153

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* [[AristocratsAreEvil Aristocracy Is Evil]]: While Spengler also was pretty critical of democracy (see below), he had no illusions that medieval life was all like {{Arcadia}}. As he wrote: "Hatred wells up out of the villages, contempt flashes back from the castles."

to:

* [[AristocratsAreEvil Aristocracy Is Evil]]: AristocratsAreEvil: While Spengler also was pretty critical of democracy (see below), he had no illusions that medieval life was all like {{Arcadia}}. As he wrote: "Hatred wells up out of the villages, contempt flashes back from the castles."



* [[MandatoryMotherhood Being Childless Is Decadent]]



* [[ChristianityIsCatholic (Western) Christianity Is Catholic]]: Protestantism was described by Spengler as a poor version of Christianity that abandoned all the appealing stuff (adorned churches) and, which he saw as most important, confession. Also note that he saw Catholic Christianity as something very different from Jesus' (or St Paul's) Christianity, which have mostly superficial things in common. (Although many people will become outraged at that suggestion.)

to:

* [[ChristianityIsCatholic (Western) Christianity Is Catholic]]: ChristianityIsCatholic: Protestantism was described by Spengler as a poor version of Christianity that abandoned all the appealing stuff (adorned churches) and, which he saw as most important, confession. Also note that he saw Catholic Christianity as something very different from Jesus' (or St Paul's) Christianity, which have mostly superficial things in common. (Although many people will become outraged at that suggestion.)



* ItsPopularNowItSucks: [[invoked]] Also said to be typical of the West.



%%* MandatoryMotherhood



* [[ItsPopularNowItSucks True Art Is Not Popular]]: [[invoked]] Also said to be typical of the West.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ForeignCultureFetish: Spengler stated that westerners essentially had this, for the classical Greco-Roman civilization, which is more different from us than many of us think. Our {{theater}} actors don't wear buskins and masks, and there's usually no GreekChorus either, DeusExMachina looks too much like AssPull to us, and our countries aren't governed by two consuls sharing the power, and there aren't annual elections for them either. (Thank God!)

to:

* ForeignCultureFetish: Spengler stated that westerners essentially had this, for the classical Greco-Roman civilization, which is more different from us than many of us think. Our {{theater}} actors don't wear buskins and masks, and there's usually no GreekChorus either, DeusExMachina looks too much like AssPull to us, and our countries aren't governed by two consuls sharing the power, power[[note]]the possible exception to this bit being UsefulNotes/SanMarino, which is led by two Captains Regent, or prime ministers, being not much different from old Roman consuls[[/note]], and there aren't annual elections for them either. (Thank God!)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HistoryRepeats: i.e. in every major culture: A culture emerges among the barbarian peoples and fuses them together to create nations. The great myths, art styles and religions develop. At the beginning, [[TheKingdom strong kings rule]], but their power soon is weakened by their noble vassals. A great movement reforms the religion. Meanwhile, in the cities a somewhat-privileged middle class has risen, replacing feudalism economy slowly but steadily by capitalism. By cooperating with them, the crown can weaken nobility and the church, forming an absolutist state. Science and capitalism develop further, and an enlightened philosophy spreads, weakening the hold of religion. Then, the middle class will decide to get rid of the old system, usually in the form of a revolution - which starts civilization. This marks the fall of the culture - wars will get worse and worse (NapoleonicWars -> AmericanCivilWar -> WorldWarOne -> WorldWarII), art will become more and more offensive, and capitalism runs rampant (not without provoking [[DirtyCommies counter movements]]). At the end, one state will conquer/control all other states, and one man will rise to the top of this state - voila, TheEmpire.

to:

* HistoryRepeats: i.e. in every major culture: A culture emerges among the barbarian peoples and fuses them together to create nations. The great myths, art styles and religions develop. At the beginning, [[TheKingdom strong kings rule]], but their power soon is weakened by their noble vassals. A great movement reforms the religion. Meanwhile, in the cities a somewhat-privileged middle class has risen, replacing feudalism economy slowly but steadily by capitalism. By cooperating with them, the crown can weaken nobility and the church, forming an absolutist state. Science and capitalism develop further, and an enlightened philosophy spreads, weakening the hold of religion. Then, the middle class will decide to get rid of the old system, usually in the form of a revolution - which starts civilization. This marks the fall of the culture - wars will get worse and worse (NapoleonicWars -> AmericanCivilWar UsefulNotes/TheAmericanCivilWar -> WorldWarOne -> WorldWarII), art will become more and more offensive, and capitalism runs rampant (not without provoking [[DirtyCommies counter movements]]). At the end, one state will conquer/control all other states, and one man will rise to the top of this state - voila, TheEmpire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmericaSavesTheDay: Spengler criticized the Germans for being GenreBlind to this trope, and being completely ignorant of the US army's achievements (creating a million man army from scratch, using battleships and machine guns, amazing logistics) during the AmericanCivilWar.

to:

* AmericaSavesTheDay: Spengler criticized the Germans for being GenreBlind to this trope, and being completely ignorant of the US army's achievements (creating a million man army from scratch, using battleships and machine guns, amazing logistics) during the AmericanCivilWar.UsefulNotes/TheAmericanCivilWar.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** He used "civilization" for a time of decline and decadence following the ''real'' culture, during which art becomes more and more offensive and/or primitive, and politics steered either by the capitalists or the army (in his definition, this time started with TheFrenchRevolution).

to:

** He used "civilization" for a time of decline and decadence following the ''real'' culture, during which art becomes more and more offensive and/or primitive, and politics steered either by the capitalists or the army (in his definition, this time started with TheFrenchRevolution).UsefulNotes/TheFrenchRevolution).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WeimarRepublic: Spengler didn't like it too much and pointed out that a few small altercations would be enough to give one leader unlimited power. And [[AdolfHitler who]] came to power in 1933? Exactly.

to:

* WeimarRepublic: Spengler didn't like it too much and pointed out that a few small altercations would be enough to give one leader unlimited power. And [[AdolfHitler [[UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler who]] came to power in 1933? Exactly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WrongGenreSavvy: Spengler mentions Swedish king Charles XII, who was a big fan of Alexander the Great, tried to follow his example, thus made war on the Russia of Peter the Great, only to have his army destroyed at the battle of Poltava, which effectively ended Sweden's time as a great power.

to:

* WrongGenreSavvy: Spengler mentions Swedish king [[UsefulNotes/CarolusRex Charles XII, XII]], who was a big fan of Alexander the Great, tried to follow his example, thus made war on the Russia of Peter the Great, only to have his army destroyed at the battle of Poltava, which effectively ended Sweden's time as a great power.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''The Decline of the West''' is a philosophical book by [[DichterUndDenker German philosopher]] Oswald Spengler. While the title suggests being mainly about the fate of western civilization, it actually covers a lot of topics - the history of the other great cultures (Chinese, Indian, Aztecs, Classical, Babylonian, Middle Eastern, Egyptian, Russian); the development of arts, science and religions; also, that of politics, economy, technics and war; and finally, tying everything together with "morphology", i.e. comparing the shapes of different cultures and find the equivalents of, let's say, NapoleonBonaparte, in them [[hottip:* :In the Greco-Roman culture, that would be Alexander the Great]]. Yes, Spengler was a bit of a RenaissanceMan in that.

to:

'''The Decline of the West''' is a philosophical book by [[DichterUndDenker German philosopher]] Oswald Spengler. While the title suggests being mainly about the fate of western civilization, it actually covers a lot of topics - the history of the other great cultures (Chinese, Indian, Aztecs, Classical, Babylonian, Middle Eastern, Egyptian, Russian); the development of arts, science and religions; also, that of politics, economy, technics and war; and finally, tying everything together with "morphology", i.e. comparing the shapes of different cultures and find the equivalents of, let's say, NapoleonBonaparte, in them [[hottip:* :In [[note]]In the Greco-Roman culture, that would be Alexander the Great]].Great[[/note]]. Yes, Spengler was a bit of a RenaissanceMan in that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TrueArtIsNotPopular: [[invoked]] Also said to be typical of the West.

to:

* TrueArtIsNotPopular: [[ItsPopularNowItSucks True Art Is Not Popular]]: [[invoked]] Also said to be typical of the West.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Spengler himself did this with several historical characters. For example, in his opinion EmperorAugustus wasn't really a great man and rather lead by his soldiers (GaiusJuliusCaesar's veterans) than the other way round.
** Also for Spengler himself.

Added: 53

Changed: 21

Removed: 53

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
minor changes


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Spengler himself did this with several historical characters. For example, in his opinion CaesarAugustus wasn't really a great man and rather lead by his soldiers (GaiusJuliusCaesar's veterans) than the other way round.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Spengler himself did this with several historical characters. For example, in his opinion CaesarAugustus EmperorAugustus wasn't really a great man and rather lead by his soldiers (GaiusJuliusCaesar's veterans) than the other way round.



* [[MandatoryMotherhood Being Childless Is Decadent]]



** The Byzantine Empire e.g. was surprisingly free from racism; an Irishman and a black African woman had no problem marrying - as long as they had the same religion. If however a Monophysite man had wanted a Nestorian woman from the same Syrian village, things likely would have ended like ''Theatre/RomeoAndJulia'', and by that we mean: Bad.

to:

** The Byzantine Empire e.g. was surprisingly free from racism; an Irishman and a black African woman had no problem marrying - as long as they had the same religion. If however a Monophysite man had wanted a Nestorian woman from the same Syrian village, things likely would have ended like ''Theatre/RomeoAndJulia'', ''Theatre/RomeoAndJuliet'', and by that we mean: Bad.



* [[MandatoryMotherhood Being Childless Is Decadent]]



* CorruptChurch: Spengler seperates religion (which is about a higher truth that is not from this world) and churches (which are by necessity worldly organizations, and which leaders are NotSoDifferent from purely worldly rulers)

to:

* CorruptChurch: Spengler seperates separates religion (which is about a higher truth that is not from this world) and churches (which are by necessity worldly organizations, and which leaders are NotSoDifferent from purely worldly rulers)



* ForeignCultureFetish: Spengler stated that westerners essentially had this, for the classical Greco-Roman civilization, which is more different from us than many of us think. Our {{theater}} actors don't wear buskins and masks, and there's usually no chorus either, DeusExMachina looks too much like AssPull to us, and our countries aren't governed by two consuls sharing the power, and there aren't annual elections for them either. (Thank God!)

to:

* ForeignCultureFetish: Spengler stated that westerners essentially had this, for the classical Greco-Roman civilization, which is more different from us than many of us think. Our {{theater}} actors don't wear buskins and masks, and there's usually no chorus GreekChorus either, DeusExMachina looks too much like AssPull to us, and our countries aren't governed by two consuls sharing the power, and there aren't annual elections for them either. (Thank God!)

Added: 542

Changed: 110

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''The Decline of the West''' is a philosophical book by German Oswald Spengler. While the title suggests being mainly about the fate of western civilization, it actually covers a lot of topics - the history of the other great cultures (Chinese, Indian, Aztecs, Classical, Babylonian, Middle Eastern, Egyptian, Russian); the development of arts, science and religions; also, that of politics, economy, technics and war; and finally, tying everything together with "morphology", i.e. comparing the shapes of different cultures and find the equivalents of, let's say, NapoleonBonaparte, in them [[hottip:* :In the Greco-Roman culture, that would be Alexander the Great]]. Yes, Spengler was a bit of a RenaissanceMan in that.

to:

'''The Decline of the West''' is a philosophical book by [[DichterUndDenker German philosopher]] Oswald Spengler. While the title suggests being mainly about the fate of western civilization, it actually covers a lot of topics - the history of the other great cultures (Chinese, Indian, Aztecs, Classical, Babylonian, Middle Eastern, Egyptian, Russian); the development of arts, science and religions; also, that of politics, economy, technics and war; and finally, tying everything together with "morphology", i.e. comparing the shapes of different cultures and find the equivalents of, let's say, NapoleonBonaparte, in them [[hottip:* :In the Greco-Roman culture, that would be Alexander the Great]]. Yes, Spengler was a bit of a RenaissanceMan in that.



* IWantGrandkids: Spengler gives the justification for this trope: Someone who has children and grandchildren, won't die completely.

to:

* IWantGrandkids: Spengler gives the justification for this trope: Someone "He does not entirely die who has children lives on in sons and grandchildren, won't die completely.nephews."


Added DiffLines:

* JustTheFirstCitizen: He wrote that titles like this are typical for revolutionary governments, whether in western Europe ("head of the Committee of Public Safety") or ancient Egypt.


Added DiffLines:

* MassiveNumberedSiblings: Spengler pointed out how (roughly) until 1800, having many children was seen as a great luck (as still described by Goethe in ''Werther''), while afterwards, big families either were [[PlayedForLaughs a gag for comedies]] or [[PlayedForDrama big drama because the parents can't cope with so many children]]. Quite a paradigm change.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also for Spengler himself.


Added DiffLines:

** Arguably also Spengler himself in various ways. Most clearly the fact that he bet on [[ImperialGermany The wrong horse]] in WorldWarOne.

Added: 1039

Changed: 2

Removed: 257

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Byzantine Empire e.g. was surprisingly free from racism; an Irishman and a black African woman had no problem marrying - as long as they had the same religion. If however a Monophysite man had wanted a Nestorian woman from the same Syrian village, things likely would have ended like ''Theatre/RomeoAndJulia'', and by that we mean: Bad.



* [[ChristianityIsCatholic Western Christianity Is Catholic]]: Protestantism was described by Spengler as a poor version of Christianity that abandoned all the appealing stuff (adorned churches) and, which he saw as most important, confession. Also note that he saw Catholic Christianity as something very different from Jesus' (or St Paul's) Christianity, which have mostly superficial things in common. (Although many people will become outraged at that suggestion.)

to:

* [[ChristianityIsCatholic Western (Western) Christianity Is Catholic]]: Protestantism was described by Spengler as a poor version of Christianity that abandoned all the appealing stuff (adorned churches) and, which he saw as most important, confession. Also note that he saw Catholic Christianity as something very different from Jesus' (or St Paul's) Christianity, which have mostly superficial things in common. (Although many people will become outraged at that suggestion.)



* Creator/FriedrichNietzsche: Spengler was a big fan of Nietzsche. However, he criticized that Nietzsche was only speaking clearly when he protested the decadence of his time - while being very vague about what to replace it with (the {{Ubermensch}} thing).



* IHaveManyNames: He pointed out how people (as in, Germans, Romans, Americans...) can have different names, which makes work difficult for historians. Point: The Germans were called "Allemands" by the French in 1813, "Prussiens" in 1870 and "boches" in 1914. But does that make them three different people?



* IWantGrandkids: Spengler gives the justification for this trope: Someone who has children and grandchildren, won't die completely.



* Creator/FriedrichNietzsche: Spengler was a big fan of Nietzsche. However, he criticized that Nietzsche was only speaking clearly when he protested the decadence of his time - while being very vague about what to replace it with (the {{Ubermensch}} thing).

Added: 264

Removed: 270

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
generic use gets generic trope


* ThePlan: Spengler claimed that [[CorruptCorporateExecutive "the money"]] was using [[DirtyCommies communist movements]] for their own interests. Which would probably be the explanation for why they didn't use brute force to suppress communism even if they could.



* XanatosGambit: Spengler claimed that [[CorruptCorporateExecutive "the money"]] was using [[DirtyCommies communist movements]] for their own interests. Which would probably be the explanation for why they didn't use brute force to suppress communism even if they could.

Added: 1998

Changed: 20

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Spengler himself did this with several historical characters. For example, in his opinion CaesarAugustus wasn't really a great man and rather lead by his soldiers (GaiusJuliusCaesar's veterans) than the other way round.
* AmericaSavesTheDay: Spengler criticized the Germans for being GenreBlind to this trope, and being completely ignorant of the US army's achievements (creating a million man army from scratch, using battleships and machine guns, amazing logistics) during the AmericanCivilWar.



* DistaffCounterpart / SpearCounterpart: Interestingly, he wrote that life has two sides: The "sword side", everything that's traditionally considered business for men, like politics, war and the big economy; and the "spindle side", essentially raising families. Not spear and distaff, but close.



* MenActWomenAre: "The man makes history.[[note]]As a soldier and politician[[/note]] The woman[[note]]As in, the woman as mother[[/note]] ''is'' history."



* TheSocialDarwinist: Spengler remarked that one (well, he at least) gets the impression in a forest that all the trees are only standing there because they won the fight for water, sunlight and nutrients against the other trees that died prematurely. So even trees are social darwinists!



* StrawmanNewsMedia:
** Spengler accused [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Harmsworth,_1st_Viscount_Northcliffe Northcliffe]] having used his press conglomerate to manipulate the readers (and thus, their countries) until they wanted WorldWarOne.
** Also, he wrote that journalists... well, suck. How much? Don't read if you're a journalist and easily offended: [[spoiler:Spengler wrote that journalists are intellectual whores, who will sell their intellectual abilities to whoever needs them, and support whatever cause he wants.]]



* WeimarRepublic: Spengler didn't like it too much and pointed out that a few little decisions would be enough to give one leader unlimited power. And [[AdolfHitler who]] came to power in 1933? Exactly.

to:

* WeimarRepublic: Spengler didn't like it too much and pointed out that a few little decisions small altercations would be enough to give one leader unlimited power. And [[AdolfHitler who]] came to power in 1933? Exactly.Exactly.
* WorldBuilding: Spengler did it in his youth, inventing the country of Afrikasien (Africasia) with its government and going so far to decide how much of an income the ministers should receive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
namespace thing


* FriedrichNietzsche: Spengler was a big fan of Nietzsche. However, he criticized that Nietzsche was only speaking clearly when he protested the decadence of his time - while being very vague about what to replace it with (the {{Ubermensch}} thing).

to:

* FriedrichNietzsche: Creator/FriedrichNietzsche: Spengler was a big fan of Nietzsche. However, he criticized that Nietzsche was only speaking clearly when he protested the decadence of his time - while being very vague about what to replace it with (the {{Ubermensch}} thing).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
namespace


* {{Johann Wolfgang von Goethe}}: Spengler's other idol, so to speak. Goethe's works about science are often mentioned in this work.

to:

* {{Johann Wolfgang von Goethe}}: Creator/JohannWolfgangVonGoethe: Spengler's other idol, so to speak. Goethe's works about science are often mentioned in this work.



* ThoseWackyNazis: When Spengler finished the book (1922), the Nazis were still a pretty insignificant political movement and not worth mentioning. The Nazis eventually ''did'' try to co-opt Spengler's work; yet Spengler, who met Hitler in 1933, distanced himself from Nazism and said about Hitler that [Germany doesn't need a] "heroic tenor but a real hero." Spengler went on to write another book in 1933, ''Years of Decision'', which contained open criticism of the Nazis, and was later banned; though, still considered as a luminary of the right wing, Spengler was ignored rather than persecuted by the regime. When he died unexpectedly in 1936, he had been preparing another book called ''Germany in Peril''. Spengler did openly admire Mussolini, though.

to:

* ThoseWackyNazis: When Spengler finished the book (1922), the Nazis were still a pretty insignificant political movement and not worth mentioning. The Nazis eventually ''did'' try to co-opt Spengler's work; yet Spengler, who met Hitler in 1933, distanced himself from Nazism and said about Hitler that [Germany doesn't need a] "heroic tenor but a real hero." Spengler went on to write another book in 1933, ''Years of Decision'', which contained open criticism of the Nazis, and was later banned; though, still considered as a luminary of the right wing, Spengler was ignored rather than persecuted by the regime. When he died unexpectedly in 1936, he had been preparing another book called ''Germany in Peril''. Spengler did openly admire Mussolini, though.



** To Spengler, UsefulNotes/{{socialism}} is very different from Communism/Marxism, but on the other hand somewhat related to the politics of Prussian king Friedrich Wilhelm I, or Ancient Egypt. In this, Spengler was influenced by the terminology of the 19th century, as prior to the [[RedOctober Russian Revolution]], "socialism" had carried a much wider spectrum of connotations.
** He used "civilization" for a time of decline and decadence following the ''real'' culture, during which art becomes more and more offensive and/or primitive, and politics steered either by the capitalists or the army (in his definition, this time started with TheFrenchRevolution).
** Also, his names for cultures (Faustian = Western Europe; Apollinian = Classic civilizations; Magian = Middle Eastern).

to:

** To Spengler, UsefulNotes/{{socialism}} is very different from Communism/Marxism, but on the other hand somewhat related to the politics of Prussian king Friedrich Wilhelm I, or Ancient Egypt. In this, Spengler was influenced by the terminology of the 19th century, as prior to the [[RedOctober Russian Revolution]], "socialism" had carried a much wider spectrum of connotations.
connotations.
** He used "civilization" for a time of decline and decadence following the ''real'' culture, during which art becomes more and more offensive and/or primitive, and politics steered either by the capitalists or the army (in his definition, this time started with TheFrenchRevolution).
TheFrenchRevolution).
** Also, his names for cultures (Faustian = Western Europe; Apollinian = Classic civilizations; Magian = Middle Eastern).

Added: 71

Removed: 314

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff Russians Love Oswald Spengler]]: There's a small group of people (but consider that nowadays few people read Spengler in general) in Russia who like Spengler because he predicted that in the future, a new culture might develop in Russia (and probably bring the country to greatness).


Added DiffLines:

* TrueArtIsNotPopular: [[invoked]] Also said to be typical of the West.

Added: 1194

Removed: 238

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwesomeMcCoolname: "Magians" for the Jews (and Muslims, and Greek-Orthodox Christians... generally, everyone from the Middle East following a religion which originated there around 0-1000 AD).



* CuteKitten: "A peacock is indubitably speaking when he spreads his tail, but a kitten playing with a cotton-reel also speaks to us, unconsciously, through the quaint charm of its movements." Yes, this book really covers a lot of topics.



* CuteKitten: "A peacock is indubitably speaking when he spreads his tail, but a kitten playing with a cotton-reel also speaks to us, unconsciously, through the quaint charm of its movements." Yes, this book really covers a lot of topics.


Added DiffLines:

* ForeignCultureFetish: Spengler stated that westerners essentially had this, for the classical Greco-Roman civilization, which is more different from us than many of us think. Our {{theater}} actors don't wear buskins and masks, and there's usually no chorus either, DeusExMachina looks too much like AssPull to us, and our countries aren't governed by two consuls sharing the power, and there aren't annual elections for them either. (Thank God!)


Added DiffLines:

* [[GermansLoveDavidHasselhoff Russians Love Oswald Spengler]]: There's a small group of people (but consider that nowadays few people read Spengler in general) in Russia who like Spengler because he predicted that in the future, a new culture might develop in Russia (and probably bring the country to greatness).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HistoryRepeats: i.e. in every major culture: A culture emerges among the barbarian peoples and fuses them together to create nations. The great myths, art styles and religions develop. At the beginning, [[TheKingdom strong kings rule]], but their power soon is weakened by their noble vassals. A great movement reforms the religion. Meanwhile, in the cities a somewhat-privileged middle class has risen, replacing feudalism economy slowly but steadily by capitalism. By cooperating with them, the crown can weaken nobility and the church, forming an absolutist state. Science and capitalism develop further, and an enlightened philosophy spreads, weakening the hold of religion. Then, the middle class will decide to get rid of the old system, usually in the form of a revolution - which starts civilization. This marks the fall of the culture - wars will get worse and worse (NapoleonicWars -> AmericanCivilWar -> WorldWarOne -> WorldWarII), art will become more and more [[TrueArtIsOffensive offensive]], and capitalism runs rampant (not without provoking [[DirtyCommies counter movements]]). At the end, one state will conquer/control all other states, and one man will rise to the top of this state - voila, TheEmpire.

to:

* HistoryRepeats: i.e. in every major culture: A culture emerges among the barbarian peoples and fuses them together to create nations. The great myths, art styles and religions develop. At the beginning, [[TheKingdom strong kings rule]], but their power soon is weakened by their noble vassals. A great movement reforms the religion. Meanwhile, in the cities a somewhat-privileged middle class has risen, replacing feudalism economy slowly but steadily by capitalism. By cooperating with them, the crown can weaken nobility and the church, forming an absolutist state. Science and capitalism develop further, and an enlightened philosophy spreads, weakening the hold of religion. Then, the middle class will decide to get rid of the old system, usually in the form of a revolution - which starts civilization. This marks the fall of the culture - wars will get worse and worse (NapoleonicWars -> AmericanCivilWar -> WorldWarOne -> WorldWarII), art will become more and more [[TrueArtIsOffensive offensive]], offensive, and capitalism runs rampant (not without provoking [[DirtyCommies counter movements]]). At the end, one state will conquer/control all other states, and one man will rise to the top of this state - voila, TheEmpire.

Added: 530

Changed: 1972

Removed: 743

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed redlinks, formatting. Subjective tropes moved to YMMV.


The book influenced people from Henry Kissinger to JosephCampbell, and even a thinker critical of Spengler as Adorno conceded that Spengler's insights were often more profound than those of his more liberal contemporaries, and his predictions more far-reaching.

to:

The book influenced people from Henry Kissinger to JosephCampbell, [[TheHerosJourney Joseph Campbell]], and even a thinker critical of Spengler as Adorno conceded that Spengler's insights were often more profound than those of his more liberal contemporaries, and his predictions more far-reaching.



* FairForItsDay: In a time, when antisemites would spread the craziest conspiracy theories about the eeeevul Jews, Spengler pretty much only said "they have a very different culture than us, we can't really understand each other (with very few exceptions), and messing around with each other will only lead to problems".



* MagnumOpus



* ThoseWackyNazis: Averted - when he finished the book (1922), they were still a pretty insignificant political movement and not worth mentioning. Now if he had written the book a few years later...
** The Nazis eventually ''did'' try to co-opt Spengler's work, given their shared German nationalism. Spengler even met Hitler in 1933...and was unimpressed, stating that [Germany doesn't need a] "heroic tenor but a real hero." He went on to write another book, ''Years of Decision'', which contained open criticism of the Nazis, and was later banned.

to:

* ThoseWackyNazis: Averted - when he When Spengler finished the book (1922), they the Nazis were still a pretty insignificant political movement and not worth mentioning. Now if he had written the book a few years later...
**
The Nazis eventually ''did'' try to co-opt Spengler's work, given their shared German nationalism. Spengler even work; yet Spengler, who met Hitler in 1933...1933, distanced himself from Nazism and was unimpressed, stating said about Hitler that [Germany doesn't need a] "heroic tenor but a real hero." He Spengler went on to write another book, book in 1933, ''Years of Decision'', which contained open criticism of the Nazis, and was later banned.banned; though, still considered as a luminary of the right wing, Spengler was ignored rather than persecuted by the regime. When he died unexpectedly in 1936, he had been preparing another book called ''Germany in Peril''. Spengler did openly admire Mussolini, though.



** TrueArtIsNotPopular: Also said to be typical of the West.



* YouKeepUsingThatWord: Spengler used many... original definitions, often giving existing words a very different meaning. Just one example: To Spengler, Socialism is very different from Communism/Marxism, but on the other hand somewhat related to the politics of Prussian king Friedrich Wilhelm I, or Ancient Egypt. Also, he used "civilization" for a time of decline and decadence following the ''real'' culture, during which art becomes more and more [[TrueArtIsOffensive offensive]] and/or primitive, and politics steered either by the capitalists or the army. (In his definition, this time started with TheFrenchRevolution.) Also, his names for cultures (Faustian = Western Europe; Apollinian = Classic civilizations; Magian = Middle Eastern). Finally (for now), his definition of "race", which had nothing at all to do with skin colors or the shape of human skulls.
** On the particular point of his use of the word "socialism" that [[HaveaGayOldTime word carried many different connotations]] during much of the 19th century to the era prior to [[RedOctober The Russian Revolution]]. It could once be properly applied to many different political ideologies that were quite divergent from one another, from moderate progressive ideals, to what we would now thing of as something vaguely nationalist, to people advocating a return to a feudal system, to anarchists.

to:

* YouKeepUsingThatWord: Spengler used many... original definitions, often giving existing words a very different meaning. Just one example: meaning:
**
To Spengler, Socialism UsefulNotes/{{socialism}} is very different from Communism/Marxism, but on the other hand somewhat related to the politics of Prussian king Friedrich Wilhelm I, or Ancient Egypt. Also, he In this, Spengler was influenced by the terminology of the 19th century, as prior to the [[RedOctober Russian Revolution]], "socialism" had carried a much wider spectrum of connotations.
** He
used "civilization" for a time of decline and decadence following the ''real'' culture, during which art becomes more and more [[TrueArtIsOffensive offensive]] offensive and/or primitive, and politics steered either by the capitalists or the army. (In army (in his definition, this time started with TheFrenchRevolution.) TheFrenchRevolution).
**
Also, his names for cultures (Faustian = Western Europe; Apollinian = Classic civilizations; Magian = Middle Eastern). Eastern).
**
Finally (for now), his definition of "race", which had nothing at all to do with skin colors or the shape of human skulls.
** On the particular point of his use of the word "socialism" that [[HaveaGayOldTime word carried many different connotations]] during much of the 19th century to the era prior to [[RedOctober The Russian Revolution]]. It could once be properly applied to many different political ideologies that were quite divergent from one another, from moderate progressive ideals, to what we would now thing of as something vaguely nationalist, to people advocating a return to a feudal system, to anarchists.
skulls.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace move.

Added DiffLines:

'''The Decline of the West''' is a philosophical book by German Oswald Spengler. While the title suggests being mainly about the fate of western civilization, it actually covers a lot of topics - the history of the other great cultures (Chinese, Indian, Aztecs, Classical, Babylonian, Middle Eastern, Egyptian, Russian); the development of arts, science and religions; also, that of politics, economy, technics and war; and finally, tying everything together with "morphology", i.e. comparing the shapes of different cultures and find the equivalents of, let's say, NapoleonBonaparte, in them [[hottip:* :In the Greco-Roman culture, that would be Alexander the Great]]. Yes, Spengler was a bit of a RenaissanceMan in that.

The book influenced people from Henry Kissinger to JosephCampbell, and even a thinker critical of Spengler as Adorno conceded that Spengler's insights were often more profound than those of his more liberal contemporaries, and his predictions more far-reaching.

Spengler's works are in the public domain (at least in Germany), and you can read them on the internet for free. Here are links to [[http://www.archive.org/stream/declineofwest01spenuoft#page/n5/mode/2up Part 1]] and [[http://www.archive.org/stream/declineofwest02spenuoft#page/n7/mode/2up Part 2]] (both in English).
----
!!Provides examples / considers the topics of:

* [[AristocratsAreEvil Aristocracy Is Evil]]: While Spengler also was pretty critical of democracy (see below), he had no illusions that medieval life was all like {{Arcadia}}. As he wrote: "Hatred wells up out of the villages, contempt flashes back from the castles."
* AwfulTruth: "Optimism is cowardice."
* BigScrewedUpFamily: He did not like "unfruitful" people, but mentioned that these families also exist. "The hate for the brother is always bigger than the hate for the stranger."
* BlackAndWhiteMorality: The Magian (Middle Eastern) religions and sects (Greek Orthodox Christianity, Talmudic Judaism, Islam, Mandaeans, Manichaeans, Nestorianism, Monophysitism) share this.
* BlueAndOrangeMorality: This is every major culture from the POV of most other major cultures.
* BothSidesHaveAPoint: As said, Spengler was relativist and wrote about the wordly and the spiritual side having a point - of course, not without mentioning that ''both'' think they're right.
* BurnTheWitch: He writes how during the medieval ages, many women even turned themselves in because they feared they might be possessed.
* [[MandatoryMotherhood Being Childless Is Decadent]]
* [[ChristianityIsCatholic Western Christianity Is Catholic]]: Protestantism was described by Spengler as a poor version of Christianity that abandoned all the appealing stuff (adorned churches) and, which he saw as most important, confession. Also note that he saw Catholic Christianity as something very different from Jesus' (or St Paul's) Christianity, which have mostly superficial things in common. (Although many people will become outraged at that suggestion.)
* ConflictingLoyalty: Do you want a worldly life (represented by government, firms, the military, the judges, farms, general real work, technics, and/or founding a family) or escape it (science, arts, religion, philosophy, ideologies, spirituality, love, sex, drugs)?
* CorruptChurch: Spengler seperates religion (which is about a higher truth that is not from this world) and churches (which are by necessity worldly organizations, and which leaders are NotSoDifferent from purely worldly rulers)
* CreativeSterility: When a culture has explored all possible art forms (first the aesthetic ones, later the offensive ones), they end up reviving old styles or copying exotic cultures (or mixing both).
* CulturePolice: Spengler suspected that in Ancient China, Confucianist thinkers destroyed all sources of the old Chinese religion. While this is hard to impossible to prove, it makes sense that Confucianism didn't just emerge finished and polished from nothing.
* DefectorFromDecadence: It's probably a safe bet that Spengler saw himself as this.
* DemocracyIsBad: Spengler describes democracy as a tool of money and materialism, and a stage in the decay of a civilization, which will be followed by TheEmpire.
* {{Doorstopper}}: The German version has more than 1000 pages, in small print.
* TheEmpire: What every culture/civilization will end in.
* CuteKitten: "A peacock is indubitably speaking when he spreads his tail, but a kitten playing with a cotton-reel also speaks to us, unconsciously, through the quaint charm of its movements." Yes, this book really covers a lot of topics.
* FairForItsDay: In a time, when antisemites would spread the craziest conspiracy theories about the eeeevul Jews, Spengler pretty much only said "they have a very different culture than us, we can't really understand each other (with very few exceptions), and messing around with each other will only lead to problems".
* TheFatalist: Spengler thought that the western world had to create an empire - or perish. "Fate guides the willing, but drags the unwilling."
* FullCircleRevolution: He commented on the Russian revolution that there were only two possibilities: Either the factory workers would learn how to run a society (in which case nothing would really change) or not (in which case, everything would break down). As we know, reality was a mixture of 1 and 2.
* GenreSavvy: Spengler's work had the aim of finding out how the western world would develop in the future and thus be able to become this, if not DangerouslyGenreSavvy.
* GratuitousForeignLanguage: Oh so much. There are Gratuitous Hebrew, Gratuitous Arab, Gratuitous Russian, Gratuitous Hindi/Sanskrit(?), Gratuitous Chinese, Gratuitous Latin and Gratuitous Old Greek (often, even with Greek letters). Mostly used for concepts which are genuine of one culture and would be misunderstood if a common but incorrect translation was used.
* HardOnSoftScience: Especially on philosophy, starting with Kant. And that's saying something.
* HistoryRepeats: i.e. in every major culture: A culture emerges among the barbarian peoples and fuses them together to create nations. The great myths, art styles and religions develop. At the beginning, [[TheKingdom strong kings rule]], but their power soon is weakened by their noble vassals. A great movement reforms the religion. Meanwhile, in the cities a somewhat-privileged middle class has risen, replacing feudalism economy slowly but steadily by capitalism. By cooperating with them, the crown can weaken nobility and the church, forming an absolutist state. Science and capitalism develop further, and an enlightened philosophy spreads, weakening the hold of religion. Then, the middle class will decide to get rid of the old system, usually in the form of a revolution - which starts civilization. This marks the fall of the culture - wars will get worse and worse (NapoleonicWars -> AmericanCivilWar -> WorldWarOne -> WorldWarII), art will become more and more [[TrueArtIsOffensive offensive]], and capitalism runs rampant (not without provoking [[DirtyCommies counter movements]]). At the end, one state will conquer/control all other states, and one man will rise to the top of this state - voila, TheEmpire.
* InterfaithSmoothie: Syncretism, which appears in every civilization once it has reached the phase of caesarism.
* {{Jesus}}: Spengler found that his philosophy still stands out among other religions, and pointed out how Jesus upon the cross inspired many martyrs to die for their cause.
* {{Johann Wolfgang von Goethe}}: Spengler's other idol, so to speak. Goethe's works about science are often mentioned in this work.
* LanguageEqualsThought: Subverted - Spengler proposed a theory that different cultures have different world views which also reflect in their language. He e.g. pointed out that the Romans used to say "fecisti" (one word) instead of "I have done" / "ich habe getan" / "j'ai fait" / "ego habeo factum" (three words), which led him to the conclusion that the Romans saw "doing something" more as a concrete action (leading to a world view centered on concrete, rather than abstract, entities), while Western Europeans emphasize that there's a subject actively doing something (leading to a world view emphasizing active work and subjects as centers of power). He also pointed out the difference that in western languages, the word "spirit" / "geist" / "esprit" sounds uplifting (from the speech melody), while the Russian word "Дух" (pronounced "dookh") is rather depressing in comparison. Why a subversion? Because he didn't believe that language formed thoughts, but instead both were shaped by the landscape their creators live in - since Western Europeans, Russians and Romans (and so on) live in very different landscapes respectively, you should expect that they also have very different languages (and philosophies).
* MagnificentBastard: [[invoked]] Like many, Spengler was fascinated by them, and stated that there's barely if anything comparable to the satisfaction than that you feel if all the pieces of a great combination fall into place, JustAsPlanned.
* MagnumOpus
* MisaimedFandom: [[invoked]] He mentions how the French revolutionaries revered Brutus - who in RealLife [[LoanShark lent out money for high interest]] and was one of the most important speculators in Rome.
* NeverTrustATitle: Spengler wasn't completely happy with the title (which seemed to imply that the western world had to fall, like the Roman empire) and commented that he could've changed the title to "The fulfillment of the West", which would be closer to his intention - i.e. the west transforming to a stable but stagnant empire in the end. The fact that many fans only knew the title and didn't care to actually read the book didn't help.
* FriedrichNietzsche: Spengler was a big fan of Nietzsche. However, he criticized that Nietzsche was only speaking clearly when he protested the decadence of his time - while being very vague about what to replace it with (the {{Ubermensch}} thing).
* OneWorldOrder: He thought the western civilization might create this at the end.
* RealityIsUnrealistic: Spengler commented that some historical events, like the death of Alexander, seem like they were written by a bad author.
* ReligionIsRight / ReligionIsWrong: Spengler had a relativist stance and brought the example of Pilate asking "What is Truth?" in contrast with {{Jesus}} asking "What is Reality?". As he said, both were right from their POV.
* SacredLanguage: Spengler speculated that in the Stone Age, language (as in, speaking) may have been restricted to the priests, just as was the case with writing in some cultures.
* ShamCeremony: Monarchy in the age of democracy, parliamentarianism in the age of TheEmpire.
* SillyReasonForWar: Spengler pointed out that many wars in RealLife were started like this - more than one, apparently, because some courtier wanted to break up the developing relationship between some general and his wife.
* SlidingScaleOfIdealismVsCynicism: Definitely not at the idealistic end.
* StarvingArtist: Spengler himself for some time during WorldWarOne
* SuicidalPacifism: One of the most horrifying things for Spengler - the preference of slavery over death. As he explained: At the battle of Cannae, 50,000 Roman soldiers died. When the Mongols overran the metropolises of China and the Muslim world, the population didn't want to fight them, and ''hundreds of thousands'' of people died. Per metropolis, that is.
* TakeThat: Spengler spares almost nobody. Particularly notable: How he dismissed racist theories on the "purity of blood".
* ThoseWackyNazis: Averted - when he finished the book (1922), they were still a pretty insignificant political movement and not worth mentioning. Now if he had written the book a few years later...
** The Nazis eventually ''did'' try to co-opt Spengler's work, given their shared German nationalism. Spengler even met Hitler in 1933...and was unimpressed, stating that [Germany doesn't need a] "heroic tenor but a real hero." He went on to write another book, ''Years of Decision'', which contained open criticism of the Nazis, and was later banned.
* TrueArtIsAncient: [[invoked]] Something very typical of western civilization.
** TrueArtIsNotPopular: Also said to be typical of the West.
* ViceCity: All the metropolises. But there's a glint of hope, so to speak - these cities may disappear and become ruins, as Angkor, Pataliputra (and for some time, Rome) did.
* WarIsGlorious: ...but scarcity will destroy everything, and a long peace will ruin people more thoroughly than a long war.
* WeimarRepublic: Spengler didn't like it too much and pointed out that a few little decisions would be enough to give one leader unlimited power. And [[AdolfHitler who]] came to power in 1933? Exactly.
* WorldWarOne: Spengler wrote the book during it. Originally he had expected ImperialGermany to win.
* WritersCannotDoMath: Relatedly, Spengler stated that while earlier philosophers (Pascal, Descartes, Leibniz) also were great mathematicians, later ones were... not. This explicitly included Nietzsche.
* WrongGenreSavvy: Spengler mentions Swedish king Charles XII, who was a big fan of Alexander the Great, tried to follow his example, thus made war on the Russia of Peter the Great, only to have his army destroyed at the battle of Poltava, which effectively ended Sweden's time as a great power.
* XanatosGambit: Spengler claimed that [[CorruptCorporateExecutive "the money"]] was using [[DirtyCommies communist movements]] for their own interests. Which would probably be the explanation for why they didn't use brute force to suppress communism even if they could.
* YouKeepUsingThatWord: Spengler used many... original definitions, often giving existing words a very different meaning. Just one example: To Spengler, Socialism is very different from Communism/Marxism, but on the other hand somewhat related to the politics of Prussian king Friedrich Wilhelm I, or Ancient Egypt. Also, he used "civilization" for a time of decline and decadence following the ''real'' culture, during which art becomes more and more [[TrueArtIsOffensive offensive]] and/or primitive, and politics steered either by the capitalists or the army. (In his definition, this time started with TheFrenchRevolution.) Also, his names for cultures (Faustian = Western Europe; Apollinian = Classic civilizations; Magian = Middle Eastern). Finally (for now), his definition of "race", which had nothing at all to do with skin colors or the shape of human skulls.
** On the particular point of his use of the word "socialism" that [[HaveaGayOldTime word carried many different connotations]] during much of the 19th century to the era prior to [[RedOctober The Russian Revolution]]. It could once be properly applied to many different political ideologies that were quite divergent from one another, from moderate progressive ideals, to what we would now thing of as something vaguely nationalist, to people advocating a return to a feudal system, to anarchists.
----

Top